Why are you an enemy of human freedom?

why are you an enemy of human freedom?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/9RQSm4HKc-s
youtube.com/watch?v=zhrYY3ocQ5o
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Because """freedom""" to own property is the freedom to deny others that property, a naturally coercive and heirarchal mechanism that has no place in a good and just society

Put down the Fountainhead and read Proudhon, faggot

>human freedom
There is no such thing Austrian

So you'd like the slavery of everyone instead of the freedom of some, and the potential freedom of all. You're a slave.

hayek was a pussy, he was too afraid to call out the jew

but maybe its ok, cuz otherwise he wouldnt have been allowed to publish as much as he did

youre hypercucked lmao

hayek was an enemy to logic, like all other austrian """""""economists."""""""

Fuck off retarded commie.

>potential freedom of all

nigga does not even understand dialectical materialism. Laissez faire capitalism lowers wages to basic sustenance and enslaves the working population. What part of 'read Proudhon faggot' do you not understand?

...

>nigga does not even understand dialectical materialism
Why would I need to understand your silly religious ideas to dispute your shitty claims? Hegel was a nutcase.

Why is it that the more freedumb people have the more degenerate, stupid, violent, apathetic they become?

that image is completely ignorant of the economic problem

read the use of knowledge in society

>Historiography is religious

people are becoming less and less free nowadays

Yeah, it is when you claim that the Prussian state is the perfect state to have existed, given by the world-soul or whatever the fuck, it definitely is.

>people are becoming less and less free nowadays
No they aren't. That's a lie. The has degenerated because of "freedom"

cute, but capitalism actually allows people to create employee owned businesses and small businesses where the owner owns his own means of production, such as a fucking computer. Communism doesn't because it can only be implemented by central state control, which is incompetent and genocidal.

hey dumb loser that has been brainwashed, get woke and start winning.
youtu.be/9RQSm4HKc-s

the US government has been growing since its founding. people are considerably less free.

>Enemy to logic
>Praxeology was based on axioms and logical deduction

Commies are truly ignorant of economics. Where would you get your factories to produce anything without someone investing their own capital on one? The "evil capitalist" offers a service to its employees by providing wages before the sale of any good and by assuming all risks of entrepreneurship. This is why people would rather be hired than self employed. In an automobile factory, the capitalist pays workers their weekly wages now; in a producers' cooperative factory, the workers would have to go without income for months or years until their product is finally sold to the consumers.

It doesn't -- the graphic shows a decentralized market socialist system. If you actually think for a second, you'll realize that central planning (in addition to having been criticized by a shitload of people on the left -- Trotsky and Proudhon, for one) takes no part here. Worker's self-management.

Once *again*, read Proudhon. Decentralized socialist economies are a solution to Hayek's problem. (also, people who claim that communism has equal wages have never read Value, Price, and Profit because that entire book by Marx is an attack on why you can't give everyone the same wage)

>gives a graph arguing in favor of equal wages
>waaaah stop assuming equal wages

This image implies one worker produces one product a day;therefor his wage will always be lower than the price of the product. The price of a product will not inevitably be higher than the wage, because workers don't produce one single thing a day. I also suggest you read up on Henry Ford. He specifically paid his workers more so that they would be able to buy his cars, and it worked perfectly. That is also part of the reason why Costco does so well to, the CEO doesn't make more than 3 times the lowest paid workers.
Also it follows a hole digging fallacy, the price of a good is not based on how much it costed to produce no matter what. Look up production possibility curve and opportunity cost to learn more about why.

Syndicalism functions less than socialism. It offers no means of allocating resources within an economy. If you were an anarchist anyways, you should have no problem with people voluntarily using capitalistic structures.

Equal wages for the firm, retard, not equal wages for the entire nation. You can't take national aggregate sales and divide it by the number of people to get wages. That's the point of Value Price Profit.

Reminds of something. If something seems too good to be true it most likely is.

Fixed graphic for ya there

>equal wages for the firm
Are you talking about people who have the same job or people who literally work within the same firm? If it's the later then that's just as cancerous.

see pic, read about market socialist system in Yugoslavia

The problem is that without a social structure that emphasizes profit-sharing (a laissez faire economy doesn't do this -- Walmart's workers cost less to maintain and still buy Walmart's shit), this is the exception rather than the rule. I assume you can understand how Costco isn't the biggest retailer on the planet (Ford also introduced radically new manufacturing processes as an assembly line, giving him a competitive advantage that helped him more than an increase in wages)

like how capitalism promises ordinary workers can become rich if they work hard despite low wages and bottleneck corporate structure? exactly