Cred Forums called out by MSM for manipulating polls

>Online results from about 70 debate polls were particularly egregious because Trump supporters “artificially manipulated” the results “to create the false narrative” that he won.
>Trump supporters using Reddit and Cred Forums message boards bombarded the online polls and spread the effort to Twitter to catapult the hashtag “#Trumpwon” to the No. 1 trending topic.

google.com/amp/nypost.com/2016/09/27/online-polls-showing-trump-won-the-debate-were-rigged/amp/?client=ms-android-verizon

Other urls found in this thread:

google.com/amp/nypost.com/2016/09/27/online-polls-showing-trump-won-the-debate-were-rigged/amp/?client=ms-android-verizon
washingtontimes.com/news/2016/sep/26/eight-examples-where-fact-checking-became-opinion-/
nypost.com/2016/09/26/lester-holt-shows-he-doesnt-know-the-meaning-of-impartial/
breitbart.com/big-journalism/2016/09/27/lester-holt-asked-trump-15-questions-clinton-2-questions/
washingtonexaminer.com/in-debate-trump-gets-6-follow-up-questions-clinton-gets-none/article/2602939
google.com
reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/54oj6f/centipedes_you_know_what_to_dolist_of_all/
youtube.com/watch?v=3XSuG5aCFGs
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_party_strength_in_U.S._states
archive.is/qDPMN
archive.is/LQbuc
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

kek

By the way, are they implying that Hillary brigades do not exist?

>shultz
>spread the effort

Encouraging people to vote for Trump and convincing them to do it isn't "rigging".

>google.com/amp/nypost.com/2016/09/27/online-polls-showing-trump-won-the-debate-were-rigged/amp/?client=ms-android-verizon

Surprised that people who accuse other people of rigging do it themselves?

People accuse other people of the sins they commit/want to engage in.

It's funny actually.
Cred Forums shits on normiebook and reddit for being echo chambers and yet there's no bigger echo chamber than Cred Forums itself.

We can't even have a discussion about how to constructively analyze Trump here without being labeled a clinton shill.

wait I thought MSM said Trump supporters were low intelligence?

this doesn't sound like the actions of a low intelligence group
MSM contradicting themselves like assholes

>mad that people are joining together to vote on a poll

That's the point of a poll.

But that's not an accurate sample.
It's literally a poll being advertised to Trump supporters for the sole purpose of having Trump win it. It wouldn't be a fair metric unless everyone knew about it.

>getting people to vote in online polls is rigging now

i cant believe these people. i hope normies dont fall for this bullshit.

>Polls show Trump is winning
>MSM: WAHHH THEYRE RIGGED

Pot calling the kettle black

No it's not, leaf
See

>(((Schultz)))

i'm disgusted. why people do this

>t. shill

>wahhhh wahhhh queenie didn't win waaah waaah
>OMG YAAAS QUEEN WON OMG YAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAS

This is how the MSM is reacting to their world and narrative falling apart.

Rigged in what sense? Online polls are completely useless and with implicit bias: just think that the people who vote the most normally are the ones who read the newspaper, which in most cases have a bias towards one candidate or the other.

How can you say that an online poll is rigged if anyone can vote for it without any constraints? Seems like the complaint is just because the voting didn't have the intended candidate winning

It's a good day to be alive.

>they were manipulated stupid drumpfkins
>BUT THEY DONT MEAN ANYTHING

fucking idiots. Show the polls were hacked. Otherwise this is no different than sending out directions to the polling centers to all our friends.

(((Schultz)))

>We don't like the results, so they were rigged!
>The British "re-vote on Brexit" petition was 100% legit! Millions of different Brits signed it!

Eight examples where ‘fact-checking’ became opinion journalism

washingtontimes.com/news/2016/sep/26/eight-examples-where-fact-checking-became-opinion-/

Lester Holt shows he doesn’t know the meaning of ‘impartial’

nypost.com/2016/09/26/lester-holt-shows-he-doesnt-know-the-meaning-of-impartial/

Lester Holt Asked Trump 15 Questions, Clinton 2 Questions

breitbart.com/big-journalism/2016/09/27/lester-holt-asked-trump-15-questions-clinton-2-questions/

In debate, Clinton gets no follow-up questions, Trump gets 6

washingtonexaminer.com/in-debate-trump-gets-6-follow-up-questions-clinton-gets-none/article/2602939

>sage

yep, it's pretty sad.

we do it all the time, but if you use the typical buzzword narratives you're either a shill or trained by shills


basically it's like this, yes Trump fucked over public money to enrich himself, he sold out white neighborhoods by block busting or convincing people to take on section 8 tenants knowing that the properties would get run down and confiscated so he could get them cheap at auction, he was in land development in NJ so you know they're a fucking pile of bodies someplace having to do with him

but thats still not as bad as Hillary and Janet Reno ordering the federal government to burn children to death on an occult holiday dedicated to molech,

so if Trump thinks the devil is real and does wacky shit to worship him, he's not leaving an awful trail of evidence about it thus he is the better candidate

also he's not attacking the constitution

Sure. But the other crap source that keeps getting posted says we turned on trump.
So how did we rig polls and turn on trump?
Better get your story strait.

