Who are you Cred Forums?

Sparta? Left? They had slaves!
Is slavery a commie thing now?

Pinochet shitposting

>Is slavery a commie thing now?
You answered your question

Pinochet is that you ?

not a argument

berniefag

right between tumblr and reddit, should I just sudoku?

but it's weekend ffs :(

...

>Stalin
>Centrist
dropped

I like you

Proud to be a gutless wimp :)

What the fuck does this even mean, Im literally dead center...

...

...

This one is basically accurate

i always get in the middle of the upper left and im not a lefty

wat do

I live in Massachusetts and everyone hates me

...

Cred Forums is a libertarian board fuck off bootlicker

same

...

NOVA ROMA

>Sandy Cheeks
>authoritarian
You wot m8? She's the quintessence of the 19th century American scientist and frontiersman in one.

Don't be a leftist

>sudoku
DO IT

Faggots

c-comrades?

...

I'm all about the Papal State pham

im not

Somewhere between Hitler and Cred Forums

Interesting, I'm also INTJ and about as left as you, but much more libertarian. That said, my I and E are pretty damn close and tend to fluctuate a bit.

But Im not tho, I have pretty strong opinions about alot of things. Does this just mean Im moderate/dont identify with any groups?

where do you take that test?

She is giving Spongebob a free helicopter ride

...

huh

If thats true then spekr tells me im a sensible person. Feels good to be sane.

I am proudly 1984

>t. Cpl. Bauers

diogenes was based as fuck

Either the opinions you hold are incredibly contradictory to one another OR your beliefs aren't as strong as you think.

each time i take this quiz i get more and more auth right

...

>expect to be way more right this time around
>I'm more left after browsing Cred Forums for two years
explain that shit to me

when i first took this during my first few days using pol i was practically dead center. the more i take the quiz, the more right i get. i guess its just Cred Forums redpilling me lmao

dont know about you though. youd think it would be the other way around

...

Cx

I'm your worst nightmare. Want to play a game?

So basically you have autism?

Average Iranian
Sweet

>2016
>being a bootlicker

gay

Cred Forums has actually made me more left wing.

I guess the honest truth is that I'm not falling for the cuck meme

like deep down inside I believe in the sanctity of the human spirit, I believe in the innert potential inside of everyone, and I know that's a destructive personality. I know I'll just get taken advantage of, in more ways than one, and while I don't enjoy being taken advantage of, I'd rather brave the world and stand how I think I should stand that crumble and fall into animalistic anger

>2016
>still believing in a liberal fallacy

post these maybe?

This is so fucking wrong and retarded

true for me too
used to be up right before pol

Sorry if this question is dumb, but is there a concept for being authoritarian when it comes to border control, but libertarian when it comes to your own citizens? I feel like much of Trump's "authoritarian" part comes from his stance on immigration, but otherwise I think he wants Americans to do and be as free as they please. Is there any concept for this?

>death penalty
>race

>death penalty for niggers

i dont see how thats a bad thing, user

t. Trump cum guzzler

It would be an American form of fascism. Idiots here will try to tell you about ideologies that don't really exist but you should ignore them.

Reminder that this one is the most accurate

Just for shits and giggles, I fucked around and kept contradicting myself (ie. prisoners should be rehabilitated, but you should go to jail for possessing weed and shit like that). You'll find its not that hard to appear to be a "centrist/moderate".

I really thought it would come out more authoritarian, but fuck it. I am a lefty.

...

>not knowing what centrist means

Trump does have any strong views huh?

hint

>youre a lefty.

>prisoners should be rehabilitated, but you should go to jail for possessing weed and shit like that

not a contradiction, you would just believe that the best way to solve the drug epidemic would be state run forced rehab

I'm somewhere between trump and "classical liberalism" (whatever that is) at least according to the last time I took that quiz

Im pro segregation, anti welfare, pro protectionist, pro isolationist, pro constitution, anti homosexual, pro nationalism.

I don't really think that test does a good job of asking evough questions to be accurate.

cen·trist
ˈsentrəst/
adjective
1.
having moderate political views or policies.
noun
1.
a person who holds moderate political views.

