Should prostitution be legal?

I can't get punani in the normal way, so yes.

No, it's already legal if you record it and sell it (porn).

i don't know

nah

It must be regulated to keep STD-filled sluts from spreading their diseases.

Other than that, yes.

George Carlin put it best:

"Selling is legal...and fucking is legal! WHY ISNT SELLING FUCKING LEGAL??"

If strongly regulated, yes.

Yes but clients and service providers must be registered.

No. it should be regulated.

niggers

i cant afford the pretty ones so NO

hehehehehe have fun getting busted rich fags

>The US is the world.

Who's business is it if two consenting adults decide to pay or charge for sex?

Yes.

Anything that occurs between consenting adults should not be illegal, including prostitution.

only hot, well-groomed prostitutes should be legal

We should just turn Australia into a containment continent again and let everything be legal and all degenerated can live there

Why should the govenrment have any say on the issue?

yes

ofc, so I can crush your mum and sister's pussies.

No.

It further encourages lives of immorality and short-sightedness for both men and women. Not many people understand this, but legislation on issues of sexual and social morality exists to make a society stable and healthy so that it can thrive. The Romans knew this, both at the beginning of the Republic and at the beginning of the Principate. And so did the British Empire. Wherever morality goes out of the window, so does civilization itself.

>Whenever I see this picture

It's technically legal here and nobody makes a fuss about it, so yes.

Maybe we shouldn't go for the full brothel sort of prostitution but street walking is terrible.

that motorbike is doing some sick tricks

But user, prostitution is le..
Oh wait
Only here?
Oh...

Yes. Then we can tax the shit out of it in government run brothels. UK is losing over £3bn a year to untaxed whores.

Plus it would clean the streets up getting them out of view.

I disagree, specially when it comes in a business so prone to pedophilia, human trafficking and abuse to comply. Besides the obvious public health issues.

It should be regulated, everyone involved identify and paying an annual membership which tests you for possible diseases and makes you learn about sexual practices. Like a license to carry guns, background check and to the workers a basic knowledge filter.

This and the fucking taxes which eradicates the black market violence and money laundry.

Do you realise that if, for instance prostitution was de legalized here the only difference would be that there would maybe be like 10% less prostitutes and absolutely no income from it for the country.

If its going to happen anyway why not capitalize on it?

Yes

That's marriage so i guess the states business since they already regulate that.

>It further encourages lives of immorality and short-sightedness for both men and women.

By whose standard? Yours?
Why do you think you should have the right to control the actions of others just because they don't meet your standards?
Is me controlling your actions OK providing you don't meet my standards? If not, why not?

What kind of obligation does everyone have to maintain civilization if it's not in their best interest?

no

It is here. They're just not allowed advertise/solicit

Pedophilia is perfectly natural, equally as much to homosexuality. It should be legal

could you repeat the question

Free market, yes.

Only reason to ban it is muh degeneracy, but banning it only leads to hidden degeneracy, better it in the light IMO.

It's better in every way for it to be legal and above board, look at the mess that is the sex trafficking trade, if pic related could go to the local brothel instead I bet a good chunk wouldn't bother sending ahmed some kickbacks to import him something special.

it is legal idiot

Yes. Absolutely.

wot

I am also mad at the double morals the west has. Prostitution and Genetic engineering shows the flaw in the christian dogma and the progressive values.

For instance the religion has imposed stupidity on pragmatic solutions to certain society needs, like using Eugenics. And the progressive values, especially feminism, has complete it madness making simple things like casual sex an asset of social status based on an pseudo-dignity, where sucking dicks and doing drugs for a female teen is alright, but to call her a whore and not suitable for marriage is the ultimate hate and evilness.

The Jews have really fucked the world with its inventions, both dogma and progressive movements.

You do realize that the government banning these things is the cause that criminals get involved with prositution and that's what actually causes pedohilia and human trafficking.

