Nuclear War

Looks like you're not going to get any serious answers, OP.

What is her name senpai?

Depends on the number of nukes tossed.

it is a tranny, its just a before and after pic of makeup

>that gf who won't have sex with you in the morning because "I look disgusting" and refuses to have sex with you until she looks like a clown covered in disgusting makeup

>Both economically speaking, and physically would we in the US or Europe be in danger?

kek, no. poos are nothing.

Ya, but she will have higher standards after makeup.

LIES

>poo education

Fallout: Indian edition

We should build vaults

>If India and Pakistan have a nuclear exchange, what would the impact on the world be?

Worldwide shortage of technical support agents

here are some word associations I have come up with

right:
>plastic
>intimidate
>slut
>instagram
>snapchat
>socialite
>prom
>selfie

left
>cute
>homely
>cook
>insecure
>cuddle
>shower
>joy

Control your woman nigger. If you're having a hard time rolling her over and giving her some dick first thing in the morning you've got bigger issues

>tfw actual tech support guy

Start buying toilet stocks now! Safe as fuck

Thanks for your contribution.

Probs be beneficial.

>fewer poos, solves their population problem
>Muslims get nuked

I'd side with the poos though if it came down to it. Kill em all Pajeet

would all out war between Pakistan and India force any other countries into the same war?

The left girl look 50x hotter
fuken makeup making girls look like clowns

...

Flow of child rapists to England would be cut off and the flow of shitty indian doctors to everywhere would be cut off as well. I don't see any reason why they shouldn't nuke each other.

100%. I think China even has weapons in Pakistan. All the major global superpowers would get involved. US, China, Russia, UK, France etc.

If a nuke was ever used, the whole of Asia would be fucked with the radioactivity in the air.

United States would get involved on the Indian side, China for Pakistan and it would probably split with countries picking who they think will be the winner.

Yeah, he made the mistake of posting a controversial picture that had nothing to do with the topic he wanted to discuss. It's his own fault.

Please stop posting her here. It hurts my soul.

Right one is still better looking.

Depends. They both have enough alliances to make it a full blown world war, but they could either all keep out or all pile in.
If it goes nuclear it's not even worth getting involved as the area will be a wasteland and any further action won't make things better.

>indian with shit taste
what a surprise

You are ignoring that for years we had 50 nukes a year detonated in the atmosphere without large term side effects outside of the immediate areas of denotation?

Depends on the size of nukes they have and how many go off. The danger of nukes to those not within the blast radius is how large they are and how clean they are.

If a load of Tsar Bomba scale weapons went off we'd be fucked because of the amount of soot that would be propelled into the atmosphere, it would basically be like a smaller version of the meteor that killed the dinosaurs. Global temperature would drop by a few degreees and take months or years to return to normal. If we're talking hiroshima sized bombs then we could afford to have a few go off before it effects the world's climate (I think), because they're not powerful enough to propel soot high enough to circulate around the globe and have a cooling effect. Remember in the relatively recent geological history of Earth supervolcanoes have gone off and haven't had a significant long term effect on global temperature (to my knowledge). Nuclear winter winter is only really a thing if you're talking about thousands of powerful nukes going off at once like a USSR vs USA scenario.

False.

Not only is she more attractive without all the makeup, that goop is also ruining her skin.

Her name is Alaina Fox.

She does porn.

This.

What is the year without a summer

>Remember in the relatively recent geological history of Earth supervolcanoes have gone off and haven't had a significant long term effect on global temperature
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Year_Without_a_Summer

>Wait a minute, that picture...

archive.4plebs.org/pol/search/image/ksJ8KReDvvaiMGwW3fquAw/

No one going to be tossing Tsar Bomba sized weapons.

They would range from 30-400 KT in explosions. A lot depends if they are air burst or not. Even if India and Pakistan were to launch all they have, it would be under 300 nukes, which worldwide is fine, even if Pakistan and India would be fucked. You would need US/Russian levels of nukes to change climate.

She has flawless skin. She's also left-wing as fuck. But seriously her skin is to die for.

>I've ripped bowls with her

>Nuclear winter winter is only really a thing if you're talking about thousands of powerful nukes going off at once like a USSR vs USA scenario.

Nuclear winter as it stands is an unproven hypothesis, It was quite literally a load of liberal CND bullshit.