>yeah dude we should help prisoners :)
>but lets make MORE prisoners while were at it.

o k

>tfw Hitler
feels good

>Liberism

I sit around liberism

nice. never seen that one.

I love Maria but I have a new ASMR mistress now.

youtube.com/watch?v=YXiW2Xs8Euw

as you stated, your belief would be that the forced state rehab is helping the prisoners, which would reduce the overall amount of prisoners in the long run, as they would be rehabilitated

it isn't that complex of a belief, I just don't personally agree with it

Fucking hilarious/disturbing. This is from the perspective after 8 years of President Clinton.

>Well-intentioned Intellectuals
huh

>did the quiz when i was still in school and considered myself to be a social democrat
>result was Reddit

>now everyone told me how far right i went with some opinions
>do the same quiz again and changed some answers
>still in Reddit territory

Yeah. Because i am sceptic towards coorporate monopoly it obviously means that i am commie.
This quiz is bullshit. I also picked answers against big gov.

mah nigga

pretty cool test

I can't put myself on the Autoritarian/Libertarian axis.

That's because I believe in absolute Libertarianism for individuals, and I believe in strong Authoritarianism for corporations.

The problem is that a lot of people think that "corporations are people too", and so they insist on treating them the same. I consider individuals to be totally different than corporations, and I have no problem also treating them different legally.

For example: Should corporations have free speech rights? Fuck no. Each person who's associated with that corporation absolutely has free speech rights as an individual -- a principle that I will defend to the death. But as for the legal entity that they create for tax-favorable, liability-limiting purposes -- should THAT abstract legal entity have free speech rights? FUCK NO. A corporation doesn't deserve a goddamn thing except the privilege of being the government's little slave bitch. I put my red dot at the very bottom for individuals, and I put my red dot near the top for corporations.

Interesting.

Wow OP. That way of organization is actually the best.

>A corporation doesn't deserve a goddamn thing except the privilege of being the government's little slave bitch

then the people who would make up those corporations leave for a more business-friendly country, your country becomes venezuela, and the only right your people have at that point is the right to starve to death

It does look cool. But they spelled "Business" wrong.

yeah i noticed too. thought about messaging them about it.

im buddha

What's the point sorting that by political parties?
You should be sorting it by law changes. Political parties rarely change any laws, they follow any laws. Same political party worked different if elected during different time.
Monarchy is simply a king ruling everything.
Socialism is people ruling everything.
Democracy is elites ruling most of things, similar to monarchy, but not as brutal towards people.

Ownership over 1.)land, 2.)companies, 3.)products and 4.)apartments is really all that matters, everything else is not even that much important. During monarchy workers owns nothing, during democracy worker almost doesn't owns anything, during Socialism you own everything of the 4 points.

...

...

What the fuck is "Liberism"?

yes

god damn it
I get that the whole thing is to speak quietly and with the soft pallet of the mouth
but
holy shit
that is beyond fucking annoying.

HEIL

...

who wants to live in my country?

Every dot on this thing is in the wrong spot. How did you manage that?

Try this one, I think it'll be more your kinda thing.

youtube.com/watch?v=e09_bdokd8s

...

>literally the jewish oligarch's endgame
Just kike my shit up senpai

what don't you like?

>environment
>60% budget
kys

Why are women rarely (if ever) bottom right?

Would be more right, but they didn't ask if I'd gas the kikes and all that.

...

But I didn't contradict myself, I could explain to you why I took the positions on the questions.

Im not suprised by the result, yet I feel like being so close to the middle is an extreme of its own.

I just wonder what in my life caused this to be the case.

lol kys industrialfag

pre-pol

Voting Trump

now

...

...

who here /for the people/ and not /bootlicker/?

What in God's name is 'left' about Diogenes?

r9

>That's because I believe in absolute Libertarianism for individuals, and I believe in strong Authoritarianism for corporations.
So you give freedom to individuals to start a business, then take it away again once that business starts to become successful.

You have removed the ultimate incentive that exists for starting a a business. So why should anyone attempt to grow their business beyond this arbitrary freedom threshold?

You are operating under the ideology that corporations are pure evil. And that individuals are pure good. But corporations are run by people.

