Am I ready for the censorship of the Internet?
Also, general discussion about internet censorship and means to circumvent it.
Am I ready for the censorship of the Internet?
Also, general discussion about internet censorship and means to circumvent it.
Other urls found in this thread:
broadcastify.com
seattlemeshnet-nodeshot.appspot.com
zedomax.com
hackaday.com
boards.Cred
ci-journal.net
cruz.senate.gov
soundcardpacket.org
youtube.com
deaddrops.com
youtube.com
meganet.com
torrentfreak.com
twitter.com
We'd ideally need to start prepping beforehand.
We'd need knowledge of radio transmission, and some clever programmers.
We could use computers for it, sending out radio transmissions, using an algorithm (that requires a seed, like a digit value or pass-code where each digit can affect a value or function in the algorithm) that scrambles the transmission. So long as people know the "seed" of "pass-code" they can reverse the algorithm to unscramble it.
The information we send out could be binary, hexadicimal, all sort of data, that another program could compile onto a "Local radio browser". Creating a less-than-world-wide web.
It would allow local Cred Forumsacks to keep in touch and organise. Furthermore, chances are, some groups of Cred Forumsacks would be better equipt than ohers, possibly boosting their broadcasting radius. They could reach out to other groups and expand a network of Cred Forumsacks post-censorship.
before October we should pull together a bare bones list of cheap transmitters/receivers/gear and have a standard setup. it would make designing the BBS so much easier
You could also use packet radio combined with remote transmitters to enhance broadcast signal
Should I head over to Cred Forums to investigate?
Just use encryption.
Open source software only.
I bought this one for $4 at a thrift store. I yet lack an antennae, however.
You can set up a makeshift one easy
Just a wire loop, right?
It'd be worth doing.
encryption doesnt matter so much if every consumer and corporate endpoint is backdoored
/diy/ has a lot of ham radio operators, they might be able to help set up a packet network
It's illegal to encrypt radio transmissions
This.
This is why I mentioned we'd have to prep before hand, and create our own algorithms and programs to cater for it.
Generally, anything publicly available right now will either have back-doors as a precaution, or will be subject to investigatory warrants. If we get our own clever hackers, who'd hopefully be smart enough to ensure they cannot be traced (And therefore issued warrants) the only vulnerability would be the people using the equipment.
And good luck getting them to talk, owning a small private radio isn't illegal.
That's true. Why bother cracking the encryption when they can see whats on your screen?
How well is this rule enforced?
Not at all if its the government doing it
Amateur radio transmissions are usually spotty at best. Range is limited, and dependent on atmospheric conditions. Also I think data transfer is extremely slow. This really isn't a viable alternative. Your gonna have to go darknet.
the biggest issue is setting up an underground infrastructure of packet radio based transmitters that can turn on and off. set these up in abandoned houses and warehouses and offices, use it to bounce our illegal encrypted BBS signal around
The FCC has local chapters, but they only focus on removing the transmitter. No attempt is made to look at the data. If you get a plan for a cheap raspberry pi based transmitter maybe we could.make hundreds and place them everywhere
how bout we all get a walkie talkie app and we shit post and talk with our voices, i was there when Cred Forums did it
Yes internet should be monitored and there should be actual cyber police patrolling and ready to serve up an arrest when you break the internet law's
We all need to grow up anyhow and start acting mature
I believe we all act a bit mischevious when we get behind a computer and it's not healthy, it can hurt others and even yourself
Nigger
It generally gets enforced when you interfere with other signals or bandwidth in such a way that people take notice
>Canadians
You know, I voted against the leaf ban in the moderation thread. I have grown to regret that. Forget the skypes, incinerate the eternal leaf.
>cheap raspberry pi based transmitter
This appears to be the best option. They can't take out them all.
We need a communication channel that cannot be (((shut down))), but the ultimate standard would be one that can't be monitored. Also, points for some sort of persistence so that a message can be seen by more people.
exactly what im talking about, its an encrypted walktalkie channel that we can talk live.
Sorry, but I am not familiar with this. How does it work?
