Really makes my brain neurons send signals to my muscles

Virginia blue
Colorado red

Idk about Michigan

screencap this

I've been saying VA was going Trump for awhile now despite the polls. Friends and family down there have said all they see are Trump lawn signs. I do believe the silent majority has been awoken and they are going to rise up and trounce the liberal carpet baggers come election day.

Is this realistic?

Starting to look that way. Polls are getting very close in PA

why don't you get the meaning of cuck?? why? why lurking here withouth understand even basic insults?

PA is too ballsy. You have a safer bet switching CO, NM, and maybe even NH.

I'd say Colorado or New Mexico are more likely than PA.

> Vermont redder than Iowa

Today's polls have Trump at -2 in PA. The future is bright.

But we'll know more after the debate performance.

What date did we hit 88888888? Will we hit 100000000 by election day?

He's probably going off of Reuters
reuters.com/statesofthenation/

Trump wins. (((They))) try to assassinate him in Febuary of 2017. He survives and comes back more pissed than ever. Vows to have all globalists executed. They decide to trigger a Great Depression. By the summer everything is completely different.

I should be asking you that, fool.

CO or NH would do it and they have by far the best chance

I'm not seeing for any reason for optimism in other states as of yet

It was a sad day for Australia

Trump will probably be assassinated on the ides of March by Jebbus Brutus. There is a good chance he'll fuck it up, though.

Guys, can someone explain why do the states matter here?
Pls dont tell me that POTUS is chosen by the percentage of states he won?

No, but he does need virginia

Learn what the electoral college is, it'll determine whether or not your country is going to get bombed

Wait. He went from winning by 4 points to losing by 13 in a matter of two weeks?

Crywank fan?

Not if he wins Pennsylvania, or alternately both Colorado and New Mexico.

Each state is worth a certain amount of points based off of its total population.
The winner of each state is determined by a first past the post voting system.

I've said it once already.

Vermont's "Democrats" are basically socialists. Their undecided are the democrats while Republicans are Republicans. As such their oversampled Dems turn either Trump, stain or don't want to vote while under-sampled independents can't balance out local reps.

NH is in his reach though. Iowa too.

I figured it would be Rato.

Rato is definitely Brutus tier.

Check the methodology and margin of error and sample size. They were pushing some polls with sample sizes of 100 or so recently.

Just glad you guys didn't spread democracy in '99 then

*unsheathes katana*

DAHNALD. I've waited long enough.

Give me the DELEGATES... or DIE.

In America there's FPTP voting system.

So you have voting areas which you elect candidates in. Once one of them gets 51%(or wins as a minority candidate say #1 has 45 #2 has 35 #3 has the rest) the area is "won" for him.

Then there comes the electoral college. Each state has(minimally 3) delegates. Outside of Maine and some other state I don't remember the FPTP rule applies here too. If one candidate wins 51% of districts in given state he gets all delegates.

It's pretty shitty system that only makes the races weird as you have with quite a lot of delegates like Arizona or Ohio and everybody tries to win those because they aren't 100% red or blue(like always blue Cali and always red Texas) while states like NH or Alaska are basically left to its own because lol who cares about them.

If there was a candidate that could reshuffle the current biases he could win the elections with ~25% of votes nationwide, I shit you not.

California: the state that keeps on fucking it up for the rest of us.

100m should be hit in about two months and a week or two based on the 8 get to now. Even when taking into account the huge post spikes you'll see during the debates, it's unlikely.