There is enough land in this country to give 7 acres to every single person while still leaving land for roadways. If we did this, then everyone would have a fair starting point in the game called life. Why don't we do it? Don't you want every family to have 20-30 acres so they can thrive and contribute their creativity?
People would not have to constantly stress about rent and mortgage payments.
Some land is worthless.
and some land is worth a helluva lot more than others
Give that land to blacks
What if I need more than 7 acres?
what if i want 7 acres of key west and i get 7 acres of barrow alaska?
>All land and people are created equal
Nice meme.
We didn't conquer the Indians for you to be such a cuck about it.
>People would not have to constantly stress about rent and mortgage payments.
You know some people don't actually do this. You don't even have to be rich. Just live within your means.
At least they won't have to bite off more debt than thy can chew on their 30 acres of Death Valley
Most people these days are worthless.
They can't do anything with a backyard let alone 7 acres.
Can I have 7 acres in Newport Beach, Ca?
If not, why?
Are you 15? I hope you're not older because what you just typed is fucking embarrassing for an adult.
I'll take my 7 acres in Bel Air.
And watch the entire planet be consumed by fucktwits who have no morals, destroy and pollute (niggers don't recycle or clean up after themselves) the land, and leave nothing left for future generations. No thank you OP, please find the nearest toilet and drown yourself in it.
at least u get 7a acres. right now, I want 7acress in los angeles, and i can't even afford to buy a tiny house in a working class neighborhood
Just imagine a world where all non-whites cease to exist, imagine the vast seas of human shit that would be left behind and eventually grow into gigantic lush forests. We could call them the Nig-Nog-Ching-Chong-Durka-lands, and each member of the Aryan race could claim massive homestead with which to grow and propagate.
Not to mention you can buy 7 acres in the middle of nowhere for less than the price of a decent used car.
Okay but I get the land on top of the gold mine.
I think about this a lot. im taking my savings soon and buying a few acres and trying to become largely self sufficient - hopefully have many kids, living the lifestyle antithetical to all forms of modern degeneracy. imo its the most redpilled thing one can do.
better than the 1/8 of an acre basement you have now
>extreme inequality should not be addressed unless exact equality is achieved in one step
But you are serfs and slaves land belongs to nobles.Everyone in u.s is free and thus this can happen with massive support we demand our land for posterity!
kek'd and checked
Distributism is the most redpilled economic way.
The Servile State:
en.wikipedia.org
epdf237.bebookslib.com
which neighborhood? pomona? santa monica? mission viejo? laguna beach?
you could move to middle of nowhere idaho, they have tiny houses in working class neighborhoods there.
The value of the land isn't equal. That isn't a fair starting point.
That is a fantasy considering China, Israel, India have nuclear weapons. What I am proposing is even remotely plausible.
Why do you care of non whites when you have your land and they theirs?
Noble cuck.
I think we should ban technology in the tropics and use them as "human wildlife refuges" where primitive people (and civilized people who want to get back to their roots) can live in a primordial human habitat.
Socialists are so fucking stupid
No one cares about tge "value" of the land but a basic human right power starting point for humans that is not serfdom ubtil house nigger.
Land belongs to the volk.
are you stupid? we would all starve to death, take it away from farmers and give it to dumbasses like you? no
Nah, instead i propose banning water and food in south korea for 1 month so you can think more clearly
What a colossal shitpost.
If this isn't bait, you should legitimately kill yourself.
>extreme inequality should not be addressed unless exact equality is achieved in one step
The same applies to marginal inequality
Which is every case
Why? Land is cheap!
Especially in Texas or remote areas.
"Socialists" retarded house nigger.
We are opposite of socialists we want to give much more people private property so they csn be indrpendant and not be chocked from life to death by regimes or ecobomy.
do you understand how good my internet is? i no longer need petty physical sustenance because i live multiple american lifetimes of pure information every second. thats why my ideas are so beyond your comprehension.
Retard no ones talking of taking farms.
This so much
People complaining about debt don't realize it is totally avoidable.
But the (((banks))) push the lie that you need to carry debt to be anybody
OP surely is.
>Socialism will work if WE try it!
Becauae it is a human right, without landownership you have no rights or power.
There's also a lot of land in Africa...
I'm not sure what you are trying to say here.
Land has intrinsic value, even animals fight over land.
