How old were you when you finally realized that the 2nd amendment doesn't refer to "the people" as every single individual but as a whole?
What it means is that the United States has a right to have arms in order to protect it's citizens, not that every single individual can have a gun to protect itself. It's not that hard guys
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
i.imgur.com
twitter.com
How old were you when you used a false quote?
>foreign proxies so obsessed over American guns
Get banned, proxyfag.
>All they had to do was write a simple declarative sentence
>They fuck it up with three commas and prepositional phrases
Apparently not that age yet, because that's not what it fucking means.
How old were you when you learned to read English. Also the supreme court has said it does apply to the individual as a militia is made of of individuals that are not in the standing military.
Fuck off my board you illiterate fuck.
And That Folks, is why the Portuguese are known around the globe as dumb retard fucks.
Bill of rights, first amendment:
"the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."
No one would say that right is only for the government, why is it when the same words are used for the second the interpretation is changed?
4th amendment:
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
Not the government's right either, it has always been the people's right.
THE THIRD COMMA IS NOT IN THE RATIFIED VERSION
Portuguese approved firearm.
see
How old were you when you realized that potugal was the asshole of the world? Any fucking moronic half-witted retard knows what the founding fathers meant by this (fuck, it couldn;t be clearer) and why.
We arent known for that
We are known for being lazy and poor, not dumb
Thats for the Brazilian niggers
>The whole point is to protect ourselves FROM them.
The citizenry is woefully underpowered.
It actually just refers to white men
OP read this and delete your thread because you've been thoroughly btfo
Check mate, OP.
Now stop making faggot posts.
(Was trying to post the image like I normally would, but I keep getting "Connection error." every time I try. Even with a pass.)
I don't see where it refers to "the people" as a whole or as the United States.
>it's not that hard
The new "current year." Thanks for the cool new meme.
Yeah, no one was more against armed insurrections against corrupt governments by the general populace than the founders of the US. They're super famous for how much they loved being unrepresented by their government and how accepting of unlawful taxes they were.
...
The right of the state to defend it's people, and the right of it'd people to bear arms. It'd pretty clear. Maybe someone who speaks native English should try to figure out what our Constitution means
Check mate, OP.
Now stop making faggot posts.
(Was trying to post the image like I normally would, but I keep getting "Connection error." every time I try. Even with a pass.)
They were specifically referring to the citizens that could vote - white, land owning men.
Times have changed
It says that because a militia is necessary to maintain freedom, people must have the right to bear arms. Not that they have the right to bear arms for a militia.
Lol every time I read that "collective right" shit I laugh.
Like.. How fucking Orwellian. Collective right? What the fuck does that even mean?
I don't have a 1st amendment right to speech or religion? but a "collective right" for the United States People to collectively speak?
....? Like.... What the fuck is wrong with leftists?
forgot pic
>liberals are so starved for arguments they have to attack the fucking wording of the 2A
pathetic
No.
The 2nd Amendment elucidates that all men have the inherent right to defend themselves, their families, and their property from aggressors.
This type of defense implies the use of weaponry, and so, the nation recognizes "the right of the people to keep and bear arms". A well-regulated militia is the natural extension of this, which is supported by the federation as "necessary to the security of a free state".
In short, the second amendment specifically prohibits any act of government that would violate this natural law.
The laws of military construction, and the responsibility of the state in regard to protective war, are established outside the Bill of Rights.
We fought you niggers for our independence once and we will fight you niggers for it again.
If you feel that strongly about out guns, then by all means come and take them Gomes
...
>supreme Court has ruled that it is not the duty of law enforcement to protect people or put themselves in harms way in order to do so
How old are you going to be when the rope goes around your neck and you realise the 2nd Amendment doesn't mean what you think it means?
I usually go with what the Supreme Court says
>its a "eurocuck tries to interpret the constitution in a way that the supreme court has already rules was the opposite of the truth" episode
>x90329756
Moortugal faggot.
t. Alberto Barbosa
>not understanding the purpose of even having a fucking constitution
>Dat reading comprehension
Also, ever since I've arrived in Portugal the 'hot right now' on every porn site features only cuck porn, why is that? Not even meming.
EAT SHIT
Yes that's so damn hilarious while blacks are rioting over police shootings while putting BLM reps on tv advocating more gun control and disarming the police.
One day they are gonna come for us all. I've gone through political phases before and considered myself liberal. I've NEVER advocated something as fucking stupid as disarming the police. That's what these freaks really want. Not just individual gun owners but everyone that's not official military.
Again, one day they will come for us all.
...
...
>What it means is that
ohboyherewego.jpg
>Portuguese
>not valuing individuals bearing arms despite being spain's bitch
b-b-but MUH GUHNS
10 U.S. Code § 311 - Militia: composition and classes
(a) The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age and, except as provided in section 313 of title 32, under 45 years of age who are, or who have made a declaration of intention to become, citizens of the United States and of female citizens of the United States who are members of the National Guard.
(b) The classes of the militia are—
(1) the organized militia, which consists of the National Guard and the Naval Militia; and
(2) the unorganized militia, which consists of the members of the militia who are not members of the National Guard or the Naval Militia.
(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 14; Pub. L. 85–861, §1(7), Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1439; Pub. L. 103–160, div. A, title V, §524(a), Nov. 30, 1993, 107 Stat. 1656.)
tl;dr - Thanks to the Fourteenth Amendment, all US citizens are members of the Unorganized Militia at the very least.
Alright stop the fucking shitposting proxy tugas,we have no business over their fucking laws and their supreme cort has already ruled the definition of "we the people", don't give me the bullshit of people not needing weapons HOW DID WE DEFEND OURSELFS FROM NAPOLEON,HOW DID WE DEFEAT THE ABSOLUTISTS HOW DID WE FORM OUR REPUBLIC GET OUT COMMIES
Nigga you know every site goes for what the user searches for so if you go and watch your fucking cuck porn no matter which country you visit you will have it there.
FUCKING COMMIES ARE GETTING US A BAD NAME GET OUT REEEEEEEE
Shall not be infringed
Trump will win and make the 2nd Amendment whole again!
>The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Looks like the fourth amendment only applies to the federal government being able to secure itself against Warrantless searches now. This doesn't apply to each individual.
Your assertion is retarded.