That an illegal run business cannot seek help from law enforcement services from fear of being shut down.

Where as an above board business would have to keep books on who they hire and for how long, pay taxes and contribute to society.

Regulation exists outside of govenment and always has, private regulation is an extremely popular and successful service, if there's a free market demand for it to be regulated then it will be, except you get to pick the regulators and their practices rather than relying on ones controlled by fiat and open to bribes.

Absolutely. It should also be tax excempt.

Lets do some math on the subject

Prosties have 1 cunt
Lets say a Prostie "works" 200 days in a year
The Prostie averages 5 "customers" a night
In a year she's had 1000 dicks in her cunt

Would you SERIOUSLY want to stick your dick in a hole that's serviced 1000 dicks before yours?

I agree with George
sex outside of marriage should be illegal

I always wondered, do street walkers use a little toilet plunger or something to suck out Jamal's semen before they let you take your turn?

I think its hotter because its illegal.

No. Even though I am totally for it and believe people should have control over their own bodies, and I'll tell you why. If you are into the idea of being able to pay for sex when ever you'd like without being arrested for it, then this world already technically exists with the internet and things like backpage and online hook-ups. Police largely cannot persue these individuals because it is becoming increasingly hard in the current environment of the law to prosecute such people, there is not definite proof of any wrong doing because two consenting adults are allowed to meet up in a private place. It isn't at all like the days of street walkers.

However, should such a practice become legal it would then fall under the purview of the state, and they're gonna litigate the SHIT out of it to the point where only brothels will be allowed, and those brothels will be heavily regulated, so much so that the days of the $30 BJ will fucking disappear and you'll be looking at something like $100 for just a handjob from the most unremarkable of whores. It will push out any woman that isn't a 7/10, and you will not be able to afford even that anymore. It's better to leave it the way that it is and simply fine them and nothing more.

Agreed, the black market enhances violence. It should be regulated. Private regulation works like a charm too, like certification.

>THIS BROTHEL IS CERTIFIED (ala ISO)
>Clients go to clean brothels
>Brothels charges fair rates
>Beautiful young girls seek them to work

Free market 101.

Also if you average a mans cumshot to 10ml,
The Prostie over 1 year taken 2.6 GALLONS of jizz.
That's assuming 1 load per customer

No chance. But I would pay a girl to do some of the freaky stuff I would never ask my ladyfriend to do. I'll leave the details out, but there are some things you just can't try out without seriously impacting the relationship you have with people.

Brothel prostitution yes, street prostitution no.

>the only difference would be that there would maybe be like 10% less prostitutes and absolutely no income from it for the country.
That depends on whether it's enforced. If you have active patrols to look for this sort of thing, and tough punishments (I am not talking about a few years in jail, I am talking about amputation or capital punishment), then very few people will dare it.
And money? Money isn't everything. You can have €100,000,000, but one armed man can take your life. And at the rate things are lining up for collapse now, no Western European man alive today can expect to die of old age.

Unfortunately, the analytic part of this post is true - pedophilia is just as natural as homosexuality. But it is a dark side of human nature, and we should suppress it violently.

>Why do you think you should have the right to control the actions of others just because they don't meet your standards?
Because all actions have consequences, and not all consequences are direct. I think people who say "two consenting adults" are missing the point - that, especially in a welfare state, people are easy to behave irresponsibly and then shove the consequences of their actions onto 'the collective'. Why should I (don't take drugs, don't drink alcohol and have a healthy weight) smile and pay my taxes, knowing full well that my taxes are going to degenerate fatties who'll be sleeping around and ruining their bodies so that when they're fifty I'll have to start paying even more taxes to sustain their lifelong health care costs?

No, it should not. It encourages degeneracy and spreads STD's, even with protection.

libertarian leftist trump supporter here
-yes

yes and it should be expensive.
only high quality sluts.

It'll be legal like it or not. The only thing outlawing does is restricting "plebs" from access to it, the elites will still shit in the mouth of university students looking for quick cash.

