Less people vote for you

...

Imagine the opposite situation, most states vote against a candidates but he wins because he has the support of a few states with great population

MAKE Cred Forums GREAT AGAIN

TEMPORARY FILTER LEAF SHIT POSTERS

TEACH THE LEAF A LESSON

thats why it doesn't matter to vote and all those "vote or die" faggots should kill themselves

accurate
florida was the mastermind behind the bush presidency

>id

the usa isn't a democracy. how many times are we going to go over this? popular vote should matter even less than it does now. people's votes in cities should count for less

well majority is supposed to rule so what is your point?

But we still need the ILLUSION of democracy so we can all sleep better at night.

>Conservative Party in UK wins 37% of vote
>get 51% of seats
>UKIP gets 13%
>Gets only one seat

GOD SAVE THE QUEEN

So much shit could have been avoided if Gore had won.

>losing election
>split california into 10
>win

America is a dynastic system.

>britbongs so ignorant they don't understand what a representative republic is or how it works

That's why Trump won't win

Not my fault I understand your electoral system better than you.

No it doesn't.
The Tory party was the most voted for and was able to form a governmental majority

>implying you could have formed a government with labour - UKIP - Greens - Lib dems and the SNP

This is what happens when you have cities in any state. The city can have an absolute shit ton of voters, but in comparison to the amount of electoral votes, it won't be equal. By the same merit, places like Wyoming have each person's vote matter a lot more, since there are far fewer people.

Also, this popular vote vs electoral thing has happened like 7 times in the past.

> Running mate Joe fucking ((((LIEBERMANN)))

> Not electing a vicious neocohen jew

Holy fuck I never noticed that before. Dodged a bullet there burgers

I really hope you aren't implying the 2000 election was a legitimate election.

>Get 12.6% of the vote
>Get 1 fucking seat
UK UK UK UK

>get 4.7% of the vote
>get 56 seats
UK UK UK UK

>Both of them less than 50%.

are you actually from australia?

The had a huge fiasco in Florida over votes disappearing or not even being counted. It lasted like 3 weeks before the courts basically made them make up their mind.

Theoretically George Bush would have one both if it wasn't for that.

>We could have
Could have what?

haha wow is that real? Jesus and we complain about our gerrymanders?

Jeb surge when?

Lad, we're not in any position to be mocking the burgers here.

>what is 1951
>what is February 1974

bbc.com/news/election/2015/results

>46,000 more
who gives a flying fuck

Could have. . .?

THATS NOT FAIR, ME AND ALL MY GAY HOLLYWOOD FRIENDS SHOULD REPRESENT ALL OF THE UNITED STATES!!!!

this. unreal that our leader can get elected without a majority.

You think that's bad?

>whole country has a say in the election, not just urban areas
>implying that's a problem

How and why the fuck is this allowed?

>(((less))) people
>brits in charge of grammar

It's fewer, independistan.

TEMPORARY FILTER LEAF SHIT POSTERS

TEACH THE LEAF A LESSON

>people still think the US is a democracy

I'm from Scotland and all I can say is I am deeply sorry for the SNP, they are a blight on UK politics.

Shut the fuck up faggot

>Oh no he has opposing political opinions

T. American Autist

This. It's not the people that decide the president of the United States, it's the states themselves.

With the current system, its basically 51% of California gets to dictate the coarse of the country.
Cali could have 49% deep red republicans and you would never even know it with the electorate system.

Fucking this. OP is a newfag fuckwit

>popular vote
>meaning jack shit when theres the electoral college

>leaf in america
out out out

the electoral college is garbage

the authors of the constitution, for all the good things they did think of, were stupid as hell sometimes

More people live in London than in Scotland but Scots would throw a hissy fit if they lost seats. UKIP have wide appeal but no centralized base so they'll get 2nd/3rd in a lot of seats but not win.

>less people

it's fewer* learn your own fucking grammar.

But yeah the electoral college fucking sucks.

It only works like that if the system is rigged in your favour, I think the Clinton machine is going to rig it in their favour.

This is useless if you don't add the number of total seats

>Beaner shit talking our only safe border

COULD HAVE WHAT!!!!!!?!?!

>windsor-detriot (dearborn)
>safe

Not understanding the simple election process in the US

>monster raving loony party

Shit son, where can I sign the fuck up?

No. The last time we had anything close to an overall majority was Eden. 1955.

politicsresources.net/area/uk/uktable.htm

Our governments are always formed by a party that fails to win over 50% of the overall vote. Israel has the fairest system but theirs is batshit crazy and relies on coalitions

>Think about guns
>Police raid your flat and confiscate all your unregistered butter knifes

Al Gore wouldn't have done anything anyways.

But Labour won the cities and lost the election

Awesome, its this thread again...

...

Haha this

English schooling is shite

>

This place is getting worse every day kill me

Fucking first past the post shit constituencies shitposting fucking jewry

Fairly straightforward to get a shotgun licence. We don't need it desu.

You, OTOH, need your gun to defend against home invasions and chimpouts

>inb4 mudslimes
If we stopped eating curry they would be fucking destitute

Proportional electoral votes or by congressional districts.
It's ridiculous that I and millions of other Californians have practically no say in who becomes president. Bet collectively we account for more than the population of most states.

It's supposed to work that way you fucking inbred britbong. It's not a democracy, it's not direct majority rule. It's a Representative Federal Republic