The anarcho comunists, feminist, sjw, ugly, antitourist, prorefugees, antieropean, anticapitalist, sidehead shaved...

The anarcho comunists, feminist, sjw, ugly, antitourist, prorefugees, antieropean, anticapitalist, sidehead shaved, bowl cut party of Barcelona called CUP wanted to get rid of Columbus monument and replace it with some native indian fighter.

But no one has supported them, thank god.

What monuments of your city are hated by the leftist talibans?

columbus was a terrible human being, tho

I don't get why we still pretend like he had any real impact on world history

Why?
Because He's not spanish?

Mind you that lots of catalan people believe he was catalan or at least his family was cause he signed Colom wich is a common surname in Catalonia meaning pigeon.

There are no documents in catalan but the ones wrote in spanish do have catalan mannerisms.

At that time the crown of aragon still controlled Sardinia, Sicily and Naples so it's common.

because he genocided indians and represents american colonialism


>I don't get why we still pretend like he had any real impact on world history
You are literally retarded

Why are spanish colonies less developed than Anglosaxon? Or perhaps this is only temporary?

Why didnt you praise KEK with those gets? You could have created a happening

>he genocided indians
He enslaved some but there was no "genocide." Unless you think that spreading diseases before germ theory existed was intentional.

Because we mixed with them instead of genociding them.

We try to bleach them but they were too many, people here in spain lived good with good weather so they didn't want to go 2 months in a boat.

Spanish women never went to America so the males had to fuck natives and thus the latino was born.

When the transportation got better we lost the colonies so...

Oh I know but that's the reason given

>India

As for the Americas, the Anglosazon colonies

1) more or less removed the native populations, while the spanish interbred with theirs
2) put more effort into developing their colonies while the spanish mostly focused on emptying theirs for ressources
3) consisted of better blood and genetics, while Spanish - having been invaded by Berbers and under Muslim rulership - have North African and Arab blood in their veins simply making them less intelligent and sophisticated
4) finally, it was the anglosaxon colonies that received germanic immigrants and we all know that it truly is the germanics (or the Americans with germanic ancestry) that have been the driving force behind the US

I think it's better that you didn't genocide them. You have no pangs of conscience, at least not comparable to those in western Europe or USA. But I've heard Spaniards were pretty savage during Sacco di Roma. How could a catholic nation have a german monarch?

>making them less intelligent and sophisticated
Then how were they the strongest country in Europe?

>have been the driving force behind the US
They are also the driving force behind the collapse of Germanic countries

>How could a catholic nation have a german monarch?
No descendants or retard descendants.
When a king died without sons they find some other king that maybe didn't even speak the language and never lived there.
All problems from spain have come from that, childless kings and succesion wars.
Pretty retarded.

>consisted of better blood and genetics, while Spanish - having been invaded by Berbers and under Muslim rulership - have North African and Arab blood in their veins simply making them less intelligent and sophisticated
lol denmark come back when you've done 1% of what Spain have done.

obviously they weren't as the UK and France both, at all times of history, have had more power than Spain

Don't mistake Germanics and Germans. Germanics = Nordics and Prussians
Germans = Slavs, Bavarians, Austrians and Prussians

It is the latter that is prone to selfdestruction

>In 15th century aragon and castilled merge forming Spain
>Spain expell moors and jews and discobers America.
>Their descendants die.
>Habsburg king comes
>Spain is the greatest power in Europe
Inbreeding
>18th century retarded king with no sons
>Spanish succesion war
>French king wins
>He's retarded
>More retardation
>Napoleon says he's gonna invade Portugal, we are allies, we let them in but they raped us
Civil war
>All colonies lost
>For some reason the french kings stayed
>We lose the rest of the colonies out of french retardation.

>obviously they weren't as the UK and France both, at all times of history, have had more power than Spain
You skiped lots of history classes
Don't speak like you know

>at all times of history, have had more power than Spain
What? Spain had empire earlier than France or UK, they were obviously stronger. The British took over only after the Great Armada fell by an accident

>It is the latter that is prone to selfdestruction
Prussia was a conquest country, protectorate of Russia and England. They have commited a military suicide. You're distorting history just so that it fits your dumb materialistic theories. No wonder "Germanics" will be muslim shitholes

no one is taking this shit seriously, they are a meme as a politicians

still it shows what we can expect
I'd ve loved if the reaction was bigger

all these lies

What lies???
Check out the spanish empire at the 15th, 16th ant 17th century m8
Do a favour to your brain

>EU sends us rapefugees
>We send them to a city with a statue of a decapitated moor
>They feel offended and leave
Based Geraldo.

>Inb4 the decapitated moor was the poortugese