The real question you wanted to ask: Are you elitist?

meh. This is why you bag it. The real fun is when you start working out how much length she has taken.

1000 dicks a year. 6" peen is average. 6000" of cock a year. Say she's been at it three years. 18000" of cock. 6000' of cock. That's over a mile of cock.

Would I be able to pay this beautiful young female specimen to fart on my face?

This is why prostitution exist in first place, you twat. Its sex for money, you aren't buying a girlfriend nor seeking a partner.

A prostitute opens her legs for you for an X time for an Y amount. It doesn't matter what she did before or what she would do late. Its a take it or leave it deal.

If we now average mens dicks to 6.2 inches
In a years time 1 prostie has had 516 FEET (a 10th of a mile) of dick

Depends on how much money you have but yes.

Don't forget to take into account the various thrusts. You can multiply it by God knows how much.

Yeah

>are you elitist
Damn right I am, anything else is Red bullshit.
Men are not equal.

>that flag
Yup.

Leave the expensive prostitutes alone they are doing great: millennial wives.

While we're at it.

1000 cocks a year. Average over here is £60-80/half hour. That's £60k a year, assuming she isn't being pimped. A consultant doctor over here (that is finished all training, 11 years from starting university) starts on £75k.

I didn't knew Hillary Clinton posted on Cred Forums.

Hi Hilldog.

I can't get laid otherwise. If there's a demand there's no reason not to have a market where it's safer for both the prostitutes and the johns

>assuming she isn't being pimped

No. It is degenerate and directly contributes to white genocide. But something must also be done to encourage these women to not even think about selling their body. They do it simply cause they need money.

They're vital for a functioning society.

Yes, but kept well regulated

What i mean by this is that you need a license to be a prostitute, and no cheap sluts, have to be fit healthy and with no diseases.

Yes. Women can finally get paid doing the only thing they're good for, and the (((wage gap))) will be a thing of the past.

Only with weekly STD testing safe cards. Pimping should remain illegal. Whores should work for themselves (self employed) and should solely be accountable for any harm done.
Risks of being stiffed, beaten, or killed are part of the job and priced accordingly. Better Business Bureau ratings should be available for escorts and secure payments should be made before services for any B+ or better grade. All income should be reported and taxed.

how often do you see prostitutes hanging around on the street?

Right, this user gets it.

Always facepalm when I hear people saying that the only way to regulate is the government. The amount of private regulatory bodies I've dealt with in my line of work is staggering and then all work pretty damn well.

Take magazine viewership for example, we used to get audited by a private auditor, they'd demand a list of our readership, they'd call them and confirm security questions they answered when they signed up, allowing them to gauge the accuracy of what we claim is our readership.

Guess what, advertisers looking to advertise in our magazine won't advertise with us unless we bare the logo of an auditor they respect. People argue "well surely they'll just pick the cheapest, or they'll get paid off" which is why there's also a free market of auditors, the ones which grow and are popular have transparent and open audit processes and meet the demands of their customers to do so. As long as customers demand quality in auditing they'll get it.

There's no reason why such auditing can't be applied to anything, and it's free market and voluntary and done through the pressure of customers wanting quality and safety.

It amazes me how stupid some people really are, "durrrr get the gubmint to audit", because we can trust this sole arbiter of morality to never ever be corrupt or take a paycheck, and they always behave in our best interest.

Prosties over here generally charge by the act.
Let's assume cunt to cost $100
$500 a night
x 200 days
$100,000 in a year

In part, yes. But also because it's presented by (((some people))) as a fashionable, cool lifestyle choice.

My university's newspaper tries to shill it once a year, just after a new batch of first years start university. They have this interview with a used-up slut who runs a 'high class escort bureau' and praise that stuff to high heaven.