/k/ knows all about military/ham/amateur radio, Cred Forums might know something about SDR though
I can't wait cause i'm a russian LUL die america die
nothing to fear and nothing to hide
We could encrypt our data differently, or handle packets differently? Like a whole new browser/protocol
download two way walkie talkie app and make a speaking channel, and you speak into your phone when you press talk, many people can join
I am going to work on aggregating knowledge with the end goal of creating an alternate means of communication. I will be making regular threads. Although I do not have much technical skill, I can effectively organize an effort.
Does it use a telephone network? or the internet?
neither
HAM radio is literally Cred Forums radio. I'm going to take some classes this fall hopefully.
Take a listen to this repeater in California it's fucking hilarious.
broadcastify.com
How does it communicate then?
I have saved tons of information about everything, especially the jews, and I plan to bury USB's into the ground.
Like a timecapsule, so if the future is dystopian and internet has been taken under full control, the subjects might find my USB, read all of it, including the jews.
Am I mentally insane?
Canadians are quickly becoming the worst shitposters in the modern era.
...then how would it work with out some sort of connection?
No. Maybe a tad paranoid, maybe a tad obsessive, but not insane. Do you want to create a torrent?
it uses the app itself, it becomes a walketalkie it does not need internet or phone lines, it does not mention internet or phone lines
So data just magically transmits between phones?
Yup, it's all magic
Needing that ai gf eh?
Its google now
Just a reminder, police departments have K9 units trained to find "porn" aka electronic devices.
You best hide all your shit from the scent of dogs.
yes it does wanna try it among anons in a pol thread
Fuck off, how does it work?
I'm against this, to be honest.
You just know the moment a woman speaks the betas will ruin the place.
The best part about text based is the complete anonymity.
If we created a raspberry pi based device, put it in an air-tight container, surrounded by charcoal, and then by another air-tight container, would that work?
Hell I don't know. I'm sure it's like most apps and it works through the phone lines.
That and a certain degree of persistence.
wi-fi
>Wanna expose your identity and location to ((((third party)))) spectators?
Nice try fucko
Well, you are fucking useless. I'm heading to do some research.
just download the app and try it damn, i done this before with/g/entoos and it worked fine.
Meshnet image boards will save the day
Well the app wasn't my idea and I'm not your search engine. You should go do some research. That's how we learn things.
That still doesn't explain how it works.
way too ambitious guys. promote open source software that follows good security practices. behave responsibly and don't give people a reason to think privacy is for people who are trying to do something bad.
Yes This!
...
>don't give people a reason to think privacy is for people who are trying to do something bad.
Sometimes we don't have a choice.
This seems promising.
(you)
Yes, connect your nodes together with something like this
zedomax.com
No it's highly unorganized and all over the place.
I also have interest in creating a liberal database, I want everyone on Cred Forums save twitters filled with traitorous libshit screaming about white privilage, so once they notice things arent going well for them, they wont be able to "blend" into society anymore.
hackaday.com
Read this, very important
>die america die
t. abdul mohammad
how about a blockchain? theyre easy to replicate and spread through any channel, ive been thinking about how to build an imageboard into one
Your USB will go unnoticed though. You need to create distributed back-ups.
Define.
Wifi is technically a radio. We use it daily to send encrypted information.
What the fuck is that?
Interesting concept.
MESHNET
E
S
H
N
E
T
You best be jesting.
CB radio made in nipland
I heard another guys was doing something like that but nothing came of it. It would be easier if Cred Forums actually made lists of the media/politicians/lefties themselves in some online database. Even better, start pushing articles that social justice types are rightfully terrible for any company or business, and then make them poison once they're exposed as being leftist
Well it's illegal to encrypt ham radio communications. Wifi is legally encrypted which is why i thought Mesh networks were a good idea
It would probably be possible to hide low-bandwidth comms within a high-powered constantly saturated band, like ATSC TV, then use a clever algorithm to avoid detectable interference. The ECCs for the TV broadcast should be able to deal with enough noise that users would be unaffected.
