CATHOLIC PARISH TO HOST GAY PARADE

>NEW YORK, September 23, 2016 (LifeSiteNews)—A Catholic parish is promoting a pro-homosexual “Pilgrimage of Mercy” and not planning on denying its participants Holy Communion when they attend Mass as part of the pro-LGBT event in October. The parish is also hosting a speaker from the nation’s leading homosexual lobby group, the Human Rights Campaign, today. The Archdiocese of New York declined to comment on both events.

>On September 22, the parish sent out a mass email advertising the LGBT event.

This is what happens when you schism from the Orthodox Church

>“Join us on Sunday, October 2 for a pilgrimage to celebrate and recognize LGBT faithful Catholics in the United States during this Extraordinary Jubilee Year of Mercy,” the announcement to the parish email list said. “The pilgrimage begins on the Upper East Side at 69th St and 5th Ave, proceeds through Central Park, and ends at St. Paul's in time for the 12:30PM mass. This event is organized by the Gay and Lesbian Alumni of the University of Notre Dame and St. Mary's College.”

youtube.com/watch?v=6Zbi0XmGtMw

Other urls found in this thread:

saintandrew.net/files/catechumen info/Catechumen_Renunciations_and_Affirmations_Form.pdf
en.radiovaticana.va/news/2016/06/01/pope_to_take_part_in_reformation_events_in_lund_and_malmö/1234020
youtube.com/watch?v=5bWHSpmXEJs

It's no secret that Catholism has been co-opted by Cultural Marxists for some time now

Yet the greater part of the Orthodox Church suffered under an overtly Marxist and repressive regime for the better part of the 20th Century

They're first traitors in your camp. How can you trust people that believe in kike's bullshit ?

"Kike" comes the Yiddish word for "circle" (kikkle). It was a term applied to illiterate Jews immigrating to America who signed with a circle, because they wouldn't sign "x" as it looked too much like the Cross.

Vatican II, bro

funny word for masons

Are you referring to Propaganda Due?

...

>LGBT faithful Catholics

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA fucking christcucks

The Vatican hijacked the Anglos so that
the Anglos could hijack the Jews so that
the Jews could hijack Socialism so that
Socialism could become Cultural Marxism
and thus destroy Protestants and the Bible, which are the only good and true things in the world.

I'm really starting to believe that this Pope will be the last Pope and Catholicism will die by his hands, Grew up Catholic but all this bullshit with the Commie Muslim loving Pope and all this fag shit is really pushing me towards Orthodoxy.

Some quotes from Luther
>Know that Marriage is an outward material thing like any other secular business.

>But the woman is free through the divine law and cannot be compelled to suppress her carnal desires. Therefore the man ought to concede her right and give up to somebody else the wife who is his only in outward appearance.

>Suppose I should counsel the wife of an impotent man, with his consent, to giver herself to another, say her husband’s brother, but to keep this marriage secret and to ascribe the children to the so-called putative father. The question is: Is such a women in a saved state? I answer, certainly

>I confess that I cannot forbid a person to marry several wives, for it does not contradict the Scripture. If a man wishes to marry more than one wife he should be asked whether he is satisfied in his conscience that he may do so in accordance with the word of God. In such a case the civil authority has nothing to do in the matter.

>Christ committed adultery first of all with the women at the well about whom St. John tell’s us. Was not everybody about Him saying: ‘Whatever has He been doing with her?’ Secondly, with Mary Magdalen, and thirdly with the women taken in adultery whom He dismissed so lightly. Thus even, Christ who was so righteous, must have been guilty of fornication before He died.

>retarded anglo does retarded things
More news at 11.

>
>Sometimes we must drink more, sport, recreate ourselves, aye, and even sin a little to spite the devil, so that we leave him no place for troubling our consciences with trifles. We are conquered if we try too conscientiously not to sin at all. So when the devil says to you, “Do not drink,” answer him, “I will drink, and right freely, just because you tell me not to.” One must always do what Satan forbids. What other cause do you think that I have for drinking so much strong drink, talking so freely and making merry so often, except that I wish to mock and harass the devil who is wont to mock and harass me. Would that I could contrive some great sin to spite the devil, that he might understand that I would not even then acknowledge it and that I was conscious of no sin whatever. We, whom the devil thus seeks to annoy, should remove the whole Decalogue from our hearts and minds

Vatican II is what sunk you

>The Church regards with esteem also the Moslems. They adore the one God, living and subsisting in Himself; merciful and all- powerful, the Creator of heaven and earth,(5) who has spoken to men; they take pains to submit wholeheartedly to even His inscrutable decrees, just as Abraham, with whom the faith of Islam takes pleasure in linking itself, submitted to God. Though they do not acknowledge Jesus as God, they revere Him as a prophet. They also honor Mary, His virgin Mother; at times they even call on her with devotion. In addition, they await the day of judgment when God will render their deserts to all those who have been raised up from the dead. Finally, they value the moral life and worship God especially through prayer, almsgiving and fasting.

