/NationalCommunism/ general

...

...

iipdigital.usembassy.gov/st/english/article/2010/05/20100518114619zjsredna0.3529736.html#axzz4L4tNLZPV

whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/pearl/www.geocities.com/Pentagon/6315/lend.html

historynet.com/did-russia-really-go-it-alone-how-lend-lease-helped-the-soviets-defeat-the-germans.htm

...

That is 5x the population of your nation.

>Not an arguement

>Not an Argument.

Propaganda

prove it first

I thought /autism/ generals moved to Cred Forums along time ago, apparently not.

Nice.

>le epic helicopter maymay

So.. literally National-Socialism ?

Why Juche? It isn't even coherent, it's just a bunch of hollow statements made to sound like Kim Il-Sung invented Maoism

because it values self sufficency and nationalism

edward bellamy is better then karl marx

>I welcome my Jewish overlords and their slaughter of my people.

sweetliberty.org/issues/wars/witness2history/3.html

"Have we escaped a Pax Germanica only to fall into a Pax Judaeica?" (The Times, May 8th, 1920)
"I have glimpsed into hell. The Jews are in control." (Sir Percival Phillips)
"The Communists are Jews, and Russia is being entirely administered by them. They are in every government office. They are driving out the Russians." (Clare Sheriden, Close friend of Leon Trotsky, alias Lev Bronstein)

>CENTRAL COMMITTEE OF THE BOLSHEVIK PARTY
>Bronstein [Trotsky], Apfelbaum [Zinovieff], Lourie (Larine), Ouritski, Volodarski, Rosenfeldt [Kamenef], Smidovitch, Sverdov [Yankel], Nakhamkes [Steklov], Lenin [Ulyanov]* (The names in brackets are their real names). Jews 10, Gentiles 2 (Krylenko, Lounatcharski).
>* There is some dispute as to Lenin's racial origins. It is known that he was married to a Jewess; spoke Yiddish as did his children.
>"Lenin had taken part in Jewish student meetings in Switzerland thirty-five years before. He is generally regarded as a Russian but there is doubt." -- (Jewish Chronicle, December, 16th, 1932).
>"Although Lenin was a political monster, he was no enemy of the Jews. He was aware of his partly Jewish origin, many of his close associates were Jews, he often spoke of Jews in favourable terms and he opposed anti-Jewish attitudes." (The London Times, Dec. 8, 1996, Section 7, page 2)
>CENTRAL COMMITTEES
>MENSHEVIKS: 11 Members, all Jews
>COMMUNISTS OF THE PEOPLE: 6 Members, 5 Jews
>S.R (RIGHT WING): 15 Members, 13 Jews
>S.R (LEFT WING): 12 Members, 10 Jews
>COMMITTEE OF THE ANARCHISTS: 5 Members, 4 Jews
>POLISH COMMUNIST PARTY: 12 Members, all Jews
>THE OTHER RUSSIAN SOCIALIST PARTIES ARE SIMILAR IN COMPOSITION
>MINISTRY OF THE COMMISSARIAT
>22 Members: 17 Jews, 5 Gentiles
>CENTRAL EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
>61 Members: 41 Jews, 20 Gentiles

Even by their own counts, the number was pretty high.
nytimes.com/1989/02/04/world/major-soviet-paper-says-20-million-died-as-victims-of-stalin.html

>Stalin
>jewish
he outjewed the jews by purging them

As does a million other far better philosophies.

>Implying Comrade Stalin didn't BTFO the jews

like?

...

>Being a nationalist
>national communism is a thing
>Stalinism is a thing and not just ML
Kill yourself comrade.

>Putin
>Stalin
You're an idiot. Read a book.

heretical.com/miscellx/bolshies.html
lol wats dis

...

Putin does business with jew but he hates jew more than Trump

Retarded commies edward bellamy was better.

>Thinking communism could work in a non-homogenious society

never heard of him. Will look him upp

what happened in the gulags, son.

tfw you will never get to see real communism tried in your lifetime

apparently it makes you super triggered lol

hes started socialism stick with your retarded low stage communism and stop take are socialism word you fucking fags

Hey, guys, now computers will make the free market useless! It is now guys.

A few million here, another million there? Who cares? Just a statistic.

Self-sufficiency is only recommendable if you can go to war in the near future, for obvious reasons. Otherwise, it's just retarded.

