Trump BTFO - loses by huge margin in new Reuters poll

> unironically thinking this is still a race

Other urls found in this thread:

dailycaller.com/2016/09/17/reuters-poll-high-confidence-of-trump-win-in-vermont/
graphics.latimes.com/usc-presidential-poll-dashboard/
infowars.com/shut-it-down-reuters-orders-cameraman-to-kill-positive-trump-footage/
cbsnews.com/news/democrats-jump-ahead-in-party-affiliation-poll/
gallup.com/poll/180440/new-record-political-independents.aspx
google.com/search?q=republican regsitration surging&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8#q=republican registration surging
google.com/search?q=trmp independents&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8#q=trump independents
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Shit I can't believe #imwithher now.

CTRJEWSRIGGEDBIASEDNIGGERSREEEE

he's done for
>b-buh the online polls we rigged by voting multiple times

K

Trump BTFO'd himself in the debates, unsurprising.

Holy fuck, Drumpf has been BTFO for good this time!

It's so weird to see poll manipulation in real time, to be able to predict the exact moment of rigging and the margin used, then watch them do it like nobody can see it. I think things like this will become harder to spot in another decade or two when the tech-illiterate people are aged out for younger web-savvy shills who understand subtlety.

>18% undecided
>3.5% MoE
Hmm

Reuters is the same poll that said Trump would win Vermont 2 weeks ago (which is pretty much impossible since it's one of the deepest blue states), and this one was taken between September 22-26. So before the debates, and n the same period that other polls like Bloomberg and Quinnipiac had him tied or leading.

dailycaller.com/2016/09/17/reuters-poll-high-confidence-of-trump-win-in-vermont/

some say Trump cucks are still shouting he won the debate to this day

Really makes you think, huh?

see: The poll was taken before the debate. The LA Times poll that was taken after the debate saw a +1 point increase for Trump.

>752 Democrats
>500 republicans
hmm %50 more democrats than Republicans

This is pathetic goddamn

Every fucking time.

>real polls are rigged but unscientific online polls are totally real guys

how's the 10th grade goin fella

>Hey guys look at this one poll from this popular/semi-popular website that shows your candidate is losing just give up already he has no chance

>570 = 500

American education

>750 Dems
>570 Reps
>216 Independents

What a fucking farce.

Nice fucking excuse, nigger.

That's a fucking lie and you know it.

More people in this country are Democrats and that's a fair number of Republicans either way. Kill yourself if you find this "biased."

Yeah, it's accurate in terms of how America shapes politically. Are you 16 years old?

Yeah Trump will lose just like the brexiteers los.... oh wait

Except the polling sample size is an accurate representation of America. How fucking retarded are you?

How can it be a lie? He gave you proof. Are you retarded?

>comparing the election to a fucking referendum
>non-Americans think they know everything about our electoral system

The Eternal Anglo everyone.

>90743848
Look at the date you retarded foolbooms

But how many were women?

300 vs 21,000 at a rally

...

>more people in this country are Democrats
no

wow it's almost as if Trump gave a terrible performance and lost the debate and Cred Forums is full of retards who fell for their own rigged polls

>That's a fucking lie and you know it.

How is it a lie? Everything I said is true, and Reuters has always been a shit poll since the beginning of the primaries.

>More people in this country are Democrats and that's a fair number of Republicans either way
Current data says they only make up 4% more, so it's not proportional either way.

trump still has a lot of dirt he can throw at hillary in the next debates she pretty much fired all her shots already unless she's going to repeat the same shit 2 more times

It's likely because that sample size has been tampered with. There is literally NO way a libtarded state like Vermont is going to go red when it polls at 70% blue election year in and year out. That's like saying California will be red and Idaho will be blue. It makes no fucking sense at all.

Hah trumpfags BTFO by drumpf's shitty debate.
The best part is trump still thinks he won and will likely fuck up the next two debates.

see:
how fucking retarded are YOU?

this is a spam thread. just sage it. trump is pulling ahead in the real world. fake skewed polls can only hide it for so long.

take a look at a more realistic poll:
graphics.latimes.com/usc-presidential-poll-dashboard/
graphics.latimes.com/usc-presidential-poll-dashboard/
graphics.latimes.com/usc-presidential-poll-dashboard/
hillary BTFO FOREVER

It ended the day of the debate so there's no way to tell if the debate helped or hurt Trump.

The election could have been fucking taped for all I care. Really makes you fucking think.

>flag

Opinion discarded.

actually trump has improved since the debate. hillary is the one getting BTFO

see:
graphics.latimes.com/usc-presidential-poll-dashboard/

Prove that it was tampered with. I won't take your word for it.

Prove it you fucking leaf.

The infestation of minorities is living proof you'll see red states turn blue. There's no way else to prove it, LMAO

Date don't matter. They got to put out the result that advances the preordained narrative that Hillary won, and everyone's getting on the HillTrain.