The studies that support nuclear winter make several assumptions that would not occur or would be very unlikely to happen.
They assume that one warhead will be given to one target.
They do not account that the majority targets will not be urban areas.
They do not account for the reality that many urban targets are not in the center of of the area but can be found on the edges.
They do not account for modern fire codes and materials.

In the end, none of the studies are reliable because they start with flawed assumptions

No physical effect from actual bombs except locally in shitistans. Economic effect severe worldwide, wild stock fluctuations, recessions, huge waves of brown rapefugees,etc..

Yeah, I don't really know what I'm talking about but I'm throwing a few guesstimates out there

>what would the impact on the world be?
india has enough 9 legged babies without having been nuked.
if they get nuked it'll cause an entire new breed of supermutant to emerge

She has multiple pimples visible just in that low res image.

Nobody has """""perfectly""""" flawless skin. With all the makeup she wears for porn, it could be a lot worse. Just look at almost any other pornstar without makeup.

>if they get nuked it'll cause an entire new breed of supermutant to emerge

Centaurs who spit radioactive poop

One thing to remember is that we had years with 50+ nuclear explosions without any type of climate change. India/Pakistan combined only have ~250 weapons.

>In 2014, Michael J. Mills (at the US National Center for Atmospheric Research, NCAR), Owen B. Toon (of the original TTAPS team), Julia Lee-Taylor, and Alan Robock published "Multi-decadal global cooling and unprecedented ozone loss following a regional nuclear conflict" in the journal Earth's Future.[130] The authors used computational models developed by NCAR to simulate the climatic effects of a regional nuclear war in which 100 "small" (15 kt) weapons are detonated over cities.

They concluded, in part, that
>global ozone losses of 20-50% over populated areas, levels unprecedented in human history, would accompany the coldest average surface temperatures in the last 1000 years. We calculate summer enhancements in UV indices of 30-80% over Mid-Latitudes, suggesting widespread damage to human health, agriculture, and terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. Killing frosts would reduce growing seasons by 10-40 days per year for 5 years. Surface temperatures would be reduced for more than 25 years, due to thermal inertia and albedo effects in the ocean and expanded sea ice. The combined cooling and enhanced UV would put significant pressures on global food supplies and could trigger a global nuclear famine.

when u are little daddy girl

This. Why even use make up when you look like this? It'd only make me suspicious of how you really look.

Much prefer the nature to the porn star version

If a supervolcano ever goes off the planet is quite literally fucked.

livescience.com/20714-yellowstone-supervolcano-eruption.html

please see

It could also be better. And she's still young so it's only going to keep getting worse.

And plenty of people have clear skin the majority of the time. Obviously no one never gets pimples but make up pretty much guarantees them.

India and I together have less than 300 nukes.

Then how do they explain that 100s of above ground atmosphere tests took place without this happening?

This paper was proven to be questionable due to the fact that massive ozone loss do not occur with the massive fires in Asian jungles.

Hi Steve from Mumbai.

I like her better without makeup.

FUCKING WHORES, ALL WHORES

Yeah It's not like american scientists use scientific method or anything.
Much better to rely on the assumptions of some random on Cred Forums.

this

No it's "john" from Houston.

Not an argument or a reasoned reply.

Woops, wrong thread.

Except we know now that those nuclear tests did affect the climate.

Which one Cred Forums?

Because there weren't hundreds of nukes being detonated at once. It was a couple every few months.

Left, she wouldn't leave me for somebody better (everyone)

Neither. Kill it with fire.

Pakistan's stockpile is relatively small with very low yield warheads.

120 warheads and maybe only 1/2 of those are deployed or otherwise ready for use. If their priority targets are air bases and nuclear facilities as well as command and control centers then they have already spent most of their arsenal.

They won't have nukes to spare on anything but the largest of cities. The small warheads in their arsenal are not even city killers (assuming pakistan's missiles can even hit cities). A large indian city would take multiple hits to wipe out and Pakistan lacks the capability.

India is hardly any better off but they at least have more modern and rleiably methods to deliver the nukes to where they would do the most damage.

tl;dr

People think nuclear war means purging all life from an entire continent. More people would die from starvation if a nulear war broke out (due to disrupted supply lines to urban areas) than from actual nukes.

WHY CONTAIN IT? LET THE POO FLOW OUT OF THE LOU, LET THE SEWAGE RUN IN THE DESIGNATED SHITTING STREETS.