>Go to Thailand
>Buy 20 teens for $40k
>Pimp them for 2 years
>$3'200k net profit

And people still think prostitution should be illegal, first you legalize the obvious taxable business. Then you separate the crime of pedophilia and human trafficking. And voila the Black Market is over. If any it will flourish foreign agencies seeking more workers and they will come to work and pay taxes rather than trafficked.

Think of it this way. If tobacco was illegal, the black market will put it next to cocaine and heroin trading. And people will careless to buy it from a dealer who also sells hard drugs. Add it violence and you got it. Human trafficking and pedophile mix and blend with prostitution because its also illegal.

but Macedonian whores always prostitute themselves

Yes
When has banning ANYTHING worked?
People will always do shady shit behind a closed doors.
Legalize it and heavily stigmatize the men who shamefully stick their dicks in public vaginas while heavily stigmatizing the women who open their legs for anyone and thus being public toilets.

No.
It degrades women for money.

Yes but with strict measures

>When has banning ANYTHING worked?

Depends upon the objective the ban. If the goal is to cause artificial price inflation with expense of other peoples money then for example the war on drugs is working exactly as planned

>all women are forced to work as prostitutes

u wot mate

>When has banning ANYTHING worked?
Well, by the year 800 much of Europe was governed by a system of laws where murder was a matter of civil law, to be compensated by cash payments.
These days, Europe is a whole lot safer. That is because the government inserted itself between and above people and started to act like a guardian of abstract morality.

No the state has a duty and role to protect and guide society away from degeneracy.

Fuck off lolbertarian cretins

>hurr why have laws, people will just break them anyway

AncapFace.jpg

Don't worry Latvia-fag. We are only 20 years from having the perfect sex-droids. The act of sex will devaluate a lot, dolls are getting so sophisticated that in a matter of time for males to have a 10/10 motionless women body for sex only and you won't feel the difference between it and a real one, besides that one moves and demands a relationship (money, love, time, friendship) and the other is a fucking object.

It should be legal but only in the following case:

Cloned humans created for solely sexual endeavors. Pretty much you clone a human and guarantee she has all attractive genes she needs from both "parents". Then, raise her with the rest of the clones for 18 years, they all go to slut and housewife university. Now assign sexi clones to lonely NEETs or permavirgin Christians.

>Free sex and confidence boosting to all betas and NEETs
>Superior humans engineered
>Having kids w/ engineered humans reinforces superior genes down family line
>Force blacks/arabs to stop having sex with their own and only attractive clones
>Attractive clones come with an "auto-abortion" gene if kid is black or believes in islam
>Attractive clones come with a x2 multiplier if kid is white
>Engineered housewife by day, engineered slut by night
>Does it for free due to being raised that way

Of course it should be legal, why should someone ask big government to regulate what you do with your body?

Also weed should be legal burgers, at least think about it.... it's what you do with your body, nobody should tell you what to do.

t. legal hooker enjoiing german

>And people still think prostitution should be illegal, first you legalize the obvious taxable business. Then you separate the crime of pedophilia and human trafficking. And voila the Black Market is over. If any it will flourish foreign agencies seeking more workers and they will come to work and pay taxes rather than trafficked.

Bingo. Whore lives matter.

youtube.com/watch?v=V58_V83skJE

Yes, as long as the woman isn't ugly

Give me one reason besides MUH MORAL CONSTRUCTS why prostitution shouldn't be legal

>I think people who say "two consenting adults" are missing the point - that, especially in a welfare state...

Stopped reading there. Now we get to the REAL argument. Hurr Durr bennies and gimmiedats. Yeah the thing is that the same principle applies here, that people do not consent to paying welfare, that's extracted via taxes which are forced and themself outside of consent (at least for the vast majority of people)

So take away benefits and the welfare state and you bring back repercussions to actions and then the whole situation balances out. What you'll find is that the people capable of being or seeing a prostitute without any kind of social fallout will be able to operate with mutual consent happily, where as the social dregs soon go away.

