I'm collecting statistics displaying negative consequences of the homosexual lifestyle so I can make a better case...

False. This is a study from Columbia Law School of 78 studies, only 4 of which found significant negative differences for gay parents. It also critiques the methodology of those studies.

whatweknow.law.columbia.edu/topics/lgbt-equality/what-does-the-scholarly-research-say-about-the-wellbeing-of-children-with-gay-or-lesbian-parents/

One of these four studies is always posted here as proof that fags are all abusive.

rt.com/news/australian-paedophile-us-jail-976/

God speed australia

I can't find that story of gay man locking his kid in the car on a hot day and the kid suffocating

The documentary on this story:

youtube.com/watch?v=Xufh8XysHJ4

>To the world they appeared as model parents with a beautiful son. But the happy facade set up by Australian citizen Peter Truong and his American partner Mark Newton concealed the darkest of secrets.

>They claimed he was their surrogate child. But Newton and Truong had actually bought him for US$8,000, the result of an unwanted pregnancy. They sexually trained and groomed their son to be exploited by a network of men around the world, known as 'Boy Lovers'. The abuse began when he was less than two years old.

There was this one long ass screencap cycling around 2+2+2+2ch laying out a non-religious argument against faggots, maybe someone here has it.

It's probably biased as I guess gay adoption is probably mostly reserved for upper class fags and gays probably feel some sort of pressure to absolutely not fuck up.

sam hyde (pbuh) did a 'comedy' sketch infront of a bunch of liberals which eventually turned out to just be him reading off stats and arguments that homosexuality is a mental disorder.

Try to find it, seems like sam's done a lot of your work for you

Facts don't matter anymore.
Feelings > All, sorry.

>sensationalized anecdotal evidence
How about instead of trying to brainwash yourselves and others you base things on evidence and reason? Its far, far worse for a single mother or an abusive straight family to have kids than a stable well off gay family.

Studies on families based on race and economic class will find way more discrepancies, focus on that instead emotional reasoning.

"No problems here" - Liberal damage control expert

Homos experienced homosexual childhood molestation at a higher rate than straights:
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?uid=11501300&cmd=showdetailview&indexed=google

Most gay couples are not monogamous:
slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2013/06/26/most_gay_couples_aren_t_monogamous_will_straight_couples_go_monogamish.html

Some statistics about disease:
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3462414/

Aren't news articles proof that a certain phenomenon is actually uncommon? Otherwise it wouldn't be news. Like how the police almost never shoot black people, but other black people shoot black people all the time. The former makes the news and the later takes a snooz.

...

...

...

...

>gays probably feels some pressure to not fuck it up
I don't see how that's a problem, that makes gays better parents than straight people if that's the case. It's an issue when people see adoption primarily as a right and not primarily as a responsibility to raise a child into the best adult you can. Everyone should feel a very big pressure not to fuck up the development of a child who is their responsibility.

youtube.com/watch?v=MNsIRDFJWC0
Dawn Stefanowicz - The Impact of LGBT Parenting & Children’s Well-Being
This woman testified before government committee about the negative impact of being raised by a gay father.

Out From Under is her book about the same subject. The most telling description from the book is her perception of her father's many young lovers as "brothers who dad fucked".

...

>anything that shows these horror stories aren't the exception, but the norm among faggots.
Good strategy, cherrypick the exceptions and present them as the norm.

...

...

What a world we live in.

...

>withdraw guilty plea
So they're victim shaming liberals??? Shocker.

That poor kid is gonna kill himself by 16 guaranteed

...

There is literally nothing wrong with being a pedophile.

>You either support it all, or fight it all
False dilemma fallacy/black-and-white thinking. Poor reasoning abilities + propaganda. Take Milo, for instance (even if you hate him, this is just an example), he dislikes trans being peddled and feminists, but supports gay rights. This is common.

This is known as cherrypicking. See the link to an analysis of 78 studies up-thread.