>Should corporations have free speech rights? Fuck no.
Then you should make corporations tax exempt. Anyone that pays taxes has a right to petitioning government. If you remove the taxes of corporations but keep the taxes on the individuals then you have a consistent reasoning for not allowing the corporation freedom to petition.

>But as for the legal entity that they create for tax-favorable, liability-limiting purposes
How about not making them tax-favorable then? And do you not understand the point of limiting their liability? If the business goes insolvent the person that built it will go completely insolvent themselves if the corporation isn't a separate entity. This would heavily discourage individuals from starting businesses if those businesses could cause them to go destitute. The success rate of new business ventures is only 50%. Those are terrible odds.

You clearly don't know jack shit about business.

>A corporation doesn't deserve a goddamn thing except the privilege of being the government's little slave bitch.

You are a confused little twat.

>all media owned by state
>no free speech
>60% of budget spent on crony """environmentalism"""
>citizens get zero support from state and have no negotiating basis for jobs. they literally cannot walk away from the deal or they starve
>death penalty for dissidents
>no market protection through tariffs
>natural resources completely (((private)))
>no agriculture subsidies so you are dependent on (((best allies))) for your food as your own farmers cant compete
>law based on religious texts just begging for even more avenues of corruption
This is all ignoring the fact that a "state" neither taxing nor providing anything to 95% of its armed population taking away ALL their drugs will lead to a revolution in 0.1 nanoseconds.

Purple 4 lyfe

Throw all the ancap memes you want at me, I don't give a fuck

congrats

he criticized private property, politics and traditions

fight me stormfags

proud to be on the left edge of proud nationalist

Last time I got slightly upper left of the center point. About half the distance diagonally from ANC.

>>no market protection through tariffs
read a book

media - id prefer it doesnt exist, but theres no option for that

environmentalism - i dont really mean spending it on environmentalism in a classical way, only abolish all things that hurt the environment, i left it there because it marks the profit loss from it well

natural resources - id prefer common property regime or non-property regime, but theres no option for that

rest of it is you being a huge pussy

...

Existential Nihilist / Codebot

What book? Not an argument by the way.

Well this is me,

Where's the one where we can smoke weed, gas the kikes, and build a wall?

Step on my lawn and you're on.

A good economics book.

Like Economics in One Lesson.

Voting Trump

middle right of purple

Far bottom right corner. It's gotta be on your property though.

being too scared to live in a world without the state-nanny

is that an argument?

no weapons, we fight like men

Left of liberism

Can someone explain authoritarianism to me, is it just a meme? Who wants to live in a society where the state has very strong power and enforces its political views on its citizens?

>implying I would waste more energy than pulling a trigger on a green square pleb

Link?

filteries.com/politics

for the record i think bernie is a cuck. that fucking test puts me further left than i believe i am because i am anti-corporation. also, dont be a pussy

I have bounced back and forth between feeling more like an anarcho-capitalist and an anarcho-communist for years based on the day of the fucking week. Apparently I'm around minarchist now.

I don't know how to feel about anything anymore.

You want to make things better for people, but people are stupid and easily manipluated, so you force them to do stuff.

brother

What's the picture that is underneath Bubble Buddy?

>not wanting to live under a tyrannical unaccountable monarch executing people for thought crime is being a pussy
>zero checks and balances and any amount of corruption is fine and dandy
I'm starting to understand how you guys keep voting HDZ

The idea is that it would run more smoothly, there would be less crime, etc. Distilled into a simplicity that is almost ridiculous it is just the argument 'would you let Mcdonalds cashiers be involved in high level business decisions that the company has to make, and what should be the mechanism by which they play their role'. IN that context it is obvious that you should just have one guy, or at most a team or something, that are deciding shit because a)they know better, and b)it is impossible to actually have a group act like an individual with no command, that is just mob violence.

I don't really care one why or the other with these arguments but go read some Mencius MOldbug if you want an entertaining new take on the subject

Or just go back to Thomas Hobbes or whatever

seems pretty unethical to me desu

a bullet somewhere has your name on it.

lol u cant have corruption if theres no state

>not wanting to live under a tyrannical unaccountable monarch executing people for thought crime is being a pussy
nailed it

why would boot-lickers be borderline libertarian? too afraid to call Nazi fags boot-lickers?