Nice link, try and archive next time. Funny how your didn't link directly to the ny post though. Click farming?

I've never understood this obsession with polls. The only vote that matters is the actual election.

Guys we should all rig the election by voting for Trump in November!

>a few hundred Cred Forumstards rigging polls with tens to hundreds of thousands of total votes

okay cool

Are they seriously implying a backwater vietnamese gardening board has the power to simultaneously rig 70 polls?

Are they just retarded or is portraying Cred Forums as all-powerful a strategy?

KEK has dubbed it for Trump

>>(((MSM))) accuses others of rigging polls.
You can't make this shit up folks!

>MSM called out by Cred Forums for manipulating reality

>Are they seriously implying a backwater vietnamese gardening board has the power to simultaneously rig 70 polls?

full of low information dum dum Trump supporters no less

...

Yeah! Let's all vote Trump!

Who the fuck is this black dude on Varney?

>"racist" or "racism" doesn't exist it's a made up word to use by race hustlers to keep black people on the plantations

How did we cheat when we just voted? Isn't this what democracy is about?

you guys are growing too strong!!
DANGEROUS people

Yep. The problem is that all of those open access internet polls are complete bullshit to begin with. They mean nothing. But they produce a number at the end and so some people just insist on believing they must mean something.

Those kinds of polls only exist to get morons to click on links so the site gets more page views and sells more ads. Nothing more.

HE CANT KEEP GETTING AWAY WITH WINNING

...

>Canada confirmed voting for Trump. Now to Mexico. Has anyone polled the cartels yet?

YOU VOTED FOR THE WRONG CANDIDATE GOYIM ITS AS BAD AS ANUTTA SHOOOOAAAAAAA

>pretending to be this much of a newfag

>might actually be this much of a newfag

>doesn't know what marblecake is

>mfw

Boy, that's friggin nerve, considering all the cheating and fixing and manipulating they've been doing themselves.

Are we ever going to grow a spine and drive these shysters out of the country?

>artificially manipulated

It's an internet poll.

It's only negative or manipulated or false when it doesn't show you the result you wanted to show.

>(((Marisa Schultz)))

When will this vicious Jewish supremacism end?

This is an actual article right now

No. It's rigged if the people don't vote the way you want... Come on, it's literally 2016, you're such a bigot.

There is more evidence that hillary perjured herself during the oversight committee hearing than that we manipulated all dem polls.

Weird that there is no reporting on that.

You stupid fucks aren't even being slick anymore.

After the debate there were hundreds of fucking poll vote threads.

/pol is dead with newfags

> voting in an online poll
> rigging

Please fuck off with this shit.

user, I'm all for Trump, but we're being naive if we pretend these were fair polls that both sides were equally pushing on their social media sites and threads to influence the final result.

They should keep their mouths shut. Or not, I'm sure the Trump campaign appreciates the help. Average voter at home sees Trump won the polls. Gets told polls were rigged therefore reinforcing the image that the media is untrustworthy and anti-Trump.

...

>line breaking your greentext

Hello CTR!

stfu shill

Cred Forums is far from a hug box. I get shit on here all the time and I'm extremely red pilled.

>google.com

That's your first mistake.

>the Internet has different political views than the general population

>they rigged the polls because the Internet polls turned out to have different results!

Lmao

>The Daily Dot

t. (((CTR)))

Again, voting in online polls is not rigging them you stupid Hillshill.

What the fuck, if Hillary was in this position then these fuckers will be celebrating all night long. I thought our local politics were bad enough.

Being called a nigger for joaks doesn't not make this place a hugbox

>Cred Forums AND Reddit
The alliance that I thought was impossible.

>shillary #1 in polls
>LOL DRUMPF BTFO
>trump #1 in polls
>THE POLLS ARE RIGGED!!!

>It's only okay when we do it

Repeat after me: anyone who disrupts the hugbox is a shill, hackable online polls are more relevant that scientifically sound ones, stoooopid SJWs are ridiculous with their hugboxes, amirite gaise?

>Cred Forums is generally a conducive environment to discussion, unless you're shitposting for the sake of shitposting
>or damning everyone on Cred Forums with a wide, condemning brush that you conveniently are not a part of

>go on normiebook
>implying you can spout whatever you like without a flamewar with people from your hometown

places like reddit, facebook, and others encourage you to behave in a way that is socially acceptable and not cross any taboo lines, lest ye be cast out like a leper. your name is ascribed to those things, whereas here with our anonymity we can express ourselves freely without fear of personal reprisals, only our ideas can be attacked.

how is that an echo-chamber?

also

>it's funny actually

words only faggots and leftists use

maybe those faggot ass CTR shillls should have been voting for their candidate in the online polls instead of shitting up the place here? stupid faggots.

They're just asshurt we're beating them at their own game.

CTR is just a right-wing conspiracy theory goyim

Whatever nigger.

(((Schultz)))

So, if Trump supporters were allowed to vote for the real electrion, he would have won right?