Mudshit pakis are more dangerous to you than hindu poo loo's. Let India slaughter them.

That paper is viewed as bunk user.
"The Effects of Nuclear Weapons" by Glassstone and Dolan showed that you have to get explosions above 5 megatons to impact the ozone layer.

Top nuke used by India and Pakistan is .5 MT

Source?

fuck off back to Cred Forums

I like the way you think.

The streets will run brown with the poo of our enemies.

She looks disgusting on the right. She looks really cute on the left

Why don't you email your list of points to this guy [email protected] if you want to get schooled.
I'm just a random user like you, and I'm not gonna sit here and pretend to be an authority on atmospheric research.

feels man ...

Right again

>More people would die from starvation if a nulear war broke out (due to disrupted supply lines to urban areas) than from actual nukes.

Nice

Is her cock cute and fem?

the salary of programers all around the world would go up

Look up the facts and get back to me. Project Hardtack II would be a good start.

but its true
u never watch "threads" ?

cda.pl/video/183048ba
polish subtitles, but in english so you will understand
(hope that it isnt prenium-movie,in other case i will find you another source)

>tfw I bang my big ass gf in the morning with the natural wood of my dick and smelling the unique scent of her smooth, warm, tender pussy and body that comes from sleeping a lot on a comfy bed while not allowing kisses because morning breath and listen to her bitch and moan mouth shut tight.

Because what's the point? The nuclear winter hypothesis is not creditable. I'm only trying to correct you from falling into the gimmick.

They're not taking seriously in nuclear strategy or policy for said reasons.

desu lad i can't remember where I read that off the top of my head, but it was something in the news in the last couple of months.

>That paper is viewed as bunk user.
okay? say's who?

user, you gotta source that.

This is what would be expected. World would be more of danger of illnesses spreading from lack of sanitation then radiation as well.

Can you build the out of Cows POO.

Threads is a 1984 BAFTA award-winning British television drama, produced jointly by the BBC, Nine Network and Western-World Television Inc. Written by Barry Hines and directed by Mick Jackson, it is a docudrama account of nuclear war and its effects on the city of Sheffield in Northern England.

The primary plot centres on two families, the working-class Kemps and the middle-class Becketts, as a confrontation between the United States and the Soviet Union erupts and escalates. As the United Kingdom prepares for war, the members of each family deal with their own personal crises. Meanwhile, a secondary storyline with the Chief Executive of Sheffield City Council serves to illustrate the British government's then-current continuity of government arrangements. As the nuclear exchange between NATO and the Warsaw Pact begins, the film depicts the terrible details of the characters' struggles to survive both the attacks and their aftermath. The balance of the story outlines the fate of each family as the characters face the medical, economic, social and environmental consequences of nuclear war.

LONG STORY SHORT, HOW THIS FILM END?
EVERYONE LOSE.SINGLE PERSONS.CITIES.NATIONS.WORLD. VERY PESIMISTIC MOVIE, GREAT FOR NORTH COUNTRIES LIKE SWEDEN, THEY ALSO ARE PESIMISTIC.

>illnesses due to lack of sanitation
>India and Pakistan
Ship = sailed user.

>"The Effects of Nuclear Weapons" by Glassstone and Dolan
I gave you the source user. Nuclear weapons will not cause enough blast to impact ozone though smoke unless you are talking about big weapons in the 5 megaton range, when India/pakistan only uses 500 kiloton max weapons.

Imagine the Fallout games, but in India and Pakistan. I'd love to form a Caliphate of Steel and purge the survivors.

Why are you so invested into the concept of nuclear winter?

So any woman you encounter that's wearing makeup your thoughts are immediately
>How fucking ugly are you, bitch?
You're an autistic toothpaste

It can get much worse. Just imagine a cholera outbreak...

You tell em Pajeet

No FEV will be involved here, hence no wasteland abominations.

THIS

...

agreed

Because despite all the people jerking off over pornstars in the comments this is a thread about the consequences of nuclear weapons

Stop shitting in the streets.

>be murrican
>less than [censored for your protection] to live

you people are funny. but in a bad way. all this "un-culture" will end once you are out of the game and florida is a smoldering ruin. the internet too, btw. i guess that's the price humans have to pay for anyway. the real wars will come after. the future looks bleak indeed
archive.is/3jVND

Yeah I'm pretty sure in India they call an epic cholera epidemic "Tuesday."