Natural consensus seekers and collectivists

You're almost me. Should we fugg?

Nativist

Paris Commune I guess.

Also what does the November Revolution refer to? The Spartacists?

Your chart is retarded.

All of these systems need CONTEXT.

Maybe Hitler would have taken a different approach. Maybe the Greens would have taken another approach. I mean fuck the "feminists" of the 19th century held massively different ideals than the "feminists" of today. They all just steal the glory of older movements or shift their positions.

Also: Shariah is LEFT. It should be bang on 1984.

I expected nothing less.

This was actually a surprise

inbetween anarchy and founders

Suck my dick fascists

im in the sensible people

my google

/1776/ represent

are you anarchists or Marxists?

Lower my goddamn taxes

I'm still trying to understand why I'm not more libertarian. Apparently hating modern art makes you more authoritarian.

People that support authoritarians also vertually always believe they will have all the authority.

An authoritarian making fun of libertarians would talk about mob rule, tragedy of the commons, point out democracy causing government to stall and get infiltrated by special interests, and such. They would wonder why people trust a government, elected by people told what to think by rich people that control the media, and represented by people that care more about keeping their job than making a country great.

Authoritarianism can work really well or really badly. The problem with it is the complete lack of checks and balances if you accidentally give control of the country to an incompetant asshole, and that authoritarians haven't figured out a way to do succession that works as well as election.

>Seems unethical to me

Authoritarians usually take power after a government that went "People can do what they want :D" drive things into the ground and cause mass starvation or something. At which point people don't care about MUH ETHICS, they just want a government that lets them live a good life.

...

I make Stalin look like a goddamn liberal.

rate me

BEST

...

take this from an authoritarian

you may not like us but in reality we are the only ones that actually do things properly

Just don't walk on my lawn! You could form your voluntary syndicalism utopia or whatever that spot is under a federal government that was ran by my spot. Can't say the opposite and says a great deal.

Yea, just don't let the balls touch.

National socialism isn't necessarily right wing. For example in germany, altruism for ones own race was of importance, rather than equalism for all, a basic form of welfare in the form of kicking out jews and having jobs= enough money to actually live life properly. No usery, no misery.

well considering that i have studied economics im definitely not a marxist, and i am not enough of an ideologue to be an anarchist. i believe in democracy, i believe in personal liberty, and i believe in having a mixed economy with strong worker protection and participation. i think that regulated capitalism is the way to go. im extremely anti-corporation.

...

i'd never walk on your lawn without permission user-kun

so a Social Democrat I guess? Who are you voting for, Jill Stein?

You need to die for your sins.

You know it.

>Diogenes

YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS

Only motherfucker that has ever made sense

...

yeah social democrat is probably accurate. and no, im pragmatic enough to know that (((stein))) doesnt stand a snowball's chance at winning the general election (source: am also jew), so ill probably vote for trump just to shake up the system and then drink myself into a coma to deal with the disgust of having to make such a choice.

I'm... sensible? This has been an interesting week

>Hitler
>Right wing

kek

a-am i close enough?

COMMIES GET OUT

more info

You've got Crispy McDyingface and Not Macaulay Culkin mixed up.

Join us comrade

>Literally Hitler

Yeah, sure.

You up for a helicopter ride?
I just think it sounds kind of fun, you know?
Let's do that.

Mein Volk.

shit I land exactly where >Cred Forums is
save me

How about a trip to the gulag first?

That's voluntarism. Ayn Rand and her bottom right corner circlejerk are the only ones who think giving of your own volition is immoral. Apparently giving to an orphanage or giving money to St Jude's children's hospital is economic deadweight loss, but buying lolicon manga generates aggregate wealth.

Is liberalism in the center of the chart or the bottom left?

>looking for an honest man

Get the fuck out of my sunlight while I masturbate you egocentric shitlord.

>throws away cup

centre. leftists hate liberals and vice versa

bottom left to bottom right. the core tenet of liberalism is a rejection of coercive authority. the bottom half only really differs on how the economic policy of the state should operate.