>online polls where anyone anywhere can vote making them useless without even resorting to tampering with them
>Cred Forums actually believes in them

We all voted in those polls to mess with them, it's never about "truth" in such polls because they're flawed from the very beginning. Just as long as it creates a problem for the MSM narrative.

The MSM manipulate polls all the tine for cheap propaganda. Third party candidates aren't allowed to join the debate unless they reach 15% in the polls.
The sooner everyone realizes how easy t is to skew, the sooner the kikes have to stop implementing them

proxys and scripts and other things are

people here think that no body is reading what they are writting, maybe you should use a private chat for those type of operatives

>Voting is rigging
Apex kek

MSM using the term false narrative. Holy shit we've come full circle.

Kek wills it

This

It's only a "false narrative" when (((they))) say so, goy.

Let me guess, you also think that people who vote for a party different than yours are manipulating the elections.

>rigged
That isn't rigging. It can cause a misrepresentation of the population by the sample, but it isn't rigging.

No.

Descending opinions that have no factual basis are what Cred Forums criticizes. Actual factually based contrary input is cool in my book, just as long as it's not "LOL DRUMPF BTFO" and "rly makez u tink" every 2 seconds.

>UNFAIR
MICS
>AND
QUESTIONS

I never get tired of Brexit 2.0.

The desperation is just so satisfying.

>thread #4235

Seriously, check the fucking catalog newfagging reddit nigger.

This. They're mad they can't write their own narrative anymore.

good thing there's no proof, right?
reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/54oj6f/centipedes_you_know_what_to_dolist_of_all/

What the fuck are you on about? This poll was on major news network websites. The access to them was the same.

>t.shill

>cnn
>nbc
>jew york times
>scientifically sound polls

There is no direct proof of intent, so nothing happened.

t. Comey

Like the CNN and Bloomberg polls are not rigged. They know the right people to call, so they can steer the polls in their favor. Stupid pundits.

still bad for them because people just won't trust anything anymore. chaos wins. Kek rises

...

how is it our vault we are the only motivated ones?

(((They))) always did have a thing for monopolizing the control of the public opinion though the mass media, eh?

No matter what happens, the damage this election cycle will do to MSM is going to be delicious.

They are outing themselves for the retards they truly are.

>shills trying to make us look bad

*through

Who gives a shit.

Hillary 2016 bitch.

>REEEEEEEEE DON'T YOU UNDERSTAND THAT BREITBART IS MORE REPRESENTATIVE OF SOCIETY THAN THE TIMES FUCKING SHILL LOOK AT MY POLLS THEY CAN'T BE FAKED BECAUSE 4CHIN HASN'T DONE THAT HUNDREDS OF TIMES IN THE PAST RRREEEEEEEEEEEEEE

You people are quickly getting more butthurt than berniebots, it's hilarious.

...

→ #
→ #
→ #
→ #
GET OUT OF THIS SLIDE THREAD AND GO VOTE FOR THE 2nd DEBATE QUESTIONS!!!

The reason Reddit and Normiebook are echo chambers is because they actively censor those with "problematic" views.
Here? If you want tell people you are an anarcho socialist then go ahead. We will tell you to hang yourself, but nobody is stopping you.

So its our fault for being high energy?

Wew lad, Hillary supporters are so low energy they can't even vote. SAD

>people vote in a poll by their own will
>IT WAS RIGGED!

Rigged would mean that whoever was running the poll put false information up

Trump won the debate though. So their "rigged" bullshit is inaccurate anyway.

...

"Professional" polls showing Clinton won the debate were rigged: report

>ignore the media exposing us for rigging the polls and go rig the debate

Hillary votes were going up by thousands a minute as well. Trumps were just going up faster, no way there weren't bots for her as well.

CTR needs to better concentrate their autism.

Get over it.

Anyone but trump.

We can't have discussions on this matter. The stakes are too high. There is no time to be rational. Leftists all these years have been playing without a rule book and they've been destroying us. We've been raided multiple times for days, Cred Forums is on full defensive mode and I don't blame them. We're at a point where shitty journalists are making bait threads to write articles and prompt tumblrs to raid us.

This is a fight of the good vs evil, the right against the wrong.
This is truly the whites mans LAST STAND globally, a Trump loss is the mark of a new era, the era of minoritys. We have chosen our side with ease for we understand the consequences, and anyone criticizing at this point is clearly a shill. You don't need to point out to us Donald is slightly retarded, that he bad at debates, that his speech pattern is the same of a 10 year olds, WE KNOW ALL THIS yet we don't care because there is too much to lose

guess correct term is "not representative"

Fuck off iphone poster

>only our ideas can be attacked
>faggots and lefties

He's right. It was a Trotskyite term made to silence dissent.

This is why I stopped paying taxes in 2008.

But what if I call you a jew?

>don't trust the online polls goyim they aren't scientific
>but you can totally trust our completely-not-rigged-totally-trustworthy polls

Like many remainian votes during Brexit, but don't tell anyone or (((they))) will call you a *gasp* racist xenophobe!

