Who is the most famous philosopher of the blue square?

Who is the most famous philosopher of the blue square?

Uncle dolf.


also
>jesus
>libertarian
>left

Nigga, is you serious? Hitler.

Thomas Hobbes

Jesus is a moralfag and didnt care about the state

Hitler was pure centre economically.

Nietzsche

What was he then?

He was for equality, partage and universalism.

Hitler wasn't economically right wing.

Not philosopher but in the UK probably Margaret Thatcher.

Jesus would be more authoritarian. People just think because He cares about sinners and non believers means He doesn't care if people do bad things.

Jesus rebuked and got mad at His disciples multiple times, and in Revelation His letters to the churches were somewhat harsh with them and He told them to repent.

Hitler's not in the blue square, faggots.

>Red
Marx
>Green
Not Jesus because that's fucking retarded. Probably Bakunin (do plebs know who that is?) or Chomsky
>Purple
Locke/Smith tie
>Blue

Not a philosopher, but i think Louis XIV. could be fitting

>Ctrl + F
>Heidegger
>None found
Y'all niggas is lame

Spinoza.

Confucius
Or Niccolo Machiavelli

Hitler was exactly at the top of the y axis.

Hitler is really centrist economically, maybe leaning red.

Hegel

Lol that doesnt make him authoritarian , even modern leftests get mad sometimes . Unle mo was an authoritarian , he ruled his city with an iron hand and he almost made all the rules of life in the city by himself . he also forced a union of all arabian tribes under his own rules

Authoritarian Right = Monarchist/Feudalist.

It is what happens in reality if you go economically right. People get power and use it to fuck you. Adam Smith wasn't much of an ideologue which is why he was based. It would be better to put Murray Rothbard in the purple square.

Plato.

Thomas Hobbes
Absolutism is protectionist => interventionist

If you go economically left you end up in the red square even if you meant to be in the green square. If you go economically right you end up in the blue square even if you wanted to be in the purple square

Agreewith this

Julius Evola

Jesus claimed to be God "Before Abraham was, I AM" "I and my Father are one"

he might have been a lunatic, but he certainly isn't a political entity

or rather, he is all political entities, all things encompassing even those things which are not yet perceived

>jesus
>not a hippy kike

Heidegger is a lame cuck though

>tfw did the test and finished in the Marx bit

"Render unto Caesar what is Caesars."
Also told the Jews they would be destroyed by the Romans.
He also tipped the tax tables over and called the Jews out.
Jesus was a based Alpha.
Learn your facts fucktard.

What exactly is authoritarian right? Why is there an assumption that nationalism and " economic conservatism " are somehow automatically linked?

Honest question.

Whose words do people twist the most or out right fabricate, Adam Smith, or Karl Marx?

>Marx
>Authoritarian

A stateless society is authoritarian?

Once again proving nationalists are inbred retards who can't tell the difference between an autocrat Stalinist dictatorship and actual communism

kill yourself

Smith. They quote his observations and imply there was a 'should' in there somewhere.

Lol not wanting to rule others and letting uncle ceaser cuck him is called being alpha . . the most alpha middle eastern prophets are david, Salomon , moses and mohmaed. Jesus was meh

Heidegger
José Ortega y Gasset
Nietzsche
Carl Schmitt
Hobbes
Giambattista Vico
Evola

Nietzsche is probably most famous though

Left means collectivism and right means individualism.

no

Charles Maurras, based as fuck.

Most Chinese are on the blue grid.

>monarcucks

The job of the government is to protect people from each other. If there is no state there is no protection from other people at all. Whose obligation is it to defend you in court or shoot nig nogs when they come knocking on your door if you can't do it yourself?

“Government exists to protect us from each other. Where government has gone beyond its limits is in deciding to protect us from ourselves.”

― Ronald Reagan

Jesus was ancap.

Schopenhauer

Jesus did not exist.

>If somebody slaps you on the cheek launch a recreational Nuke at them for violating the NAP.

>Jesus
>politics

The republic has cucked France, not the monarchy.

Hitler

Adam smith wasn't a libertarian. Hes was monarchist and devout christian so yeah he would be in the blue.

No it doesn't.

Yeah yeah a dynasty which produces 1 good king and 5 inbred retards who kill each other for power and dont give a fuck about the common people is perfectly good. France became a global superpower under the republicans and napelion not the bourbons

>Tunisian intellectuals

As long as you don't prove otherwise it fucking does.

>Brazilian
That proves you wrong, fucking monkey .

Stefan Molyneux

>not apreciating powerful men

I'll assume that's many peoples definition as it will vary by person but this is why I'm confused regarding the term " authoritarian right " as in to imply " authoritarian individualism "

Did a paki rape your obese girlfriend, nigger?

So much butthurt LMAO

>In Revelation
>his letters

Jesus was dead by Revelation, and the epistles are all written by people other than Jesus. But yeah, you're right about him being strict. Don't let the people stone the adulteress to death, but tell her to leave her life of sin all the same.