This is retarded on so many levels. Millions of acres previously owned by farmers would go to people who work at Walmart, who have no knowledge of farming or desire to farm. Famine would quickly ensue.
What's with the influx of "woke" facebook-tier threads today?
>saged
You'd want one of the good pieces of land for yourself, thus condemning someone else to seven acres of jagged icy terrain. You non thinking cunt.
Retard, "socialism" boogeyword this is a policy not a dogma of "socialism" dey gona tax me n tak me shit! No ones going to take anything from you, your stuff matters little to improve the volk.
You can't be this delusional. You've never been to Wyoming or Montana or Idaho. If you spend time in the west, you'd understand how dumb this idea is. Owning land doesn't mean shit, nor does it guarantee self sufficiency or the ability to grow crops/vegetables. You still need building materials, utilities, food and supplies, which aren't available in all parts of the empty west. Niggers don't want to homestead. They're scared of nature, animals and just about everything else and they're lazy.
nice argument
Cool, I'll lay claim to 7 acres of Manhattan and you can have 7 acres of the Everglades.
>Putting everything into one pot and giving everyone the same number of acres SURELY WON'T CAUSE ANY RIPARIAN RIGHTS PROBLEMS!
EBT has made farms obsolete
thanks family
you should probably off yourself as well
>giving land to poor people
For what purpose? They would not know how to work the land at all, it would be a complete waste, leave it to the people who actually know what to do with it.
Kek
Yed but artificial value of properties is not the true land value, abd practically any land can be developed to be wealthy.
t. Neet
You completely ignored jobs
No one is talking of taking land of farmers.
Some, not 60%
...
>DONT QUESTION THE ELITE KEEP TALKING ABOUT JEWS AND MEXICANS DON"T QUESTION THE ACTUAL ELITE IT HURTS MY FRAGILE BRAIN I"M A GOOD SLAVE DON"T BE A BAD SLAVE
Exactly how long after you redistributed everything, would there be some rich people and some poor people again? I'd say between 40-60 minutes
people have children
not everyone deserves land
public land is often times extremely beutiful and I dont want any fucking wiggers spics porchmonkeys chinks pooinloos or kebabs fucking SQUATTING on it leaving their trash and shit music everywhere
For they to be free and independant.
commence the bitching about privilege..."Oh, white people don't have to drive as far to work...White people put us on land they knew would make us shoot each other...We need more land, because being a farmer reminds me of slavery..."
No thanks...plus, I'm Clampet rich anyway
In the USA I guarantee you can buy a plot of land for a few thousand, with ultra-low taxes. So save up your tips and you can go live on a few acres and be totally happy within a few years. Oh what's that? You don't want to go live on a piece of shitty, undeveloped land miles from anywhere?
Yep
Ill buy the land of the retards for shiny beads
Why woulf that matter? No one cares if inequality only retardedness where peopñe have no land to survive from.
Alaska is about 1/6 as big as the continental United States. So for every 6 people that get 7 acres in probably livable land one person gets almost total shit. Not enough black people to fill it up, so who else gets thrown into Alaska with them?
1/8 acre basement is a huge fucking basement. That's over 5,000 sq feet. Any NEET on here posting from a 5,000 sq feet basement can say whatever the fuck they want.
7 acres is fucking useless.
not all the land is the same value what about that mister help the poor
>Clampet rich
You struck oil?
You are an exploiter, yet you will complain when you are exploited.
Yes
That is the natural order of things
so move...
billions of people throughout history have done it, shocking to know that you too can join the human race...
it's America, they have the same lame ass shit at every fucking offramp...
you can take a huge paycut and still massively increase your quality of life...
Why would blacks matter? They only matter becayse they are forced to be shit and connected to you eben with their inferiority, in their land they wont bother you.
ahh...but do you get the mineral rights? there's the rub
you are assuming that they will magically thrive and contribute anything at all
You want to be exploited? Cuck
I am against exploitation because i dont want to be enslaved by whoever is above me in tge xhosen criteria.
Not all land has the same value, and it would take to much time and money to make it worth assessing all of the land and distributing it. Besides the people that spent the money on that land should decide what to do with it, and a lot of people have no idea how to manage land anyways. Do you know what that would do to the entire fucking market? Do you know how much people have invested in their real estate and land? Do you think that this would not result in near instantaneous disaster? Even beyond that why is equity a good outcome, do people serious deserve just as much as everyone else purely because they exist? The entire concept of just forcing everyone to distribute the land "fairly" is retarded and unfeasible.