This nigga
duuuuuuuuude that guy just sppoked me especially after coming from this thread too boards.Cred Forums.org/pol/thread/89813579/
What about a script that automatically archives everything posted by members of a whitelist?
well fuck that was odd I thought it would auto shrink to
>Star Trek Voyager tier
Their downloading our database using a carrier riding on our transporter beam
>Cred Forums gets a daily "save a leftist information in the database thread"
I should handle the saving swedish leftist, feminists, traitorous figures, twitter, real name, approx area of living, we cannot allow them to easily blend in once the tide has turn, no fucking way.
If we can only make sure it doesnt fall under "doxxing", we wouldnt actually harass them, just compile their info.
I want to start, like 30 minutes daily, but I need other anons with me to host the general.
Imagine anons dating a girl, or looking up their co-workers only to see they were former mudlovers and supporter.
The nignet
lol they are talking about the riots
i have the material i just need to put in the time and take the test. do you have any gear?
Vaguely understood this, you clearly know more about this stuff than I do.
From what I understand, we'd basically be broadcasting disguised as part of another broadcast, not enough to be noticeable by other devices except our own, which would be programmed to seperate our broadcasts from the large one, such as the TV broadcast?
Broadcasting in their shadow
How feasible is this? Has it been done before?
Not as a means of creating an image board.
What if you're required to operate as an entry/exit node for transmission if you want to be a part of the system? That would give us more coverage and decentralize the hosting, which is the most important part
the thing that's pretty cool about the old radio is that it can travel insane distances
meshnet is pretty useless if it needs sight contact
>What if you're required to operate as an entry/exit node for transmission if you want to be a part of the system? That would give us more coverage and decentralize the hosting, which is the most important part
This is a good idea.
An image board would be far fetched by any means, in my opinion. At most, we could make a textboard, or maybe have some means of uploading a fax or other low data means of distributing information.
WIFI is radio so all the same principles apply
ci-journal.net
Good point.
google my friend
You can use SSTV for image and videos in 'posts'. We can also encrypt the SSTV in a unique method. We don't have to make something unencryptable, but as long as we're decentralized and anonymous and somewhat tough to get into
Essentially.
Lets say you have an ATSC channel with 6mhz bandwidth. You could probably create an algorithm that selects (based on epoch time or a key of some sort) a pattern spread out across that 6mhz, say in 5khz segments, then naively assumes that in x space at y time, n bytes are signal. Then you use signal processing to look for magic bytes and an ECC to extract the message.
It would be very low bandwidth, but one could also use a shared dataset that translates very short sequences into much larger messages. If you used ASCII for something like base-126 for instance, you could encode huge amounts of data in short character sequences, then you just need to disseminate the shared dataset to everyone.
So if I hooked up a wifi antennae to a radio tower, I would have a mega wifi?
>An image board would be far fetched by any means, in my opinion. At most, we could make a textboard, or maybe have some means of uploading a fax or other low data means of distributing information.
I don't know. I think we could pull some Cred Forumsizmo's and /k/ommandos on board.
It could start out as a small text board but gradually expand over time to image-board proportions.
Still text alone + fax would be preferable to a post-censorship public imageboard.
If you built a receiver designed for a bandwidth much narrower than the signal you are hiding in, and gave it good band rejection characteristics, it should work. Couple that with error correction similar to TCP/IP and you may have a solution.
you would be missing some hardware and it is a gross oversimplification, but yeah. there are cities that have city wide free wifi
Canada was a mistake.
> the preliminary conclusion is that the 280 km link is stable, and the 380 km one is probably at the edge of the 2.4 GHz link capabilities with low cost equipment
that is pretty amazing
and all you need is a router and some signal booster? how high does the antenna need to be?
Well there's more to it than that, but in a sense yes
CONTACT YOUR FUCKING LEGISLATORS
JUST DO IT
WHY CAN'T Cred Forums INTO REPRESENTATIVE GOVERNMENT
The issue with an image board is it requires a central place for the "thread" to live. Each "thread" would have to be hosted and receive transmissions ("posts"). The transmission could be written to the drive of the host, but would it transmit out the new posts as well? That seems like a good way to get arrested. How do we overcome this? How do we "host" a thread and still have it decentralized?