Post it when you're done.

This image is the most patently retarded thing i have read all week and i feel embarrassed for the brainlet who wasted their time on it.

/r/'ing the info about toxoplasma having a link to homosexuality

But it's true. You don't have to personally agree with those things but if you support the movement itself, you support the progression towards such deviancy. Your approval is no longer required or even necessary, once it becomes widely accepted as normal. You only live to watch the world descend into chaos as you hold onto your own morals as the new generation of "conservatives".

Anyone attempting such research would be (((purged))) from academia. I guarantee this is VERY common. Homosexuals have no sexual boundaries.

found the Hillary voter

Huh. A sheep with basic computer skills.

mfw i see staple of "black men (MSM)" and realize they're 7 percent of the whole population.

>(((Columbia Law School)))

Fags sexually abuse their kids. And they have so many mental illnesses I would not feel comfortable with fags raising adopted children. They'll definitely brainwash them with cultural Marxism at the very least which is awful

the majority of people who are pro-pedo on Cred Forums are pro-pedo so they can abuse little girls. you're not going to find credible evidence that says homosexuality is linked to pedophilia because none exists. if anything the people that abuse little boys also generall abuse little girls.

WOW!!! omg~!!
this is such a surprise
wow, I can't even
what the heck
gays are demented perverts!!??
noooOooo
what are you... I can't even... what is this all about, no, no way!

youtube.com/watch?v=jjPQ_jVlEnQ

There was time when it was common sense that this kind of should would happen.

Why add slippery slope reasoning onto an already irrational mess? Examine history of deviancy. There used to be 10 yr old prostitutes on the streets of London, in the height of Victorian modesty and civility. This was changed by feminists, another part of your silly list. CP was legal in places in Europe in the 70s, and has since become highly illegal and taboo.

Its not a slippery slope, its more like a hilly landscape. Stop spreading propaganda and brainwashing and think for yourself.

...

Not really he doesn't, he actually says he wishes he wasn't and wouldn't wish it on his kids

>I'm cherry picking

yeah nah

Still doing a better job than black single mothers.

This one is invalid.

This is Pol, your pesky logic won't work here!

>thinks liberals would stop someone from breaking a religious law
>He doesn't see what modern feminism is doing

And now they're fighting for prostitutes to be allowed to walk the streets, because it's empowering. They are pushing for segregation because whites are the new niggers, to them, and can't be trusted in a safe space. They're pressing for nigger-only housing developments themselves.

You should follow your own advice and pull your head up from the ass of the liberal media, for once.

Nope it is called slippery slope, and it is an argument, not a fallacy. Refute it or shut the fuck up.

>Christian Apologetics & Research Ministry
Oh, yeah. I'm sure they're a great, unbiased source.

...

...

Because people start to believe they can make 2+2=5 with that attitude

nope

why do they look the same? creepy af desu

Having evidence on hand is crucial for any argument.
Even if it is widely accepted.

>decades later, after *Chan
>"Hey, remember that old site that we used to shitpost on? Those were some good times, huh?"
>What is he talking about?
>"The one with the funny pictures, they called memes"
>What's a meme?
>"And we used to spread these memes, like inside jokes, and it became like a game - almost a job"
>What the fuck is this man talking about? Is he crazy?
>"Boy, those were the days. You remember that stuff?"
>"H-heh.. Yeah, of course! G-good times! Heh..."
>Why don't I remember?
>It's like someone erased history itself
>Why can't I rememb

Yeah. They're being like BLM tards saying every time a black person is shot by the police its racism, its the same emotional reasoning, if they see some sensationalized new stories it must mean all gay people are raping children.

Feminists upped the age of consent and stopped child prostitution in the 19th century. They were adamantly left-wing.

>And now they're fighting for prostitutes to be allowed to walk the streets, because it's empowering.
Or because they don't want to base everything on religious morality, and legalizing prostitution will likely decrease violence and the spread of STDs?