That doesnt matter.
We should just give them the money that the land earns.
Marginal land no longer exists. All land has some value based on it's natural characteristics-- the wind that blows across it, the sun the shines on it, and the water that falls upon it all have a quantifiable economic value.
The difference in value between the good and the bad should be put dedicated to the public good, either as services or basic income.
You wouldn't need physically have any land, just your share of the produce of all the land. That way, no additional entanglements would be created over land title.
shut up carl
You can get 2.5 acres of land in Siberia, tax-free for five years.
theatlantic.com
The market doesnt matter.
smells like dindu and it ain't washin out
true words. Behold
No, land that is badic to human survival should be to the best job be distributed to everyone.
Africans are people not land you shitlord.
plus to be fair...slavery
in very few respects can I understand their logic, but I can understand wanting nothing to do with fields and crops
I'm sure farmland was included in OP's calculations since some states (Iowa, Nebraska, Kansas etc) are mostly farmland. One farmer with 7000 acres is much better for society than 1000 random people with 7 acres apiece.
no they aren't.
The everglades acutally makes a ton of fucking money with far lower maintenance costs than manhattan.
You could live in the everglades and give airboat rides to tourists for $100 a pop, eat fresh gator tail every night, and slay all the swamp pussy you wanted.
With 7 acres in Manhattan, you literally inherit the largest concentration of jews outside of Israel and the largest amount of Puerto Ricans outside of Puerto Rico.
No one is talking of fucking up farmers by taking their land to give to non farmers, just taking the land not in use by farmers or excessive farming land and distributibg to peopñe to start families.
Right, throw them in Alaska so we don't have to worry about them. But Alaska is too big, so we need to throw someone else in there with them to fill it out.
black people would still complain
Sure, the farmers retaon their land generally.
yes...sort of....family farm, they found oil in a shale deposit under it...sold the acreage off for neighborhood developments...kept mineral rights...the real money was in the acreage though
oh wait.....I get it now give them free land to "thrive" on and "we" will become better off.
like Germans sending people to "free" camp
Yes it fucking does. It is what determines the value of the land you are distributing, and the money used to purchase goods, and the fucking computer you are posting on. If you suddenly throw everything out of whack by arbitrarily giving everyone X amount of land, it is going to fucking crash and burn and everyone will lose.
bah..sorry on my phone, hit wrong ID..
yes sort of...family farm...found oil in the shale deposit...sold acreage for neighborhood development...kept mineral rights...made a ton off the acreage...regular income from the oil
then they have kids and it's all unequal again, besides not every land is the same fag, I bet you'd rather get some land in Florida than in the alaskan snow or in the freking desert
Hes inxorrect, any land with grasd is sufficient for survival and export.
No ones speaking of inflexable dogma everyone must have equal 7 acres, just a general rule of thumb and exception privleges and such added later.
As my grandmammy once said: "if it aint white, it aint right"
>having land is a human right
kys, worse than the UN
No production will be lost not a single dollar "lost" aome money from people could be reimburaed and nothing changes those earned bills still have same value as the speculators had before.
>inequality should be addressed by leveling the playing field for dumb losers and hindering others
kys commie
or we can wait for the country to collapse and take what we can hold
No ones cares of absolute equality just a startint point of equal opputunity, theres a reason public schools were made.
t. Alberto Barbosa
You are not very bright are you?
So... who gets the Mahave desert?
But it would be. The free market would automatically put the land to the highest and best use, as land speculation would no longer be possible, thereby liquidating all speculative landholdings, and making land more affordable for those currently priced out of it.
The unearned income accrued by landowners rightfully belongs to society. Others in this thread are correct to point out that not all land has equal value. A square foot of the UWS is worth ten acres of swamp-- who would take the square foot?
The physical land itself is unnecessary to hold. What good is 7 acres to somoene who works in the city?
Land should be nationalized, and then rented. The entire fund should then be distributed back to everyone, equally.
the stubby burrito men
Literally said by John Locke.
Yeah let's repeat and see how well that turns out.
