I did not say that

>I did not say that
What did he mean by this?

Really causes my neural cells to depolarize by opening gated channels in the membrane and passively diffusing potassium ions out of the cytoplasm down its concentration gradient leading to a sequence of action potentials to stimulate in accord with long term potentiation pathways developed through the release of seratonin at key moments of sensory input.

>he thinks you 'say' a tweet

You twat a tweet you twit.

He doesn't run his own twitter

Well, in that context he's saying the polluting of the atmosphere was done to show how unhealthy it is so other nations would more than likely be ok with voting for a policy that would allow industry jobs to be taken over seas. What hillary accused him of tonight is that he said smog clouds don't exist, a clever[it wasn't] way of lying.

What they claim he said and what he tweeted are two entirely different things.

DRUMPF BTFO

He should stand firm. Climatology is a corrupt field. It has been taken over by leftist lunatics with massive confirmation biases. They've been shown time and time again to be dishonest. There are still real climatologists out there who call out their BS. From a physicists POV. wattsupwiththat

He meant that he contradicts himself regularly and doesn't even realise it.

Then someone should tell him what's being tweeted from his account

What did he say that contradicts this?

Hillary literally accused him of saying global warming was invented by the Chinese. He responded that he didn't say that. He clearly did.

its passed your bedtime trump

[citation needed]

...

Truly he was born to be a politician

Just posted

You aren't gonna make enough shekels with this shit tier shilling, trumpkin

>hillary innacuretly quotes him

your point?

Didn't necessarily call it a hoax. She also said nafta was gold standard and claimed she didn't

>this guy gets to vote

i want out

>inaccurately

In what world is that not accurate?

He actually corrected himself in his rebuttal: first saying 'I did not say that' then changing that to repeating 'I do not say that' twice.

Which is the definitive statement? I would assume the latter, the one he emphasised twice.

Hey, maybe he did think it was a conspiracy but changed his mind and that's why he doesn't say it any more. Changing your mind is apparently good enough for Hillary whenever she is called out in her previous statements, right?

We need to get rid of regulations so we can compete with Chinese pollution

Trump must have forgotten where he was back then in his red pilling process about globalism. The tweet is not incorrect, but the Chinese are only an aspect. There is simply more to the scam, but he's right in that it's meant to destroy western manufacturing.

The guy forgot he put it that way in 2012. He's expanded on his understanding of a concept that american public is just now becoming aware of.

Doesn't remotely matter if he forgot how he framed this idea back in 2012 when he was not as fully researched as he is today.

>Hoax: to trick into believing or accepting as genuine something false and often preposterous

>…created by and for the Chinese in order to make…

Seems like he called it a hoax by definition.

That he's a dumbass that doesn't believe in science if it's bad for business

Sweden, if Hillary's husband can tell us what the word is means then Trump can get away with saying "I never said climate change was created by China as a myth." Note Holt said climate change.

...

>muh feefees are downtrodden

Feel free to move to beijing china

The context. Obviously it was a play on words by hillary to make it out as if trump is anti-science, something the clinton campaign has done previously; textbook example of misrepresentation of someone's arguement

What context was the tweet in?

Agreed. If you read some of the actual papers used to argue in support of large-scale manmade climate change, they tend to be blatantly politicized. The underlying datasets are also often 'adjusted' in ways that create upward trends where none existed in the raw data.

CO2 levels are definitely increasing, but the connection to higher aggregate temperatures is considerably more tenuous than is commonly claimed. Particularly on longer time scales. It's not even clear whether CO2 or temperature came first in the past-- rising temperatures tend to release CO2 from natural sources.

Saying that climate change is invented when the data is out there to support it is pretty anti-science to me. Especially when he only uses it to defend the idea of bringing wide-scale manufacturing back to the states. As though that would work in the first place.

THANK YOU FOR CORRECTING THE RECORD SHILL

Maybe instead of shipping jobs to china the US could have worked on clean energy ahead of time for self. Too bad the politicians of that time period didn't give a fuck...

Climate Change and Global warming are two different things, my stupid nordic google.

The CTR meme is so convenient.

A shill calling others a shill. What a night.

not an argument. How does it feel that your drumpf lies too much? He's not going to win.

Ahem,...

He meant he thinks global warming is a conspiracy theory, obviously. He wasn't running for president at the time, though, so he could say whatever he wanted.

>he doesn't have an assistant that runs his Twitter
Sven please

This is the most important issue facing our country. Not the niggers burning down cities. Not the mudslimes commiting terrorist actions. Not shitskins invading this country by the millions every year, turning it into just another third world socialist shithole.

Nope. It's smog.

I'm fucking tired of this country and this planet. I'm done with it.

That's called county laws not federal laws. Trump cant tell the county how there pollution is.

The "solutions" to AGW benefit China at the expense of the US economy. What he actually meant by that tweet and by his response in the debate is anyone's guess.

"Climate change" was simply the new catchphrase when they realized it wasn't actually getting warmer. Before that, we were worried about "global cooling" caused by... emissions, and requiring that we urgently shut down our economy and become forest-hippies, or something to that effect. Look it up; I am completely serious.

Funny - all the climate change guys in my uni's math department are from China

FUCKING HILLARY SHILL
HE DIDN'T SAY THAT ON THE STAGE
HE SAID "I DO NOT SAY THAT", MEANING PRESENT TENSE
JUST BECAUSE HE ONCE SAID THAT DOESN'T MEAN HE STILL SAYS THAT
FUCKING SHILL
KILL YOURSELF
TRUMP 2016

>MUH GLOBAL WARMING DOOMSDAY PROPHECY DEATH CULT 2000
I guess atheists need something to believe in.

Maybe you're too young to remember the world before people used the term "climate change"?

The first I heard of it was Gore. Before that dipshit I remember a few news stories about the coming ice age.
It's all the oldest trick that predates the book: Blame the bad weather on whatever is inconvenient to you.
Shaman say fire make sky angry.

>2012

No idea if that twitter is real, but there is much truth in it.

Make this big bad global warming / climate change boogeyman and start to regulate the shit out of industries with emissions quotas and shit, also making energy costs soar.

Industries controlled by the very same politicians that enacted said regulations moved slowly in 3rd world countries, with cheap energy, cheap labor force and surely loosely enforced environmental laws if any.

So here we are: China, India, and others have all the heavy industry, and manufacturing industry while polluting the planet like no tomorrow.

On the other hand, Europe and US are making their own people pay energy through the nose (even if the main polluters left long time ago), have an increasingly idiotic population unable to do tasks common 30 years ago, and also have to keep millions of shitskins on welfare too because reasons.

He didn't say that. :^)

trumpfags will continue to say that "he tells it like it is"