Lets just migrate to i2p or tor.
I2p isnt ideal bc its much more technical than tor and has shit throughput so memes would basically only be produced by normies.
Tor is much more practical but definitely infiltrated by the feds.
Those are our 2 best options unless you fags want to develop some sort of new method to communicate via shortwave or some shit.
Damn NSA, you smart.
I have to keep re-reading posts trying to translate them to dumb, based on context.
Pretty sure I get the general gist of it.
What would be essential, if we plan on avoiding monitoring, is secrecy. Either gather information by innocuous means, or create a core of skilled people to design the hardware and standards and what-not. Once it has been worked out, this information can only be shared through live interactions. Each person shares this information to people who they know are trustworthy, and so forth. Keep a low profile in general. Also worth consideration, would be to not have images capable of being uploaded, so that the alphabet agencies can't create a casus belli (CP) for dismantling the network, if they do find out about it.
The higher the better. You're trying to get over trees, buildings, the curvature of the earth., etc. So it varies depending on where you are and what you want to connect to.
So basically a telegram for internet browsing.
I am. However, we need a plan b.
>The issue with an image board is it requires a central place for the "thread" to live. Each "thread" would have to be hosted and receive transmissions ("posts"). The transmission could be written to the drive of the host, but would it transmit out the new posts as well? That seems like a good way to get arrested. How do we overcome this? How do we "host" a thread and still have it decentralized?
Most secure option is i2p but itll kill our ability to send memes and we would lose our ability to redpill normies because of how technical it is just to add someone to your addressbook. 2nd best option is tor but its significantly less secure.
>unless you fags want to develop some sort of new method to communicate via shortwave or some shit.
That is what we are doing.
Tor is our best option tbqh, i2p is viable but its a distant 2nd.
Now that I think about it if I recall correctly theres also something called, I think, the freenet or something along those lines, but I know little about it other than it has a higher throughput than tor so memes are more viable.
Yes, "invite-only" seems to be the way to go.
The biggest flaw we'd have is human error, the users.
How bout TORchan?
zw3crggtadila2sg.onion
>>unless you fags want to develop some sort of new method to communicate via shortwave or some shit.
>That is what we are doing.
But why would you want to do this when tor, i2p and freenet are all viable options?
Why not just migrate to a new peer to peer infrastructure within the current internet?
Someone should probably start documenting this stuff so our chatter eventually becomes a plan. Ideally, I think we would want 3-5 people who know each other IRL who would initially set up the system, and as it was mentioned earlier, expand to trusted sources. My question is what about people who don't have the means or know how to make one yet still want to participate?
>How bout TORchan?
>zw3crggtadila2sg.onion
I second this, I havent actually been on TORchan yet but TOR is by far our best option considering the number of guides out there for its usage, the size of its normal userbase, and its security/throughput tradeoff
Zeronet does this really well is growing fast, theres a 0chan.bit there, it kinda sucks for now but we can do more
So, OPs would have to continually transmit to keep threads 'on the air'. Posts would be transmitted to the OP on the same band as television channels, but low enough bandwidth to not cause disruption. The data would then be decoded using a dataset yet to be agreed upon. The OP thread gets updated and transmitted out on the same bands.
This is doable.
during the arab spring, some countries cut off internet to stop communication over social networks. Radio is useful as last backup
I am making a document of this information, along with my independent research.
1. Decentralized systems can't be eliminated easily
2. Alphabet Agency monitoring.
The threads run slow. There's not enough people posting content.
>
>during the arab spring, some countries cut off internet to stop communication over social networks. Radio is useful as last backup
Eh, I think if youre stuck in some arab spring level shit being cutoff from Cred Forums would be the least of your worries.
The main problem with radio is distance and cost, I think itll be a stillborn attempt desu, but idk much about radio other than youre fucked if youre fucked if youre trying to send a signal from USA to Deutschland unless you have some really formidable equipment (ie extremely expensive)
Great. I have been snooping around past month or so slowly learning about Meshnets and what not during my free time but I just don't have the know-how to actually start up a network. From the sounds of it at this point It seems that our only option is something where there is no dedicated hosts but.