What the fuck am I? I took a different political compass and it said I leaned to the right, but did not fall into the Libertarian area, nor the Authoritarian area, but on the line, and another told me I was a "Business Conservative" and this one is is, making me look Libertarian.

No, I think the chopper sounds like more fun

you are a centrist

>The picture looks like Stalin

So does this mean I'm a liberal or left libertarian?

Fuck I want to be right wing

>all those plebs

>What the fuck am I?
Centrist leaning right and one of the only people ITT not to post meme results. You Only thing I really see objectively wrong with your sliders is that military to science ratio. You only need a little science spending for fundamental research, the real practical and engineering innovation happens in military and private sector.

here's my filteries test

Hii , Pinochet!

personally, i would argue that liberalism and libertarianism are essentially the same thing. libertarians tend to be radically anti-authority, whereas liberals tend to be more accepting of limited coercive control i.e. republicanism.

you can be considered cetre right nowadays, dont worry

but if you moved women, faggots and minorities to the right + maybe ditch progressive taxatation and min wage
youd easily be right

i've always tested between the 't', crown, and swastika
doesn't seem consistent with some other tests I take, though
I miss the one that gave a bunch of adjectives to you (nativist, globalist, tribalist, capitalist, etc.)

>literally Argentina

murica libertarian republic here.

Seriously, after years of debating political ideology pros and cons with my brother and myself I've gone through the works but I can't think of a better political ideology.

>Conservative
>Libertarian
>Anarcho Capitalist
>Minarchist
>Fascist
>Monarchist
>Early American Libertarian

Honestly I can't see anything wrong with the system put in place by the founding fathers except that it devolved into the current mess.
That's what happens when you get God and guns out of the education system.
If traditional values and guns stayed in the educations system then men wouldn't get emasculated and woman wouldn't get the right to vote which ruined literally everything.

>I miss the one that gave a bunch of adjectives to you (nativist, globalist, tribalist, capitalist, etc.)

abtirsi?

Ahhh ok. Thanks for explaining that to me a bit better.

...

too bad nobody else is buddha or that political ideology could work.

Oh really?

can i ask seriously what are you doing on pol?
not joking or insulting, you dont seem like a guy who would be here
oldfag?

And this test, at least when I took it, doesn't allow me to choose something more extreme than "most recreational drugs legal". I don't care if someone wants to do hard drugs or if someone wants to produce them, if they want a Darwin Award that's their personal problem.

Maybe you should ask him or all the young Argies fleeing the country in droves why he doesn't want your shitty communist system anymore.

>tfw unelectable

I just like it here. It's a good place for debate and the shitposting is fun. Not an oldfag. I don't like echo chambers.

nice progress

oh, thanks. I thought I got that test from some other site and the link no longer worked. maybe I was mistaken.
I enjoy seeing how these change over time

hell yeah lefty/pol/ represent. let us gather in the last bastion of free speech and mourn the authoritarian fags who have hijacked leftist ideology.

Am I retarded

The test is shit. It calls me a green because of my environmentalism, but I don't want anything to do with failed (((diversity))) or degeneracy. Also, I said I wouldn't waste the state's resources attacking what people do in private, but the test never asked how I would respond in public.

...

libertarian=retarded so yes

Just go expansionist and swap all but 3% of science to military and you're good to go.

Berniefag, except I wouldn't let BLM cuck me on my own podium because I'm not an invertebrate.

>monarchy
>libertarian

...

ahhahahahaahhaha
boy you must be new here

If you're a capitalist after reading Cred Forums, you aren't paying attention

Third Position

>implying

>death penalty based on race

didn't think it was full stormfront here yet

anyone like me?

I don't think I'm too far off

You literally cannot beat this

...

ima fashy goy

Well shit.

hello Strasser

wat am i

...

I've been moving a little left baka

and why tf are you guys using that quiz spekr.org is better

Me too family

I wish I had begun documenting this sooner, was more liberal two years ago when I started using Cred Forums

What am i?

This one is better

...

I'm a National Syndicalist.