HAHAHHAHHHAHAAAHHAHAHAHHAHHAHHA

see
NONE of these national polls are proportional to party allegiance with the exception of LAT

get fucked

...

>a shit poll

Typical Drumpf shill argument.

>LA Times
>Realistic poll

No, that one is rigged by the Drumpf shills here.

Could it be, that if happened JUST AFTER the debate ended? Wow, it really makes you think. Can't believe Trump shills are this desperate to defend their walking disaster of a candidate. He did worse than fucking Kerry in the 2004 debate, LMAO

...

>Polls that were taken before the debates
Okay.

infowars.com/shut-it-down-reuters-orders-cameraman-to-kill-positive-trump-footage/
>Reuters
>Neutral

>More people in this country are Democrats...
>fails to realize 43% of Americans are Independents
>states it's a "fair" representation when 1/8 of those sampled are Independents

Thanks for Correcting The Record.

This site manipulates everything. Take a wild guess.

>LA Times

You guys have any other polls than that? Clearly shows how biased you are. Trump shill detected.

haha i know you're just "pretending to be retarded" but look into the methodology of the latimes poll. it's 3000 randomly selected from around the country. not rigged at all.

how could it even be rigged. plz explain? just admit it, you got owned

It was taken after the debate ended. Lay off the weed, Geert.

Yeah enjoy those (((scientific))) polls where they polls 42% democrats 23% republicans and rest independents.

Then they use their statisticians to deflate the margin of error as much as they can to seem legitimate.

>thinking polls matter

"new"

The most egregious thing is polling Independents in the teens, when they are a full third of the fucking electorate.

how is it biased. plz explain? and yes, literally every other poll. you can see how biased they are, though, by looking at their methodology, like OP's.

see:

Taken after the debate, Sven.

>Independents
>A third

Someone stop this meme.

...

cbsnews.com/news/democrats-jump-ahead-in-party-affiliation-poll/

Read it and fucking weep. Also, I didn't get owned. This isn't fucking newfag times.

furthermore, trump is leading by double digits in independents

it's all ogre for hillary. trump has:
>endorsement from cruz (huge for mopping up remaining gop)
>endorsement from former NH governor

Yeah you're right independents are more like 40%

That's the same Reuters that ask 15% more democrats than republicans in their polls, right?

>It's over for Hillary

You do realize he's losing in both the popular vote and electoral votes, right?

Reuters/IPSOS polls shouldn't even be considered.
I don't understand how they are considered legitimate and LA Times is considered "skewed"
All of their polls are absolutely skewed toward democrats, even more than independents.
That doesn't reflect the reality.

>cbsnews.com/news/democrats-jump-ahead-in-party-affiliation-poll/


Since we're posting old data - gallup.com/poll/180440/new-record-political-independents.aspx

It doesn't matter. Every poll oversamples one group over another. What matters is how they weigh the results. And they probably used to weigh it more heavily on republican side which is why Trump was always doing better in their poll than in others.

Even the Electoral map is in favor of Trump now. Landslide imminent.

>cbsnews.com/news/democrats-jump-ahead-in-party-affiliation-poll/
weep about what? that's common knowledge. you're not proving anything. we all know there is a slight edge on dem vs gop official affiliations. you think this is news?

read these and weep:
google.com/search?q=republican regsitration surging&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8#q=republican registration surging
google.com/search?q=trmp independents&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8#q=trump independents

you btfo forever

Then prove to me LA Times isn't skewed, nigger.

>Gallup

Discarded

Psalm 137:9 (KJV) Happy shall he be, that taketh and dasheth thy little ones against the stones.


What if you burn in hell and plead God for forgiveness and He just looks at you and laughs cause you're such a fag?

>gif related is (You) refusing to listen to all the people who begged you to accept Jesus your whole life

losing in neither. nice try, shill

trump will win in a landslide

>they try to sound like an authority the people oughta listen to
>this while declaring war on a Meme Template Image
>Ipsos is in bed with swedish (((Dagens Nyheter))) who continue to shill for the Hill despite rapidly losing readers/money to our AltMedia

just like american SJWs in recent weeks all of this will self-implode given enough days of time

Hail KEK!

Shadilay!

This. Reuters are lying scumbags who disgrace journalism. Although these days, which mass media isn't?

OP just blew everyone the fuck out. Y'all niggers just got trolled.

You forgot the other poll published today, cherry-picker.

>independents outnumber democrats and republicans
>we coincidentally have a minority of independents in our sample

Bbbbbbut thats a racist poll. We don't care about racist polls.

Trump is literally hitler btw

0/10

LA times poll leans as much R as Reuters leans D, and it uses the same sample everytime, which is an heresy in statistics. Doesn't means Reuters is accurate, but there's a good chance Trump did get hurt by the debate, and hurt hard.

...

...