Cred Forums, what do you think is the ideal and most effective type of government?

it's photoshopped muh dickens

>Animu

Here

That's why I asked about YOUR type.

Protect the nation from outside forces, and enforce contracts between entities within?

Probably a libertarian monarchy

the type of govt which allows for like pics unrelated, faggot

moar

So intentions matter more than results? As long as they government can prove they meant well, they're good no matter how much they fuck things up?

But those same governments are destroying the identity of the nation and its people.

Chilling at work and watching Godfather II

Here

moar
o
a
r

...

Name?

I dunno, it was posted here few months ago

Thanks
To answer your question: Any degree of authoritarianism. Fascism specifically; one that relies on its people, more than the people on it. It's an ailment on any prosperous country that its people choose not to work for it.
Also moar

yes but effective to who and effective in what?
to who: the majority? everyone? the working class?
in what:economoic prosrepity? keeping tradition/values? scientific develompment? peace?

a government does much more today, social security, education, healthcare

>But those same governments are destroying the identity of the nation and its people.
Only Sweden. And even they made an U-Turn.

Non zionist

You're right, I should've added "actual results"

In the case of Scandinavia, they're actually some of the best managed places on earth.

Absolute Monarchy

Debatable

how many pics of her do you have?

Stalinism

Collective consciousness via mass ego death.

I have no ideal form of government. I'm just against communism. I think a variety of different systems could work.

My Brother of African Descent.

Democratic socialism with a progressive agenda for the 21st century.
Duh.

I agree, Fascism which doesn't start wars with all its neighbors and focuses on the narions is a great one.

That's why I asked Cred Forums

>They made a U Turn
Since when?

Only Israel can be Zionist.

I got randoms here and there

Ethno-Nationalist Capitalism.
No system is perfect and it will eventually fail, but that would be a high standard of living.

But widely accepted

m.youtube.com/watch?v=Fhmf4eNdnCg

You wouldnt be a jew without promoting degeneracy and white women being whores

*BRAAAAAAAAAAAAP*

cheers lad

Also debatable

Fucking kike getting off to white women because your satanic race is cursed by the god

Niiiiice

>a government does much more today
And that is half the problem of failed governments

it all depends on the type of technology and ancient history past history and recent history of the govt in question but if we are speaking of our world right now i would say that one world order is the next step anything other than that would indicate collapse.

Stalin's Real Socialism.

The only way humanity will advance is if we transcend our humanity.

>your satanic race is cursed by the god
don't blame me on your trouble.

Im just a working class kike.

i know right?

>a government does much more today, social security, education, healthcare

You said ideal, correct?

Datamining is the ideal and most effective type of government.

So is making threads with images more interesting than your thread.

Both are the ideal and most effective type of government.

after our one world govt phase we will have a brief time of confusion this means separation of communication in this great men will be born and attain a different perception of what technology is and can do. Soon after comes another golden age of mankind as this technology spreads so does communication and understanding and a yearn for peace envelopes the earth at this point we have 2 choices essentially stay stagnant and "happy" as long as we can or continue our endeavor of humans natural instinct to invade and conquer this time with "wisdom" and "understanding"

A government where he politicians sit down and discuss the issue, agree whats in the best interest of all the people, and then do it

Foking noice

Autocracy.

Fascism

Buddhist Theocracy.

Is this an r9k meme designed to devalue the sexual value of women's asses?

yup

Cannot contact reCAPTCHA. Check your connection and try again.

Meriotcratic directdemocracy, with some national socialism and christianity

Theocratic Monarchy

meritocratic*

Best ally.

Every time I see an ass thread like this I can't help but thinking of them having putrid farts that smell like sewage or rotten cabbage or eggs and having to inhale them. It makes me cringe

Why meritocratic?

Absolute monarchy or an elector count system.

This will be ineffective. Enjoy your scat fetish though, I guess.

libertarian/minarchist nationalism

because then the most qualified will be in positions of power

instead of the most popular or the most affluent (nepotism)

It isn't discovered yet, some might say that there isn't a thing as the perfect government

I don't have a scat fetish

They were all crazy, retarded bitches in the anime.

Yet.

>le monarchy automatically means no individual rights for those living in it meme

Excise your individuality like the cancer it is and join your species in the bliss of ego death.

excellent taste in booties mr.shlomo - you are arite in my book of jewry.

Are you speaking from experience?

Yet?

>Absolute monarchy
I feel like that is rolling a dice between absolute corruption and something better than what we currently have with capitalism. At least there's a chance to remove welfare and relocate those resources into more productive things.

Small local government with national and supranational oversight. Fuck international law tho.

dictatorship under a true supreme leader

What is going on here?

Schlomo post some cute boys.