Indian shitting streets mixing with high levels of radiation... India and Pakistan are literally going to be crawling with shitty ghouls and super mutants.

Somehow I imagine you as an upper class Brit with stiff upper lip

>All that street poo would be pulverized and lifted into the atmosphere to be distributed around the world as dust.

>As the dust remained suspended in the air, there would be a global outbreak of "Curry Asthma"

>Millions of children and old people would die.

Imagine the smell.

>India and Pakistan have a nuclear exchange.
>Would the US and Europe be in danger?
Obviously, such an exchange would eject clouds of poo far into the upper atmosphere, risking the health of anyone caught underneath the shitty fallout.

Fallout: Looville Wasteland
You were just some ordinary Indian. Praying to cows, working at a dollar an hour at Tech Support, and shitting in the streets when all of a sudden, a big fucking poo shapped nuked from Pakistan destroys all of Indian. Now Indian is broken into fractions of Tunak Raiders, The remains of the Indian goverment, The Science Guild, The Doomsday Cult of Islam, and the survival colony of Pajeets. Fight and traverse across the Indian Wasteland by going to cities with poor sewage, improvised housing, shitty roads, bad smells, and awful weather. Negociate with traders and caravans through a non monetary barter system. Loom after your needs of hunger, thrist, sleep, and bladder. How will you survive the Indian Wasteland? The choice is yours.

You didn't answer the question. Why are you so invested into a concept you've never read a paper for?

Yeah I just threw up a little.

I don't really see the point when half of this board thinks climate change is a Chinese hoax the likelyhood of anyone accepting nukes had an effect will be nil, and it will just be "what would top tier scientists know, here's some assumptions of mine I came up with in a few minutes that those scientists couldn't possibly have thought of in a several year research period"

I'm guessing the scientists who did the 2014 study were aware of the one from 1977 you say somehow "debunked" it (even if it is older).

I'm just repeating the findings of scientists, are you one of those brits that doesn't need experts to tell you anything?

I would be really happy

Are Indians redpilled?

>paint's face like a fuckdoll
>"WAH STOP OBJECTIFYING ME"

...

The most important issue is ground blast vs air blast.
Air blast produces little fallout, little lasting radiation and no climate effects.
Ground blasts create radioactive dust, much more fallout due to dust being carried with the wind.
AFAIK, ground blasts would only be used to target hardened targets (command bunkers, missile silos,metc.). The vast majority would be air blast, yielding a relatively clean result.

No, Hitler was a autismal spaz who did more to fuck the white race over than anyone else.

SIDES

You can use a variety of weapons ranging from simple farm tools, classical Indian weapons, abs gus that dont work when you want them to. You can Indian-Rig most weapons to make even better (though somewhat sketchy) weapons. New Perks offer many bonous skills like delayed bladder, gain the ability to hack robots as quickly as possible, and steal rupees more efficently.

It would start as a tactical exchange. At this point, China, Russia and the US will urge restraint. if this isn't observed, both of their nuclear arsenals will be bombed by these air forces.

Neither India nor Pakistan would be stupid enough to launch nukes, despite the posturing. They know that doing so would cause their Balkanization. Both countries are well-represented on the diplomatic stage and wouldn't want to hurt their hard and well-earned positions as regional powers.

Your best tool is the Pajeetboy 2000. Invented by the brightest minds in India, this totally not a knock off the classic Pipboy lets you listen to Indian music ranging from Bollywood pop to classical Indian music. Use the featured telecom feature to contact allies, or confuse enemy robots with bad.tech support. You can even program your own programs on Pajeetboy 2000, provided you have enough science skills to do so.

No, the scientists you are speaking of in 2011 where climate people, not nuclear people. Nuclear people called them out for not even referencing old basic publications in the nuclear field.

your 2011 paper you holding so dear would be like saying "X plant will take over wheat fields if temptures go up 1 degree" and then biologist specializing in X plant say "No, we did research in the 70s and debunked that, what in the hell are you talking about, didn't you read our papers?"

Also, I call bullshit since you refuse to admit you are wrong about nuclear testing and climate change.

The peak contribution was in 1962, when nuclear testing may have contributed as much as one hundred and seventy megatons TNT equivalent of energy in 1962. Averaged over the year and the Earth's surface, that represents forty-four millionths of a Watt (44 x 10-6 W m-2), for a warming contribution, ignoring dust effects, of around thirty-five millionths of a degree Centigrade (35 * 10-6 C), still too small to notice.

