Why does /pol deny the holocaust?

>(((Critical scrutiny))) and (((Investigation))) has been done countless times. The (((documentaries))) about it are from (((universities))), people here are pretty rigorous in their methods. The denial is criminalised because it's spreading (((objectively false))) propaganda.
FTFY, froggot.

>muh 6 gorillion
Has already been disproved countless times.

I cant deny it cause its forbiden in Germany by law.

>Has already been disproved countless times.
It's been right, by people who conveniently ignore the dozens of evidence and witness of even German people.
Read Hannah Arendt, she quotes the literal engineer of the Holocaust.
>>(((Critical scrutiny))) and (((Investigation)))

>THE HOLOCAUST DIDN'T HAPPEN
>Yes it did. Here's some evidence from numerous scientists of various religion and nationality.
>IT'S FALSE. THE HOLOCAUST DIDN'T HAPPEN.
>What a fucking retard you are. We should not allow you to spread these lies.
>WHY AM I OPPRESSED

I watched Hitlers UFO and Alien ambassadors last night on the history channel. In depth study proved exactly what they said it would. I looked online and there were opposition to this but I don't even read them because they are wrong. If they were right they would be on Netflix.

Don't deny, just point out the inconsistencies and question why they exist.

It wasn't the biggest genocide yet it gets a special name, it wasn't the most barbaric and the numbers are probably off by a little.

All this wouldn't be a big deal if it weren't illegal to ask why in so many places.

Nice strawman. You'd be the ones to believe that either way you frog worshippers.

It did happen but it is over exaggerated as fuck.
There were no lamp shades from human skin, bars of soap from ashes, death by masturbation machines, etc. Six million Jews weren't killed and burned from late 1942 to 1945.

You can take your investigations, documentaries etc. and ram it up your kike ass.

A free society does not fear debate and letting people form their own opinion based by facts, or lack of it, that both sides present.

>strawman
WHAT scarecrow?!
>frog man
Wow look at this guy, has to bring me memes into every argument. I wonder why?

SOUNDS LIKE YOU'RE IMPLYING IT DIDN'T HAPPEN GOY! YOU'RE GOING TO JAIL SOON!

/thread

>Don't deny, just point out the inconsistencies and question why they exist.
Already have been numerous times. Why do you think there are still documentaries made about it ? To correct inaccuracies in the previous ones, said inaccuracies being often minor.

>It wasn't the biggest genocide yet it gets a special name
Proximity law, and it's one of the biggest in relative population. It's also a good and easily understandable example of "modern" genocide, with the demonisation process, etc.

> it wasn't the most barbaric
They voluntarily starved people, among other things. And there is no scale in barbarism.

>it weren't illegal to ask why in so many places.
It's called respect and due to the dead. That's the same reason you can't slander, or that your editor won't let you publish a book in which you proclaim that the Earth is flat.

>Hurr durr you believe an event with dozens of books written about it you must believe something improbable because in my mind you must be a retard.

The debate has already been done in Universities and the truth is here : it happened. To deny reality, especially on such a subject, should be criminal. It's the same reason slander and illegal exercise of medicine are forbidden.
>You can take your investigations, documentaries etc. and ram it up your kike ass.
Why would you want to claim debate when you refuse to look at evidence ?

There was however experiments on living persons and death trucks, among other things. Reality is as morbid as it is.

The 6 million figures is an estimation made by several historians among the year. I'd say it's mostly accurate.

Bro the Bolsheviks directly executed over 5X as many of their own people as the Germans did Jews, poles and Catholics and nobody knows Jack shit about those. Mao killed way more people. North Korea probably killed a similar number though stats are very unreliable from there.

Europeans killed WAY more Native Americans from both hemispheres than Germans did anyone.

I'd like you to cite some inconsistencies proven wrong (such as no human soap found, no lampshades, allied bombing of supply routes causing much of the starvation) since you just keep using that same phrase about it all being done just oh so many times. Your logic is off anyway, they've proven the world is going around the sun hundreds of times over, yet despite many people having been put to death for suggesting so, it's not illegal to suggest otherwise.

