What is the best type of government pol?

what is the best type of government pol?

Constitutional monarchy, of course.

Ones where athiests aren't allowed to vote and create modern liberalism

purble cause we wuz empire :D

Why are all presidential republics third world states?

Absolute no right obviously.
Saudi Arabia is fucking killing it when it comes to international politics. I mean fuck they do the most I humane shit yet the UN puts them in charge or humanitarian right, clearly they are winning the game.

National Socialism

Direct rule by the British Empire, obviously.

anarcho-syndicalist commune

Juche

I would rather live in any of the countries labeled "parliamentary consitutional monarchies in which the monarch does not personally exercise power" than any country in the world.

No one

Alternatively, absolute monarchy

>he fell for the constitutional monarchy meme
>wanting your'e country to be represented by leeches

Constitutional Confederate Republic with regular referendums

Basically, the Swiss political model

Anarcho Capitalism

>Morroco still has a kang
is that why they are not in the African Union?

this

ha ha, libya

They refuse to join it themselves because no one recognises Morocco's rule over Western Sahara.

Oligarchic Republic

Cred Forumsocracy.

Benevolent dictatorship is the only logical form of governance
>I never watched the show, is pic related a dictator or is it just a maymay?

Confederacy, like we used to have until the savage, cheating north invaded the south.

>Western Sahara
No offense to them, but what kind of shitty country would it be? They have absolutely nothing, it would be the poorest country in Africa, imagine the disaster...

sounds like an average african country to me

you put all the white south africans in there, they might be able to turn it into a paradise

Restrictive monarchy or aristocratic republics.

>Neoreactionary

So... Catalonia during the Spanish Civil War?

They have a long Atlantic coast, which would makes them better off than most in that region.

But it's not as much about the economy as it is an issue of identity, sovereignty and the will of its people. If they want to live in a shithole, but happy, homogeneous, and independent, what's wrong with that ? why would we decide what's good for them ?

Wouldn't you have preferred that France be slightly less prosperous but homogeneous white country instead of an African melting pot growing its GDP by 1% /year ?

>you put all the white south africans in there, they might be able to turn it into a paradise

Clearly not. It's Western SAHARA dude.
>The land is some of the most arid and inhospitable on the planet.

They have no fresh water, no arable land, not a fucking tree, no wildlife, no resources, nada...

National Socialistic Republic

+1
Constitutional monarchy

Militaristic Monarchy, with an Aristocratic Council, an official Placebo Religion and the unifying desire to conquer the stars. Basically a light version of the Imperium of Man in 40K.

Yes of course, but the price of the pride seems incredibly high here. I understand their will, but it seems unreasonable...

What a Prussian answer. Well done.

Since we are just combining different governments together, like Power rangers.

Totalitarian Anarchy. Nothing ever happens, ever.

> unreasonable
They learned to live in that sahara for a couple thousands of years now. So having a free government won't make them forget how they managed to breath until now.

Parliamentary republic is shit, it practically merges the 2 out of 3 pillars of democracy to 1 making the party ruling the parliament completely uncontrollable
Presidential is essentially a constitutional monarchy that people get to elect a king every 5 years
I would go with semi-presidential

enlightened absolutism

This

Do you want a British monarchy or your own?
>But who would be the American Royal Family?

This.

You can't have a national socialistic republic, those 2 things do not match because of the inherent objection of national socialism against democracy.

...

Semi presidential is often a president with his party supporting him as parliament majority. And If he doesn't have that, it would simply block the country, and he will have to compromise on his promises with the opposition like a parliamentary system.

A perfect separation of the 3 pillars would require what you did in Athens : Sortition. selecting random non partisan citizens to control the government.

That is one party government
Now look at the map carefully
Tell me what you see

Anyone who didn't say constitutional monarchy isn't paying attention.

Liberal National Anarcho Capitalism

It can be said from every people of Africa, but being a political entity is a complete different thing than just being adapted to the place. You know what happens to the weak in Africa right? Even your country will try to fuck them, not to mention the revengeful Morrocans. Their backyard is fucking Mauritania, the place will turn into Somalia 2.0 in no time.
I'm always by the side of those who fight for their rights, but seriously this is 2016, an autonomy à la French Polynesia is the best for them.

Cuck