Hitler did something wrong

Yup, the fucker wasnt near Stauffenbergs bomb when it exploded unfortunately.

>>Invading too many places too quickly
That was Italy. Hitler always focused on his objectives
>>Killing a bunch of his own party members
These were Beefsteak Communists, who joined the NSDAP when Communism was banned. He needed to get rid of them before they couped the government.
>>Having a shit economic policy
Germany was in an economic boom while the rest of the world was in a depression. Hitler created millions of jobs and ended the poverty of the Weimar Republic.
>>Not actually doing the holocaust
He shouldn't have done the holocaust because we need the truth to get out for a revival of National Socialism to spring up.

Yeah the arrogant little cunt thought he could blitzkreig across the entire asian continent in the middle of winter, and his actions are directly responsible for the impending extinction of the white race. What a stupid fuckbag.

>believing in the holocaust hoax
>falling for kike propaganda
youtube.com/watch?v=9SQWB36uKkw

OP, just go back to plebbit.

>Germany was in an economic boom while the rest of the world was in a depression. Hitler created millions of jobs and ended the poverty of the Weimar Republic.
Germany was in an economic boom while the rest of the world was in a depression. Hitler created millions of jobs and ended the poverty of the Weimar Republic.

Would Heydrich or Himmler have been a better Fuhrer?

This.

You forgot mismanaging the Reich to the point where most of his generals were encouraged to scheme against their peers, sowing seeds of dissension, disloyalty, and resentment that would probably have ruined the party after Hitler's death.

What was it?

Germany was in an economic boom while the rest of the world was in a depression. Hitler created millions of jobs and ended the poverty of the Weimar Republic.

...

SHART

yea, he didnt win

youtube.com/watch?v=HnfwBeVFlbU

Article on Hitler's economic policies

Ding Ding we have a winner

Well I know that. Germany went from one of the poorest to one of the richest countries in Europe in a matter of years. Russia and Germany would have clashed no matter what, but perhaps Hitler should have left Poland alone so the English and French wouldn't declare a war Hitler couldn't win. German military efforts at least served as a kind of temporary buffer between the millions of communists in Russia and the spreading of communism over Europe.

That's my birthday desu famalam

Not finishing the job.

>Invading too many places too quickly
They had limited resources. Waiting longer in 1939 would have made the allies only stronger. And invading the USSR 2 month earlier would also have been the better choice. Time was against the Nazis.

>Killing a bunch of his own party members
Roehm wanted to remove Hitler from power. Hitler should have removed more military aristocrats... i.e. the resistance. That would have done the trick.

>Having a shit economic policy
Meme. They expected economic problems by 1942 or 1943 but not this "muh collapse" propaganda wants you to believe. Also their economic plan, i.e. barter trade with other countries to cut out high finance is what got the war in the first place (at least against the allies).

>Not actually doing the holocaust
Well they needed labour, killing them would not make sense. Even with slave labour they had a labour shortage.

>His shit economy may actually have forced him to invade those places as the Soviet Union's economy was growing faster than Germany's
Great, you have just discovered why the war came in the first place, i.e. Germany BTFO'ing France and the british empire in trade markets/economy (just like pre WW1) and "stealing" foreign markets from the US by using barter trade (and better/cheaper produts) in times of economic crisis.... making the economic recovery of the US, UK and France even slower or stalling it. US economy was in 1938 no better than in 1930 after all...

It's all about economy and the reason you have just given in regards to "Nazis vs USSR" also applies to "allies vs Nazis".

This would not have changed a thing. The destruction of germany was the plan, not removing Hitler. One of the chiefe resistance movement members Weizäcker realized after the war that their attempts in removing Hitler would not have changed the outcome of the war. The allies at some point even refused assistance/information from the resistance saying "people who would fuck up their own country are not to be trusted" and the allies knew that the higher ranking resistance members were mostly ex prussian aristocrats and britain reasoned that should they take over, the resulting military dictatorship/leadership would be even worse than Hitler.

the resistance movement fucked up the war and what they have fought for would have never come true. They believed the allies would stop when hitler is dead... and they learned after the war that this would not have happened.