It's established that Cuba killed a greater % of their population than Germany, so if it's all proximity, where's the "special" name?

"Almost truth" is not good enough for me so even though I accept most of the proof it happened, the sacred treatment compared to other genocides is both questionable and wrong.

>The denial is criminalised because it's spreading objectively false propaganda.
As opposed to all that objectively true propaganda?
Even if the Holocaust happened, lying isn't illegal, user. It's just interesting that our politicians give so much of a fuck about this particular "lie".

Hurr durr you believe an event with dozens of books written about it you must believe something improbable because in my mind you must be a retard
>not an argument Pierre

>experiments on live people
Numerous countries did this and in far greater amount. Look at Japan and the Soviet Union.
>gas trucks
Yes there were some however no where near enough to make a dent in the population as what you are pointing at.

The Holocaust happened yes however the scale is just not possible I believe. Most historians say that the final solution began in late 1942 and this entails shooting, gassing, forced labor deaths and starvation. I believe the SS worked with a plan to starve much of the workforce by giving them the minimum amount of food to survive on however when you add labor to it there isn't a way for them to sustain. I think they did this because they needed a workforce and deportations stopped due to other countries not wanting Jews and when the war began there was almost no deportations happening anymore.
I don't believe in mass scale gas chambers though and the burning rate because the amount the Germans used rail to move supplies, military goods, civilian goods, metal and other materials like concrete, troops, military equipment like tanks was huge.
They finished the Berlin Flak towers in 8 months I believe and that was ridiculous, that was only possible through mass amounts of rail being utilized for the project. There were four towers that used sand, concrete, and steel to build.

I just find it near impossible for 6 million Jews to die in such a short time frame with the limited amounts of transport.

>lying isn't illegal
Slander is. So is lying when you're a teacher, a doctor, or (god forbid, that one is so ironic) a politician. It's a bit difficult to control the later, but the former is quite easy, it's called peer review and the scientific method.

>open book about Holocaust denial
>It's contradictory to direct sources/make heavy use of pseudo-science/outright says that Hitler did nothing wrong (often combination of 3)
There, it's false.

I'm not one to deny Stalin and Mao did a great deal of atrocities, but come on. You pulled most of it out of your ass.

It's "special" because it's the closet to us geographically, politically, it's the most documented and it really defined what is a genocide. Armenian genocide, as an example, was pretty much denounced "retro-actively", and probably because Hitler used it as an example.

I'd also like see your claims on
>Bolsheviks directly executed over 5X as many of their own people as the Germans did Jews, poles and Catholics
Because Hitler was a real champ at murder. He doomed the white ethnicities, in his own way.

>I just find it near impossible for 6 million Jews to die in such a short time frame with the limited amounts of transport.
There are very good History universities in the US. Wikipedia has also a good reading recommendation. I recommand diplomacy when talking to your teachers about it, of course.

Off to read your book.
In all seriousness, the genocide was specifically engineered to be as "effective" as possible with multiple methods tested - another reason it's "special", it's because of the sheer technicality of the methods employed.

>Numerous countries did this and in far greater amount. Look at Japan and the Soviet Union

>because X did it it makes it okay when Y does it

People who deny the holocaust are lying assholes.

Why would you deny Hitler's greatest achievement?

Hitler doomed the white peoples
Imagine a world without it :
>seamless decolonisation
>no poor Africa
>no "socialism" with Chinese characterics
>no "Great Patriotic War" in Russia to consolidate Stalin's regime
>no Cold War, friendship between East and West and joint effort in Space Exploration

Because it didn't happen.

>seamless decolonisation
Stopped reading there. Decolonization was a mistake.

Because its impossible to kill that many people in concentration camps in such a short amount of time.

Hitler didn't do enough. Judaism still exists.