Communist is the ultimate identity politics. Literally everything is based on the concept of class. Don't add "national" to make it seem edgy. Killing millions of your own people is not "national". Your allegiance is to ideology and class, not to anything else. Fuck off.

Do you even know what communism is or are you just shit posting?

im thinking of joining the union desu

We see communism in UK, Take over Europe, I remember when soviet, good times.

>there are actual down syndrome drones that deny human genetics and actually believe in marxist pseudoscience on this board

What happens in those for profit prison, little boy.

Yeah, you are example of the person which should be purged. A pathetic left wing parasite, which is only capable of leeching off other people and throwing pieces of edgy rhetoric.
Truly swedes are cancer of this world

So glad I don't live in a poverty stricken marxist shithole LOL

Why don't you go move to Venezuela?

Why is it that Stalin and Mao and communists are considered far-left but Hitler and Mussolini are considered far-right?

I mean, aren't they the same shit? Cult leaders, took complete control over everything, crushed dissent, controlled anything in the state and how things are run,hell the nazis called themselves socialists too.

Like, when I think far-right I imagine a very individualist anarchic society. Where everyone lives and fends off for himself in nature, with a town where you meet for trade or to steal someone's wife and inpregnate her or something like that. Anarcho-primitivism or what is called.

But nazi are just super totalitarian, for the power of our people! types just like socialists. So what's the difference?

>That whole post

>government funded for profit prisons
Hmm, they're shitholes but at least millions of people aren't being slaughtered in them.

>sweden

>communist education

venezuela doesn't have socialsm they have lower-stage communism.

Venezuela is shit, when Russia in charge around here we all had jobs, if there where rare things they would be rare for all.

United Kingdom is more stable then Russia, better place for communist leadership, I am looking forward to the new union.

Shill thread.

No way people actually takes marxism seriously in 1996 + 20

What is your response to the fact that the majority of Bolshevist revolutionaries were Jewish?
What happened during the Great Leap Forward, son.

haha epic stuff Mao

It's funny to hear westerners like this guy complaining about life in western society

> hurr durr prisons are just like concentration camps and gulags
> omg people are calling me racist this is fascist control of thought and speech!

You people have been coddled and had it good for too long.

>neo liberalism
>marxism

>You are being brainwashed by "them". "They" control you like the little dumb puppet you are.
Why aren't you a nazi, again?

Get boned, commie

>le evil rich people are hoarding

lol if you took every last penny the super rich have and distributed to every single worker, the average person would have maybe $2000. Also when people try to spend this money the prices will go up because there's not enough resources to justify this new increase in demand

Rich people use a tiny tiny fraction of consumer goods in an economy.
When workers work, they are making products and services for mostly the working class.

The rich don't have anything for you.
Your "revolution" is completely meaningless.

Neo Liberalism falls in practical times, turn into bureaucratic communism, people turn Bureaucratic communism into naturalist state communism where all people are working towards great things.

edward bellamy started equality too and these retarded commies don't know that real equality meaning is.....

>private property
>mop privately owned
>capital accumulation
Great communism lads you polacks really know what you're talking about

Its true that is why you give people what they need to live, give them chances to earn what they want and like, live in simple ways and share with community for happiness.

Stalin was a philosemitic internationalist though.

radioaryan.com/2016/07/the-orthodox-nationalist-stalin-philo.html?utm_source=BP_featured

Here's a well documneted podcast on the subject by russian speaking PHD Mathew Raphael Johnsson. Senior researcher for The Barns review.

The portion dealing with stalin starts at 22:50, the part before that deals with niggers on rampage, and while interesting has nothing with Stalin as such to do.

Obviously this thread has nothing with reality to do, so it will just be shitposting.

>the failure of Venezuelan socialism is actually the failure of

LMAO holy fuck your brain is cucked

Not an argument.
In fact you seem extremely upset over the fact you couldn't refute what I said.

Your revolution is literally meaningless and you will actually be worse off in the end lmao

Owning Privet things is not forbidden under communism, just the means of production belong to the people, you need to read more books to understand how things should work.

Capitalism not evil, just easy to abuse, the more people there are the more people want communism.

>the more people there are the more people want communism.
Nobody wants communism.

People like to own things and make their own way in life.

Communism is jewish.

There's a lot of Jewish people in Europe
A lot of Jewish people come from petit bourgeoise families so they'll have more time to read and stuff
Why would they side with people who want to kill them?