See you in november

>b-but only we are supposed to rig the polls

Haha how do millions of supporters "rig" a poll by voting in the poll together?

But it's their narrative, we just hijacked it.

Same here friend

winrar
It gets tiresome.

I don't know, buddy, it would surely be totally unprecedented and foreign to 4chin

>millions of supporters
lel

>Cred Forums voting in polls so they don't count. They are worthless polls anyways because of the methodology so who cares mirite guize?? But still, gotta let everyone know they like totally cheated..

The MSM media ONCE AGAIN telling us, that we are wrong. Telling us that Trump lost, that Trump cant win, that Trump wont win etc.. WHen are they going to "get it"?

Oh thats right they won't. Because 80% of the CEO's and Owners and Presidents of JEWISH MAIN STREAM MEDIA outlets are postions held by (((JEWS))) when they are 2% of the population.

CTR and other shills.. Don't be afraid, to take the redpill.. Do some research. See WHO is controlling the narrative. And when you find out WHO is the majority of narrative. Ask yourself WHY...

Thats all we ask here at our friendly board of peace

>telling your friends to vote is now considered rigging

Shut the fuck up and get the fuck out of here

>reading comprehension

I wish I could have done that. Fuckin payroll deductions ...

Fuck this government

What kind of idiot doesn't know that online polls are always misrepresentative, and easily rigged?

If you can't stand up for your beliefs in public, maybe it's because your beliefs are shit

I agree.

That Islamophobe needs to be urgently stopped before any more innocent Muslims are driven to commit terrorism.

Its not our fault Hillary supporters are unmotivated.

>The MSM media ONCE AGAIN telling us, that we are wrong. Telling us that Trump lost, that Trump cant win, that Trump wont win etc.. WHen are they going to "get it"?

What is there for them to get? That you are as deluded and opposed to rational arguments as the very SJWs the alt right was created against?

Face it, you're every bit as cultish and rejective toward reality as the far left retards.

You are the rejects of capitalism, the losers who didn't seize the opportunity and you want to blame it on someone other than you. And misery loves company.

WIth my post see image from

One poll.

Sorry there is no way Cred Forums could have rigged every fucking poll in existence. That would take such a massive, coordinated effort, it's impossible.

Clinton spends millions on you fucking CTR shills and you couldn't even rig the polls.

If 2 cant put our faith into online polls, what can we believe in?

>yet there's no bigger echo chamber than Cred Forums itself.
You don't seem to understand what an echo chamber is shlomo. No one stops you from being a retard on here.

thedonald subreddit is indistinguishable from Cred Forums
They share the same userbase

>spam polls after debate and getting everyone to vote for Trump multiple times
>News media catches this
>Pol starts to complain about getting caught
You guys are only damaging Trump in the long run, Trump lost that debate and now since you fucks rigged the polls Trump won't get off his high horse and actually prepare for the next debate

Fucking reddit at it again.

Cred Forums is a board of peace.

>thedonald subreddit is indistinguishable from Cred Forums
>They share the same userbase
Fuck off

Shut up Clinton shill

what are some these realities that we are rejecting? can you even name one, or is your comment just bullshit?

>They cheated by telling people to vote
We're going to do the same in November

Oh please, you don't get banned on Cred Forums for disagreeing with the hivemind.

There is too much shitposting here though, I'll give you that.

This.

>masses of leftist are not brigading
MSM lies as usual. Nothing to see here.

>all the other online polls were rigged
>but muh CNN poll is totally legit

this is honestly true

and i helped vote in the polls

Start working for cash under the table. I make just as much money now as before maybe more and its all cash. Sadly I have to not use banks and not hold normal work but there is a great deal of cash work out there. I'm not paying shit into the system until liberals are out.

If you are not voting the way we tell you to, you are rigging the polls.
Great logic.

Jesus, you are bad at this pretending to be naive thing. But I'm glad to see you've read the gentleman's guide to forums or whatever the fuck that was stickied here a few months ago.

>That would take such a massive, coordinated effort, it's impossible.

It's not massive nor impossible. Scripts and bots don't care if they have to vote on one link or ten.

Plus half of those polls were on alt right sites to begin with, I suspect those hardly needed any rigging. So all in all, you had maybe a dozen polls that actually required swaying.

>the polls were rigged by a bunch of people voting a particular way.

Umm, maybe they just genuinely support Trump.

Thanks for correcting the record m8

>multiple times

There were no scripts involved, most just voted once.
I assume a few autists reset their cookies and IP a few times and added a few extra votes but nowhere near the amounts needed to get Trump a landslide unless he was already winning well.

Since when is voting in a poll 'rigging'?

Hillary is just unpopular.

The media are taking us autists too seriously Kek.

>hill shills can't even be bothered to rig online polls

There were literally dozens of polls. I voted once in several of them, but that is hardly rigging. Rigging a poll is easy, rigging dozens simultaneously in a short period of time is fucking difficult and goddamn tedious. Nobody fucking did that.

And Trump did win the debate. The point of a debate is to pick up undecided voters. Hillary is not, Trump massively is. Therefore Trump won.