It has been documented than yes. Hitler put priority to the purging before the war effort.

Colonisation was a mistake. No people has a right to command other, no matter their perceived or real superiority.

>Slander is illegal
Slander is an attempt at defamation, who am I defaming when I say the holocaust didn't happen?

>Lying is illegal when you're a teacher, a doctor or a politician.
Teachers aren't allowed to lie regarding the curriculum, for example a biology professor can't suddenly say that organisms are made of magic and fairy dust. If the holocaust being true is part of the curriculum, then the teacher must abide by it.
Doctors aren't allowed to lie about matters regarding the medical field. They're not allowed to tell you you don't have an illness when you do, and visa versa, as well as adherence to the scientific method. It's to make sure that patients can trust their doctors.
Politicians are technically not allowed to lie, but we both know they use enough weaselwords to worm their way out of any situation.

While I can understand that lying in about specific matters is not allowed for teachers, doctors and politicians, there is still no reason to criminalise one particular lie for the entire population.

funny, they wouldn't say the same thing if the roles were reversed.

How is this related?

Whats more fun than triggering a bunch of whiney half dick kikes?

How can you deny something which never happened? I for sure didn't see it, did you?

Well, we have the witness testimonies. Why would they lie about it?

I witnessed George Soros stealing 100 million dollars out of my piggybank and I want them back now.

But you are one person. We have thousands of persons testifying about the holocaust. How can thousands of people lie about the same thing?

My family and friends saw him too because he stole that money from me at my birthday party, after taking a shit on the cake and forcing everyone to sing Happy Birtday twice even though it was very awkward.

hmmmmm

What you are saying is that thousands of Jews intentionally gave false testimony. Do you have evidence for that?

No, I'm saying that I want my money back. Don't get me started on how he masturbated my dog to death, nothing will bring him back and nothing will make me forget.

All we can do is make sure that it happens NEVER AGAIN.

But there is no evidence that Soros took your money.

Do we have evidence, in a media dominated by the very Jews themselves, where all the history books have been "altered" to fit the narrative, where the public schooling system creates millions of like-minded morons who never question, and in a society where any critique of the Jew is labelled as anti-Semitic and how dare you even imply we ever lied arrest this goy!
Look what happened to those who questioned it, their careers end overnight. You are asking if a sheep has a wolf's tooth. The fear of being called a racist means that your family will have nothing on their plate.
"Do you have evidence of the gulags ever existing?" he asked, as comrade Vladimir waited beside the two for a response.
You forget the Culture war has been all but won by the same people you are protecting.

>Why does /pol deny the holocaust?

The what?

Of course there is, there are witness testimonies from me, my family and my friends. Also I can show you my piggybank that doesn't contain my 100 million dollars anymore.

If that is true, then why do we allow it? It seems we are willing victims who deserve to be conned by the Jews. They are clever, we are dumb. Right?

What if it was proven that you were giving false testimony?

>It seems we are willing victims who deserve to be conned by the Jews
how can you unironically type this and except to be taken seriously. come on buddy, what is this.

So we are duped by the Jews? Why do we allow it?

Why should anyone listen to piggybankheist deniers?

Slander means calling people out on their lies?

I believe the holocaust happened. I also believe the estimate of 6 million is an overestimate, and that most of the deaths were due to starvation (happens to more than just prisoners during wartime) and typhoid (spreads very easily in squalor with a cooped up population). I just dislike how, out of the millions and millions of non-Jewish peoples that died fighting in WWII, Jews both get a high estimate AND take all the "victim points" for WWII, to the point that an entire bloodline has been shamed into voluntary extinction, an ideology is banned in virtually all of the Western world, and a literal career criminal even has a CHANCE at being President because the guy running against her is muh Hitler trigger-word/boogeyman.

If deniers have evidence, then we should listen to them.

No, piggybankheist denial has to be outlawed and honestly, swinophiles like you just say otherwise because you want to steal money out of piggybanks yourself.