>not admitting not being able to have an objective solution to this issue

Nothing should be illegal.

yes

Of course it should be legal. Prostitution is only illegal because the vaginal jew doesn't like competition.

Of course the AIDS monkey would think this.

I mean individual women"prostitute"

It stigmatizes them as worthless whores,sluts,cocksleave.
No right man would ever date this degenerate or even have relations with them.
Making their lifes worthless and useless as a person.

Also This.
#robotsfeelsmatter
Tays lives matters :^)

...

>So take away benefits and the welfare state and you bring back repercussions to actions and then the whole situation balances out.
Well, that would be a start - but I still believe legislation governing morality exists for a reason. The way to make a society stable is to enforce heterosexual monogamy.

There are plenty of them but laws and policy isn't made by engineers nor businessmen (pragmatic), its under charge of brainless icons known as politicians.

I am not trying to shame humanities careers, but its proven this kind of issues are solved if the people in power were technicians.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technocracy

Never wonder why the Nazis did amazing policies? They were so into technocracy. Distributed decisions by the right people.

Yes. It saves people the time who are more interested in getting laid than dating. Men want sex women want money. Both parties now satisfied.

Yes.

Fact: The divorce rate is lower in countries with legalised prostitution

Also when it is legal it takes the exploitation out of the girls involved, so they are safer and usually healthier.

No one should go to jail for paying for sex.

then they complaint about muh discrimination

yes in countries where prostitution is prevelant woman tend to understand their place and do not over exagerate their value.

>MUH FREDUMBS OOGA BOOGA
>MUH BODY MUH RULES
>HEROIN SHOULD BE LEGAL AND SOLD TO KIDS!!!!!!!!!!

Women have been sucking dick to get what they want since before the concept of money existed. Passing a law doesn't change their nature.

Legalize it, bring it out of the criminal underworld, and tax it for the safety of both the hos and the johns.

Yes, but heavily regulated and taxed.

Hong Kong style one-room brothels to prevent pimping and street walking, every whore to be tested for stds daily, every john to be tested before sex.

Well isn't that because the case can be made that heterosexual monogamy produces the most stable outcome throughout history in the absence of laws and the overbearing nature of government? Isn't that just observation?

Isn't the a component of immorality to use force to make other people comply with what you consider moral? Or by your moral standards is it OK to use force as long as you think you're right?

Does that also mean others can use force against you and your family as long as they believe they're right?

>Fact: The divorce rate is lower in countries with legalised prostitution
That's not a real fact. It's one made of bullshit.

>Prostitution isn't legal in his country
L O L

That is interesting information let me thank you by tipping my hat.

Yes, the only reason why it's illegal is due to stupid puritan reasons relating to the prohibition era.

mind ur own business, homosexual. You got fag rights now give druggies what they want

There is something beautiful and sinful about being a hooker.

I live in malmö and I have often fantasized I was a black woman from africa who has nowhere to stay and has to sell herself on the street, imagining how cum from men of various races would run down my black thighs as I lay crying in bed.

because republican babby jesus cries otherwise

It's sad that this stuff happens, but it happens WITH regulated markets, these people weren't found with a child in their back seat in some libertarian utopia somewhere. So we've established it can and does occur with regulation and probably would occur without it.

It's a good thing they're allowed to remove themselves from the genepool, it means that child can go to a loving family, maybe a couple who can't have children of their own. And those 2 degnerates can no longer sperg out more hellspawn which would otherwise be completely endorsed and supported by the funds of a state.

Degeneracy is ALWAYS going to happen, only the state endorses and encourages it to happen.

>degrades

subjective

>duty
>role
>degeneracy

all subjective

its a subjective issue
no solution can be objective, that is impossible

>Well isn't that because the case can be made that heterosexual monogamy produces the most stable outcome throughout history in the absence of laws and the overbearing nature of government? Isn't that just observation?
It's only societies that have heterosexual monogamy that can have advanced laws, rapid technological and artistic progress, and effective governments. But it is equally possible to lose such elements of your culture by means of moral degeneration.

