Trump BTFO by USA Today

Not a single person has faith in the corrupt media anymore

They claimed that he's unfit because he's supporting authoritarian states like Russia. Meanwhile it's perfectly OK for Obongo and Shillary to sell the US to the Saudis, supply weapons to ISIS. They forgot (((who))) backed the coup in Chile, who Batista was working for, who backed the African dictators.

But anything is good to use against "le ebil womyn-hating dahnald drumpf bigot xD", I guess.

>mfw watching USA Today collapse in the near future

>left wing leaning
USA TODAY is a well know Republican rag.

May has done a good job so far

Posting revenge porn isn't really presidential.

>implying there is anything that requires him to recover

>CLINTON SUPER-PAC ANNOUNCES SUPPORT FOR CLINTON!

Color me surprised.

Which is why it will decline and become irrelevant.

But using the bitch of a cartel druglord for your campain is?

At least they have principles that made them make a tough decision; a decision that might end up being readership suicide.

Yeah, ok, bud.

>(((Editorial board)))

Is Trump so stupid that he had to post revenge porn at 4 am. My lord, he has no control. Every fag on this site knows bait when we see it, but Donald, no.

pretty impressive that a traditionally conservative paper would do this actually. They are really risking alienating their dozen subscribers.

You think he is the one actually tweeting?

Jesus fucking christ how naive are you? He sends his staff a list of quick talking point, they refine it and post it on twitter. This was discussed a while back, retard.

His twitter isn't an anonymous image board and he's going to suffer the consequences.

This isn't 3D chess, it's underwater basket weaving.

I actually work the night shift at a hotel and USA Today is the paper we set out for guests. The niggers never take their copy, but I see white people browsing it when they are having coffee in the morning

Today I overheard so many white people talking shit about this editorial, made my day

It's a real shitter of a newspaper, their big claim to fame is that they have a color cover everyday, their "articles" are no longer than like 5 paragraphs and their crossword puzzle is easy enough for zika donks to solve

It's probably his autistic son Baron.

So Trump picks "the best people" who are so tone deaf that they make the same boneheaded mistakes he makes? I think the guy is an imbecile but I don't believe his yes men are that bad, they wouldn't have posted something that dumb.

yeah surely

at the end of what you can say, shill?

>Not a conservative paper.
Nice try though.

You're the one that can't face reality and most likely a shill. How much do you get paid to defend revenge porn?

>implying Trump posted it
Consider my record corrected.

And the shills just continued to shill.

Enlighten me on the 'mistake' he made. The Clinton machine tried the same old smear tactics with another contestant, and Trump revealed that the contestant didn't have a leg to stand on. She was disreputable, could barely fulfill her contract as a contestant, and fucked a druglord.

...

>(((republican)))
Ftfy

Trump did post it. It's kind of his MO to be baited and say stupid shit if you hadn't figured it out yet?

Any sauce on that?

The sextape? I trust you have some evidence to back that claim up?

Trump has kept this up for 5 days now and he has audio and video and written records of him being on the defensive when he could have just blown it off.

Is he trying to lose the women vote? Do you not see how poor of a judgment call it is?

More like a neocon rag.

Isnt USA Today a gossip outlet like TMZ?

What exactly makes you fit to be president?

This whole thread is the source because we're talking about it.

Spending a week berating a woman because you were accused of harassing her during the debate is probably not a wise decision.

The guy is an actual moron I've tried to find some other explanation for his actions but I can't see anything

I never said the sex tape; I just said he linked it, which he did. Are you in denial?

Okay, same thing to me.

Jesus fuck, you jew rat, scroll up. You said and I quote, "Trump did post it [revenge porn]."

And let's say he didn't mention a thing about her.

Wanna guess what news would be posted nonstop? And losing the women vote? She's a whore and had a kid with a druglord. How is attacking her going to lose their votes?

Instead, he's burying it into the ground so it has no weight when it gets brought up again.

I'm not even fanatically pro-Trump, but you fags are making the same arguments Clinton does.