However, I don't think bottom left quadrant of the political compass means you want to let criminals go unpunished. Just means you want to leave people alone and help the needy. Bottom right is leave people alone and stack paper. Top right is tell people what to do and stack paper. Top left is tell people what to do and act like you're helping them.

Lol, we were 1rt global power under Louis XIV. Btw Napoléon is a monarch.
And if you look at the revolutions in the XIXth, the republic shot at the people, not the king.

What you don't see from Tunisia I think is that now our goverment are putting the republic is first place and then France. Practically the form is taking over the substance.

No, but one of your fat arsed jungle bitches gave me a nasty rash once.

Louis 14 was goat but alot of other bourbons were too shit . thats the problem of monarchy. Also your last point can be applied on monarchy too

idk who made that chart but they obviously did not read the bible

Jesus is totally authoritarian right
when he says things like
"But those mine enemies, who would not that I should reign over them, bring them hither and slay them before me."
the ultimate dictator i say
and you know what
im all for it

>you want more authoritarian points to be badass but can't bring yourself to give a shit about peoples private sex lives

Muhammad

Aquinas
evola

>Jesus was a socialist

This meme seriously needs to die

>recreational Nuke
wat
also keked

Can someone explain why Jesus would sometimes say stuff like that but other times advocate chilling out and shit? So far I assume it meant be cool with other christians that want to be good but be based with the asshole infidels. What is the consensus on this?

Authoritarian individualism means that there's a dictatorship in which the individual can live his own private life. It's possible to have a dictatorship where the people are not obliged to work for the state. Do a research about Pinochet's regime and you'll get what that means.

Holy fucking shit this is dumb.

Adam Smith wasn't pro-capitalist, he was an observer of economics. He is to economics what Darwin was to evolution. This would be equivalent to saying Darwin was a eugenicist just because he noted that evolution was an extant phenomenon.

I have many problems with Jesus Christ being labelled left-wing. Jesus Christ in all likelihood would not have even dreamed of advocating the kind of centralised action necessitated by left-wing ideologies. At most he would've been on the central vertical. He would most likely have been somewhere in the purple quadrant.

SO is the problem of republic.
And there are plenty of reform that has been done by republican that in my sense has destroyed France such as with religions, uniformization of the country, etc...

Julius Evola

>Jesus
>abortion and gay marriage and pot are cool
Haha no. Faith heals.

He would most likely have talked about why those things are bad but also determined that it was for god to judge us and not for any earthly forces to inhibit our liberties.

Newsflash: A lot of purple quadrant people are vehemently opposed to those things but would never stop them.

Jesus stopped a lot of things.
Remember when he whipped those kikes?

He didn't use force to stop anything, unless you're insinuating that he was a hypocrite?

>he believes in the hippy jesus meme
He loves you and want you to be in his kingdom but he has no chill
Pic related

What I'm trying to figure out is why Jesus would sometimes be full of chill.

You fucking retard. Jesus has published an extensive literature on Austrian economics. He's an ancap.

God is an authority you stupid frog.

he was a Jew though

What do you mean by "full of chill"

yes but that's after he returns and everyone is required to follow the law(see old testament)
anyone who will not obey will be slain
as of right now we are to live at peace with all men and its not hard to do so when you consider the following

Proverbs 16:7

When a man's ways please the Lord, he maketh even his enemies to be at peace with him.

and how can your ways please the lord you might ask?

by keeping his commandments

When he says something like turn the other cheek.

...

>All those people in here thinking that Hitler was anything but deep red

I like how its always atheists who havent read the bible who put jesus in the green box. Jesus was in the blue.

me

It's explained in my pic
Basically turn the other cheek is to not chimpout for being offended (a slap on the cheek is used to be an insult)
Basically do not feed the tr-devil

Reagan

Joseph de Maistre

the "hippy Jesus meme" is nowhere in the bible
if they actually read the book i bet people would
describe him as "Based"

he was Judaen. Nothing that says he was Jewish in the book.

So senseless violence for petty revenge is bad, but violence can be good?

I'll second my big nigga Nicky.

Jesus is bleu

even 2000 years later people still don't get that Jesus did not come to establish anything earthly
even when he explicitly said it.

THIS

Honorable Mention: David Hume

"Were the alternative quite necessary, it were surely much better to be deprived of liberty than to be destitute of government." -- The History of England

You stupid fucking ape you can't even read. This specific Cred Forums compass is left and right economics.

Holy fucking shit, you're stupid as fuck

Anarchyball lol

People who practice immoral filth in private will corrupt society while in the public. Their heads are fucked. Their ways should not be tolerated or encouraged.

Julius Evola

This
If he was here in 2016 when he insulted the pharisians it would be on the News with "a known guru disturb religious Authorities in Jérusalem" as the title and everybody would post like he is an absolute madman and make Pepe smug faces with his clothes

Evola
Guénon

>Implying that Jesus was a leftist cucklord

Literally forced money changing jews out of the temple by whipping them and throwing tables at them. Read the Bible maybe, or at least just the New Testament if you're going to comment on it.

