Miss me yet, Cred Forums?

>Word-renowned debater
>actually intelligent (graduated from Princeton and Harvard Law)
>Actually knows policy
Ted Cruz would have mopped the floor with Hillary last night, Cred Forums. Shill all you like, but we picked the wrong man. Oh, also, he actually had a real plan to stop illegal immigration, unlike el-wallo.

P.S. Why won't Trump stop lying?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/Sl9-tY1oZNw
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Cruz
dallasnews.com/news/politics/2016/09/20/cruz-teams-mccain-graham-push-additional-israel-funding
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Cruz would have made America constitutional again.

I've never turned my back on Cruz. To the date I am still not supporting Trump.

Fuck him tbqh.

Honestly, he prolly would have been better for the country. idk. What was his immigration policy.

Build Wall

American here, I ain't building a wall

Please come back!

Nope.

C'ya.

BTW - what did you do yesterday to rile up the conservatives?

10 feet higher

>lost against Trump
>would have won against Hillary

ayy family, nice logic


also, trump did great on the debate. now fuck off idiot

Yet he lost against Trump. Ted's problem was that he is too much of a pussy, if he had attacked Trump at the very start instead of letting him grow bigger for MONTHS and had proposed the muslim ban first he would have won the primaries easily.

A Cru-bio presidency would have been alright tbqh

The reason why Trump one was because of the Media. The Media wanted Hillary to win so they shilled hard for the candidate that was easily to beat (Trump). If you don't see Hillary's power play and only see memes and 'muh maga' you don't deserve to be in Cred Forums or even to vote.

Won*
Damn autocorrect

Trump didn't do great. This is blatant dishonesty.

Damn #Cruzmissiles fell short though.

>We picked the wrong man.

This is not the discussion forum of the Republican Party. We chose the dankest man and kek will do the rest.

>The reason why Trump one was because of the Media.

Kek
I am actually on my stats class

>The Media wanted Hillary to win so they shilled hard for the candidate that was easily to beat (Trump)

You're retarded, if that was the case they would have shilled for Jeb or Kasich, who fit the role of gentlemanly muh principles losers like Romney and McCain perfectly. The (((media))) is going apeshit because Trump might actually win.

If he was a Ivy school debater, then why did he lose to KEK?

>The Media wanted Hillary to win so they shilled hard for the candidate that was easily to beat (Trump)
Remember when morning Joe were shilling for Trump and attacking Cruz? Unfortunately Cred Forums was too stupid to understand their 3D chess

Not really, it would have been harder to manipulated the Establishment Republican than Trump.

All Trump care is about its Numbers, making him easy to be played.

This.

Yeah.

People don't see the reality of the situation and just care about "muh wall", "muh MAGA", "muh Chyna"

We had a chance in 2012.
Don't call it a grave.

Democrats also pick the wrong cundidate. It should be Bernie.

>world renowned debater
since when?

Wow
Trump shills are all out today in full damage control desu

Hes an apparently legendary debator from his time at harvard. Where you are actually taught how to respond and not just say "LOW ENERGY JEB"

sit on a chode tripfag cancer

Establishment republicans were pretty much not viable this cycle. The top 3 front runners were all outsiders like Trump and Carson or "outsiders" like Cruz.

lolno, Bernie would have only delivered safe blue states, he got rekt in every swing state.

I use a tripcode for Various reasons like
1.keeping track of my posts on mu multiple devices
2. To separate myself from the flag I have.
3. because I believe a man's worth is the worth of his reputation. Being user does not allow for the worth of reputation

Stupid enraged voter base on the right.

pic related

To bad he creeps everybody out

k

Actually they were. The most viable establishment candidate was Rubio. Minorities would have flocked to him along with moderate Americans.

That's true. Actually the only thing republicans had to do to take this election was to elect someone who has a pulse and can speak in intelligent and coherent sentences. Instead we have some subconscious stream from a clown. That's disappointing. Debate was so one sided it was ridiculous.

A whole thread of shekel sucking faggots

>I will never endorse a person who attacks my wife or suggests my dad had something to do with the assassination of JFK
>I am endorsing Donald Trump
Ok Cruz. You can go to bed now, ya cuck.

...

Uhm, isnt this man bron in Canada and therefore not even eligible to be president of the USA?

Rubio was not viable at all, he got assraped in his home state so hard he ragequit politics for a while.