Great things happened
pastebin.com/wV97RYQT

The only reason Stalin can be said to have "purged jews" was because there were almost only jews in the actual ruling comitties in the soviet union.
Any purge at all there was nessecerily a "purge of jews".

Stalin married jews, his children married jews, he put jews in after the jews he "purged" from the goverment. He was constantly surrounded by jews.

Calling stalin "rightwing" or "anti-semitic" is retarded, and only a leftist way of trying to dissasociate from their failed leftist utopia of the USSR.

Communism is not jewish, and you can own things under communism, just things are more fair.

I think you don't hate communism you hate what you see communism as in your mind, study it and find out if it is as bad as you think, fair enough if you still hate it but you will know more and be more educated.

only the poor class wants communism so round up some bums and start a revolution.

...

> This evidence shows that Hitler, though he called himself a socialist to try and pander to the left, never had the intention to distribute the means of production to the workers. He banned unions, strikes, reprivatised banks, protected corporations, and took out communists, anarchists and even socialists in his own party. Much like Stalin, he was an opportunist and a “political schizophrenic”.

Yeah I understand all that but why is Stalin/Soviety Russia considered communist then? It was the same oligarchic elitism and supression of the masses like Hitler's Germany, and political pandering to "workers" while not giving a shit about them.

What's the difference then?

You said that Venezuela is a socialist country and I proved you wrong because those things don't exist in socialist countries.
Yeah those Russians were better of being serfs amirite
There's a difference between private and personal property

>Communism is not jewish
>creator of communism was the son of a rabbi
>vast majority of communist or communist sympathizers are jewish

People who support communism usually have low IQ from bad genetics.

I know you down syndrome cucks don't believe in genetics, but yes, you have low IQ.

I am not poor, I have nice house in the village and a nice apartment in the city, heat and food. I go out daily, I have computer and TV.

Capitalism provide things quickly for people who are sharp and clever, but people who are not clever suffer, Communism was good for the clever and better then capitalism for the slow.

aren't communists supposed to be atheists?

and you're forgetting about the chinese and the commies in latin america

>>vast majority of communist or communist sympathizers are jewish
>Implying

Great argument
The USSR was state capitalist not communist

>le horseshoe theory
Mate.

>I proved you wrong
>by saying I disagree with you
You didn't prove anything lol
Are you 13 years old?

>There's a difference between private and personal property
LOL It's just an arbitrary distinction that leftists came up with that has nothing to do with the real world.
Nobody cares about your retarded prescriptive definitions.

>Jews have the highest IQ on average

>le vast majority of communist or communist sympathizers are jewish meme
>People who support communism usually have low IQ
Pick one Cred Forums

>aren't communists supposed to be atheists?
So?
What does that have to do with anything?

They don't believe in genetics, they believe all human behavior is socially/economically constructed.
It's an extremely retarded belief system that completely denies reality.

>pastebin.com/wV97RYQT
"hitler was a capitalist"

This is when you really start facepalming. Hitler, Mussolini, Franco, they were thrid possitionist ecnomic nations. The only possition that makes sense.

It can be phrased as "free enterprise under the consideration of the peoples well".

In NS germany profits were caped at 6% of the revenue, anything more earned had to be paid out to the workers. If you wanted to start a bussniess you aplied for permission and the state decided if it was in the peoples interest. Degenerate filth was forbidden, usury was forbidden, but people were allowed to keep a fair share of their gains if their economic activity was benefitial to the nation.

It's so obvious and natural it makes anyone wonder how anyone could ever ever think marxism was a good idea.

You are not arguing with me you are just calling me names, Communism is not jewish just because jew form ideas for it, Do you think Jews run things behind your back?

I do not know my IQ, I might not be that smart, but I am successful and I look forward to the communism that will arise soon from the politics of other nations.

People read some edward bellamy and you can see communist cucked allot of his ideas and called them cuckarl marx ideas.

>The USSR was state capitalist not communist

Then why is USSR called far-left instead of far-right like fascists/corporatists?

lol the jews are the ones running communism

the plebs like yourself are the ones that have to live under communism and actually believe in it's fairy tales

So are you saying that private propert,capital accumulation and private ownership of the mop exist in socialist countries? Come on leaf.

buddy, you're already 10 posts in and I know you just got off break. You said:
>A lot of Jewish people come from petit bourgeoise families so they'll have more time to read and stuff
Do you think the Bolsheviks killed Jews, primarily? Are you mad? The primary victims of the forced starvations and civil war/revolutions were Eastern Europeans.
Go live in a Bolshevik nation if you love it so much. Thatcher is rolling around in her grave, how can a Brit be such a faggot. Or are you a (((Brit)))?

