Trump is supposed to be the Cred Forums candidate

>Trump is supposed to be the Cred Forums candidate
>Hillary is the one supporting air strikes on Muslims

How does this work?

Bombing muzzies is what started this whole middle-east and refugee mess dammit

>Trump is evil like Cred Forums right?
>Hillary is doing evil things though

>How does this work?

ky shill

>OP confused as to why Cred Forums isn't supporting genocide

Reality isn't black and white.

No, Clinton wants to destroy secular, stable govts like Syria by support Islamic rebels.

Even if you were correct:
Keeping them out of the US + not bombing > letting then into US + bombing

Cred Forums has never really been about supporting genocide (inb4 jews).

All most lads here on Cred Forums want is for the floods of socially destructive third-worlders to stop, and to be left alone to live life on their terms. No shits are given about Muslims in general, so long as they stay in their own containment shitholes far far away from the West.

I believe "muzzies" leveling the twin towers was the start of all this mess.

Or if you want to be really pedantic you could say that American policy decisions in the immediate aftermath of ww2 re Saudi Arabia started this mess (agreeing not interfere with the proliferation of whabism provided the Saudi's gave us oil and distanced themselves from the ussr....thanks Roosevelt)

didnt know ron paul was a Cred Forumsack

Because I'd rather let the Middle East sort itself out than continue wasting taxpayer money and 'causing' a refugee crisis? Let the sand googles kill each other, don't waste American lives fighting them for a war to support Israel.

Syria was never stable....countries that deem it necessary to rule with an iron fist are not stable. They're preoccupied with quashing dissent and uprising

sauce

Bombing them doesn't really help when you're also scooping them up and dumping them on American soil.

Cred Forums secretly love muslims?

This, the bombings are an excuse to bring them over

Just let them kill eachother, holy shit.
Do you seriously think that we have a moral base to bomb the entire middle east without Hillary getting killed in a riot? You do realize that first world countries also have many extremists, and there is literally nothing we can do about them.
Islam isn't compared to cancer just to insult it, you have to kill more than possible to make sure there is nothing left.

>Hillary is the one supporting air strikes on Muslims
And then the muslims come to Europe as refugees. Just like (((they))) have planned.

Shills think if they just repeat their message over and over again it will magically convince people. People say they're pissing in an ocean of piss, but it's more like an army of mental midgets with microphones. They never provide evidence. They rarely provide reason and logic.

we don't want to kill shitskins aslong as they stay in their homeland

Because continuing to attack the Middle East while importing more and more refugees from the countries you've destroyed isn't in America's best interest.

It's one of many reasons why Hillary Clinton would be a HORRIBLE president.

HAYAI

ubi se hvala,

or if you'd like to step into this gas chamber I made just for you slavonian cuck.

The question is about how you should deal with ISIS, not about how you should ignore the rest of the world as long as there's some imagined homogenous population, which doesn't even make sense in the US. You've already commited to being the world police and have your fingers in every conflict, can't exactly pull out now.
Trump is delusional and the shit he keeps saying while still having supporters is unbelievable. This is worst then a communist personality cult.

I'd rather take a chance on Trump than let Hillary keep forcing us down this path.

She will undoubtedly get many people killed.

Shillary wants to import them.

This. Don't bomb them, kick them out of western society completely and ignore them until they settle their own bullshit and act like people instead of animals.

Trump's a lost cause anyways.