So nuclear testing changed the world wide temperature at most .000035 of a degree.

Since you do not know what you talking about, please fuck off.

You are using too much logic in this thread user.

Right is when you're out on a date
Left is after you hit it after the date.
Personally, I prefer left.

Since we are talking about looks.

Both are just okay. I perfer a girl who wears a little makeup but not caked on.

Brown-pilled perhaps.

Very true, and cities are only targeted with air bursts.

There is a lethal gamma burst associated with a nuke, but most people exposed to lethal radiation are also badly burned by the blast. Most hiroshima victims died from the fires as their wood and paper structures burned uncontrollably.

There was no evidence of anyone in Japan suffering from fallout resulting from the blast. People close to the blast had radiation sickness form the initial gamma burst (prompt radiation) but that was it.

Even at ground zero there was not enough persistent radioactivity to be harmful.

There were several productions like this in Europe and America. They were political propaganda from Leftists wanting unilateral nuclear disarmament by NATO.

After the fall of the Soviet Union, they discovered that the disarmament groups were funded by the Soviets. Keep in mind, NATO nukes were the only thing keeping Europe from being invaded; estimates were that NATO could only last 2 weeks of conventional fighting max.

t. Oldfag

Fight a variety of scary enemies from simple raiders, to elite bezerkers, stealthy and dangerous Rad Tigers, to the most feared beast in all of the Indian Wasteland: The Death Elephant.

sophie dee is cute as hell natural

Indians have no reason to be biased when it comes to WW2.

This. Plus a third of the worlds poo would be vaporized leaving a fertile land ripe for recolonization.

Not if it's just a bit of lipstick or something, but if they're wearing a lot, I absolutely think that. It's basically false advertising at that point.

Effect will be global,If India and Pakistan fought a war detonating 100 nuclear warheads (around half of their combined arsenal), each equivalent to a 15-kiloton Hiroshima bomb, more than 21 million people will be directly killed, about half the world’s protective ozone layer would be destroyed, and a “nuclear winter” would cripple the monsoons and agriculture worldwide.

business-standard.com/article/current-affairs/the-global-cost-of-india-pakistan-nuclear-war-116092900377_1.html

>I'm just repeating the findings of scientists, are you one of those brits that doesn't need experts to tell you anything?

You are repeating something you haven't read or studied. Stop posting.

I want this game.

The study that this is based also falls into the same pitfalls.

The biggest effect of an Indo-Pakastani nuke war would be a major loosening of inhibitions on using nukes in the future. A nuclear exchange happens, life continues as normal (except for the dead Third Worlders that no one cares about), suddenly the thought of using nukes isn't so scary.

I would bet another nuclear war within 10 years after the first one.

first country to plant a flag on ground zero gets dibs on all area that the blast took out. i think russia will probably get there first and claim most of the land

WW4 between China, Russia and USA to claim the Indian land.

>If India and Pakistan have a nuclear exchange, what would the impact on the world be?

Brilliant. No more pakkis and substantially less poos. Both are vermin.

>Both economically speaking, and physically would we in the US or Europe be in danger?

Almost none.

That "study" already been debunked user.

>left looks normal right looks like a fucking tranny

Looks great without makeup.

Most women who are half way good looking do.

India has ~2 trillion GDP, world economy will be nuked along with it.

You're autistic

Panicky Poo to scared to nuke pakis.

Chicken.

Go on admit it you are scared of the orc pakkis and are a butterball.

मुझे नहीं लगता की बात अणु बम तक पहुंचेगी।

Damn, that girl is the best of two worlds. Looks super cute without make-up but sexy and naughty with make-up on.

1.5 for India
1.2 for Pakistan

The vast majority of that would be domestic economy, the goods produced and consumed locally with local inputs.

...

why is the left so much better looking

Are you fucking retarded you Irish cunt, I don't hold the nuclear codes, this thread asked what will be the affect of nuke war which i posted you dumb fuck. Are you really that stupid that you think some guy on Cred Forums decide to use nukes or not.

