ITT: Redpilled books

> cover is literally someone about to take the blue pill

I'm yet to read it myself but after learning about Edward Bernays I think it will be worth a read.

maybe for entry-level condition breaking

Thats a reprint cover though

...

Prefer Ellul's book.

Still my favorite of all the covers I've seen for the book.

> tfw you realize weed is basically Soma

>Slaughterhouse Five
>1984
>Les Misérables
>The Godfather

...

>tfw you realize half of Cred Forums will be made an example of during a day of the rope scenario.

in response to your obvious bait a more serious suggestion

The Culture of Critique by Kevin MacDonald

Waking up from the American Dream by Gregory Hood

Republic by Plato

Truth, Justice, and a Nice White Country by Greg Johnson

The Ego and his Own by Max Stirner

The Doctrine of Fascism by Benito Mussolini

confessions of an economic hitman
stranger in a strange land
whiskey tango foxtrot

books people try to blame on the *other* wing.

already on it brother

...

Right up there with The Prince. Oz is behind the curtain.

counter-currents.com/

also

A modern utopia

Read the Republic.I really enjoyed it.

What's a good classical philosophy book to follow it?

I also recommend Think and Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill.

...

Some Christians can still be found on Cred Forums I guess. Greetings brother!

Meditations by Marcus Aurelius

Every Google needs to read this

any good redpilled books on ruby ridge, waco, unabomber, okc bombing?

Meditations by Marcus Aurelius

Peace be with you brother!

Thanks, hit me with any other recommendations you might have.

A favorite.

OP is probably good

Two treatises of government by john locke is super important. the last chapter "of dissolution of government" was basically plagiarized for the US declaration of independence preamble. its a bit wordy, you can get by with the sparknotes if you choose to.

the unibomber manifesto is pretty redpill

And yet Huxley wanted to fry face even on his deathbed.

...

What's this about exactly? I've thought about checking it out

>inb4 just google it

...

For philosophy or general?

Tao Te Ching
Anthem
Book of the Five Rings
Siddhartha
Shock Doctrine

...

>No one has posted the pinnacle of red pilled literature yet

What the fuck

...

Picked it up this weekend and tried to explain to my ditzy gf what it was about,

...

Blood Meridian

RED PILLED AS FUCK

>not putting the greater good above your personal interests

The Road to Serfdom by Friedrich Hayek.

Set in Russia. 3 brothers and their father who while different in the surface, are victims of their innate character which manifests in different ways for each.

Very good exploration of psychology of the self and of relationships.

is it really? it was written by a commie.

...

I disagree entirely. It was my use of pot that lead me to becoming redpilled

Shit tier book for autists

>tfw not enough spare time to read and absorb all these books
>tfw you will never be enlightened by esoteric knowledge

...

A gram is better than a damn

blazitfaggot

just put aside 30 minutes to an hour to read, or get off Cred Forums and read

>reading memenomics
>reading a famous book just so you can tell people youve read it
any introduction to econ textbook would tell you a thousand times more than wealth of nations

It did for me as well, but drugs can't be used by the masses to gain insight. You have to have a specific personality that lets you meditate/assess yourself internally while under the influence.

For most people it's " LOL IM SO BAKED RIGHT NOW, OMG BECKY IM SOOOO WASTED " etc. Psychedelics and cannabis can be powerful tools for self growth if used with the proper setting and mindset. But it doesn't work for 99% of the population.

Thanks, Siddhartha is great to read alongside The Alchemist by Coelho. Short read.

>but has time to browse Cred Forums

R u science man?

is this the one that reveals that his dad is a commie porn director?

Drivel.

Don't forget to brainwash the youngins or just the illiterate.

How in 1887 did edward bellamy Know about credit cards and driver less cars and internet.....

It has to be mandatory reading.
I was surprised too at the content

Any other books that are too redpilled for Cred Forums like pic related?

The ultimate. All encompassing, inarguable. Published 1890, if you read it that year then the coming of 1914 and 1939 would not surprise you despite the relative peace of the era

> excuses, excuses and excuses the book

Top kek if you thought this was in any way insightful

The Camp of the Saints.