>Libertarian Marxism

It makes sense if you understood that marxism and communism actually are against big government authority.

Communist countries always try to end authority in the military and make the military democratic. They also want to end the military ultimately because it is "too oppressive"

Free market libertarians have more in common with marxists than they would like to think. Ancaps are basically free market marxists.

I looked it up and apparently it's a real thing someone came up with. It said they emphasize the aspects of marxism that a small government wouldn't necessarily conflict with.

It was just funny to read that for the first time without any context.

Look into Luxemburgism. Libertarian has a different meaning in Europe.

ANCAPS REPRESENT

Politics is like porn. There is a political ideology for everything. If you think of it, then it exists.

Not at all what I was expecting to be honest.

Is there an ideology for the worship of clothing?

Apparently I'm a Bernout...

>all the replies "this one is accurate"

the lolberg cancer here needs to be purged

>communism isn't authoritarian meme

In practice it is always authoritarian.

So, there's a piano-rights activist out there somewhere?

I don't doubt it, but would love to see it to laugh at it

a bit right of diogenes

I mean, he isn't wrong. A lot of far lefties in the center line really do want people to be happy and well taken care of.

The problem is reality doesn't work like that. Especially when your country will get absolutely dumpstered in trade which leads to no money and no ability to do the things you need to continue these policies.

Marxism is literally 'the people with more are undeserved of it and this needs to be equalized'. That is why the term 'cultural marxism' was derived from it, the notion that cultural groups of better societal ranking are undeserved of it, which needs to be equalized. Libertarianism is literally 'equality of outcome doesn't matter'. The two are absolutely antithetical.

Who are you voting for and how the hell are you left?

don't take political compass too seriously. The questions they ask are insubstantial and the spectrum is a very subjective thing so it's not a reliable indicator of your beliefs

That's a good thing

1984, humanity cannot govern itself.

i fall really close to mercantilism

I agree, but its best to see what your enemy sees.

Rate my score

penis balls

Kek

One of my biggest problems with libertarianism is its inability to deal with subversive kikes who are entirely responsible for the cultural shift over the last 60 years in America that has led to the current situation.

I always get putin, that, or some authoritarian bullshit. I don't know whether I'm autistic or the test or bullshit, it interprets wanting democracy as "must be socialisms"

Libertarianism and marxism express social freedom in some form. Libertarians support the lgbt, and so do marxists. I'm a national syndicalist. Both can be antithetical in some areas but there is an overlap which makes it work. Generally when someone puts two ideologies together it focuses on the overlap.

Reasonable opinion that I happen to agree with/10

Did I do good?

This, some of the questions are so iffy about what it means, and dosen't explain a lot on the situations that the questions are being told in

"I don't think the state has any right to what happens in the privacy of the bedroom"

What if it is some couples vore fetish? i want the government to get on their degenerate asses

4/10 anything other than ancap is commie

also sensible! like i needed a chart

Been on the Trump train since almost the beginning. The result isn't too shocking, considering there is some overlapping appeal to both trump and bernie. But i've always been more socially conservative on the one hamd and protectionist on the other. The main reasons I can't feel the bern is illegal immigration and social issues.

I like the way Russia lets fags have buttsex in private, but they aren't allowed to indoctrinate children.

I'm not really strongly anti-gay so that seems like the most reasonable solution to me.

fight me nigs

Ok I see. What the hell would I be?

Hello would you like a free ride in my helicopter?

So i just did "strongly agree" to everything, and i just got what both the Democratic and Republican parties are.

>fight you
your low left, that is Buddhist monk in Tibetan mountains tier

>cuck wants people to beat him up
not surprising

>90108993

That looks like when they warn everyone about the butterfly from the treedome

It looks like moderately right wing in the standard American sense of the left-right spectrum. You could vote for someone running on marco rubio's platform.

I got ya bro

Took the test a few days ago.
Former libertarian, voted for Obama in '08, Johnson in '12, not voting this year, used to be a Libertarian party member, now I'm an unaffiliated anarcho-syndicalist.. Give me that free, utopian Star Trek society or give me death.

...

...

>Corporate tax minimum 49%
Kill yourself you fucking commie