Sanders would also mop the floor with Trump. Too bad too many americans are easily fooled by someone screaming "COMMUNISM!" while stuffing federal funding in his/her pockets.

Idk. Kinda hard to figure except that the American Electorate seemed to think he had a screw loose. Nepolean complex perhaps?

They have picked Trump. The most unlikely because he is a leader. It is so funny, the irony is just overwhelming that the sons and daughters of all those 60's leftist hippies are falling for a lying, toltoltarian, product of the Military Industrial Complex.

The irony is just stunning.

He got assraped because of the media.

The media has manipulated elections for a long time. Showing favoritism for certain candidates so only a few remain and the one they liked the most wins.

Trump is just a pawn for the media without he even knows it.

Cruz would be called Canadian daily. Cruz wouldn't stand up to being called a Nazi racist bigot. That's what the left does, they get you off topic defending something you didn't say and then you look like an asshole to middle America. They use those made up words because they work.

Why didn't you do it /US/ why ;-;
Anyone remembers what was going on here when he was running as candidate?

THE DELEGATES DAHNALD
ITS NOT TOO LATE
WE CAN FIX THIS, TOGETHER!

He got assraped because he sucks. Member when Marcosoft was stuck on a command and kept executing the same line?

>the guy that sounds like an evangelical preacher would be more appealing to independants

BTW currently listening to liberty report.

No, that was just another Trump lie.

>Miss me yet
No

>worth of reputation

look at this fag thinking he is a special snowflake

Watch this youtu.be/Sl9-tY1oZNw

Sounds a lot more presidential and intelligent than claiming CHYNA is manufacturing climate change and then lying about it, huh?

>filthy spic
>fucking all the bimbos around him
>wife is a Goldman Sachs shill
>fucked over NASA
>father is a filthy commie and help killed JFK
>evangelical

He needs to go back.

No, I am not a special snowflake.
I just don't see the purpose of hiding behind a common face.

Marco was a (((media))) favorite himself until the moment Christie destroyed him at the debate, then making fun of Trump's penis size at a rally was the final nail on his coffin. I bet that piece of retarded advice was the fault of Rick "BBC cumslut" Wilson.

DAHNALD. THE DELEGATES!!!!

If this is the reputation you want then I don't see why anyone here would want to build one.

>you just hide behind a proxy while saying you're american

makes perfect sense

Why do you want to revive the republican party? It's clear they got owned and will never recover, neither should they. Time to craft something new and stop calling it alt-right. Republican party lost so very much it isn't even funny. Yes, they lost to Donald Trump and Donald could have won more if he didn't lean to republicans so much.

>Harvard Law
>intelligent
You realize they don't teach law there anymore right? They just teach "theory"

I thought about it. But something about him told me no. I had a bad feeling in my gut. When Trump came along late in the game, for me it was decided. And I knew that there was nothing that the Clinton machine would not say or do to destroy him. So he's the man a god help him. Because I decided on day one of the Trump election bid I have turned off the TV. I have not watched any TV since the Trumps Election bid started. I didn't watch the debate last night. There was no reason for me to. I have decided and I am a man of my convictions. Everything I have heard about Trump and his leadership style has bolstered that decision.

I have been trying to redpill all the Hilary supporters around me but they are to firmly entrenched in the MSM propaganda. There minds are closed. They cannot see the whirlwind coming for their blinders. The destruction of the economy, the importing of jihad, the destruction of wages due to the mass importation of illegal labor from south of the border. Everything they hold dear will be destroyed by a Hilary presidency and they cannot see it coming.

Trump is the only hope to restore fiscal sanity, stop our war mongering in the world.

It's time to bring the drones home and to stop destroying countries. How is a nuclear war with Russia and China good for the USA? How is this good for humanity?

>He's literally white
>Caring about NASA
>Father is literally far-right

lol. You have to score 175+ on the LSATs to even be considered for Harvard Law. You're a moron, user.

Universities and phd people were always the dumbest. Besides being nerds they ruined this planet ever since they are all over politics after WW2, each year with less backbone.

>>>/Reddit/

Hand o'er the votes, Hilluhry, or face the wrath of Capn' Dahnald

Born
Rafael Edward Cruz
December 22, 1970 (age 45)
Calgary, Alberta, Canada

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Cruz

>Awk! Hand over the votes!

The right does the same.