This book is being literally fulfilled through the current Moslem Hijrah into Europe and America. Jean Raspail is like a prophet in his accuracy of the recent events taking place.

You didn't refute any points.

Cat in the Hat was pretty good.

Marshall Macluhan - Understanding Media

This guy coined the term "Global Village" in the 70's, has a model for the development of technology that has so far played out exactly as described and gives a step by step (albeit difficult to read) breakdown of how the mediajew is controlling your mind.

Gustav le Bon - The Crowd

Describes how to influence massive amounts of people. This falls under a "know your enemy" redpill as le Bon's theory became foundation for the work of Edward Bernays (amongst others)

These two books are very much aimed at showing you what mass media is doing to your, and "our", mind.

Shit book.

look lads free b8

Fucking collectivists.

...

Why am I getting an illegal error when I try to google Wealth of Nations?

I thought it was interesting. The information it provides is fascinating, although you should interpret it for yourself rather than just going along with everything Diamond concludes.

I read it, agreed with a lot of his points and thought he did a good job of explaining how Europe and the Old World were able to dominate the New World civilizations.

His excuses for the Africans and Abos are garbage though.

Soz m8 can't take seriously a woman who in no way shape or form accounts for children in her ideology. Furthermore she accuses the "collectivist" of using "the greater good" as a "moral blank cheque" and then does the exact same thing with individualism. This book is literally edgy fedoratipping navel gazing for closeted psychopaths and double digit IQ capitalism broners.

God I hate getting baited.

what were the excuses?

Hard to get this book but its good
Dialogues with the Devil

OR if you cannot get it. Read "Screwtape Letters" by CS Lewis HERE:
rednovels.net/classics/u5583.html

The first book really gets you to understand the nature and form of satanism and its rationale. Important because once you see it, you will genuinely understand just how depraved "equality" is. It genuinely unfucks the brain regarding secularism.

The Screwtape Letters does much the same but is shorter and works if you are a beginner to moderately red pilled.

...

The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and Its Impact on World History
> the rejection of Logos by the skypes and its impact on world history

Libido Dominandi: Sexual Liberation and Political Control
This book examines the development of technologies like psychotherapy, behaviorism, advertising, sensitivity training, pornography, and, when push came to shove, plain old blackmail – that allowed the Enlightenment and its heirs to turn Augustine’s insight on its head and create masters out of men’s vices.

...

Presidential campaigns would be so much more interesting if campaign staff read this.

Very nice seeing E.Micheal Jones on here

Degenerate Moderns: Modernity as Rationalized Sexual Misbehavior
In this ground breaking book, Jones shows how major determining leaders in modern thought and culture have rationalized their own immoral behavior and projected it onto a universal canvas. The main thesis of this book is that, in the intellectual life, there are only two ultimate alternatives: either the thinker conforms desire to truth or he conforms truth to desire.

Also in the trilogy:
Dionysos Rising: The Birth of Cultural Revolution out of the Spirit of Music
Living Machines: Bauhaus Architecture as Sexual Ideology

Barren Metal: A History of Capitalism as the Conflict between Labor and Usury
> E. Michael Jones attempts to return the science of economics back to where Adam Smith found it when he wrote The Wealth of Nations, back to its proper matrix in moral philosophy.

Lack of access to large domesticatable animals. Which is debatable since animals like the Aurochs (ancient cows) were huge and ferocious compared to what we've turned them into. The Abos killed off most of the large animals in Australia, the Africans supposedly didn't have any.

Limited crops for cultivation, which is somewhat compelling for the Abos; but totally falls apart for Africa.

Isolation from other cultures. Again somewhat compelling for Abos; but nonsense for Africans.

The problem with all the arguments for Africa is that it gives no reason why they didn't just cruise up to North Africa, get camels, learn writing and other tech and bring that shit back like Europeans and Asians did with each other's knowledge.

The Abos were more isolated; but so were other cultures and they at least managed to invent bows and arrows.

PS: On a side note the most interesting thing in the book is that the American empires (Aztec, Maya, Inca) never invented the fucking wheel. They could predict fucking eclipses using astronomy and mathematics; but they couldn't build a fucking cart.