>Trump has kept this up for 5 days now and he has audio and video and written records of him being on the defensive when he could have just blown it off.

if you go all the way back, he is simply like this. he says things like "i would apologize if I were wrong about something, but it has not happened yet".

he actually believes the horseshit that he says, even when he contradicts himself in the same interview. he was born filthy rich, and never had to listen to anyone about anything. it was appealing for a while, but now he's starting to sound just plain stupid.

Here, a screenshot.

It's not, m8. Neocons are rusers. They ruined the republican reputation with war and corporate lust.

To add, trump isn't even a republican by most measures. He is a nationalist libertarian leaning type. Old school by the people for the people. State and individual rights, etc.

The big story is that USA Today has an editorial board.

>Trump
>libertarian
>central piece of policy is to eliminate free trade and stop immigration
>fascist-like devotion to 'law and order', stop and frisk tier policies
>wants to ban assault weapons
No. Just no.
More accurate is that he is a populist fucktard that has formulated a platform to appeals to ignorant and bigoted cucks.

>How is attacking her going to lose their votes?

He wont lose his supporters over it but his supporters would vote for him no matter what anyway. He's going to lose with moderates because he's coming off as a bully. If he had liberal voters he will probably lose them as well.

>He's going to lose with moderates
yeah you're a retard or a shill. There is no "moderate" vote to be had, it's spiel that lib talking heads go on about forever in an effort to tone down their opponent. It worked against Romney, but Trump is not that easy to convince.

It's more of a hybrid. Advancing society, keeping crime at bay while also allowing for full rights for the people.

>banning assault rifles
Wat

America wants a bully and independent voters belong to Trump. Get fucked cuck.

>Ignorant
>Bigoted

You have to go back.

...

I hope everything goes back to being mostly rational after the Trump train finally ends. To many people have bought into this madman and his insane ramblings. It's become cult-like and it's unsettling to watch. I probably would have voted for any of the republicans except Cruz but this guy is simply impossible.

A "reveal" about how his latest behavior has pushed you over the edge? Haven't seen this before.
It's true most Americans have the memory of a goldfish when it comes to elections. The shit they're throwing at Trump is not new, not different, and you idiots swalllow it up every time.

The only thing that makes Trump different is he won't stop fighting back. He won't let anyone bully him in a defensive corner for the rest of the election, unlike every other weak-ass candidate we had for the past three (if not more) elections.

>revenge porn

She fucked the guy live on TV

>Trump is such a bad candidate, that USA Today denounce him, but also refuse to endorse Clinton
>"FUCKING LEFTIST SHILLS"

They're not the only to denounce Trump. What about the Arizonian Republic endorsing Hillary, firs time since the late 1800's that they've ever endorsed a Democrat Nominee. Are they leftist shills as well?

wasn't she married at the time to someone else? why are the left defending trash like her?

Who the fuck cares what some shitty news site says, this whole "stop trump" parade has been used so much i think pretty much everyone is desentisized by now.

>Wow, look at this very "respectable" "reliable" newssite bashing trump. Theyre even saying they never pick sides in presidental elections! That means alot

I mean really, who the fuck cares.

gee wonder how this is gonna turn out.

This will only help him. Everyone hates and distrusts the media. People will see this and want to back Trump more.

>arizona republic newspaper endorses clinton
>republican paper endorses a democrat

and they are surprised that people cancel subscriptions.

If they said it on tv, it must be true

Yeah.

There's no conflict of interest between protectionist taxes and libertarianism. It's once you start adding those taxes between the people you govern that you have problems.

...

...

>every media outlet on full shill mode

>openly demanding people vote for Clinton

>every celebrity is coming out demanding people vote Clinton

>even Will and Grace are dug up from their comas to tell people to vote Clinton

if Trump had no chance, the globalists wouldn't be making it so obvious how biased they are. they're terrified. they've seen the internal polling. Trump is on for victory.

They accuse him of being what is has been proven Pillary is. Serial liar, erratic etc. the best in they add they is not an endorsement for Pillary in there, just to you know, cover their own ass if she goes down in flames and what not or seem impartial. Losers.