>They are pushing for segregation because whites are the new niggers, to them, and can't be trusted in a safe space.
What does it have to do with feminism? They are related because they come from the same process of postmodernism and naivety, not because they're interwoven in a grand plot to destroy society. If they are, explain how black BLM women hate white women, gays hates trans, feminist hate gays, etc?

>You should follow your own advice and pull your head up from the ass of the liberal media, for once.
Whats the point of creating an opposite system of brainwashing to them? How about just not brainwash people?

Can I just very quickly point out that the case against these guys was thrown out and they're now suing/they sued the government.

If you're gonna incite, incite with a guilty party.

Its a slippery slope argument (never said it was a fallacy, its just poor reasoning and often hides inadequate understanding) and the informal fallacy of false dilemma. It was refuted as well.

You are like a little baby.

1/2

True

2/2

Please go educate yourself. Homosexuals are at most 2% of the population, but between 55 and 80% of the Catholic Priest abuse cases. In one legal article, the 'unknown' category was greater than heterosexual cases, and along with 'either', 'both' and 'uncertain' never reached 15% on any of our cases.

Cannot comment on studies not linked to Papists, atm.

I answered no to the first question. Do I still need to read the rest of the flowchart, or am I excused?

...

>defending feminists uprooting the base of feminism
I want to laugh because of how ridiculous you and they are but I can't bring myself to do it, since I know you're serious.

>what does racial segregation have to do with feminists
>explain how BLM women hate white women, gays hate trans, feminists hate gays, etc
The fuck are you on? Have you really had your head shoved up someone's ass for so long that you're totally clueless to what has been happening?

Feminists are pro-BLM openly and have been seen with BLM during protests. As for the rest of the shit you spilled on my screen, that doesn't even make any sense or have a place in this discussion. Maybe post some images that back up that claim of supposed in-fighting? Because the only in-fighting I'm aware of are the manhaters and the egalitarians that are within feminism.

How about allow conservative media to have an opinion so people can listen to BOTH and draw their own opinions, like you would suggest?

>stop brainwashing people
I'd love for this to be a legitimate sentiment and not a passive aggressive snark but you've aptly exposed yourself as an idiot that doesn't actually care about society. It would be nice if we did have some media outlet that was unbiased but as we both know, that's pretty much impossible, since the media outlet would be controlled by a sponsor and that sponsor would undoubtedly have their own agenda and opinions that they'd want to spread.

That's why it's important for both sides to have a voice, instead of so many fucking liberal news outlets, like we have today. You'd have to be an idiot to believe every single opinion that you hear, as you so graciously pointed out for me.

Excused? We need you on the front lines, soldier.

Why do faggots rape children? Is there a reason? Like a narcissistic complex syndrome ?

Absolutely fucking degenerate. Pedos are like vampires, turning their victims into pedophiles. How do we stop this chain? Do we kill the head pedo?

Kill them both. 100% death penalty

>How do we stop this chain?

speaking from experience, the only thing that can realistically stop this kind of thing is a human extinction event. otherwise these people will be around for as long as humanity exists.

>I want to laugh because of how ridiculous you and they are but I can't bring myself to do it, since I know you're serious.
Ad hominem as the first part of your post? Provide a counterargument, you are being emotional.

>Maybe post some images that back up that claim of supposed in-fighting? Because the only in-fighting I'm aware of are the manhaters and the egalitarians that are within feminism.
I already gave an example. If gay rights are part of the same plot as BLM, etc, why does Milo hate feminists and BLM but support gay rights?

There is a massive amount of evidence of infighting. Look up how feminists think gay men are too privileged, or all the twitter BLM people calling out white feminists for being racist, for example.

>How about allow conservative media to have an opinion so people can listen to BOTH and draw their own opinions, like you would suggest?
No doubt, but you're spreading misinfo and propaganda with your infographs

>I'd love for this to be a legitimate sentiment
Its definitely a legitimate sentiment.