Surely if they could build those temples they could chisel a wheel out of something

>American empires (Aztec, Maya, Inca) never invented the fucking wheel

More none-sense from that shit-tier book. The Incas very well know what the wheel was. It was just simply useless to them in the terrain they lived in. Have you ever been to Peru, or Chile? Or the Andes in general? I have. Try pushing/pulling a cart a km in any direction. Maybe in the Altiplano and desert regions you could use carts but the Inca empire was concentrated the more mountainous parts like Cuzco. The animals at their disposal were much better suited to transporting things at long distances than anything with a wheel.

>t. archaeology student with a focus on Andean civilizations

Yes, that's the argument the book makes as well. Terrain too hilly to make the wheel practical.

But come on man, you're telling me there's nowhere they could use a fucking wheel barrow?

Have you been to Greece or Italy? Also mountainous as fuck and yet they made heavy use of the wheel.

And the Inca built some great fucking roads, roads that still exist and yet no hand carts?

Its weird dude.

hey guys can I be a redpill too

Italy and Greece are not comparable in terrain to the Andes. A more appropriate comparison would be the Himalayas.

I'm not flaming you here, just telling you that the day you visit those countries, even from the airplane looking down at the Andes, you'll understand more.

Altitudes are too high, oxygen too low making labour more physically exhaustive on the body. Their roads were built for "on-foot" movement (pic related). "Great" is a subjective term when applied to these roads. They were great at their purpose, which was to move armies, animals caravans and messengers, they were in no way meant to be smoothly paved. Try pushing a cart with a wooden wheel through that. Llamas are just larger enough to carry things but small and weak enough to be useless as beasts of burden, thus they could not pull carts. Theres a dozen more reasons as to why they didn't need a wheel. Read more into it from actual experts on the field, and actual archaeologists not some retarded arm-chair "historian" who's really just blaming white people for things and excusing less civilized people of the time for other things.

Oh and by the way, that book tries to emphasize the brutality of European conquests while totally brushing off that of Amerindian conquests. How do you think the Inca and Aztecs became empires? Nobody ever asks that question. You think they just nicely asked people to come under their rule and it was resolved peacefully? They did the same shit European powers did, just in different manners. All empires are built through violence, no exceptions. Conquest is rarely peaceful.

>Oh and by the way, that book tries to emphasize the brutality of European conquests while totally brushing off that of Amerindian conquests

No argument there, I think the world is better off without the Aztecs.

More Impressive:

Cortes or Pizarro?

Flashback by Dan Simmons

Most of the people surrounding the Aztec confederacy hated them, they just couldn't defeat them. You really believe the narrative that 300 Spaniards defeated an empire?

They allied with their enemies to took advantage of the situation. Particularly the Tlaxcalans, who provided thousands of native soldiers to the Spanish in their war against the Aztec confederacy. The Tlaxcalans were rewarded by the Spanish by being allowed to remain highly autonomous in their native lands throughout the colonial period.

"hate'' isn't the right word. These are warrior cultures recognizing the might of Spanish technology and martial skill, warlords aligning with the clear long-term winner. One mounted Spaniard was worth a hundred native warriors, easily.

This is such an awful book. It takes what happened and finds an explanation that suits its agenda. The worst part is how bad it does that. His arguments about locations of seas, differences in climates and animals that can be domesticated etc. can all be debunked by simply opening Wikipedia and by looking at a world map. I suppose it's a popular book because it seemingly offers an explanation to white supremacy that doesn't involve superior whites.

Can you recommend any good history books/textbooks/historical atlases that cover the entire history of mankind or at least large portions of it? I've always loved history

...

...

Hitler's Revolution

This book is probably the most scholarly work on Adolf Hitler's economic, civic, military, and diplomatic policy's during the years leading up to and during the war.

I would highly recommend this to any of your friends or family members for the sole reason that it doesn't talk about Jews, yet it praises Adolf Hitler and National Socialism, and makes it perfectly clear that Hitler was forced into war against a hostile Soviet-allied coalition which was hell bent on destroying Germany and her allies.