Right wing libertarian with pro-Christian values

Absolute slavery
One ruler, all the rest are slaves

fascist state

There's a higher chance of having a decent ruler since the next heir will more or less be trained from birth for the role and be surrounded by the best advisors (that's the ideal anyway).

The prime advantage of a monarchy is that outside influence (banks, corporations etc) have zero effect on the monarchy,

But isn't that technocracy?

good thing they added numbers
kek

Except a monarch can execute you at any point and nobody will say anything about it. Best case scenario is people rebel.

Constitutional Monarchy

That all depends on how the monarch is able to balance expansion of his nation's borders with their available resources. Considering the state of the world, it's safe to assume that the prime advantage you stated isn't true.

Imperialism.

>technocracy
Not necessarily, if it turned out that our technology advanced to even greater levels then of course a meritocracy would need technocrats, you would still need experts in every other aspect of governance.

If technology advanced to, say, a singularity, then a meritocracy would naturally evolve to a technocracy, I think

>you will never suck on anarchism's foot pussy.

why even live.

>it's safe to assume that the prime advantage you stated isn't true

What is oligarchy.

There isn't a Prime Minister or President on this Earth that doesn't owe someone a few dozen favours on his or her way to their office.

Holy shit thats Mick Foley's daughter...

Sharia
Not even joking

Decentralized government where local governments have freedom to make significant decisions.

We need to find a middle between (direct) Democracy and Technocracy.

Where people are only allowed to vote on certain issues if they proven to have some knowledge about the subjects.

This knowledge must not be too demanding that would create a high-IQ-only elite, what we pretty much have now. But also not too easy so it would exclude people voting who have no clue what they're voting for. Which is the case with about 50~60% of voters today.

For example, if you do not know that ethnic jews are highly overrepresented in the liberal media institutions. And jews are highly overrepresented in the Neocon movement.

You have no business taking part in elections. You know nothing important in life.

I think with the coming of the Internet such a complex system is possible.

NICE B8 IMAGE FAGGOT BUT I WILL NOT RESPOND TO THIS THREAD

glorious enlightened despotism

>Sharia
>that flag

Very understandable, but overall I agree with it seeing as our minister of health is a rabbi.

Who?

The one where the government and other people leave me the fuck alone or I shoot them. I'll pay for muh roads but won't pay for suicidal utopia projects.

>Infidel acting like his country won't be muslim soon

i think he's saying that since a female's ass is inherently sexual and one of the primary sexual identifiers of a woman - by associating it with farting/shit etc, you will not wipe out your attraction to asses, but rather associate the attraction of an ass with shit/farting and develop a scat fetish.

Right libertarian

decentralized republic where only familys have the right to vote. 1vote per family, you dont have children? no representation.

No government, Anarcho Capitalism style!

The kind without any Jews in it.

this

do you realize there are ID's here?

Direct democracy moving towards a subconscious consensus with the aid of cybernetics

I wouldn't call it ideal, but Chinese Shi style bureaucracy is indisputably the most effective.

It survived when dynasties did not. It endured for almost two thousand years while other legal systems came and went.

>Hence, the Scandinavian governments perform best by almost every indicator in existence.

I beg to differ.

Libertarian nationalism. Government provides for a strong defense, ensures equal legal protection, facilitates international trade, secures the border, manages immigration, and actively tries to minimize its own footprint through personal incentives. Beyond that, states decide their own rules, except when those rules abridge the unalienable rights of individuals.

the one Russia has.

A city state with a constitution, direct democracy legislature (meet somewhere like Athens), an elected supreme Court who appoints lesser judges, and an unelected prince who is appointed meritocratically as the executive.

marry me, Yui

Benevolent dictatorship/philosopher king

You not wrong about that. I'm saying that even an absolute monarch eventually becomes beholden to a burgeoning merchant class. They either facilitate their operations in order to maintain effective trade and resources or risk losing them due to emigration. Once those fuckers get their foot in the door of the upper class it's all downhill from there. Divine right is considerably lazier than outright greed.

One where Hillary Clinton is our leader. Praise be to our glorious leader!

MUH
FUGGIN
DIIIIIIICKKKK

is it the lighting or is it my imagination, but this picture looks like they where wearing bras and someone plastered fake tits all over em, they look kinda unreal

Monarchy is my personal favorite my second favorite is Republicanism

This so far. Women are prohibited from voting with the exception of owning property. Soft drugs decriminalized and as well as prostitution so background check required on gun purchases, no waiting periods. License to carry in public partially because of above, mostly because I want anyone carrying in public to be minimally effective at wielding a firearm. Some budget measure for water sanitation only because I don't know enough about negative impacts regarding it otherwise the budget is only going towards military spending. Consumption tax only levied in time of war/state of emergency. Science is to be only privately funded, no perverse incentives from government funding research. Tariffs used to fund government for the most part, in peace time 50% spent on military, the surplus is maintained for a rainy day.