>but they are to firmly entrenched in the propaganda
Projecting that much

Go check his facebook, he gave Trump his support and said Hillary needs to be stopped.

the media was doing everything they could to stump Trump

did you even watch the Republican debates? At one of them they literally brought graphs and shit which the moderators held up, they did their best and he still won.

>Word-renowned debater
Yet he lost to a fucking boorish businesmann.

Fuck off Ted.
We all know what you said yesterday.

Don't forget, Cruz fucked Katrina Pierson.

kek

Actually I don't know what he said yesterday. Please spoon feed moi.

I can't break through their programming. Telling gay people that the Syrian Muslims would throw them off a rooftop or worse if they could and you just get blank stares like they didn't even hear you. That's programming. It is so strong.

RATTED

Is there proof of that? If so that would be awesome

Cruz would have owned her in the debate, just like Romney did to Obama and fucking lost anyway because he's not Trump. Trump has drummed up the most republican voters since Reagan because of his staunch anti-immigration stance and simply because he is not a politician. Everything Cruz says sound incredibly insincere and rehearsed - very politican, much like Hillary herself.

Jesus she has the jaw line of Kurt Russel

also he looks like a snake and he is 2 holy 2 get elected ever

You don't remember the Cruz scandal where they said he cheated with 5 different women? Katrina was one of them.

>Lost to Australia in the Semi's
What a pleb

He lost me when he went full Bible thumper - he is much more likable when he isn't prattling on about "traditional conservative (christian) values". Shilldawg would eat him alive though - shes been dealing w/ her fellow political scumbags her entire career - remember that most people don't care about actual policy they just want vague phrases like the ones Clinton rattled off last night

Wasn't that just tabloid gossip? Also, if Katrina was one of them, why is she working for Trump as his mouth piece? Did Trump cuck her in front of Cruz? Did she choose the stronger male? It's almost contradictory cuz the rumor is Cruz cheated with 5 different chicks, but one of his chicks ends up with his opponent?

See what I'm getting at here?

Oh OP you are so right I agree
Trump utterly destroyed her.

He talked about real plans and policy and Clinton just talked about Trump.

He had her on the ropes the whole times. All she could do was arrogantly smirk while she was losing. It was embarrassing for her and for the Democratic party.

Almost all the polls except for LOL (((CNN))) agree.

Trump dominated, faggot

I can't support him after the booger incident

After watching the video of it, just seeing Ted's face makes me want to vomit

...

Right, but he was born an American citizen and was perfectly safe to be elected President. Trump knew this. He just lied about it, like he does about everything.

You might be right, honestly.

Cruz's persona during the debates was super off putting, he was a wannabe 1950s President "Let me be crystal clear" - he must've said that line a million times. If you watch him Congress he's actually a pretty fucking cool dude. But for whatever reason he put on this persona for the debates that made him look like a total weasel try hard

we will nevaaaaaaa surrendaaaaaaa

>pro-TPP
>against net neutrality
>uncharismastic and too focused on "muh religion" which alienates moderate voters
>massive neocon Zionist who along with John McCain and Lindsey Graham just spearheaded a push to fund Israel even more after they got the largest military aid in history, also massive anti-Putin good goy
>dallasnews.com/news/politics/2016/09/20/cruz-teams-mccain-graham-push-additional-israel-funding
>in the pocket of Goldman Sachs like Hillary, his wife even worked for it
>guy who led the shutdown of the government
>wants to cut social security

Cruz would've never led to such a large cultural change in regard to trade and immigration as Trump did, too much of a typical smarmy, non-populist politician.

The only good thing was that he was more socially conservative, but even that creates issues since there's no flexibility or wiggle room on things like abortion.

Christ you sound exactly how I thought you would when I saw you had a trip. Like a massive fucking faggot.

I supported Ted Cruz all the way through the primaries. He was my #1 choice. I am now supporting Trump, but I would've much rathered Cruz to be nominated for the GOP. For me, it's more a Republican vs Democrat thing now, and I'm supporting the Republicans.

>The reason why Trump one was because of the Media. The Media wanted Hillary to win so they shilled hard for the candidate that was easily to beat (Trump). If you don't see Hillary's power play and only see memes and 'muh maga' you don't deserve to be in Cred Forums or even to vote.

>all these posts disagreeing

It's bizarre how the opposite view is so prevalent with Trump supporters. Even with the core argument, that they prefer Hillary and would like to see for her the easiest road to her election, unchallenged. Even with fresh evidence of how much media attention Trump received above his pay grade. Even with the evidence of how much better most of Trump's competitors always performed against Hillary. This combination of facts will simply not penetrate against the meme that, hurr the media is 'ginst us and 'ginst Trump. Have people honestly never heard of the tactic to build someone up only to tear them down? It's practically the industry of celebrity orientated media.