>The threads run slow. There's not enough people posting content.
Threads run slow as in theres a lack of people or the connection is too terrible for torchan viable?
There are roles for everyone, however, a low profile must be kept. I have decided upon working on this project in relative secrecy.
should look into a low cost rapid deployment transmitters that you could plug into a public electric outlet and walk away. pre configured/set to repeat a transmission. maybe connect enough to get a meshnet packet radio service going to scramble the connection origin and boost the strength. make it fun for the kids. "Plug in this black box and fight the power.". Instant activist
lack of people
If we make it easy to use but also make each user an entry/exit node then more people=more security (on top of using radio)
>There are roles for everyone, however, a low profile must be kept. I have decided upon working on this project in relative secrecy.
Honestly given the size of the distances between users and how technically inept I would assume a large minority of Cred Forums users are I dont think this is all that good an idea, itll either be stillborn or die out.
I want something like this but Id prefer Cred Forums survived in general which means retaining the userbase
cruz.senate.gov
I guess we should've gave this prostitute the delegates
can raspberry pi's do this?
They are relatively cheap and you don't look suspicious buying some meme computer.
Just put a bunch of them under tables in internet cafes, and maybe get Cred Forums to help us.
>from USA to Deutschland
I am pretty sure that can be done with a modern ham radio.
>We might actually live to see the birth of another internet like it once was pre-Eternal September
there are modified raspberry Pi's you can buy that do it
>lack of people
Do you think it would gain traction if I were to start threads really promoting torchan?
I fell for the college jew and am very busy as a result but could squeeze out the time to start threads at least once a day.
I don't intend to replace Cred Forums, but to have a back-up.
That reminds me of the AI from the Ender's game books that used the ansible communication system as her sort of "Body". What if we were to do something like that? Have a Virus go out and use "Slave" computers as nodes for the system. Not sure how viable it is in reality but it could work as a temporary network until we get a more permanent solution in place.
Basically mesh nets and they already exist
This is all you would ever need
Rpi + decent transmitter
Mesh networks are the future
if the internet got shut down the world would be a better place
>>from USA to Deutschland
>I am pretty sure that can be done with a modern ham radio.
Really? Like I said I know very little about radio technology, if something like this were to work Id be very interested and willing to invest some cash to participate
use XMPP+OTR and the TOR
you can basically talk world wide with a ham radio but if youre talking to a very long distance the audio will distort and shit
Yeah, especially some low bandwidth stuff
youtube.com
Also for local file sharing etc
deaddrops.com
>I don't intend to replace Cred Forums, but to have a back-up.
I see, Im interested and willing to play a role where I can
they have scent proof containers you can buy on amazon
That's called a "zombie botnet"
Highly illegal and could potentially drag us all down if they get to trace the original sender
Start emailing small business owners. if you have the gall, call them and get them to open your email and infect their systems with a fud botnet
The Chinese are doing it, we can too. We might be able to hijack an existing botnet lol
It's possible. The whole darknet thing keeps most people away I think
yeah, do it. I will too
>It's possible. The whole darknet thing keeps most people away I think
Hmm, Ill start some threads up tomorrow after class
Then I think we should use those.
>Buy with cash, physically, under aliases if need be
>Walk into libraries, internet cafes, college campuses, hotels, literally anywhere with free internet
>Get a prepaid phone with 4g LTE and one of those data-to-internet converters, modified pi's may not even need them though and put them in abandoned houses, alleyways, hunting sheds etc.
>scratch any serial numbers/product ID's so it can't be traced to you purchasing if they find it.
>profit??
I'm no tech geek, but this seems somewhat solid, and HAM radio if shit hits the fan.
Sounds pretty good, right?
Can't you rent botnet services over the darknet? It's like Amazon Web services
I'd be willing to help
Could make self contained microservers that only contain part of the data and act as a proxy. In addition the more you add the more the data is broken up between the nodes and the less likely the system is brought down by one node being found.