>It would be nice if we did have some media outlet that was unbiased but as we both know, that's pretty much impossible,
Cred Forums is a media outlet, and its (somewhat) unbiased as a rule. You're brainwashing people here using faulty logic.

There are powerful people seeking as much control as they can, but its not a leftist plot. Left and right are both manipulated by them, people having gay rights and saying maybe all pedophiles aren't evil isn't going to destroy society.

youtube.com/watch?v=oN4w8e432_o

They are into that shit.

...

hi Milo

youtube.com/watch?v=Tr8pYcHFfzI

Pretty sure homosexual lifestyle doesn't include raping children, OP

shut up child-raping faggot, vast majority of pedos are gay

>doesn't even know what Ad hominem means
>posturing
I didn't have anything against you personally until you started refusing to argue properly. I already pointed out the problem in the green text directly above said "ad hominem". You don't see a problem with feminism undoing everything that it worked so hard to achieve? Nothing about that seems backwards to you?

>what you said cited as an example
Pure conjecture.
>look it up
>he really doesn't know how to argue properly
You made a claim, now persuade me. I've been researching such things for a solid decade and you've brought to my attention something I've not seen nor heard of before. I argue that those are isolated and minor scale events, if at all. If you want me to admit I'm wrong, you're going to have to provide evidence to support your claim.

>feminists think gay men are too privileged
>all the twitter BLM people calling out white feminists for being racist
Specifically these. If ALL of twitter behaved in such a way, surely it would be effortless on your part to provide me an example. I don't have a twitter account, nor do I know where to look. You have much more experience in this particular situation, so it would only make sense for you to post a screencap for reference material.

Disagreeing with something doesn't make it misinfo. I think Hillary is a victim-shaming pig but you'd disagree, because you think she's great, for example. I could provide proof that she has indeed shamed victims in the past. You could still choose to deny that evidence and disagree with me, though.

>You legitimately care
Thanks. It feels like most people try to keep their tough guy personas on and are too busy worrying about what others think to admit that they actually care about the world around them. I appreciate this.

>Cred Forums is unbiased
See; Gamergate

I was a liberal once. It was the left that labeled me a bigot that got me to rethink my life. I never asked for this.

christ, some filthy fucking animals.

>vast majority of pedos are gay
Which is pretty different from "vast majority of gays are pedos"

>Which is pretty different from "vast majority of gays are pedos"
no, not really, considering the average twink is too old to be desirable by the time he's 20. Also, when all CAPTURED pedos are primarily gay, it would suggest that there are many who are not captured...right? Come on bender, you know you love fucking little boys. Its the subject of all your porn.

>t. republican amerifat.

I'm a Democrat you child-raping sicko.

I agree.

The 4th top ranking law school in America. Also the most expensive.

Ikr

democrats are not browsing this shithole.

>no, not really
Yes, really

It's simple logic bro, you can't change facts

But even then, what's the problem? Pretty sure there's raped children too in your holy book

>everybody that doesn't agree with me is a pedo
As expected by republican amerifat logic

>dur dur dur facts facts look at all the facts i haven't proven
Right, right, I know the drill you apologist bugchasing rape-bear.
>everybody that doesn't agree with me is a pedo
no, no, I didn't say that, I said no one plays the apologist for AIDS spreading rapists EXCEPT an AIDS spreading child rapist. See, its not about me, it's about you you disgusting fuck.

chasing bugs and raping boys, it's a homos life for me!

youtube.com/watch?v=R1X2uOLUghw

>goes on the internet asking for evidence backing up his preconceived notions about things instead of forming his own opinions with facts
I'm on the fence about gay adoption leaning towards not being in favour of it but jesus christ how is this acceptable let alone worthy of 100+ posts? If you want an echo chamber go to leddit.

>democrats are not browsing this shithole
leftists of all kinds are here, promoting sodomy and pedophila. you're here aren't you? fun times.