-Nostra aetate

>But the plan of salvation also includes those who acknowledge the Creator. In the first place amongst these there are the Muslims, who, professing to hold the faith of Abraham, along with us adore the one and merciful God, who on the last day will judge mankind.
-Lumen gentium

kike

Worst fucking pope of all time. Even worse than Borgia.

I'm seriously considering at least nominally converting to Orthodox.

>nominally converting
Please don't, consider this form for converts
saintandrew.net/files/catechumen info/Catechumen_Renunciations_and_Affirmations_Form.pdf

As you can see, it's not something to take lightly. If you want to convert for serious reasons of faith, we'd love you to, but if you just want to convert in name only, don't bother.

Why dont they promote a gay pilgrimage to Mecca?
3 birds, 1 stone

Kek

...

no one believes your papist propaganda

...

Is that meant to be a criticism of the Church?

>“Christ committed adultery first of all with the woman at the well about whom St. John tells us. Was not everybody about Him saying: ‘Whatever has he been doing with her?’ Secondly, with Mary Magdalene, and thirdly with the woman taken in adultery whom he dismissed so lightly. Thus even Christ, who was so righteous, must have been guilty of fornication before He died.”
(Table Talk , Weimar edition, vol. 2., no. 1472, April 7 - May 1, 1532; Wiener, p. 33).

>“But Christ took upon Himself all of our sin, and thus He died upon the cross. Therefore he had to become that which we are, namely a sinner, a murderer, evildoer, etc....For insofar as he is a victim for the sins of the whole world, He is not now such a person as is innocent and without sin, is not God’s Son in all glory, but a sinner, abandoned by God for a short time. Psalms 8:6.”
(Detailed Explanation of the Epistle to the Galatians, part 2, fourth argument, Walch edition, vol. 8, p. 2165, nos. 321-324).

>“Be a sinner and sin boldly, but believe and rejoice in Christ even more boldly...No sin will separate us from the Lamb, even though we commit fornication and murder a thousand times a day”
(Weimar ed. vol. 2, p. 372; Letters I, Luther’s Works, American ed., vol. 48, p. 282).

>“If, in faith, an adultery could be committed, it would be no sin”
(Möhler, Dr. Johann Adam, Symbolik, p. 131; Luther disput. Tom. I, p. 523).

>“When our consciences are assailed by the devil on account of our sins: so one should say, spoke D. M. Luther: holy devil, pray for us: Sancte Satan, ora pro nobis. Have we not sinned against you, kind Sir Devil?”
(Table Talk, Walch ed., vol. 22, chapter 26, p. 1242, no. 41).

>“If someone is being tempted, said Dr. Martin, or is amongst those who are being tempted, let him then beat Moses to death, and throw every stone at him”
(Table Talk, Walch ed., vol. 22, chapter 27, p. 1233).

>Papists at it again

you're a complete fucking retard if you are a part of any religious community anyway so throwing yourself off a bridge would be the only intelligent way to get out of anything, amigo.

What does atheism have to offer that's so great?

>he came to power and done none of that shit
Luther was a LARPer.

B-but muh apostolic progression!

Cucktolics do nothing more than run behind protestant bandwagon. Anglicans already have gay priests.

>This thinking of Newman had a major impact on the Bishops at the Second Vatican Council, and appears in their statement that ″the understanding of the things and words handed down grows, through the contemplation and study of believers, ... (which) tends continually towards the fullness of divine truth."[1]

>Orthodox Christians tend to be far more conservative and suspicious of change than either Roman Catholics or Protestants. As such, many Orthodox theologians reject the concept of doctrinal development outright, instead arguing that the entire deposit of faith has been present in the Church from the very beginning, and has never changed.

it doesn't that's why its great

The Pope is celebrating the 500th anniversary of the Reformation with the *Church of Sweden* (which is of course extremely pro-gay) next year.

en.radiovaticana.va/news/2016/06/01/pope_to_take_part_in_reformation_events_in_lund_and_malmö/1234020
youtube.com/watch?v=5bWHSpmXEJs

Offering nothing doesn't make something great.

Luther was such a selfish and evil man. His errors have cursed so many. Let us pray to the Lord for all protestants to know the truth of Christ. Protestantism honestly saddens me.

>Treating belief as if you were choosing a long-distance service provider.
>Showing this much disdain for truth

I'm not mad, I'm just disgusted.

Atheism doesn't value truth, Christianity does. Atheism inevitably leads to relativism.

>relativism
How many denominations of Christianity are there again?

Atheism is not a belief system, and as such, it doesn't value or devalue anything except the existence of a god or gods. An atheist may value truth, or they may not. Your question, however, was what atheism has to offer, as if deciding what you believe is some sort of bargain hunt. That's what's disgusting to me.