Sounds like a good idea. You could come back here to advertise the threads.
Yea, that is a major caveat but who knows when Cred Forums will become illegal.
I personally don't even have the tech know how just because I am busy all the time. I am just tossing around ideas. Although it does remind me of a guy I knew about who controlled a 32 Botnet. he refereed to himself as God and always in third person.
The goal is to transmit in the same frequencies as cable channels, but transmit 'in their shadow'. The Pi can do that, but we need to test it first. If any Cred Forumslacks are in the Ohio area we can start this
>scratch any serial numbers/product ID's so it can't be traced to you purchasing if they find it.
I imagine there's a record of the MAC address whenever one is sold. You could potentially be traced through that.
We could pay street urchins to purchase our raspberrys.
Yeah that could work
should we start making write ups and move an an (encrypted) IRC?
ye olde proxy
I live in a small town in east TN, and there are people within radio horizon of me posting in literally every TNfag thread. If my situation is indicative of the mean distribution of active Cred Forumsocks, then wide-scale radio communication should be possible even between incredible disparate users (barring oceans, etc) using cheap off-the-shelf radios.
We could all standardize to using MURS channel 4 in case of a real PAULCON 1 happening, with the proword PATHOFLIGHT for generic identification.
If I'm correct, pi's literally are plastic and metal until you put in a microSD with an ISO image, I guess you can buy one with raspian pre-installed, but If you were concerned about the MAC addresses being traced back or whatever, couldn't you just install the edgy anonymoose software that would run this shit and not enable wifi until you got to your local starbucks? Well I'm tired as shit, so I'm not thinking the greatest now, sorry if my ideas are shit
i got enough information from this thread to build a prototype network. special thanks to the cabin who tipped us off about atsc standards. if I am able to get a low cost rapid deployment anonymous solution together you will be the first ones to use it.
I'm not super familiar with Pi's, but usually the MAC address is burned into the networking device. Therefore it is independent of the OS. It can be spoofed with software, but not easily changed.
Looked into more of that before mentioned Commsprepper YouTube Channel. youtube.com
You can, the problem lies in that we are assuming the entire internet would be off-limits for everything except wall-gardened corporation approved ecosystems.
We would need a way to relay information outside of the IPV protocols
Damn right
Good stuff there
I've been using single sideband at sea for 20 years. Never heard of anybody getting busted for using an illegal channel and before satphones, lots of guys had scramblers as well. Never heard about any of them getting popped or even harassed.
Then could we make our own? I mean, it's not as complicated as building a whole computer, and most people that come here can do that anyway (myself included) I have pretty solid soldering experience, and if we anticipate majot happenings ahead (hilldawg get elected, Cred Forums gets on national news as a terrorist site) we could just pass around some pdf files on the components and download links, as well as usb drops all around popular cities?,Would that even work?
I mentioned using ASCII before to get base-126 encoding (one character reserved for control), but if you went to unicode instead (which is multibyte, so some characters would be two, three, or four actual bytes), you could encode up to 127,999 characters/messages/etc per character space.
>encode up to 127,999 characters/messages/etc per character space.
This could work.
Yea, We could have Text based "Boards" That are basically radio systems sending out messages and are sort of like a group email. You download the "Mail" from the senders and have it organised with a time stamp. This way you could have some means of flow when communicating with multiple people.
lol are you crazy? Most repeaters ban discussion of politics and even in the ARRL license book they tell you not to.
Reason being hams know that the FCC really gets nothing out of them and wants the bandwidth back so they're scared something offensive gets on the air because it will be an excuse to eliminate their bands.
They have to keep acting like they are an important public service in emergencies.
Also if youreally had initiative to get licensed you would have found the ARRL guide where they cover what you need to know AND GIVE YOU EVERY SINGLE QUESTION THAT CAN POSSIBLY BE ON THE TEST IN THE BACK OF THE BOOK. If you spent an hour or two a day on it a smart person could pass the test with maybe two weeks study.
