Who wins in a war:

who wins in a war:

A bunch of rich capitalist people.
A bunch of highly educated socialists and comunists.

Same resources, same manpower, same technological development.

who wins?

those two nations would have completely different manpower and resources, dumbass

With a debt based economy the rich can just borrow money to near infinity to pay for their supply chain.

sorry, I meant, same capabilities at the start of the war.

He's right though.

The capitalists win the military and the socialists the ideological war.

communism is simply a fucking bad economic model on a large scale and they wouldnt have the efficiency to arm themselves properly or even feed the troops right

meanwhile the capitalists would simply be taking work from a bunch of different PMCs all competing to make the most shekels and build the best gulag buster bombs or whatever

The Capitalists. The socialists can't afford to fund an army.

None of the above.
The Jews always win.

Capitalist dont wage war because its not profitable, so they would be fighting on the defensive, maybe a war of attrition.

It really depends on the current economic situation, the one on the economic depression will be much more aggressive.

So I'd say the commies if they arent starved and brain dead already.

But then again, if the capitalists were faced with a constant thread a private military industry would bloom giving way to the most horrifically cost effective weapons ever made.

Communists have gulags. Both have incentives

Socialists/Communists would probably start fracturing and purging one another over ideological differences

The capitalists would recognize their core competencies and organize appropriately

>implying
That only ever happens after they've won.

> War is not profitable

Whoever uses Jew magick best wins*

That is neocon propaganda of nation building, if there's no state war is simply less profitable than world trade.

You do know what nation building means right?

the reds, as they could orientate the entire economy around the war, plus they can mass mobilize the population. also they wouldn't need as many shekels to fuel their war economy, they can print at will and use rationing and price controls to contain inflation which is also a plus

>highly educated socialists and comunists

>they can print at will
So the USA are communist?

the US can also print, but the state doesn't control it, the fed is entirely autonomous from the executive and doesn't follow state directives

Rich capitalists, and it won't even be close. Socialists and communists will be no better at fighting than they are at doing any other type of productive work. Capitalists are used to building things, and getting stuff built. Socialists and communists won't even bother fighting, they are too lazy. They'll just stand around, protesting and making faggy signs, and demanding that someone else fight the capitalists. This war would be over in less time than it takes to read this post. Capitalists will pitch a shutout - will completely wipe out commies, while suffering 0 losses.

doesn't matter
society gets screwed either way

>whats was the korean and vietnam war

commies memed all over capitalist puppet regimes of the west

>the reds, as they could orientate the entire economy around the war
The Americans did this with war-time propaganda that arguably works better than outright coercion. It's hard to judge because the example they're up against historically are the Russians, who are fucking insane

The state and the FED are controlled by the same persons.

the americans essentially socialized their economy mate. rationing, mass printing of money and state directed production using massive monetary incentives, shutting out all other business lines. long term capitalism is ofc better, but in a war resources mobilization and human mobilization is what counts, and an equal capitalist/commie fight would see the reds holding an advantage with their greater state control of the economy and higher taxes

The congress does control the money printing, they pass spending projects and sell a bond of which the main buyer is the fed who has to print to pay, so its not like they just print at will.

Plus the original fed was supposed to buy only corporate paper which when repaid was effectively again out of the economy(actually a brilliant idea) that was the so called elastic money supply, but then congress hijacked it on WWII and since then they are only allowed to buy government paper.

congress has no handle on the money supply, all they can do is burrow from the fed, which does indirectly influence the money supply, but ultimately no-one but the fed could just ask for the money supply to be increased

You can't win an ideological war if everyone is dead numbnuts. Didn't you learn anything after WW2?

congress and president can't order the fed to do anything

>the americans essentially socialized their economy mate
fair enough point

Well, the Communists did win their ideological fight in the Western countries.

They wouldn't have the same manpower though. Socialism benefits the mass of humanity.

checked

Dont be that retarded, the congress mandates that the fed buy when no one else buys thats why the fed is called the buyer of last resort, the fed is bound to buy since its its obligation.

For example, do you think the fed would still have the rates so low if it wasnt pressured to do so?
Look at Yellen, its been months since she's been talking about a "normalization of rates" that just never happens, why? BECAUSE IT WILL BLOW UP THE CURRENT DEBT EVEN MORE.

Face it dude, the fed are puppets as well.

This is the US finance minister. Notice anything?

There are people way above the president, at least in financial questions.

who's really doing the puppeting, the congress or the feds?

At this point I dont really know who is jewing who anymore desu senpai.

The crows

true dat mate

>educated socialists and communists
What are these fantasy creatures?

If it's a modern war, they just nuke each other... or if nukes are off the table they just air and sub bomb the hell out of the other's air and naval bases.

Modern war between two developed countries is not possible because any victory would be a pyrrhic victory. This is why "modern war" is a battle of economics and ideas.

Thew jews

Well shit, someone better tell the soviets

> Who wins?
The Chinese

This actually did happen btw. It was called the Cold War

Fuck off loser Chilean bitch. Don't you have some fucking avocados to eat or pebre to jack off with?

>same resources
being a rich capitalist amounts to nothing then
>same manpower
socialists lose their only advantage
>same technological development
implying sociashits can ever compete with shekel-funded research

>yfw these Cred Forumsacks are literally the white equivalent of blacks who bitch about white people

I guess self-awareness is something that escapes these goys.