The nuclear winter concept was shit from the start:

>1) assume every nuke is hitting a city made of old wood and paper (Hiroshima)

>2) Assume the fire started by the nuke would spread uncontrollably due to knocked over oil lanterns and houses made of kindling (again, using Hiroshima)

>3) Calculate the amount of smoke and soot produced by burning a paper city ignited by a 15kt nuke

>4) scale that up into megaton weapons and assume 1000 times more kindling would be burning when the same city was hit by a bigger nuke (???)

>5) Multiply this by all the nukes in the world going off at once, all of them burning giant paper cities with overturned oil lamps burning uncontrollably

>6) WOW that is a lot of soot and smoke in the atmosphere! That would be like a big volcano, and you know what volcanoes do? They can cause a very short term drop in global temperature by blocking sunlight.

>7) THEREFORE NUCLEAR WINTER!?!

That is over simplified but not far from their original train of through when dreaming up this nonsense.They believed that even 100 cities burning would be enough to bring about nuclear winter.

They tend to forget that we have annual forest fires here in Canada that are larger than some European countries. They grossly overestimated how much smoke it would take to block out the sun.

because she is not painted with degenerate products made of baby foreskin

also

RARE
A
R
E

She looks wholesome and cute, but you can tell she's already starting to ruin her face with all that nasty cakeup. That shit does a number to your skin, eyes, etc. Their hairspray alone smells like weaponized, aerosolized cancer.

She drinks too much also - dark bags under the eyes.

this leaf isn't that bad

have a (you)

Dark bags under the eyes do not mean drinking per say. I never drank and have dark eyes in the morning. So does my siblings and about 50% of our kids. Joys of pale skin

kek is here

>Paki, China, Russian joint force does a P-Day invasion on the beaches of India.
>Landing crafts loaded with troops land on the beaches of India, under heavy fire, storming a beach covered in poo.

Aside the radiated bullshit that would go into the atmosphere I think the only people that dont WIN from this scenario are india and pakistan.

Though I hate to think of indian refugees being a thing. At least we'd get poopfugee memes.

Makeup should be banned.
Also, only googles and cryptogoogles like "hot" women. Non-degenerates will pick a "cute" one any time.

Alaina Fox

says the brownie who shits next to toilets

makeup very often hides ugly, anyone with a modicum of experience can see through that shit

>In 2014, India exported $292B and imported $421B
That's 0.7 trillion of direct import/export, not counting investments, patents, services outsourcing, international loans and so on.

according to '50 ways the world could end' if a single nuclear device was detonated in Shitstain/Pakiland the nuclear fallout could kill 6million in the UK

So, about 1/3. Looking at their exports, there is nothing that can't be replaced easily. Somewhere around 40% of imports are military equipment.

Overall, I don't think it would cause any major economic problems directly. The real fallout (sorry) would be investors spooked by flying nukes who would flee to precious metals and hard assets, tanking the markets temporarily.

No, it's because she looks like a whore on the right. The left one looks girl next door.

Nuclear winter my arse.
Fire is self-modulating. Too much atmospheric fire burns down the O2 supply, which causes the subsequent fires to burn less intensely.
Takeaway: Massive ongoing global fires make continuity of massive ongoing global fires less likely.
The problem solves itself.

Its not about being replaced easily or not. Its about world finances, balance sheets, derivative instruments and so on.
Collapse of Lehman Brothers investment bank caused world-wide recession which we are still struggling to overcome.
Collapse of India + Pakistan will be like 10 Lehman Brothers at once, and world market isn't going to survive it. Governments will have to rebuild financial market from scratch, writing off huge chunks of liabilities for all major players.

Please tell me this is bait

She still has makeup on in the left pic, Its just that she is not dolled up.

He obviously referred to Indians in whole you retard

Kek

The poo fallout would be devastating.

>tfw no plain gf

Too much makeup isn't attractive Nigel. I thought you'd have learned that with all the chavettes you have over there who run around with cake-face everywhere.

There's nothing wrong with some light makeup -- eyes, lips, frame the face a bit -- but so many women these days use so fucking much that it makes them look unnatural. Not to mention that nasty shit rubs off on your shirt any time they hug you.

If I see that ugly bitch one more time!

Pakistan's nukes are old, hiroshima sized warheads on decades old soviet rockets that might as well be made out of old trash cans. Any modern missile defense system could easily pick them off. India isn't stupid enough to lob a nuke at them just because. It's not happening

I've had dark areas under my eyes since I was a child. One kid even asked me what I did to get two black eyes in third grade...

refugees

Right gives off the normie vibe.