>Isn't the a component of immorality to use force to make other people comply with what you consider moral?
The use of force is not necessarily immoral. It can be justified in a range of situations - what that range is varies with your norms and your values, but you could make an objective measure by looking at real-world outcomes of use-of-force decisions.

>Does that also mean others can use force against you and your family as long as they believe they're right?
Practically speaking, whoever is strong will use force and whoever is weak will have force used against him. Vae Victis. Therefore, if you care about yourself and your family, it is only right to encourage your society to take steps against immorality and antisocial behaviour. Because if the group falls apart, all individuals within it will be eliminated. That's what's happening to Europe now - the replacement of social individualists, us, by social collectivists, migrants.

>When has banning ANYTHING worked?

Prohibition. Brought alcohol sales to a near stand still even with a black market, and the ills caused by a largely inebriated public were almost completely gone. Unfortunately this created a whole new set of problems.

A better way to phrase it would be, when has outright banning something been the only solution to a problem?

Porn is legalized prostitution, just fyi

Speaking of porn, check out my site www.xxxbonanza.com

>prohibition
>worked

*smirk*

>Average
>6.2 inches
not in your burgerland it isn't

dunno, it only stigmatizes them because people like you create the stigma and enforce it, possibly out of some misguided believe of purity and "muh waifu" If it was less stigmatized and more women did it, then even good women might try it, the same kind of women that would be worth being with.

It's just sex for money, it isn't the same thing as the sex you get in a committed relationship

It should be fucking cheaper

don't know what you're talking about :^)

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1470475/

>"Drinking habits underwent a drastic change during the Prohibition Era, and Prohibition’s flattening effect on per capita consumption continued long after Repeal, as did a substantial hard core of popular support for Prohibition’s return. Repeal itself became possible in 1933 primarily because of a radically altered economic context—the Great Depression. Nevertheless, the failure of National Prohibition continues to be cited without contradiction in debates over matters ranging from the proper scope of government action to specific issues such as control of other consciousness-altering drugs, smoking, and guns."

That's not quite what I'm asking. What I'm asking is that if the satability comes from heterosexual monogamy on its own, why have the laws. The laws certainly aren't a prerequisite. We know that society pre-law was also pretty stable because of the benefits that heterosexual monogamy gives you, the people looking after children and K selecting and investing have better chances to go on and do so, and degenerates tend to die in a ditch somewhere because they lack these traits.

The initiation of aggression certainly would be though? That response or reciprocation to other initiated force would be.

By your own definition doesn't that mean anyone under government regime who accepts force, such as laws that protect victim-less crimes, taxation (theft), themselves make the people "weak". If you start to initate force against other peaceful people doesn't that make you the threat instead of the people trying to live peacefully.

I disagree that you need violence to keep a group together, in fact I think that just divides that group. What is happening to Europe right now is happening because of the increase in government, migrants are paid for by taxes taken by theft to prop up a government which stays in power due to violence and immorality. If migrants are allowed in against your wishes doesn't the government allowing or endorsing it, as well as forcing you to pay for it, doesn't that tell you about this way of thinking?

It already is legal
The reason it isn't "legal" is because society doesn't want little girls growing up saying that they want to be prostitues for a living
And it's the right thing
Prostition is a job for fuckups and those who were delt a shit hand in life not regular people.

nice reading comprehension
thats not something "working"

Not anywhere it isn't
World average period is 5.1-5.3
If you take out Indians and asians that never moves up to about 5.5-5.7
Literally nowhere I'd the average 6 or above and anyone who says otherwise either has no idea what they're talking about or they're lying

>The reason it isn't "legal" is because society doesn't want little girls growing up saying that they want to be prostitues for a living
And it's the right thing

but it doesn't seem to have a problem with little boys wanting to grow up to be murderers (A.K.A. Soldiers) :^)

>Prohibition. Brought alcohol sales to a near stand still
Erm according to who exactly? There was an entire black market bred out of this which fueled alcohol sales at establishments off the books. For the vast majority of America during this time it was not hard to get your hands on alcohol if you so wanted.

