This triggers the trumpkin

>this triggers the trumpkin

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FiveThirtyEight
worldwide.vote/hillary-vs-trump/#/
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

>media working hard to establish their narrative

didnt trump lose all the primary debates too

>talks socialistic ideas
>smirks and smiles like a little kid whole debate
>every sentence is literally ad hominem

How the fuck she won? Trump wasn't superb but shillary was terrible.

>>every sentence is literally ad hominem
What was one ad hominem by Clinton? I asked this last night and nobody gave an answer.

>FiveThirtyEight
Literally who?

I'm seeing a whole lot of random ass """"""""""news sources"""""""""" popping up since the election started

I cant post link im on mobile. Watch again you cant fucking miss cuz she made it every 2 minutes.

Lol

Hillary Clinton gave a bog-standard performance. Empty platitudes, misdirection, and the occasional focus-grouped zinger. There was nothing memorable about her performance. By any conventional measure, she won.

If anyone still thinks Trump's performance can be gauged by conventional measures, they are too dumb to have a meaningful opinion

His entire campaign has been one of breaking every ironclad rule and profiting from it. I'm not going to claim that I understand why or how - realistically, if I knew the secret sauce I would be out there getting rich off of it instead of shitposting at home. But his pattern has been, consistently, to suck all the air out of the room so no one is talking about his opponents. He takes the heat for the news cycle, then a week later no one remembers anything except Trump. Half the time, he comes back and rewrites his own history to look reasonable, then moves on to a new "campaign-ending gaff" with higher poll numbers.

Make any statement you want, but if you're honest, check back in a week and see how his poll numbers have changed. Then ask yourself if any of his defeated opponents would have done the thing you're suggesting instead - odds are good that he already defeated someone who thinks just like you do.

lol retard

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FiveThirtyEight

>wikipedia page bigger than the bible
>sub 1000 Alexa ranking
>random ass """"""news source""""""

>Not knowing what 538 is
>Pretending to follow US politics

political analysts who successfully predicted the outcome of several elections over the past 8 years

wow, how shocking, hill-drones say she won, trumpkins say he won, I say it was boring as fuck and a tie.

Except the UK elections

And Brexit

Red=Trump?

NATE
>(((((((((SILVER)))))))))

>likely
Kek

Make sure to also post the article he released just before that where he said debate bumps don't matter while he prepped for Trump's victory

I would do to that ass what Hillary does to truth and justice.

Days ago Hillary was saying she should be '50 points ahead'. We've had countless articles callin trump a nazi, hothead, maniac, psycho, imbecile, amongst many other insults. We were told this guy is a meme candidate who shouldn't be taken seriously and was only there because of these alt right trolls.

Hillary however is a serious politician. Perhaps with some minor health issues or controversies, but is overall much more qualified and competent. Undebatebly so in fact.

This is the perception many people get through the newspapers and tv stations everyday.

Was that apparent in the debate?

No. trump gave a measured and considered performance. The pundits can over hype some Hillary sound bites or mistakes from trump, but as the days go by the idea that trump is a viable candidate and reasonable man is what viewers will remember the most.

The debate easily helped him moe than Clinton.

worldwide.vote/hillary-vs-trump/#/

The world has spoken. If I ever seriously said drumpf or trumpkins I'd be worried right now.

What was his highlight of the debate? When he talked about how his aspie son loves computers or how his Palm Beach country club has minorities?

His performance was a disaster. All he did was babble. He talked over everything Hillary said, and the way Hillary remained measured and stuck to her train of thought while he barked over her made her look even better. She didn't get rattled like the clowns at the GOP debates, so his tactic of acting like a retard only made him look like a retard.

You would honor and uphold that ass?

kek now they can rig the polls even more

>hothead

I would fail to satisfy it and then lie about it later.

Learn English you fucktard

The more votes it gets, the higher Hillary goes. By time the 41 days are up, it'll be 80% Hillary. Screencap this.

lmao mika, who was literally consoled by the DNC, said Trump will probably surge after the debates despite losing

Except the political/social climate has changed drastically over the last 8 years. Also, they didn't predict Leave winning.

Shows this for me. Must have changed recently

I love Nate's progression. Silver -> Bronze -> Copper -> Plastic -> Cardboard

Weird. It's almost as if there was a group of people working to change it. Like, being paid to make her look better.

Sure, never heard Nate say anything dumb like this before.

Stick to the numbers, nerd.

>Poll allows multiple votes by default
>I posted the 1 vote per person results

Why should it? It's just another lie.

Topkek.

>By default the poll shows the results of mutiple votes per person

check all time results instead of last 24 hours

Makes sense. Thanks burger!

Statisticians who predicted the outcome based on polling data. Their political analysis is terrible, they're just the only people who actually know how to treat polls properly in thw US.

I'm a little baffled how anyone could think Clinton won that debate. Unless its from lowered expectations of "if she doesn't go onstage and drop multiple shartbombs then its a win" I just don't see how a working brain could reach that conclusion.

Trump clearly won the first few rounds and the rest while Clinton lost them. But she started off at a medium level and never improved, while Trump improved over time and was clearly getting under clinton's skin as her performance diminished. Its a clear 10-0 decision.

The very reason we're hearing all this post-debate discussion of biased moderators and microphones not working is spin for the Clinton loss.

Now, a debate performance is in the eye of the beholder, supporters or either candidate are going to come away from it thinking their side won. But objectively one side does better than the other and in this first debate Trump pulled off a win of moderate proportions.

Bullshit, Romney is widely regarded to have won the 1st debate but there was no bump in the polls.

>This triggers CTR

His poll numbers with the 35-64 crowd actually went up this morning

...

but he's +3 in today's LA times poll....?

Cucks

>using the same polls that we all raided

good one user

Nate (((Bronze)))

>this morning

was the data collect post-debate? Polls usually have a delay on them

>my local newspaper said trump won, so he must've won

The truth is that the media determines who wins a presidential debate and the media has been democratized.

A handful of democrat-friendly media outlets are getting overruled by the internet. Trump won the debate no matter what you or your favorite progressive "journalist" thinks.

Didn't you write an article invoking the Cred Forums and reddit boogieman being out to get your polls today? Did they not pay you enough for it?

are you kidding?

>donald, you called this one woman fat 10 years ago
>donald, 20 years ago you didn't pay enough to this guy I brought
>donald, you're only successful cause you got a loan from your father 40 years ago

I'm not going to say Trump did well, but the second half was entirely about his business record -- which is his fault for not deflecting from, but come on, it was ad hominem.

Also

>she has a name, donald, her name is juanita donita peso!

is this a fucking disney movie? get out of here