Oppressive, totalitarian, criminal Putin's regime strikes again against core western values

Oppressive, totalitarian, criminal Putin's regime strikes again against core western values.

Other urls found in this thread:

artsy.net/artist/jock-sturges
a.pomf.cat/feegul.webm
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

>controversy protests

disgusting old hags can't handle the competition top kek.

Most likely this.

There's no slippery slope! The fact 1/3 of convicted child molesters are gay despite being less than 15% of the population is just a coincidence goy!

Gay and pedo existed before kikes made it a shekel hunt

Where's your false god now?

why so regressive n' intolerant?

Where are the photos? I want to see if it worth the scandal or not...

>artsy.net/artist/jock-sturges
yeah, because nudity in art can only ever exist for the sole purpose of porn right?

To be fair this is quite unequivocally porn.

Is this porn too?

>greentexting a link

welcome to Cred Forums noob!

How about this?

It's nudity, not porn.

Or this?

yes

Good, based Putin.

nudity is not porn.

Sexual acts are porn.

I don't really care I just think of an ideal goy as any person who would support a homosexual pedo fag. If they support something that despicable they probably will riot for pedo rights if someone tells them to.

This seems to happen every few years. Nudity=/= porn but getting an underaged girl to pose naked is still to a degree fucked

For nudity to be porn, it has to be sexual.

Nude photo in anatomy book... not porn.
Instructional video of vaginal surgery... not porn.
Nude photo of woman sucking her own tit... porn.

>implying the source of those things is a merchant

You're still a babby

None of his pictures are sexualized at all. If his stuff is porn than most people's family albums would contain porn. I do get why people are upset, but they're way overreacting.

well it's not porn but the photographer is obviously a pedo so...

Good riddance. I lived in an uber liberal area as a kid and my mom pawned me off to "photographers" almost daily. A lot of these guys aren't good people.

under US federal law that is porn and if a child they would be in jail for possession,.

Yep.

Can they even afford to pay people to stage these "protests" anymore?

I'm sure many Russian men would be desperate to look at loli shit like this

How exactly it's a porn?

a.pomf.cat/feegul.webm


anything that is created explicitly for sexual pleasuere

post the images here faggut

>anything that is created explicitly for sexual pleasuere
So all should wear only closed cloths, and all images with non-ugly people should be banned, sounds kind of familiar.

I just jacked off to it.

r u male or female?

Boy, but girls my age were around pretty frequently. Sorry to disappoint.

> controversy protests
> drunk-looking man pours urine on pictures

Its a very thin line though. Just look up Martin van Maele or Franz von Bayros. Some times it's hard to say when it crosses the line.

>ideal goy advocates for pedo rights
Why? Pedohysteria is the great weapon in the arms of jews. Frame anyone you dont like as a pedo and they are doomed.

In a perfect society, things like this would be okay, because the thought that someone would harm a child without no one ever knowing would be unthinkable.
Think how poisoned a world we live in where a man talking to a child is seen as some sexual deviancy.

People recoil in shock when I tell them the first girl I ever had sexual intercourse with was 10 years old. They never bother to ask what I age I was and immediately make "pedo" accusations.

wait so can you give the legal definition of whats considered art?

Wouldn't that end all arguments abotu whats art and whats not?

what age were you :3

I agree , that's absolutely porn

13