He is still not as bad as Stalin. Somehow Stalin got away with his shit. Hitler killed few millions of jews, big fucking deal. Stalin was able to kill more Ukrainians years before war.

> Hitler should have left Poland alone so the English and French wouldn't declare a war Hitler couldn't win.

There are many hypothetical scenarios. For instance, poland could have accepted Hitlers alliance against the commies. This would also have finalized the post WW1 borders between germany and poland, something not politician before hitler would have accepted. No more way into the war for britain and Europe rather "safe" from the commies.... many possibilities indeed.

You're 92?

The shower heads only had ten holes.

youtube.com/watch?v=X2pT1dbGs2A

Hitlers mistake was that he took his own bullshit seriously. Many of his decisions were ideological and not realpolitik.

Didn't at least the Brits view Hitler as a buffer agains the Soviets, leading to them accepting his breaking of the treaties made to contain Germany ((Bigger army, annexing nearby German majority territories, etc)) and then only stopping once he showed he wasn't trustworthy? ((Breaking the munich treaty))

Just want to put in that a lot of stuff said about Hitler wasn't him acting stupid but post-war generals blaming their mistakes on someone that was dead and couldn't defend himself.

...

One little problem, Hitler planned to exterminate intelligence, leaders, engineers and keep the rest of Poles as slaves on farms.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generalplan_Ost

>>Killing a bunch of his own party members
Hitler didn't purge enough.
He should have gotten rid of all violentally anti-slav elements in his party.

he made a lot of mistakes

hindsight is 20/20

Hitler had not the islam, the perfect religion for fanatical warriors.

Everyone deserves a second chance.

He shouldn't have taken direct control on the eastern front
He was good at planning the general strategy but wasn't knowledgable enough to take more control
He should've left it up to the generals like he did in the early war

He was an idiot for killing his own officers who were a lot better at war stragedy
It worked for Stalin but Hitler wasn't as intelligent as he was

>Didn't at least the Brits view Hitler as a buffer agains the Soviets
Maybe early on, so 1934 or 1935. The moment germanys economy skyrocketed they went butthurt (US too). UK wanted to get treaties going with the USSR in the beginning of 1939 or so but stalin refused because he knew a new entente will avoid european war.... and he god damn wanted that war.

>leading to them accepting his breaking of the treaties made to contain Germany
Well the anschluss crisis was actually created by the austrian dictator back then and hitler was just an opportunist and "took" it... Austrians wanted it anyway. Regarding Czecheslovakia: It was actually the UK who pushed the Czechs into giving back the sudetenland to Hitler. Even Hitler didn't know why and he basically went along. UK basically stalled for time because they were not ready for war in 1938. France was of course, they invaded from the west few days after the war started and retreated because they feared starting another world war... they could have ended it quick because germany had barely any military in the west.

>trustworthy?
The "breaking munich agreement" was used for propaganda reasons to make hitler look not trustworthy. The situation was different though. Churchill, Chamberlain and other thought Czecheslovakia was only a temporary assemblement and expected to crumble sooner or later (basically multi ethnic state like austria-hungary back then only way smaller). After the Sudetengermans were heim ins reich and the slovaks also split, the Czech president went to hitler and basically asked for protective agreements. Hitler should have refused because of the treaty but Prague has the oldest german university and was our good ol culture... kek. It was not "GIEV PRAGUE OR DIE"... it was offered out of necissity.

>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generalplan_Ost
>Nearly all the wartime documentation on Generalplan Ost was deliberately destroyed shortly before Germany's defeat in May 1945.[6][7] Thus, no copies of the plan have ever been found...

the two sources cited are from 2004 and 2008.

HOW CONVENIENT HUH? The plan was never found... Just like no holocaust order, strange.

>Germany was in an economic boom
Shit was a bubble, that's why he had to invade countries.