This would have been ideal, IMO.

The public were swayed by novelty.

...

There was a technicality and it was legal. Just sensationalism again.

Cruz is an off-brand Ben Shapiro past its expiration date.

Sad that he hit his peak so early in life

If Trump loses, Republicans should thank their lucky stars every day that the Dems didn't have the guts to go with their heart. When it's all said and done, Hillary will simply have a mandate to not be Trump; it'll be easier to stand against her agenda. Sanders would have felt empowered to be as openly socialist as he wanted to be. He might have finally erased the meme that the country would never elect a socialist (the have several times), and was killing it vs all Republicans.

More to the point, the republican primary voters picked the guy who would most express their seething anger. Trump was made possible by Obama's antagonism.

What is that even supposed to mean?

t. booger

>going to mexico for education
>ever able to use that education to get a job in the states

fuck off forever

>world renowned debater
>lost to Trump

Your own logic is flawed

Cruz didn't lose to Trump because that wasn't the format of the primaries.

His immigration policy was TOUGH, he just wasnt retarded enough to build a wall

That's a good point, user, you're absolutely right.

Cruz did worse in the north-eastern states than Kasich. So I don't think that had such a major impact since Cruz got more media coverage than food-man.
I think it's because he doesn't have the right personality that is likeable, cheated Carson, known to be a liar according to the other candidates and was in the end backed by the establishment which made him lose his outsider status. It was over for him when he picked that hag.

>considering a manlet for POTUS

this. this is all a big production.

cruz wouldnt get far with his evangelical crap. in fact they would probably have divided the evangelical vote with cruz being put on the spot about literal interpretation of the bible or non literal

is noahs ark a historical event or a bed time story? thats all it would have taken to drop him in the polls by half his current support in your scenario

Academic debates and presidential debates are not even remotely the same. Trump's television experience is more valuable for presidential debates than a school debate club.

I was a #cruzmissile from the first primary debate. Trump was always great entertainment but his policies sucked cock and he didn't have any eloquence whatsoever. Now I'm not a NeverTrump guy, but seriously what the fuck was everybody thinking picking him over Cruz, Rubio, Carson, or golly gee Kasich? The establishment blows but why Trump and why now? If there weren't gonna be 3-4 new justices in the next 8 years I'd be tempted to vote for Clinton. Fortunately my decision is made easier.

Donald you better not fuck this up.

El Rato is only 45. His time will come

Why are fedoras so fixated on their meme that Cruz was running on his religion when he wasn't?

Just say it like you mean it. You are a single issue voter bound and determined to vote for the least religious guy in the field.

My thoughts exactly, except the Clinton part.

>lost to australia
>proving bantz > facts

this is why trump won the primary

Don't kid yourself to think that Trump's script kiddies are going to convince undecided that he actually won that debate last night.

Yes, he is not considered a natural born citizen because he was not born on US soil. If he had been born in America, in a territory, or on a military base and to two American parents he would be eligible (at least according to the 18th century view, today and even when he was born he would need only one American parent). The technicality Cruz pursued was a law passed (IIRC a bit before or after the turn of the 19th century) that would have him considered as a natural born US citizen but that law was only temporarily able to grant citizenship, after the period in which a person could be considered a natural born citizen under that law expired, the law had already served its purpos and Cruz missed the boat by over a century and a half.

You should never even think of voting Clinton out of spite. I did that once. Once was enough.

>talking about goldman sachs shill like he is smart and respectful person

Trump would destroy Cruz and Hillary both in same time, in any debate.
You can even add Rubio and Jeb in 4v1 debate, it wouldn't help, Trump would wreck them all.

Let's dispel with this notion that Cruz would've won the primary against Jeb and Rubio without Trump's help. Cruz would not have survived the rnc. They were going to overthrow him just like they tried with Trump except all of the rnc hates Cruz for backstabbing them, so Trump had enough supporters to survive.

I'm sorry, Rato. You tried to warn us but we didn't listen.

>Telling gay people that the Syrian Muslims would throw them off a rooftop or worse
Actually there are gaybars in Damascus

The only people whod execute faggots in Syria are the ones that the West supports, arms and trains.