>I-IF TRUMP SUPPORTERS VOTE IT'S RIGGED

Aight, that triggered me. Any CTR in here? I want to beat the shit out of you.

>the anonymous hacker known as """four channel"""

>unscientific polls have dubious results
>this is somehow Hiroshima Nagasaki's fault

Nice projection kike

If the debate was rigged, I think it's only fair that the polls are rigged too.

youtube.com/watch?v=3XSuG5aCFGs

Polls weren't hacked, but nu/pol/ did rig them. There's a thread here about rigging the polls by voting multiple times and using bots.

Polls were rigged by voting
>>Current year

>Open incognito mode on phone
>Vote
>Close browser
>Turn on and off airplane mode
>Repeat

Also there were multiple polls being spammed after the debate

>CTR are actually paid to do exactly what they're claiming we did
>purely by "getting out the vote" in our communities we're "rigging" the polls
Its disgusting, they openly act like we shouldn't have any vote at all

Brexit polled relatively even with remain in the week so before the election.
It also only won with not even 52%

Fucking this.

This.

Also try saying this on reddit and see what happens no matter the subreddit
>get in the oven you dirty nigger loving kike

silly user trump supporters are not human, they shouldnt be allowed to vote

Thin skinned, incoherent and easily rattled.

I honestly hope leftist are put to death after this

we know, we don't pretend it's not
Cred Forums is a more organized Cred Forums, now kys shill.

>claims Cred Forums is an echo chamber
>no one here can kick you out for saying this
it's like pottery

how dare trump supporters go out of their way to make sure that they show their opinion in polls, fucking disgusting 2bh

...

You live in a ludicrous filter bubble and refuse to see it. You obsess about statistics, because your uneventful lives are so boring, you have to find excitement this way and you do so by finding likeminded NEETs who for the first time in their lives feel they have a greater goal in life (same as the Berniebots, really).

You ridiculously overestimate your reach, exactly because of the echo chamber that this place is. Threads get a few hundred replies from about half as many posters before being archived, the most successful posts of the week on the_donald gather maybe 3000 votes and third that many comments. By all rational means, the entire alt right on the internet consists of few tens of thousands of active people at the very best.

The debate was watched by 84 million.

THAT ONLY GOT 319 REPLIES

BTFO

>Online polls are rigged because Trump has more people voting for him

the fuck?

>Cred Forums: hey guys go click this link and push a button
>smart complexity

>rigged

How are they "rigged" exactly?

>mfw Hillary supporters think the only time something is rigged is if it's the opposition doing it

or maybe it's because you'll lose your job or worse be put in jail.

So many words and no actual arguments; really makes one think, huh?

>people said things on the internet

its all over boys

>alt right sites

thank you for ctring the record

and yet...

>obsess about statistics

Well... considering in the right context they are the only truth that matters. It's a bit important to obsess over.

>Cred Forums and reddit posters faked these 70 polls in trumps favour
>the same posters that turned on trump because they got mad at his overweight basement dweller comment

so you're arguing Cred Forums is too small to rig the poll?

This. And they are going to use it for a reason why its okay for them to actually rig the general election. Mark my words.

Don't worry when they do they will have given us every reason to have their heads.

What a bunch of pointless babble. I'm still waiting for you to tell me which realities we are rejecting. You claim that we overestimate our reach, but that is just your unsubstantiated opinion, not a fact.

Like libtards everywhere aren't doing the exact same thing. Just another way you know the media is completely biased.

To the media, landslide support is the same thing as being rigged.

>It's a "Last stand"
I have heard this rhetoric from the right every election. It's simply not true.
They said it about Gore, Kerry, Obama twice, now Clinton.

If Clinton wins, she won't enact or change anything too drastic to the point where there's no going back. She won't pursue a hyper liberal agenda, because she doesn't care about any of that. The last thing the dem establishment wants is complete success because then they'll have nothing to fight over or use to appeal to voters on.

Yeah, Cred Forums should be blamed for Clinton's supporters not being organized.

Faggot.

They're not "rigged" in the typical sense, but they are not a fair polling representative of what the nation might actually think.
Far from it.

>Cred Forums BTFO
but I thought Cred Forums was an echo chamber, how is it possible you posted this?

This is pretty embarrassing desu

>comments get removed
>ragie leftie calls your boss trying to get you fired
>blackmail
>people argue with emotions / shout you down as a group without actual arguments

>they manipulated the polls by voting for the candidate they support
Lmaoing@yourlife

Prove it.

>they are not a fair polling representative of what the nation might actually think
un-scientific clickbait polls never are, didn't you realize that? that's why they need all these damage control articles. The right isn't doing damage control, that's the best indication he won.

No, they manipulated the polls by spamming them all over Cred Forums with "SMASH THAT TRUMP BUTTON" rhetoric.

This sounds like the websites hosting the polls rigged them. This will make people trust the media even less.

>this whole fucking election

But you only "smashed" once, so you put in your legit vote. It's manipulation if we are more connected than lone normies?
>implying clinton forums didn't do the same thing

So is there any proof of botting, or otherwise felonious or disingenuous manipulation?