>dur dur dur facts facts look at all the facts
Right, right, I know facts aren't that accepted among republicans and christians.

>no, no, I didn't say that
Indeed
You directly acted like that

Because you can't do this type of research without being lynched at any modern university. This battle is lost. Be glad you are not a child in the social services system.

>I'm collecting statistics displaying negative consequences of the homosexual lifestyle so I can make a better case against it
What if the stats conflict with your conclusion?

>I already pointed out the problem in the green text directly above said "ad hominem". You don't see a problem with feminism undoing everything that it worked so hard to achieve? Nothing about that seems backwards to you?
I don't understand what you mean.
>defending feminists uprooting the base of feminism
I don't understand how raising the age of consent, or stopping spread of STDs and violence against women uproots the base of feminism? Or do you mean something else? If you say something that doesn't make any sense, and then say I'm an idiot as a counterargument, that is an ad hominem. Greentexting my presumed intention also comes close to a strawman, no?

>If you want me to admit I'm wrong, you're going to have to provide evidence to support your claim.
I assumed you realized this, since you went after me for "having my head up my ass" for not agreeing with you about your image, with the excuse that I should know from browsing, and this infighting is brought up often here as a sign the left is falling apart.

Feminism vs gays
lgbtqnation.com/2015/11/has-misogyny-in-the-gay-community-become-an-epidemic/
telegraph.co.uk/men/thinking-man/the-gay-community-needs-to-deal-with-its-misogyny-problem/

BLM vs. white progressives
timwise.org/2015/08/blacklivesmatter-bernie-sanders-and-the-problem-with-some-white-progressives/

> If ALL of twitter behaved in such a way, surely it would be effortless on your part to provide me an example.
I didn't mean all as in all of them do it, I mean all of those as in look at all of those apples.
>post a screencap for reference material.
I don't have these on hand. There are threads about it fairly often.

>Disagreeing with something doesn't make it misinfo.
Its misinfo because you're putting everything you disagree with into a single nefarious camp. There are libertarians and right-wingers who argue for pedo and gay rights.

>wet fisting noises
sorry, you'll have to speak up -- I can't hear you over the sound of your pink sock blowing out all over the room. Your anus is huge, do you smuggle children up there, or is it strictly for small dogs and cats?

:^)

>BLAH BLAH I'M NOT LISTENIIING SHUT UP OK?
kek
e
k
That pic has been disproven years ago, you can't even pretend it's true on /x/ anymore.
Are fake screens and roleplay all you got?

no no no, listen carefully you pedo bguchaser. The argument isn't that all gays are pedos, but that the vast majority of pedos are gays -- meaning that gays range from hebephiles to pedophiles PRIMARILY. Go poz a twink and think about your sins.

...

>be me
>be faggot
>read this
>be ashamed of being a faggot

Seriously why are so many gays so fucked in the head. I want a normal relationship but god damn it these people make that look impractical.

>WAH WAAAH WE'RE NOT PEDOPHILES WE'RE HEBEPHILES!!!!
>WAAAAAAAAH GET IT RIGHT!

youtube.com/watch?v=3adatEVSL9M

>That pic has been disproven years ago, you can't even pretend it's true on /x/ anymore.

See I know right, why bother keeping that disproved image?

>stuff from 2001 can't be found on the internet still
how to explain to autistic millennials that the internet isn't actually forever...?

kys

there are 15 or so other corroborating examples including a fucking documentary, but you think nitpicking one bit of evidence = a win?
>this much damage control

youtube.com/watch?v=oN4w8e432_o
youtube.com/watch?v=R1X2uOLUghw

I like watching the crime and investigation TV channels and one thing I've noticed is at least 90% of the serial killers involved in torture/sex shit are all bi or gay.

You first

Feminists fought to stop prostitution, because it's objectifying.
Now they're fighting for prostitutes to be free to practice, because it's empowering.