Because they tried marxism and it failed, then had to resort to this thing the left calls "state capitalism" which is just the jews owning everything.

>So?
>What does that have to do with anything?

you talked about karl marx's dad being a rabbi like it mattered. If anything, he was probably butthurt about his dad and religion and created his own philosophy.

jews are supposed to be ultra-capitalist (bankers, money lenders etc), not radical for the people kind of guys.

>and I look forward to the communism that will arise soon from the politics of other nations.
Communism is unpopular as ever right now.

Good thing marx's theories were proved wrong and there's no possible way workers would ever consider "rising up against the bourgeoisie".

Your revolution is impossible.
Poverty worldwide is actually decreasing and has been decreasing for decades now.

LOL

Fascist economies imperfectly modeled themselves after corporativism. You can call it capitalist, and it certainly does share some features, but that does not make it so.

Hmm.
It seems to me that countries with the least amount of private property, capital accumulation and private ownership of the mop are the one's doing the poorest and have the highest poverty rates.
Veneseula and north korea. lol

You say no true socialism exists in any country, okay fine
But the countries that are the closest to socialism are the biggest shitholes lolol

just remember a merchant has no state so they don't understand borders.

But, capitalist powers are exploiting developing countries and keeping them in a perpetual poverty cycle? Globalization is totally screwing developing countries, guys! Have you heard of economic hitmen? It's literally neocolonialism which is making western countries rich at the expense of developing countries.

Because their goal was socialism (which will lead to communism) and it was state owned not privately owned
Definition of capitalism-
Capitalism is an economic system based on private ownership of the means of production and their operation for profit
>the vast majority of communist or communist sympathizers are jewish
>the plebs like yourself are the ones that have to live under communism and actually believe in it's fairy tales
Are you saying that I'm a Jew? Hahaha please just shut up you're making your position look bad,

In the UK they are talking of Trotsky as good politics, The EU is working towards unifying Europe, people grow frustrated with unfair gap in wealth and new communism will not need leaps forward working off and fixing Capitalistic infrastructure.

I hope for no revolution, I am happy to change things slowly.

>jews are supposed to be ultra-capitalist (bankers, money lenders etc)
No they're not.
Everybody knows they play both sides.

Massive amounts of jews are marxists.
You really have no argument here.

Marxism is so fucking dead, it's incredible there's actual retards dumb enough to bring up the religion of marxism today.

Because all kinds of people from Lenin onwards have been CALLING themselves communists and there's no one around with enough authority to auto-correct that to "single-party despotism." Communism itself has nothing to do with dictatorship, oligarchy, plutocracy, single-party states, trampling human rights, press censorship or any of that shit.

Also, "right" and "left" mean VASTLY different things in different countries and coming out of the mouths of different people. When you can discuss political issues without using a single reference to left, right, liberal, liberatarian, traditional, any -ism or any of their synonyms, you are ready to graduate Cred Forums and go talk to the smart people.

FUCK OFF MY BOARD COMMIE SCUM

that sounds like typical modern liberal welfare state to me

> In NS germany profits were caped at 6% of the revenue, anything more earned had to be paid out to the workers.

that's like the corporate and the high income taxes.

> If you wanted to start a bussniess you aplied for permission and the state decided if it was in the peoples interest.

that sounds like our "regulations" to keep control over businesses and shit

I guess degenerate = problematic for nazis?

What's different from today then, other than anti-jewery?

>supporting judeo-bolshevism

Capitalism is just left-right wing socialistic fascism.

Jew have state in middle east, as it grows they will go there more and more, west should stay out of wars in middle east, they stay away from here anyway but things are bad for people in west europe.

Stalin dindunuffin.
The majority of kulaks were white you fucking retard.
Definition of capitalism-
Capitalism is an economic system based on private ownership of the means of production and their operation for profit
No the west has all of that stuff too leaf b8man

>Capitalism is an economic system based on private ownership of the means of production and their operation for profit

Yeah that is the marxist definiation. Congratulations, it is probably worse than any other definiation of the concept of captialism,

But then they'd obviously need to have a really ba definiation, so as to cement the absurd dicotomy of communism/capitalism.

>In the UK they are talking of Trotsky as good politics
Who?
The UK has had marxists for years. There's no way they would get in power, and if it ever came close people would fight against it and the military would never go along with it.
People don't want to be slaves.