What stupidity atmre you rmtalking about, the best use is forvthecfarmers to own tgeir land forvthrme volk to own tgeir land.
Elitism or intelligience does not give you a right to power over others.
BASED ABSOLUTELY BASED
The market was a mistake
What about when new people are born? Sounds like a flawed plan.
Based Hobbit.
The market serves the volk, you are either withbthe volk or you are against the volk.
New ppl.born in family land inherit tge land.
And some is better than none.
>he thinks the everglades is worth more than manhattan
This is your brain on fascism
...
>New ppl.born in family land inherit the land.
FUCK OFF FUCK OFF YOU ARE SO FUCKING RETARDED, BAD NEWS YOU HAVE AUTISM
No the current farmers would lose their land. Especially the big farmers.
All land has to be given to the people.
>No production will be lost
Yes a lot of fucking production will be lost, as you forget not everyone is perfectly capable of managing land efficiently
>People can be reimbursed
For one, this defeats the purpose of redistributing the land in the first place as now some people have a clear advantage. Two, you simply couldn't properly calculate the amount to reimburse each person. Three, Tons of money is lost by the people that own that land since money is subject to stagflation which is bound to happen rapidly after you redistribute the land and have the government give literally billions to people (which will hurt everyone)
>Those earned bills still have the same value
But they don't, for one the market never responds well to major economic changes. Hell economists are still shitting their pants over Brexit and predict an upcoming depression. And of course the supply AND demand for every single product is completely spun off course in every direction. Money has no fixed value, it is only worth what it buys and what it buys won't be that much after extreme stagflation and market collapse.
>fair
Life isn't fair. When will this stupid fucking meme die?
ITT: OP wants to give this beautiful land to shitskins who will defile it with their litter and graffiti
Jusy let em rot in Detroit
No it doesnt, that would have adverse effect on tge volk, those farmers are given land for their healthy production.
fuck the volk i'm for the people
i'm for all human beings
fuck fascism
Fuck forgot pic
Sounds great to me m8, now we're all equal I no longer need to pay taxes, and I'll be left alone for the rest of my life?
We did just that after the fall of communism. And we're still one of the poorest countries in the EU.
The only achievemen of this stupid policy was the absolute destruction of our agricultural output and the irrigation system.
Life is as fair as we the volk force it.
Race
Family
State
Individual
All people belong to a volk but i have no issue with flawed volkism which includes foreign races.
Fuck your stupid socialist shit faggot
No production is lost only the current ownership and paper loans aka dollars earned which could just as easily be repaid.
Right, but who gets Bay Area California, and who gets Alaska you fucking faggot?
yes
Ask why you deserve even an acre of land instead of demanding 20-30. Who are you? Why should anyone give you anything? What right do you have to demand anything?
This is a world where you struggle to produce and survive. Socialists tend to forget that, because they're lazy and have let others provide for them their entire life. But at the end of the day, SOMEONE is doing the work for you so that you can eat and not starve. SOMEONE is making that keyboard so you can type your idiocy to Cred Forums. It's not you. You need to produce something of value if you want to co-exist in a world where your life can be made much easier through the efforts of others who produce things of value for people like you to consume.
You are askung retardation, you need more time until you break out if the narratives of "capitalism" the founders never once mentioned or followed an ideology of capitalism.
Who cares.
The foundation of the ideology of capitalism and commubism are both in the same ideology of marxism and critical theory.
This, this is why we can not have nice things. Fucking faggot thinking they are entitled to anything they want and fuck everyone else.
Men have a right to own property, a free man is a man who owns agricultural land a slave is someone who does not.
Fags dont ruin nice things of yoy and your entire city, they could lease their land to companies recieve royalities while working or studying in something else.
Those who producd mord of course will have more money, this is good.
seeThe point is that both have economic value. I agree that 7 acres of Manhattan is worth more, thus splitting up land on an arbitrary, unequal basis that would create more problems that it would solve.
It would be far better to tax the land based on it's intrinsic value, so that everyone who holds land (either expensive land in cities or lower value rural land) makes the highest and best use of it.
It's a tax on the natural factors of production which afford land its value.
Will the land be developed or do I have to do my own planned economy?
What is farms?
Something tells me you don't understand what I am telling you, let me go through this slowly.
Not all people are entirely capable of managing land.