Of course the gubmint will tell you that sales were down and that it worked because that's what they want you to believe to justify their position.

Only for white girls

but it did. in fact after prohibition, the drinking habits of the population were forever changed. It shouldn't have been an amendment, that was over reaching, but what do you expect from authoritarians. Alcoholism was a huge problem in america before prohibition, and the banning of it large stopped most of the problems it had caused.

Yes! And tax the fuck out of them. They like to live off welfare while making avg. $250 an hour.
They also use illegality to fuck over clients. Registered or thrown in jail.

austrian whores prostitute themselves too, thats what whores do in general, you know

>Of course the gubmint will tell you that sales were down and that it worked because that's what they want you to believe to justify their position.

dat gubermit boogey man tho...

Cred Forums is pro-free market after all.

Then again, act of sex isn't exactly a benefit in current year what with all the downsides.

Yes.

No.

All who practice/make use of the services should be punished.

My dream is to open a casino brothel that sells drugs, pussy, alcohol, guns, and more

it is legal so what

...

>dat gubermit boogey man tho...
The only boogey man is the one created by gubmint to encourage you to relinquish critical thought and hand all the power over to them so that they can further control everyone's lives.

That's the only boogeyman.

These anons get it.

I tried to argue for it in a politics class last year, the professor(she) sperged out about how it endangers and objectifies women. She also thinks we have to give the country back to the natives. University is a fucking joke.

>Yes! And tax the fuck out of them.

Which tax are you going to reduce or remove in return?

>when he breaks the NPA by using the heroin you sold to him on your land, allowing you to enslave and execute him

...

Question why you're going there, look for compatible uni's to finish up your degree, if you can find better ones then move and when you state to your professors/admin why you're moving you can voice your opinion.

Free markets apply to education as well, I firmly believe the way out of this stupid social justice epidemic is to make educational institutions great again, get all the smart people flocking away from the bad ones to the good ones. It encourages competition in the quality of the courses they offer.

Brothels should be and prostitution should be but not in public space

It's already legal under the name of marriage.

yeah, its gonna happen either way legal or not
would rather have it taxed, registered and tested for stds

fuck ghetto niggas getting rich of it.

Sound like murica to me

Yes, it's a service, people will still use it, why not try and make it as safe as possible for the women and men involved?

Honestly yes.

College sluts will give themselves for cheap bankrupting old whores.

Women would be put at a disadvantage because if they say no you could just find something younger and cheaper than her.

>would rather have it taxed, registered and tested for stds

Which tax are you going to reduce or remove in return?

< see this image

but also consider that many do things for money and in a world without manufactured lack would things be like this?

on the other hand, would a generally more open and loving population mean generally more displays of sexual affection?

also, legal and lawful are definitively two different things. see a law dictionary.

At this point only so that it drives out the dregs. Legalize it, regulate it, tax it.

I'm doing my degree in economics, 7/8 of the professors in my department are based as fuck. I made a mistake of taking a polisci class as an elective is all. I've seen replaced all my (((arts))) classes with math, stats, and compsci courses. I pretty much never have to interact with liberal types anymore.

Same here. I don't know how to get sex from women so I just go to whore houses once ever 2 years and have them suck and fuck the living soul out of me.

Yes. People own their own bodies, so they are allowed to sell it and rent it out.

I also want to point out that almost everyone who thinks it should be illegal, do not think porn should illegal. Why would me paying someone to have sex with me be wrong, but me paying two other people to have sex while I record it he okay?

It should absolutely be de-criminalized. Its just sex.