Like NRO, The Weekly Standard? K, bud.

>They accuse him of being what is has been proven Pillary is

what objective people are saying is that she lies, but her lies are pure political garbage that most politicians use.

his lies are beyond the pale, as if he is not grounded in reality. and that's why we don't want him to be commander in chief and be able to direct a nuclear strike.

she's corrupt to the bone, but she is not going to wreck humanity. he is unpredictable.

Nice trips.

Maybe when they file for bankruptcy, they can show Obama what good proles they were and he will bail them out.

>media outlet who wouldn't survive Trump's presidency doesn't want Trump to get in
MORE AT 11

Damn that's a nice Pepe, mind if I save it?

>she's corrupt to the bone, but she is not going to wreck humanity
>it's a Trump can fire nukes wall by himself without approval from anyone episode
how boring

the guy wants us to kill ISIS and then stop fucking up in bloody sandboxes. I'll take the isolationist over the war hawk who craves Iranian and Ruskie blood.

>USAToday
If anything this is good for Trump

>>it's a Trump can fire nukes wall by himself without approval from anyone episode

who exactly does the commander in chief have to ask?

but you are correct if you are saying that the brass would tell him to fuck off and we would have a constitutional crisis until he was impeached and removed from office.

Those beautiful losers.

I really love that Trump is giving them more than enough rope to hang themselves. He will say to their face at rallies what a bunch of liars they are and Tweet here and there, but he's been pretty cool about it so far.

MSM are being outed as the biggest bunch of idiots there are. I think that's great.

>"It was with great disappointment that I read that USA Today decided to take sides in a presidential race for the first time ever."

>for the first time.
>ever.

>"You might believe that well-meaning people at the newspaper simply feel so strongly, they had to take an unprecedented stand. Working on the inside for more than 30 years, I have a slightly more cynical suspicion: outside forces were at play in persuading the editorial board to take the action."

sharylattkisson.com/farewell-usa-today-i-hardly-knew-ye/

Trump would not succeed in this endeavor, as he will, if it weren't for the time period we live in now. These skypes are absolutely terrified, and in any other age of history they would be able to quell this American Nationalist surge. However, we live in a time where a very large number of Americans are no longer getting their news from (((mainstream))) outlets which has led to the great awakening we are witnessing that will be written about in history books for centuries to come. The great rebirth of the West, made possible in part by alternative media who don't regurgitate the directed talking points of the political elite, and in part by a burger grilling expert advice and opinion forum. Praise Kek.

Man Trump really is a giant man-babby though.

How do you get so rattled by a remark that you spend the entire week proving your opponent right?

Well at least, as opposed to all other media platform, they admit their bias.
Also, the distrust of the media will make this only benefit Trump, who now has concrete solid evidence of the so-called "unbiased" MSM campaining against him.

Meanwhile television networks look more and more like Picus from Deus Ex.

>How do you get so rattled by a remark that you spend the entire week proving your opponent right?

he is making sure that he has the male chauvinist pig demographic locked up.

why he feels he needs to do that is a mystery.

>ONE POST BY THIS ID
JUST SAGE IT ALRDY IF YOU HAVE TO REPLY FFS

Stop posting retarded shit with "BTFO" in the title

What I don't get is his assertion that the media is biased against him. Like 9/10 the media is just reposting stuff he himself wrote. Trump's own thoughts have a liberal bias apparently.

>He's a bully for bringing up a Clinton surrogate's criminal past after said surrogate spent a week on national TV bashing him

trump sucks dick, but USAtoday sucks more dick

This Is Now A Clinton Foundation Thread

>WE'VE NEVER TAKEN SIDES - UNTIL NOW!
Sure thingy, buddy. What makes them think anyone gives half a shit what they think? Like this is supposed to make them more credible somehow?

>I've never raped and murdered a woman, so if it ever happens you can be sure she deserved it!
Fucking jackasses.

>bigotry

Oh the irony

please tell me that's not hillary clinton