All in all I want a government that exists solely to protect the people and the rights of the people albeit with a few restrictions on liberty, society can figure out what the hell it wants to do. Multi-party democracy since I want that for legislation purposes, I think this model could be easily adapted to a monarchy as well, secular government because you're free to believe what you want with the exception that your beliefs violate another's rights, subvert the government or its laws, or even have sedition as an edict. I think that covers it generally.

Why does this look so fucking fake?

Because it's something you'll never see outside a picture

That is one choice posterior.

i need a thick white girl very badly

You're welcome to move here.

You'd quickly realize that ''free'' is a socialist meme and it's not all rainbows and shit here. The worst thing with socialism is that once you get used to raising taxes ''just a bit'', regulating ''reasonably'' and spending ''some'', the ride never ends and it will be an eternal ride of raising taxes, regulating everything and spending everything. Until we run out of money and the system collapses. Shortly put, it's not sustainable.

The best system would probably be one with an extremely wise, intelligent and immortal God-Emperor with unquestionable authority.

Technocratic Socialism

This
Too bad is very hard to find one

HHHHHHHNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNGGGGGGGGGHGH!

MUH FUCKING DICK!!!!!!!!!!

...

kek

ABSOLUTE MONARCHY
ANY OTHER IS C.UCK SYSTEM

...

Neocameralism.

No they didn't except maybe in Russia but it's not like that has changed a bit since that monarchy was overthrown.

Kanker idioot. You certainly won't be allowed to vote.

t. Andrew Ryan

What funds the police?

Got a link for this test?

MONARCHIE ABSOLUE DE DROIT DIVIN
Only possible answer. Deus vult.

It's not a test, and it's in the image.

filteries.com/politics

Adjust your policies, balance the budget and it will tell you what you are.

Also, how the fuck does my socialist hellhole have LESS restrictions than the libertarian utopia I replied to?

/r/ing the picture, more of the set

The way around the democracy problem is controlling who votes

Federal Government:
>constitutional parliamentary republic
>"house" elected by Single Transferable vote (proportional representation popular vote)
youtube.com/watch?v=l8XOZJkozfI
>"senate" elected by provincial/state governments
>you must be 25 to vote
>You must be revenue positive to the gov (pay net taxes)
>Constitution written like a set of rigorous logical rules
>Supreme court is a group of several grammar and logic parsing AI's that use a voting algorithm to decide if a new rule logically violates the constitution (NO JUDICIAL ACTIVISM)

Economic policy:
>free market except for mandated government board appointees for certain industries
>semi autonomous (board must be 51% government representatives) state consortium run resource extraction and primary heavy industry (steel mills) and hospitals aka the Chinese state capitalism model
>Progressive reverse income tax that guarantees at least 15,000$ per year effective income
>If you are unable to manage to survive on 15k per year or have too many kids etc you have the option of moving into a government social assistance "campus" where you have shelter and food but are under strict rules (aka heavily policed) and can't have any more kids as long as you live there
>10% flat income tax
>10% flat consumption tax
>0% capital gains tax
>$40 per ton of CO2 carbon tax
>relatively high land tax to prevent sprawl and intensify land use (this has alot of really cool benefits)
politicaleconomy.org/gaffney.htm
>mild protectionism, only free trade with wealthy advanced economies
>Singapore healthcare system (hybrid family centered voucher/ healthcare savings account system)

Immigration:
>Merit based
>Tightly restricted
>try to ensure a permanent slight labor shortage
>legally mandated ethnicity quotas, aka must reaming 80% European Caucasian (this isn't that crazy, Singapore does this)

Thanks lad!

Source? I want to watch this anima.

I want the original 10MB file version please.

In a true monarchy that is true you dumb britcuck. Do you even know your own fucking history?

Your bastardized form of "monarchy" isn't.

Can I get some (you)s?

writing this really made me think :(

The Christian ethno-state. What form it takes after that is of very little consequence. People are happy in democracies, republics, autocracies, monarchies, and dictatorships as long as the population is genetically similar and has the same morals.

The downfall of society is not so much the exact governmental system, but when people feel they don't have a reason to support their nation, which is based on a fundamental psychological concept.

mamma mia!

Oh damn

This is perfect. I agree. Unfortunately it will never happen :(

sauce?

National Socialism.

Prepare your anus.

>Andrew Ryan
Since LE isn't a category I just included military as an agency to protect rights. Private courts btw. If it was a federalist system or confederacy I imagine it would be up to counties and municipalities to figure out how they're going to fund LE.

I don't know how I implied Andrew Ryan there, I'm straight tripping.