But he lost last night against Hillary

>The only people whod execute faggots in Syria are the ones that the West supports, arms and trains
Well at least we're doing something right

You forgot forgettable.

No he didn't just look at the online polls

protip: after Trump leaves the stage, win or lose, there will be nobody left in politics willing to push your anise birther memes. From here on out, you'll have to make better arguments for what you believe.

his mother is a citizen so he is a citizen. period.

kek, well thats one way of looking at it

DEBATES DONALD
HAND THEM OVER TO ME

>World renowned debater
>lost every debate

>>Word-renowned debater
Would you say hes a master debater?

>would you say he's a master-debater?
I certainly would, but he's definitely better 1v1, where he can use his intellectual prowess and logic. Trump is the opposite, he's much better debating more than one person at a time. Trump is more of a mass-debater.

Hillary Clinton just suffered the Ted Cruz effect. This is a popularity contest and being a good debater does not mean people will like you. In fact, both Cruz and Clinton have a distinct way of putting people off.

He did fine though Clinton was really underwhelming.

That was the purpose behind Cruz's delegate strategy in places like Colorado, where he'd have put too much time on the ground for others to compete.

Trump won the debate, build a wall and get over it CTR.

you are correct. trump was given 24/7 media coverage while they talked about how much they "hate" him.

all it did was inflame the dumbest denominator of the conservative base and win him the primaries, which is exactly what the media wanted.

literally the dumbest most inarticulate retard was voted ahead of actual competence.

>just look at the online polls
You forgot your emoticon.

no one wold have voted for cruz

>intelligent
>believes that net neutrality is the Obamacare of the internet
Nice try

This

This guy and Sen Gowdy for AG,head of the FBI or Supreme Court.

Cruz says Trump won the debate.

This is now a delegates thread

I'm telling you Dahnald, the delegates are not to be trifled with. Hand them over.

his wife works for godamn sachs

Very well, Dahnald.

It didn't have to be like this.

Take the delegates, Dahnald. You're gonna need them.

Ted Cruz is white. His dad was originally from the Canary Islands. Cruz is of Italian, Irish, and Spanish ancestry

>why trump one
>one
Beaner confirmed, americanexpat my ass

>>Word-renowned
Literally who?

Yup but they didn't expect Trump to be doing so well.

>Mexican statisticians

This is what gets me. It's not as if this is new, media setting us up with their favorite fall guy.

You had a chance this time as well.

>Word-renowned debater
then why didnt he do better in the republican primary debates? he didn't definitely win any of them

>actually intelligent (graduated from Princeton and Harvard Law)
Know who else graduated from harvard law?
obongo.
the clintons both went to yale.

Credentials mean nothing. Cruz probably just got in because of his beaner heritage

>Actually knows policy
There was very little substance in the debate anyway.

To win an election stacked against you in terms of demographics, you need bluster like Trump. Regular conservatism is already dead and will never win an election again - too many minorities for that. Rather than appealing with policy - which Trump has never done beyond the vaguest of statements, promises and demands - the only remaining way to get a non-Democratic president into the office is to mobilize nonvoters and those just fed up with the establishment.

Cruz would have lost 40-60, rallying all of the conservative remains behind him and nobody else.

>actually intelligent
>christfag
Pick 1 and only 1.

>Word-renowned debater

You have to be an idiot to think Cruz would have been a better choice.

>Trump brought the most votes into the GOP in primary history ever, Cruz did not. Trump is more popular face it.

>Religious right zealots have a very hard time winning. Teds base is smaller than Trump. Working class voters would care for him less.

>Would have the same electoral disadvantage Trump has but with less popularity so less chance of winning swing states.

>No chance of winning traditionally blue states. Forget even the chance of PA, MI, or WI.

The best part about Donald Trump is he is the change agent and Hillary Clinton is the status quo. With two status quo candidates, Hillary would probably come off as having more relevant policy plans rather than "muh religion."

Trump created a movement off of the idea of strengthening our foreign policy, stop getting screwed on trade deals and losing money, build back the middle class, and law and order.

Cruz lost to Trump and just because now you think hypothetically Cruz would have had a better debate performance that means he would have won the election. You're disregarding the fact that Trump started a massive movement and made career politicians like Ted Cruz look like an idiot. Ted's not what anyone wants right now. Yeah Trumps a poor debater, but he isn't a politician. We nominated him based on his message, and his message is how he will win

>then why didnt he do better in the republican primary debates? he didn't definitely win any of them
You better believe he did. Note that Cruz was not the obvious first choice out of the field of seventeen, but became Trump's principle opponent.