>The EU is working towards unifying Europe
Yes, thankfully there are people that are against marxism that fight against the EU.

>people grow frustrated with unfair gap in wealth
Literally an irrelevant statistic, see:
>I am happy to change things slowly.
Good thing whenever marxism is tried it fails and people actually see it failing. Nobody wants it.

>In the UK they are talking of Trotsky as good politics
How?

>he EU is working towards unifying Europe
Yeah under the boot of authoritarian neo liberalism.

that's why jews that live outside there state just like the refugees are a merchants.

Jews are white! You outted yourself, Chaim! See you at the synagogue, rabbi.

>Stalin dindunuffin.
It's amazing someone can be this much of a self-hating drooling retard. lol

You're the people who the word "cuck" was created for.

>Yeah that is the marxist definiation.
Oh ffs hahahahahahaha
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capitalism

>What's different from today then, other than anti-jewery?
Ban on usury, ban on degenerate bullshit (porn etc)
>> In NS germany profits were caped at 6% of the revenue, anything more earned had to be paid out to the workers.

>that's like the corporate and the high income taxes.
You seem to understand nothing. It's not as if they didnt have corporate taxes. The compaies were subject to the state, and the state made the economy the subject of the people.
Not the other way around as in the current liberal paradigm.

In a NS state the economy exists to provide the people with what their wants and needs.
Today our states exist to provide the jew-economy with the pre-molded people parts they can grind to dust in the machinery and make a profit of.

The difference is fundamental.

>Kulaks=Jewish
leaf
great argument leaf

>creator of communism was the son of a rabbi
Marx's father was a Jew who converted to Protestantism, Marx himself was an atheist.
Marx's atheism is clear in his description of materialism.

...

>give people what they need to live

And where is this never-ending well of gibmedats that is distributed to the needy?

Ownership of capital was mostly private, but you couldn't freely control it. Corporativism is in a sense similar to how economic regulation is applied in developed economies today to natural monopolies. In that case, there is no benefit from direct competition, only from the threat of entry, so what you are doing is ensuring firms are reasonably efficient because their owners will want to maximize profit.
There is a nuance here.

>wikipedia is a valid source.

Capitlism is the jewish perversion of the free market into a system where the banker-jews and the (((investors))) in the stockmarkets take the fair earnings of the people. It's communism by the back-door.

It's endgame is the same as communisms endgame is. To make all economic activity subject to a handfull of people who own the entire economy. It's enterning it's endstages right now with the jewish banker families and their assortment of shabbos goys owning almost the entire western world.

Just the same as how the soviet economy was owned by the elite party jews and a handfull of party-veted shabbos goys.

Told you, you're almost at twenty posts: the border between average Joe and DRUMPF HAHAH
just correct that record, goy.

haha epic this post has been approved by trudeau lol see i can shitpost too fuck this gay thread fuck off Marxists need helicopters

I should had typed "free enterprise" (((free market capitalism))) is absurd and sick. Anyone who supports it has not thought it's consequences through.

Excellent critique of capitalism, I hate the fags who just say "redistribute, bro".
The whole creation of advanced, modern civilization/competitive spirit is a good argument, but kinda boring and overused.

It's the end stage of capitalism mate you're libertarian small buisness paradise is never going to come back.

Do you not care for workers right or for them to be treated "fairly"? If so why would you be against regulation anyway seeing as corporations will still do what they're doing now in places like China? Small business will never be able to compete.

You view it wrong, people need a place to live, they need food, they need heat, they need water and doctors and schools, this is not hard to get, all of these things are so cheep, communist state needs to be as efficient or more efficient as capitalist explotation but in favor of the people.

Give people money and a job, if they do not work they do not get money, make it so they can do the job given, the slow should have simple jobs.

>you: Do you think the Bolsheviks killed Jews, primarily? Are you mad? The primary victims of the forced starvations and civil war/revolutions were Eastern Europeans
>me: The majority of kulaks (the "innocent" dindunuffiners you're talk about) were white.
>you:Jews are white! You outted yourself, Chaim! See you at the synagogue, rabbi.

>says I'm the one making retarded posts
Jesus.

>he thinks means of production is remains private in Venezuela
>doesn't realize Chavez seized the assets of all oil companies in his country to fund social programs to give him mindless sheep
>none of this money went to maintaining the only valuable export Venezuela has, time wins and their oil wells shut in from lack of maintenance

Socialism everyone. Not to mention Chavez's replacement was a fucking bus driver in Columbia. He doesn't even have the equivalent of a high school education, kek. Listening to him speak is like watching a child try and form words.