With the good reasons
Reminder that he throws people who don't believe in him in a lake of fire

he was talking his people
in other words if the brethren among you wrongs you
do not seek revenge
when he was speaking of being "chill"
it did not extend to the other nations
it was for the children of Israel

and i have to say this the people in Israel now are not the real Israelite
the bible also speaks on those things
luke 21:24
revelation 2:9
also the real Israelite would forget who they were and be scattered to all nations
Jeremiah 17:4
And thou, even thyself, shalt discontinue from thine heritage that I gave thee; and I will cause thee to serve thine enemies in the land which thou knowest not: for ye have kindled a fire in mine anger, which shall burn for ever.

Here's why this is nigh impossible. The Horshoe theory in effect, so when blue tries to lean into economics they become practically no different from the left. The nature of authoritarianism means that it will have to lean towards intervention in the economy. Fascism and Communism play out same way.

No person or ideology can be placed on that map. Ideologies are made of people's thoughts and every people is an invidual, not some dot on a map.

Your chart is a spook.

...

Machiavelli

>implying that he wasn`t

Oh no I've aggravated the ape. He's going to come use monkey joo jeetsu on me now I better run.

Marx isn't in the red square, faggot, and Adam Smith doesn't deserve to be placed anywhere on the chart.

Thoughts and ideas are easy to place into categories depending on the person. If you say that Marx and Smith are nothing alike then that proves that there is a line that defines them.

Jesus being libertarian left is literally the solution to the problem of evil

You don't deserve to be placed on the chart.

Darth Vader, since we're allowing fictional characters

You are only claiming that because you find "Categories" useful for you and gain advantage from them. If "Categories" would disadvantage you would join the chorus of people shouting "Don't categorize me!". Your "Categories" are a spook.

>(((Jesus)))

Universalism hard work and strong morals as we know now per the bible. You are thinking economically libertarian.

AS strange as it sounds, christ is more the top right, economic freedom with heavy moral responsibility and law. While christ would not want us to be forced by a monarchy to do good or bad. At the same time, there is nothing in the bible that forsakes that. Reality is, if we are to take christs messages politically.

He represents a socially conservative and mostly economically right. The degree of authoritarian does not matter because one had to follow whatever government was in charge, in all things except evil.

But there are many parts of the bible which speak about "obeying the law" "respecting your parents" and such which fall into the authoritarian perspective.

Anybody who thinks JC is libertarian left literally has no idea about jesus and is riding on popular (leftist) kike opinion

Also, MARX believed in a state and religion free society. He is 100% bottom left.

MARX is the one who occupies the bottom left.
STALIN occupies the top left
ADAM SMITH is well placed
JESUS CHRIST would be the blue square

Yes you can. Hitler is closer to Marz then he is to Smith. That means that their thoughts are categorized.

I shouldn't be spoon-feeding a white trash who can't grasp basic concepts of politics but you're so pathetic that I'm starting to feel genuinely bad, oh, and sorry that I'm late, unlike you I have a life going on.

Now, as I said earlier left means collectivism and right means individualism. This relates to everything, especially the economy, nigger.

In a left-wing society there is the COLLECTIVIZATION of the means of production, the people run the fucking economy. Just in theory, I know, but that's what we're fucking talking about here.
And in a right-wing society the economy is ran mainly by private initiative, and what does PRIVATE mean you disgraceful fucking bastard?

When I get in charge of my country I'll make sure to send every little stupid nigger like you to work breaking rocks in the wilderness. That's the only activity your two-digit IQ makes possible for you to do. Fucking pig.

>Stirner fag thinking that the more stuff he can call a spook means the smarter he is.

>privatizes the banks
>kills reds
>destroys labour unions

Adam Smith is on the right, Marx and Hitler are both on the left, Jesus Christ doesn't apply here.

The one and Only.

THIS IS THE FUCKING DUMBEST SHIT I HAVE EVER SEEN

>MARX
>TOP LEFT

>JESUS
>BOTTOM LEFT

Kill yourself OP you fucking dumb nigger. Bible demands authority to the church and to state leaders as well as to the family. Its moral code makes it survive in any degree of authoritarian environment but it is 100% morally imperialistic and so fits on the social right of the scale. It is also generally authoritarian so fits on the top.

Marx was a dreaming retarded philosopher that thought one day a social utopian world without the state and without religion could exist. just man collectively helping man to reach this stateless paradise.

Literally garden of eden level politics. 100% fucking bottom left. How the fuck do people keep getting this wrong?

Its STALIN and his Kike friends that fit the top left.

Jesus's father was a literal cuck for God. So I'd say whichever square forces you to get cucked by a higher power is the square for him.

She saved you from the worst. That said Strauss as a neocon would fit pretty well in that corner tho.

/thread

Adam Smith should be in green. Rothbard should be in purple. Keynes should be in blue.

Heidegger.