>that image
Also, according to Aristotle, a benevolent dictatorship. I think one could possibly be created with artificial intelligence. Of course it would be able to wipe humans off the earth pretty easily, so that could be a bad idea.

Jesus fucking Christ I hate Canadians so much. Range ban when?

forgot my picture

perfect white ass

Humanity ruled by a hyper advanced AI, a Warp-God created by us in our image.

Anything that preserves that national indentity and allow social and economic freedom, i think Pinochet is my everyday bet

...

Here (you) go

None

>benevolent AI dictator

problem is this will probably require Strong AI, and with that comes; how do you give the AI goals without that making it take them to the logical extreme

for example:
>make everyone rich!
prints trillions and mail it to people

>no more death!
it tracks down and freezes every single human bean

>allow social and economic freedom
>Pinochet
wat

probably airbrushed to shit and tons of surgery on the girls

if you've ever seen a pic of multiple topless girls who arent porn stars all the tits are different

>I think one could possibly be created with artificial intelligence
It's more likely a person will connect his mind to technology and take on that role.

Just to be safe.

Or have two - one human based, one not.

>0% capital gains tax
>10% flat income tax
bad idea.

How does it feel to believe in a fake meme ideology?

I like this. It's a nice, simplistic 5th grade introduction to governments that is perfectly suitable for these shows 5th grade audiences

>fascism
The problem with fascism is it is destined for corruption if you seal a meritocracy (which you should be doing). A meritocracy is a society the rewards those that do well, but the problem with fascism is it only rewards those who believe the most in its fascism. Those in charge will always favour yes men of those that are actually best for the job

This means it's extremely susseptible to corruption.

why?

I just think its pointless to try tax rich people more, they will just jew their way out of it,besides I want to attract rich as shit people to live here not encourage them to leave, hide it, or leave it somewhere it can't be productive

10% of $50 000 000 is a lot more than 50% of $0

It would have to be one immortal, benevolent monarch. If he died, one of his descendant successors would inevitably wind up being an asshole.

direct democracy (at all levels)
federalism
subsidiarity
social security system only for nationals or foreigners who have come legally and made significant contributions
only those who have done military service can vote.

Tribalistic Anarchy

Similar to Israel, a small country with relatively unified founding principles, strong military tradition, and yes, fucking democracy of some kind. Small nations are conducive to democracy but need a strong military culture to maintain.

Switzerland, New Zealand, Israel, Finland, these are the types of countries I have in mind.

In the US, this translates to support states' rights, limiting immigration, limiting population growth, supporting military training, and so forth.

>not being able to sell meth to toddlers because muh government

cuck

All good governments of history has seem to be some kind of aristocratic military republic with the goal of expanding the nation.

Sadly that is extremely dangerous

>Government
>effective
Only for those who rule. And for slaves\statist, who cant leave without someone, who will fuck them.

>The best system would probably be one with an extremely wise, intelligent and immortal God-Emperor with unquestionable authority.
That's what Pluto thought, but it's easier said than done. And even if you happen to find this perfect leader at a young age to rule, what do you do when they die?

That's where monarchism comes in, as their kid is the closet relation therefore most likely to inherit those "great" genes and be like their father/mother.

The other option we will have one day is to program and AI to be our eternal emperor. Essentially create our own god.

But it's no good talking about theoretical models that don't have a real check on corruption or incompetence.

>live
fix

ASS

Based liberty get

Me as the single ruler with complete control over all legislation.

You don't need to rich to live in you're country, you just need them to spend their money in your country

probably waxed the tits or airbrushed the sagging.

Too bad there is an angry bush monster under those bikinis and make annoying sounds when a 2 inch dick is fucking them

...

theocratic republic

High inequality rarely has good effects on society historically.
The reason you tax the rich is because they benefit from public services more.
Their companies benefit from an educated population provided by public schools, infrastructure, law enforcement, etc.

Comunists are an exception, the don't deserve freedom

Fascist Syndicalism.

Rich doesn't pay taxes - they collect taxes.

Ha, fag

She would look so good in a dress and heels.

Trudeau, is that you?

Or they just give the burden of taxes to the lower classes.

Someday friend. Someday.

Capitalists are an exception, they don't deserve freedom
t. communists
Tell me how those are different.

We are right.

Thats also the case. But i am talking about "richest" who are using government to steal from others. Cause government has its own interest.

I like the one without implants.

She's not in the picture obviously.

The one that produces those types of asses .

Aaaand there's the butter

Where are the arguments shart

Terran Federation

something along the lines of re:zero

I'd still marry her purely for that ass

I need it on my face on this day, and on all days until my last.

Re:Zero I think

fucking shit man that ass

A nation of the Pepes, for the Pepes.

Extremely rare OC Pepe reserve backed currency.

I bet you would still shag any one of those birds.