Or if this was Clinton would this be spun as "Millennials Engaging in Spontaneous Online Grassroots Political Activism!"

If Trump supporters claimed the same we'd be called conspiracy theorists and laughed off

>the majority of polls were all rigged

>only our CNN poll wasn't

These people must really think we are idiots.
They will pay for it.

The media in November:
>election showing trump won was rigged
>following debates, alt right mobilized support on Cred Forums and reddit to get more people to vote for trump
>trump votes were artificially inflated by white males voting trump
>majority of trump votes came from voters spurred to action that otherwise would not have voted
>allegations of foul play point to entire districts of people successfully inviting friends to vote trump

>There's a thread here → # about rigging the polls by voting multiple times and using bots.

That is easy with one poll. That is tedious as fuck with dozens of polls. Even with bots.

It would mean at least 2 more supreme court justices with a liberal bias. Into a court that legalized gay marriage by fiat.

Imagine what they could do to the country...

>implying clinton forums didn't do the same thing
Find me one Clinton board that had anywhere near the same level of spamming.
One.

I'll wait.

>How are they "rigged" exactly?

People voted on them and didn't click Hillary.

If it goes against their narrative.

How did we rig the polls though? We are people who watched the debate... we were then asked who we thought won and gave our answer... we were also asked multiple times by different websites and organisations. Where's the rigging exactly? All it shows is killary has no support

>Rigged
>Goes up in real polls as well

;^)

but you do claim it

in fact that was your justification for rigging these polls

Oh, you know of some clinton sites that did it like Cred Forums did?
Please share.

>poeple vote on online polls
"Its rigged"

fake and gay

Copy paste difficult CTR?

The only repeating things here are dubs blessed by KEK.

>voting and tweeting is rigging

I have never, ever said that this is America's last chance. I'm 33 years old.

This is absolutely our last chance. I've witnessed white Americans lose 30% of their demographic within 10 years. That's not natural. That's not normal. There is a concerted effort to destroy white people. It starts at the top of our government and goes down from there. Trump is our only hope.

The alternative is war. I'm not going to sit back and watch my country given away by kike politicians and journalists.

Do you not know what an echo chamber is? Just because I'm here disrupting it doesn't mean 98% of the posters don't say the exact same thing.

No. Anyone can run the right scripts and cast hundreds or thousands of votes from a single computer. It's been done by Cred Forums many times before.

>if trump supporters vote for the candidate they like then it's rigged

When you spam votes on message boards that have a huge bias, yes, that's rigging unless you also even it out with another site

So, they want everyone to have a unique id when they vote in online polls, but don't give a shit and actively fight against that in the real election? Go figure.

So what you're saying is, even though Clinton has pad supporters whose job is literally to do shit like inflate a poll, they couldn't manage to out spam a rag tag group of shitposters?

So the polls were manipulated because one side got the word out? You're standing by this ridiculously retarded reasoning?

>it has to be a tie for it not to be rigged
Are you five?

>voting is rigging

Why do these communist fucking shits hate democracy so much?

>t. shill

There's no claim in that article that either proxies or scripts were used.

>If Clinton wins, she won't enact or change anything too drastic to the point where there's no going back

She is not only calling for mass media censorship but it is actually already happening. That alone is fucking frightening as goddamn fuck. Add the Supreme Court issue and we are lookin at a potential Clinton dictatorship. We are on the edge of tyranny here. It's Trump or Civil War.

Nice backpeddling.
So you have nothing then?
Not one site?
Not ONE?

Still waiting.

Just wait until November. "We're having a second election, because too many people voted for Trump."

Well, polls can't be accurate because they allow all sorts of folks to vote.

It's supposed to be a poll on who won tonight's debate. Now half the people who voted didn't watch it and are just shilling for their respective party. Another part isn't even allowed to vote because they're foreigners.
Also people who don't vote exist. If sHills don't vote it's no wonder that zealous Trump-men win all the polls.

So please, actual americans: Go and vote on the election day. Every single one of you matters.

Who is really rigging the polls?

So if a candidate gets TV ads to say vote for them it's rigging? It's the same thing.

No opposing force on the polls.

Can you read?
I'm seriously asking.
Are you illiterate?

>the poll

There were over 70 polls at the same time.

Oh noes.. totally caught us.. I mean.. its not like Hillary has CTR.. a super pac dedicated to "rigging" online forums.

>“artificially manipulated” the results “to create the false narrative”


The MSM wouldn't know anything about thatm would they?

People should just start shooting these people.

CNN's was of registered voters over the phone by a pollster, you retard.

Except that's not at all what he said, but nice goal post moving.

Find me a place where the online polls were skilled for Clinton supporters the way they were here for Trump supporters.

I'll wait.

>(((schultz)))

You'll find more diversity and opinion on Cred Forums than at your next interracial orgy.

Oh no I have to replace 1 line of code who could overcome such obstacles truly incomprehensible and unrealistic

Yeah, of which 44% of the voters were democrats and 21% were republicans.

>sampled 42% democrats vs. 26% Republicans

kek, stay dumb.