>I would highly recommend this to any of your friends or family members for the sole reason that it doesn't talk about Jews, yet it praises Adolf Hitler and National Socialism, and makes it perfectly clear that Hitler was forced into war against a hostile Soviet-allied coalition which was hell bent on destroying Germany and her allies.
haha what? do you recommend hitler's revolution to your family?
I'm partly polish, I'm sure that side of my family would love to hear that suggestion!

Good and very short book. You guys pick up the free pdf you'll have it read in an evening.

...

"Hate" is very much the right word. Pick up a book before you post.

>Tlaxcalteca were never conquered by the Aztec Triple Alliance. The Aztecs allowed them to maintain their independence so that they could participate in the xochiyaoyatl (flower wars) with them to facilitate human sacrifice.

>one of Cortez's captains, Andres de Tapia, once asked Moctezuma II why the stronger Aztec Empire had not yet conquered the nearby state of Tlaxcala outright. Moctezuma II responded by saying that although they could have if they had wanted to, the Aztecs had not done so because war with Tlaxcala was a convenient way of gathering sacrifices and training their own soldiers. Tlaxcalan historian Munoz Camargo noted that the Aztecs would often besiege Tlaxcalan towns and cut off trade, which was uncharacteristic of a typical flower war.

After they Spanish were defeated in Tenochtitlan:
>The Spanish were able then to complete their escape to Tlaxcala. There they were given assistance and comfort, since all 440 of them were wounded, with only 20 horses left....Cortes was able to pacify the country, after the natives realized the Spaniards put "an end to the rape and robery that the Mexicans practised."

Right out of Wikipedia. Maybe read a little about about the actual sacrifice rituals too.

Yes, "hate" is a most appropriate word for how they felt about the Aztec confederacy. And there was no clear-cut winner. The only thing that allowed the Spanish to win was the diseases that ravished the native populations, including Aztec armies and the enemies of the Aztecs allying with them. Horses and muskets are only advantages in the appropriate conditions. In the terrain of the valleys of Mexico, horses become useless and muskets easily miss. When the Aztecs made the mistake of fighting in open fields, they lost, but not to 300 Spaniards. To thousands of other native warriors plus some musket fire and some cavalry charges.

>the Tlaxcalans provided: 80,000–200,000 troops.

Kek agrees

This book is filled with esoteric information which dispels the lies of Hitler and National Socialism. The author devotes an entire chapter to the German-Polish Danzig corridor dispute which, without Britians and America's intervention, would had ended peacefully with Hitler and Poland signing a 25 year non-aggression pact.

The author clearly states, and backs his claims with contemporary sources, that Hitler wanted friendly relations with Poland. The allies used Poland as a pawn as a pretext to declare war on the Reich in order to topple the Germany National Socialst government which threatened global Jewish hegemony.

bumparoo

I've not read the whole thing but this book refutes a lot of anti western historical revisionism.

>Confessions of an Economic Hitman
>Tragedy and Hope
>Creature from Jekyll Island
>Behold a Pale Horse
>The Trillion Dollar Conspiracy
>Rules for Radicals
>War is a Racket
>Propaganda
>Behind the Green Mask
>The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America

and a fuck ton of others

This one might be worth a read. It has some interesting comparisons between the national debts and militaries of Great Britain and the United States. It's quite short too, which is nice.

Start getting into audio books, and find time to read.

The ultimate red-pill.

...

...

...

...

...

...

I fucking loved this book

...

...

Reminded me of this youtube.com/watch?v=k7Ks7tbXZl4 turns out its the same guy.

Journey to the end of the night
by Louis-Ferdinand Céline

and La vida es sueno
by by Pedro Calderón de la Barca

elitist /lit/fag here you guys, stop posting fedoracore already

Albert Camus - The Stranger / The Plague / The Fall
Ernst Jünger - In Stahlgewittern (try getting an old edition when war Jünger was less tame and full war poet)
Huntington - Clash of Civilisations
Turgenev - Father and Sons
Piketty - Capital in the Twenty-First Century
Zwagerman - Duel

Apparently this is redpilled.

Anyone on Cred Forums started with the Greeks?

...

Is that guy even tied off?

This classic is a vital read - it outlines all of the evil that the ARYANS have done, how they planned to BLITZ every man woman and child in England before going further in to describe how we will scour the ARYAN STAIN from planet ANGLO.