I am not a libertarian nor against regulation.

What end stage of capitalism? Natural monopolies are not new. They have and will always exist. Some sectors have a tendency to be full of small firms, others have a tendency for concentration. This is determined by the different cost structures of the different sectors. The nature of your clients can also play a role (B2B is completely different from B2C) and so does the nature of the goods you're selling (think of homogeneity vs heterogeneity/specificity).

>sweetliberty
>no sources

True, a lot of them were Jewish, but Jews were actually oppressed. A movement promising this oppression to end would be appealing to many Jews.

All of those goods, services and infrastructures are largely inefficient when they are controlled by a monopoly with zero competition (the government). Not only are you taking away the incentive to work, because everyone gets gibmedats and a safety net, but you are also stifling innovation.

Your utopia sounds very akin to matriarch societies that still exist in the modern day, and there's a reason why all of them are still tribal scavangers that are happy to wipe their asses with jungle leaves.

Industrial democracy will humanise capitalism, comrades. Don't throw the babby out with the bathwater. Rather than try and re-invent the economic wheel we can simply change a few laws here and there and keep on trucking. After all, what better way to give the worker the means of production than to actually give him the means of production?

Definition of Socialism-
Socialism is a range of economic and social systems characterised by social ownership and democratic control of the means of production.

Does ^ describe that? No.

You're talking about state capitalism.

Venezuela has gov sector employment which is only marginally higher than the united states and lower than most european nations. cepr.net/blogs/the-americas-blog/public-sector-employment-in-venezuela-is-not-so-large-as-the-associated-press-suggests

Stagnation is a worry, you need people in leadership who can strive forward and push innovation, your competition is other nations, there will always be a national divide, a global one world nation is not possible.

> ban on usury
ban on wall street speculation

>ban on degenerate bullshit (porn etc)
how is it different from SJWs banning porn, tits in video games and so on?

> You seem to understand nothing. It's not as if they didnt have corporate taxes. The compaies were subject to the state, and the state made the economy the subject of the people.
Not the other way around as in the current liberal paradigm.

Yes but that's exactly the kind of bullshit that bernie and obama are saying, ie socialist bullshit

If I gave you this quote without a photo, and replaced class with race and billionaire with jews, you wouldn't notice a difference

Face it buddy, you nazis are filthy commies just like Bernie Sanders. Same collectivist mindset against people more successful than you, similar butthurt.

> mfw nazi party was literarilly called "National Socialist German Worker's Party" but nazis pretend they weren't filthy commies

forgot the quote

So maybe what matters is not so much how many people are employed by the state but how retarded the politicians are towards private enterprises?

There you go, same thing

Are you fucking retarded or what?
Communist!?!? While being"""""nationalist"""""(communism is internationalist)
Hey Islamic commie faggot ky

Are you retarded or what?
(((Bernie sanders)))
He's a commie

And (((Adolf Hitler))) was a commie too, read my post Also, Hitler just like commies loved to defend muslims, he probably adored seeing eva braun penetrated by sandnigger dick

Hitler purged the moderate part of his parrty, then after a while he started his war with Russia which was just typical leftist inter-fighting, we see it right now in this election with bernie people throwing hillary under the bus. Communists love to throw their own under the bus, they're animals like that.

>hillary
>leftist

>nazi corporatism
>communist
(((Romani)))an intellectual

Both him and the Bulgarian are prolly trolls.

>noobs that don't even know what old world communism is

You see, there is a reason why many communist countries went full circle into panslavic ultranationalism, the entire thing got derailed from the start by occurring in Russia

The desired result was sort of what is going on now in the West, but we stole the movement and... modified it for our own needs and purposes so much it can't be called real communism anymore, because it was not culturally marxist unlike the stupid kike bullshit today

ITT: edge lords being edgy

>I watched zeitgeist addendum and am now an expert on economics

85 percent of Jews are atheists.

Once a kike always a kike

>TFW autists say that Stalin was a good leader
>Implying he wasn't an insane (yet badass) who lynched everyone who disagreed with Stalinism and adopted Trotskyist ideals
>Hated Poland and wanted to divide the world into Communist blocs
>Allies with Hitler before Hitler cucked the Soviets

Yeah what a fucking hero.

It's a shill thread , why do you bump it