For the past 300 years competent people have been managing land efficiently, buying out land with the money the earned from their previous land, and giving it to their offspring which will have been educated on how to manage land. Over generations they build up a sizable amount of land about 3000 acres
Then you suddenly decide to take their 3000 acres away from them and given to people that most likely have never owned land and have no idea how to manage land.(since they didn't have 7 acres to begin with)
The competent family gets 7 acres, meanwhile 2993 more acres are owned by people with no experience managing land.
Imagine doing this all over the US. We are going to lose a ridiculous amount of production. This literally happened in Russia when they freed the serfs and gave just half of all the land to them. This happened every single time mass redistribution of land occurred.
And to repeat myself since you clearly didn't understand. Money is only worth what it can buy, and if the markets collapse it won't buy much. No you can't just print more, no you can't arbitrarily say it has X value, but something tells me you have a very arbitrary ideology.
Do all the niggers get land in Death Valley?
you clearly don't understand that idea
Sorry kek, but we're done giving them anything. They need to go back. Blacks are too expensive to keep around.
>People would not have to constantly stress about rent and mortgage payments.
Yes they would. Do you really thing the gov is going to just let you live your life with taxing you in so many different ways? You must be younger than 50.
We tried to change things, but those we elected kept lying to us. So sorry. I feel guilty for where this is going.
depends on where your mom wants to live
>so sorry.
i appreciate that actually. apologizing is never meaningless. we will try to do what we can for the future generations while taking care of the elderly too. it is a hard situation now.
>Then you suddenly decide to take their 3000 acres away from them and given to people that most likely have never owned land and have no idea how to manage land.
and that's what happened in Zimbabwe. good comment btw
What we want is generally give people land not take shit from farmers.
>Would give others a chance.
>Will be supported by a majority of voters.
Pick one.
All this debt, welfare, wars and police state won't end well. Most my age aren't happy about where the country is now.
Look to history to see where this leads.
All the lazy people would sell their land in 20 seconds, spend the money on crack, and then be whining about being homeless because of rich people all over again.
Fuck you you evil cocksucker.
Another thread with a hot chick and a socialist position.
We know who you are. We know what you're doing. We know why you're doing it.
You do not know who we are.
You do not know how we know you.
You will be brought to heel.
So you intend on giving people worthless land? Or what, giving them a piece of paper that says "you technically own this land, but it isn't yours"? You are playing a zero-sum game, unless you are giving people worthless land.
Why not just lower property taxes?
Do you even own property? Do you?
I own (we'll the bank does) two houses I rent. I pay county AND city property taxes. Lower taxes would make me lower my rents.
Local, State and Fed govs are broke. What do they do when they need money? They raise taxes.
If you/we can't control our own local govs. This is key. And we have lost control.
wait, who do you think i am? seriously
Someone wastes their money on buying stupid shit. Sells their land to someone else to get out of debt. Land consolidation among the economically literate. Repeat until we're back to where we are now. Haves and Stupids.
>What we want is generally give people land not take shit from farmers.
Why not just give them a vacant lot in a town or city, and they don't have to pay taxes for say 50 years or something? You will see revitalization then for sure.
There is enough cock in this country to give 7 cocks to every single person while still leaving cock for roadways. If we did this, then everyone would have a fair starting point in the game called life. Why don't we do it? Don't you want every family to have 20-30 cocks so they can thrive and contribute their creativity?
jejejeje...yup.
Why is that human nature is never taken into account? jejejeje
pic related boys and girls
I'll take 7 acres at the beach. You can have the 7 in death valley.
this.
and of course we are already a socialist system. the primary reason our debt is 20+ trillion. Ron Paul was right, this won't end well. it never does.
>socialists are actually this stupid
top kek
The only socialism is the public schools healthcare police military, roads and every government service courts etc..
Socialism.juat means done in interest of all over the one.
America is about working for your keep. The only ones here who accept handouts are un-American niggers, spics, and H1B gooks/chinks/japs/pakis/poo-in-loos.
And banks, farmers, corporations etc..
and retirees, military veterans, women, etc.
>The only socialism is the public schools healthcare police military, roads and every government service courts etc..
Exactlly, and look how big gov is and how our debt has run up to 20+ trillion. But hey, Nooooo problem, This Time Is Different....right?
My friend, this time is NEVER different. Please look at history. Start with Rome.