Why is the declining birth rate seen as a 'negative' thing?

Why would it be a negative thing?

Also

A FUCKING LEAF!

leaf,

Because the only demographics with declining birth rates are Whites and Asians. Arabs, Hispanics and blacks are exploding while we face the endangered species list

...

Because whites are going down while undesirables are still popping out children like chickens have eggs.

But you see, that's bullshit, because I'm white and I know plenty of white people my age who had children, either it be as teenagers or now as adults.

>undesirables
you are literally a Nazi

You got a problem with that, Beady?

Retard, how many of these friends have 3+ children?

They all have 1. But that's the common amount nowadays. Having 3+ children nowadays if you aren't REALLY rich is absolute insanity and a nightmare.

China alone will keep Asians from ever going extinct simply by allowing people to breed more

Because, you know, one of the factors economies depend on is the number of customers. Less customers = less demand = less profit = another shoah

If you can't see the connetion you must be retarded.

Their male population is suicidal because of the lack of females. The fuck are you on?

It'll crash the economy. Less people around = less people to spend money.

I do see the connection, but I want him to elaborate on his point because otherwise there's no discussion going on.

/thread

Yeah but isn't the west ALREADY in an economic crash / crisis?

it wouldn't be if googles had to face the consequences of being grossly irresponsible

Yeah, one or two childrens top, thats not enough to keep the demograph growing.

People are not having kids for cultural and economical reasons, and not because they don't want to. For me this means we are not living all that well if we can't afford to sustain a small family with two children. We will probably stop having sex if the current contidions persist. It's already happening in Japan.

Because the ponzi/pyramid social security scheme that our nations operate requires more and more goyim every generation to pay for the retirement of the last lot.

All the while, food, land, transport, and every other fucking resource is FINITE. In the case of countries with a small landmass... very finite.

Not only that, but a low birth-rate is also terrible for the economy. If people stop reproducing, it will inevitable come to a point were the majority of the population will be composed of elderly people, see Italy for example, this means more people retiring and less people to replace then in the work place. Put two and two together and see were that will led you.

For every white Canadian not born the government has to import one third world brownie. That third world brownie has on average 3 children. This means that in one generation, trendy childless millennials have succeeded in completely changing the demographics of their country and basically destroying 100 years of culture and heritage. 1000s of years in European countries. All because MUH VIDYA, MUH WALLET. One child per white family is not enough. It has to be more like 4 or 5 to really make a difference.

It's not it's a good thing. Overpopulation is one of the worst problems in the world and people just don't want to admit it. We can't just continue to grow exponentially or some bad shit is going to happen.

It's a negative thing because white countries will soon be full of niggers,spics and gooks.

a steady supply of new tax payers is needed to fund the welfare state. lack of new tax payers represents and existential crisis for democratic (mob rule) states since it will inevitably lead to bankruptcy. cutting spending isnt an option (political suidice). importing taxpayers (immigration) is a stop-gap measure that only delays the inevitable.

Which again reinforces the vicious cycle, the young have to work to sustain the elderly, the young cannot afford to have a family, there are even less children in the new generation than the last.

The right amount to keep the population is 2 kid PER woman. If the countrie dosn't have this, he will problably face an economic and a social security crisis. Because you have less work force, if the number of old people isn't bigger than the young the problem doesn't happen.

It isn't a negative thing for 99% of the people in developed countries. It's because ((((((they))))) want more and more worker ants and consumers so ((((((they)))))) can make more money.

That, combined with social programs that mortgage our children's future so we can live a comfier later life by taking social security and bam: the myth that population decline is bad.

Remember when we were in elementary school and we learned that overpopulation would be the death of us all? Wonder what happened to that story. Think ((((they)))) had anything to do with us going completely opposite now?

>the majority of the population will be composed of elderly people, see Italy for example
LOL. We have a decent birthrate compared to other countries and far less immigrants

It's not about quantity it is also about the quality of the children being raised. Since women joined the working force, they barely have time, in some cases for their children.

Overpopulation has been fixed since the begging of times. Either by natural causes, such as resource depletion.
Or in Europe, where if you couldn't sustain a family, you were very likely to end up in a monastery.