I hope the rest of your post is just a weak troll attempt.

It's hard to push that meme when Cruz consistently performed better than Trump in pre-general election polling. But then you just do as required and simply assert your beliefs as facts.

Sorry, just woke up from a siesta .


Trump is easily a tool by the media. He doesn't know it and his supporters always believe he plays "muh 4 dimensional chess".

I expected more of the Republican party. I expected this election for it to be like the UKIP or Mexican PAN. Unfortunately the party fell for the media play.

Trump will not win, the debate is a perfect example of how the media can play Trump easily and this manipulate the ameri vote. The media has made this election into a soap opera type op here in Mexico they call "efecto televisa"( making a candidate look like a soap opera star and like that win the election).

Pretty sad another Republican won, at this pace I would have even thrown my support for Jeb Bush or Kasich.

Makes me think OP. You guys do need more leafs in your lives.

This, but Cred Forums fell for the bait. The entire party fell for the bait.
And now the country will pay the cost by having a Hillary presidency. I expect the destruction of the American nation as it stands today thanks to Shillary.

That's it, I'm a #Cruzmissile now

You have to be a massive retard to believe that the media was at any point for Trump.

If you've been watching this election since the start you would know well that no media outlet, whether it's magazine, MSM, radio(other than conservative talk show hosts), online news, was ever for Trump.

Other than Breitbart, Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh, ALL of the media has been clearly against Trump. They covered him often because thought publicity on him would make him look like a loon but they didn't realize how much his message resonated with people.

He won the primary from garnering publicity and the MSM fought him the whole way.

If you think they wanted someone easy to beat to win then they would have shilled hard for someone like Kasich, so it could be Romney all over again. They instead tried to bring down Trump but didn't know that nothing they could do could prevent people from hearing his platform.

Why the fuck would the democrat controlled MSM want the guy who brought the most primary votes in history to win? The guy who started a movement and forced places like Michigan to register Republican to vote for him. Why would they possibly go for the neo-right populist candidate?

You forget the the main law of publicity
Any publicity is good publicity.

The "bad" publicity for Trump made him a household name. Making him into a "viable" candidate. If Trump was not reported, he would have ended like Santorum. But the media has been colluding with the Dems so they wanted an easy opponent against her.

When it comes to primaries, that does not guarantee they will win. The people going to vote for Trump were not in swing stated, but in heavily Democrat states, therefore making their vote almost invalid in a national election.

I see the election not from the inside of the US, but from the outside. Making it easy to see the bias for or against someone.

You don't get it. If candidate x gets 100 times more media attention than candidate y, candidate x will win every single time. All the better that a good portion of that coverage is poisoning the well for the future.

Bias is most apparent in what is covered and what is not covered, not in what characterizations are made of the coverage.

This guy gets it

I'm not sure, aren't the media desperate to portray how right-on they are?

I think their motivation was probably similar as everyone whinging about him on facebook - they want to look good. Additionally, Trump articles will have generated them far more traffic than any other candidate.

No

A basic principle of human behaviour is our small attention span and small memory. People will remember who won, not what got them there.

>Trump is easily a tool by the media. He doesn't know it
I wouldn't exactly say that. He's good at branding, and knows how to bring attention to himself. More like Trump underestimated the media's discipline, thinking he could turn them around, or use them against their inclination. But note how the complaint about Trump now is that he's not nearly as accessible as he once was. Only freely available to FOX.
>I expected more of the Republican party. I expected this election for it to be like the UKIP or Mexican PAN
The key difference is that UKIP was singularly purposed. The GOP's motivation in this election is for its establishment to survive with their power intact over those forces, from outside or from the base, trying to alter its purpose. Never make the mistake of expecting more of the Republican party.

>Pretty sad another Republican won, at this pace I would have even thrown my support for Jeb Bush or Kasich.
And that would be a mistake of another kind.

Trump innately brought ratings, sure, but the key to long term influence is painting narratives in general terms, not getting everyone to agree with you on every point.

>the guy who brought the most primary votes in history to win?
Another thing. This is not a brag point. You only get "the most primary votes in history" if there is reason to have more primaries than previously. Trump had to go deep into the schedule to secure the required number of delegates, and there are more primaries now over the caucuses which used to predominate.