Which deliberately oversamples Democrats and can be manipulated by the Clinton News Network to say whatever they want to say.

CTR
>Its totally ok for us to be PAID MONEY to RIG online forums to show FALSE Hillary support. But when Cred Forums does it for free its TOTALLY WRONG.

GTFO. We aren't stupid. We aren't falling for your shit. And most importantly of all, we truly don't give a fuck. We want a happening.. Regardless if Trump gives us a happening or not as President.. The MSM is throwing fucking fits over this shit. We have already won. Any more is just EVEN MORE icing on the cake. We love this shit. Cry more faggots. We. Love. It.

>You'll find more diversity and opinion on Cred Forums
Stopped reading.
This place is a national socialist bubble.

There's more Democrats in the country than Republicans you retard, by a significant amount actually.

first day, bud?

Wrong.

>I have heard this rhetoric from the right every election. It's simply not true.

No, it was true all along: the Average Joes were simply deeply conditioned by the (((mass media, Academia, Hollywood))) and so many (((other interests))) to look the other way, to pretend nothing relevant was happening, but the reality is that it was: the rug is being pushed from under your nation's feet as we speak; it's been that way for decades.

The United States are nearing it's "Last Stand", and if the US population doesn't seize this opportunity, your nation and by definition the rest of the world are completely and unequivocally fucked.

>If Clinton wins, she won't enact or change anything too drastic to the point where there's no going back.

Exactly, the United States will keep going it's current way, that is: it will march onto it's own destruction, as the US' transfer of power is officially completed and the political power is finally wrestled away from the Constitutionalist plebs and right into the hands of the (((Globalist elite))), who has never meant to act on the US or mankind's best interests.

Haha it's telling that Trump is just barely behind in the post despite the poll oversampling Democrats and under sampling republicans.

Thank you for Correcting the Record.

>brit
Get out of this thread you uninformed fellow

Correct the record

Look at me. I'm the narrative now.

>get BTFO
>"uh... um.... uh well LOL CTRL HAHAHA XD"
Checkmate

Nobody has even alleged there are scripts or bots. Show me anywhere in that article where that was suggested. Sites are quite capable of detecting scripts and bots (see the Delaware Cruzmissile who tried to rig Drudge) and correct the poll.

>We have to keep America white!
That's too far for even me to go, friend.
This is borderline racism.

This is a CONSPIRACY THEORY.

The CTR SHILLS have turned into Alex Jones type drones.

Incredible.

This election truly is ground breaking.

Put your tin foil hats on, being insane has now gone mainstream....

When did it become cool to be a conspiracy theorist?

When Hillary Clinton started arguing against a cartoon frog named Pepe?

What a Time to be Alive!

>(((Schultz)))
Oy vey, truly another holocaust.

Ya nah cunt

My grandpappy killed nazis.

Jews are still cancer of the earth. Nazis were no where near the first to try and exterminate the scum.

(YOU)

Were you not in the threads where we bumped trump over clinton in every poll?

Go back to bed.

The only tinfoil hat here is you thinking that people here actually get paid to post.

>5 cents into my savings account

>Publicly disclosed information is proof of fraud
>I don't know how to statistics

>CNN said the flash poll over-sampled Democrats and under-sampled Republicans by a net 15 percentage points, when compared to the percentages of respondents in its regular national poll.

>Still, even among independents, Clinton was rated the winner, though by a smaller margin: 54 percent to 33 percent.

>Public Policy Polling, a Democratic polling firm, also found Clinton the winner, 51 percent to 40 percent in a post-debate flash poll. Clinton performed even better among two voting blocs she will need to win in November: women and young people. In both demographics, a higher percentage than the overall group thought she won. Fifty-four percent of women and 63 percent of young voters said she was the winner. Among younger voters, 47 percent said the debate made them more likely to vote for Clinton.

quoted for truth
t. /fit/
ps. no homo

>unironicly using checkmate in a shill post
>ignoring all the arguments and going straight for the shill call out
Wow are you even trying to hide it anymore?

Because unlike you, people don't actually give a shit about unscientific online polls enough to check for them.

You realize you're only proving right

They mention reddit just to get a response. They want you to get pissed off.

Then how come the Cruzmissile got fucked for riggin an unscientific online poll?

And that post you have screencapped is an obvious shill trying to delegitimize Trump's win.

But that isn't an argument.

Do you think the (((Globalist))) interests are promoting the importation of mass non-European immigration by any spontaneous coincidence?

Conspiracy theorists like you are hilarious.

>it's only rigged when they do it

it's not an echo chamber, it's just that retarded shills like you get called out easily, and that's what makes you mad kek

ITS A CONSPIRACY OF THAT DAMNED PEPE FROG PEOPLE!!

>OH wow. I don't like democracy because I didn't feel like voting yet the other side did and they won. It's like the majority made their decision heard, or at the very least fucking bothered to vote. THAT MUST BE RIGGING,EVEN THOUGH EVERYONE COULD ONLY VOTE ONCE AND WE MADE SURE THAT WOULD BE THE CASE.It can't be that we're lazy fucks or autistic shills.