I am thinking of of creating two channels, One being decentralized but easily observed. This would be easy to develop and possibly be able to deployed in time for the election. It would be mainly used to crowd source news and discuss happenings.
The other would be a secret radio network hidden from observation and only accessible by people who are given the standards and means to access it by an IRL trusted source. This will take a few years.
Expanding on that, one could standardize message segment lengths to something like 32 characters, which would give you 32^127,999 possibilities per segment and make it much easier to process the signal. In that scenario, the shared translation dictionary could expand almost infinitely while maintaining perfect backward compatibility.
Bumping for interest.
I've been toying with the problem of creating a large enough meshnet.
Best I can come up with: Hijack the "internet of things".
People are buying televisions, refrigerators, lightbulbs, power strips, etc. with wifi built in, and it is generally known to be an insecure nightmare waiting to explode.
Once it gets popular enough, people will start targeting them.
Imagine if, instead of malicious intent, we used them as meshnet relay points.
Or we erect large antennas innawoods, either way you can't stop the signal.
Nevermind, I misread that as
>Decentralized systems CAN be eliminated easily
I was wondering.
I don't know how many IoT devices you would be able to give an over the air firmware patch to in order to enable that operation
>Private radio transmissions
Well I guess all of them have to accept over the air updates, just a matter of finding the 0day for the right device
>Private radio transmissions
No persistence
It's impractical but an interesting shower thought I had, it isn't that popular yet and somebody would notice it sooner or later.
Best bet is finding the most propagated device that could relay transmissions and testing it
Ham radio? The first test of TCP/IP was done with ham radios that can be used to create a wireless network.
Power-line data transmission is already a thing, but it would likely be difficult to completely co-opt because it's unlikely you could get signals through transformers unless they were designed with bypass in mind, and AFAIK they aren't (with some exceptions). It might be more practical to use cable coax and stay within the filter frequencies. I'm sure you could only propagate so far, but you could at least connect your neighborhood, possibly much more.
im going to rape you Trudeau. Im going to fist fuck you to death.
I've been interested in experimenting with a meshnet using something like the ESP8266 wifi module, one that supports SSL would be preferable.
Pretty cheap to toy around with.
What about MEGANet by kim dotcom?
Might as well email everything you do to the FBI
TOR
I'm going to head to the store to fetch some milk and such. This thread might die before I get back. I plan to make an alternative communications general tomorrow. I am gathering all this information into a document. Lets try to get something rudimentary up before the election.
Judging by recent events, emailing your secrets to the government is probably the one surefire way of ensuring they never become public.
so I put this in google and land here instead
>Autoplaying video with exploding cars
>Looks like it is from 1999
Seems legit
Welp I got school in the morning so I'm off. Hopefully we can get a good concrete plan tomorrow in the Alternate communications general was gonna make. I am interested in the HF radios so I think ill start researching some of that stuff.
It would be easy to write an interpreter si that visually, everything looks like Cred Forums
bah, we need to make it look the 90's BBS.
Long Live &TOTSE
Cred Forums here
If they take down the Internet via DNS (most likely option) you can get around it by using Namecoin.
>Uses blockchain technology for DNS lookup rather than ICANN root DNS servers
If they take down Internet by cutting off cables and backbones, Hyberboria
>Creates a decentralized Internet using consumer routers. Just install it on your router
I've been toying with he idea of using free/cheap shortwave broadcast time blocks in friendly/neutral countries to disseminate information to the U.S/unfree west in the event of this occuring. It's cheap, easy, and has a wide range of reception. While not secire, it would allow us to continue red piling people and disseminate basic instructions to dissidents and resistors.
Thoughts?
Sounds like a good idea.
We need to start fucking pastebining ideas and write ups FFS
Everyone, really, this has already been done, the crypto-anarchist hackers have been working on this issue for years. The results are:
>Namecoin
Decentralizes DNS (What Obama is giving to the UN)
>Hyperboria
Decentralizes the network completely
Double posting because you faggots need to pay attention and stop sperging out trying to reinvent the wheel
Annon used proxie:
It's super effective!