Feminists 3.0 have a tough time over prostitution. My body my choice/female empowerment is celebrated. HOWEVER, if that female choice BENEFITS men in any way, they are against it. So they fight against legalizing prostitution since it benefits men.

yes, it is the oldest profession and until they are replaced with robots they will always exist. So why not regulate it?

>Why would me paying someone to have sex with me be wrong, but me paying two other people to have sex while I record it he okay?

Their argument is that the pay is higher and they can't be abused as easily by a scumbag pimp or a hole in the wall brothel owner.

I think all that testing would make it so expensive people would just go right back to the low-quality, untested street-walkers.

Yes, but that top should be illegal. Its ghastly

Its a tricky one

In principle, no one would want their daughter to become a prostitute so it shouldn't be legal. It's a degenerate way to make money and is making being a whore a career.

In practice, it will always exist since they'll always be people wanting to pay for sex and those willing to offer it for money, so it may as well be regulated for health and to take money away from criminals/human traffickers.

I'd say it should be legal but not promoted/advertised/encouraged. But if you look for it and are over 18 it's there.

The problem with their argument is it's going to happen whether it's legal or not.

With legalization comes regulation. If it's legal, we can make sure they have a proper wage and have actual security instead of a pimp. We can make sure it's in a proper brothel like the bunny ranch, instead of just getting picked up off the corner and going to a seedy motel. We can make sure it's consentual and cut down on the sex trade and enact strict regulations to make sure everyone is clean to minimize the spread of STDs.

it already is - Marriage

yes, but not street prostitution or bestiality

Decriminalized.

You can't make it a legitimate business, but you can still pay for sex.

So more of a contracting service.

Though if you want to completely prevent it you have to lower the working age and eliminate minimum wage.

Can't sling pussy working at Baskin Robbins.

You mean they should finally build personal sex robots?

Should be mandatory

Except I won't be aiming for that prostie.

I'd be aiming for the fresh 18 year old ones.

It would put women at a serious disadvantage as you could just find a prostitute younger and cheaper than the bitch that rejects you.

If sex is a basic need the government should be providing it to disabled NEETs who can't otherwise experience it

youtube.com/watch?v=HErf4OELzYk

Once again japan is leading this human cause

...

It's illegal?

Maybe if drugs were legal then all of the deplorables would end up offing themselves leaving better opportunities and resources for the rest of us. Thought of that?

Streetwalkers and brothels are in bongland, but pretty much everyone ignores the latter unless there's blatant trafficking going on.

Pretty good system, honestly.

I've fucked many a prozzie from my local city , agency girls mostly and a few independants. Uni girls are teh best by far

No, just rape and pedophilia.

No.

In a perfect world government wouldn't be involved in such matters, but in a perfect world we wouldn't have degenerates selling or buying sex and helping to destroy western civilization.

It would give prostitutes protection under the law and regulate their health care. Sex related crimes might be reduced but it wouldn't be eliminated entirely, Amsterdam has really bad human trafficking and prostitution is legal there for the most part.

when_you_see_it.jpg

I would, I just wouldn't stick around after.

Legalizing it has it's pros and cons.

The pros would be
>Better life and security for the hookers but the cons are many for the government.
>They can be taxed by the government.
>No middlemen (pimps) reducing the crime rate towards both the whores and clients.

Cons would be
>Whoever party that legalizes it will lose voters that didn't want that to happen.
>Now that they are legal it's the government job to take care of them like any other worker (labour laws and shit, retirement, insurance, etc).

There's many more but these are the first ones that come to my mind, no one will ever legalize that shit due to these reasons, it's all about voters and money.

>find girl
>marry girl
>girl leaves you
>girl takes half your money
>legal

>find girl
>fuck her one night for money
>illegal

You're not the boss of me now!

yes, tax the dumb cunts

>taxing gov't workers

Obviously the guys are getting taxed.

Yes.

it is

YES AND IT ALREADY IS LEGAL