>By the way, are they implying that Hillary brigades do not exist?

Yes they exist but they're not at computer savvy as most of the neckbeards that post here.

> OMG! Online pol "rigged"!
"rigged" by who?
...unless you mean the people controlling the poll.

Because people voting and using whatever methods to skew the online poll isn't rigging, its people from the outside with an agenda taking advantage of a flawed system.

When are these idiots going to get the point that it is THEIR responsibility to create a secure and valid system. ANYONE can fuck around with you for ANY number of reasons if you don't take security measures.

Just

like

open

boarders

>people voting is now considered rigging by the people who rig things

Also the CTR shill are in fucking overdrive lately

>posts proof that Cred Forums is rigging results
>"lol its a conspiracy"
Cmon man

>As of October 2014, Gallup polling found that 43% of Americans identified as Democrats and 39% as Republicans, when party "leaners" were included; those figures changed to 41% Democratic and 42% Republican after the November 2014 elections.[3] However, an earlier 2013 Gallup survey found that 42% of Americans identified as political independents, a record high.[4]

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_party_strength_in_U.S._states

Where are you getting this info? It's most certainly wrong.

Not this nor this

By 3%. It's 26% R 29% D and the rest Independent.

> anyone that disagrees with me is automatically a shill getting paid to post because they're in a conspiracy against me and muh freedoms

90% of Cred Forums

Dem participation and turn out is down 30% while Repub turnout and participation is at a historical high right now.

Sorry but Clinton lose faggot

Both wrong.

The Democratic party has significantly more registered voters as of 2016, but that doesn't mean that all conservatives are registered republicans.
Almost all liberals are registered dems.

You're obsessing about whatever the fuck that poll was in every fucking thread, it's hilarious. I didn't follow the elections until now and have no idea what was behind that.

>And that post you have screencapped is an obvious shill trying to delegitimize Trump's win.

Some dedicated shills you have there, sonny.

archive.is/qDPMN

>Arguing with a Cartoon frog. t. Hillary Clinton.


Honestly.

Think about it.

Arguing.

Against.

A.

Cartoon.

Frog.

Wew lads.

We just do it for satire and the LULZ.

Hillary and CTR shills actually believe what we are saying is literal.

>dedicated shills

No fucking shit, they've been at this for months, as you would know if you weren't such a cancerous newfag.

>no source

Sounds legit.

He's an obvious shill though, he has all the hallmarks of it and won't even provide provide any conversation besides "le Cred Forums BTFO!" Posts and suddenly thinks he's won. He is a shill. I am simply calling him out for it. also most of Cred Forums knows it's an echo chamber and just doesn't care

Said the Swedecuck as Ahmed fucked his wife.

>getting out the vote online is now considered "rigging"

Can they be any more biased?

According to what source? You can't just make claims and expect anyone to believe it. This isn't Reddit

>old woman yells at frog

Nobody is claiming proxies or scripts were used. They're just legitimately upset that Trump supporters voted.

Once you understand both of those images, you are finally ready for pic related.

The shills are getting burned out. They need a break

"Wrong."
-t Donald Truno
Repub turnout and participation is 6 points higher then dems this cycle.

You before proof:
>you have no proof!!!!!!!

You after proof:
>No fucking shit, they've been at this for months

alrightythen.gif

Great idea, buddy. That's never gonna catch up with you.

>Nobody is claiming proxies or scripts were used.

archive.is/qDPMN
archive.is/LQbuc

Say what?

We didn't 'rig' the polls, we voted in them. That's the way democracy works, people who actually can be bothered to show up at the polls decide the outcome of them.

And this is what the MSM and the DNC (is there a distinction any more?) is pissing themselves over. The enthusiasm gap. No matter how hard they try to shill hillary, absolutely no one is excited about voting for her. Now, of course people will turn up for her at the polls. The die hard democrats, the virtue signalers who want to post a picture of them with their 'I voted' stickers on facebook, or whatever. But she is not inspiring anyone new to go out to vote for her.

Trump, on the other hand, fills stadiums to capacity, dominates the news cycle 24/7, and is living rent free in heads across the entire world.

The same thing happened with Brexit. It's not that the polls were deliberate lies by the media, it's just that they have no way of measuring something outside the norm. While remain or hillary may be what most people passively support, the status quo doesn't inspire people to get off their asses, go to the polls and actively vote like a promise of change from a unpopular situation does.

>They're just legitimately upset that Trump supporters voted.

(((They))) are always "legitimately upset" when any opposition makes it's voice heard; that's how (((they))) roll.

Cred Forums is most powerful organization in all of world.

All I hear from the Shillary side is
"Our paid shills can't outvote a 400lbs basement dweller"

She's anxiously not getting her money's worth. Sad.

>"BY THE POWER OF NUMBSKULL!!!"

Why are you such a Naziphobe, don't you know it's 2016? When will this vicious hatred end...

#NotAllNazis #EndNaziphobia

UNDER BUDGET AND AHEAD OF SCHEDULE!

We are the israel to their America