I also don't believe it was a purely liberal or feminist movement, to stop STDs from spreading or to raise the age of consent, since conservatives are against sexual deviancy, and this would benefit both groups.

>Your reason for using ad hominem
I see what you mean. My bad.

>You assumed I knew
Welp.
>articles provided
Thanks. I'll read them. I appreciate it.

>putting everything into a single nefarious camp
But that's the natural flow of it. The slippery slope doesn't always work but it works here because that is how human logic works with progressivism. Once homosexuals gain their equality, the pedophiles among them will be emboldened to come out of the woodwork. Truly not ALL homosexuals are pedophiles and not all pedophiles are homosexuals.. however, with the graphs, articles, and forum images provided above, you could argue that more pedophiles are gay.

Again, I'm not saying all gays are pedos. I just know that homosexual rights have only given more strength to other people, specifically those that support bestiality, incest, and pedophilia.

The graph is accurate, despite how we personally feel, because it's not up to us. It's up to those people that push for such things. We are only stalwarts that hinder their progress. This is why I said, you'll see as you get older. You will eventually become a conservative, as you see what progressivism truly is.

>how to explain to autistic millennials that the internet isn't actually forever...?

Some are still there. :^)

>literally every screen is either linked to Cred Forums, a troll or about sexual roleplay
>focusing on the fake ones alone
b-but it's from a 2001 deleted website!
>everything's literally from 2007-8

B-but millennials!
>being more than 40 years old
>on a website mostly populated by underages

And then we all realized he was indeed a pedo in disguise.

>no

what now you dumb cunt

If you feel ashamed of being a faggot because of a few isolated cases like this thread, you better kill yourself. We don't need more shits like you.

Here's a last one. I gotta go. Watch the sport game at a stadium with my husband and friends.

>Feminists fought to stop prostitution, because it's objectifying.
>Now they're fighting for prostitutes to be free to practice, because it's empowering.
Doesn't this show that the left is changing its mind constantly? I still don't see how you think I was defending feminism uprooting itself. I'm not a feminist.

Changing prostitution and age of consent benefited both groups; far-right Puritans were also involved, but it was far more beneficial to feminists in the long run. It made men have to seek out older women for marriage, and feminism is originally sexual control of men by older women, who were jealous of men wanting teenagers.

>But that's the natural flow of it.
It isn't. CP and pedophilia was legal in some places in Europe in the 70s. It was legal in most of Western society into the 1870s, and after. It goes up and down, it isn't a slippery slope. The argument for bestiality is completely different from the argument for pedophilia, and I'm sure many of them hate the other group.

Intersectionality is a feel good theory, but it often doesn't work in reality, and is a herd-minded idea, whereas there are also libertarian and some right-wing groups fighting for certain of those "progressive" values.

Modern feminism is in some ways very conservative. Or at least, it ping pongs back between conservative and liberal values based on the current flavor of the week. In reality its just cognitive dissonance. Why do some gay rights and feminist groups support Islam, which hates them?

>you could argue that more pedophiles are gay.
Nah, these are cherry-picked, see >This is why I said, you'll see as you get older. You will eventually become a conservative, as you see what progressivism truly is.
I'm a libertarian, not a leftist. I don't want either brainwashed side to determine what people can and can't do.

Alright. I've glanced at the articles. I have just one question: If there's so much in-fighting among BLM and Feminists, why do they still ultimately support each other and join forces to hate CIS white men? Especially when CIS white men are split among their support with BLM and Feminism?

It's evident that CIS white men aren't the problem here, so why are they still the major target, and not the system itself?

inb4 because the system is run by cis white men
For one, you don't know how they identify and secondly not all people in leadership positions are men. More and more women and minorities are being chosen over men because of BLM and Feminism. I was personally turned down from a job for being white. But of course, no one believes that.

>And now they're fighting for prostitutes to be allowed to walk the streets, because it's empowering.

Really? Most feminist in my country are all: whores are oppressed by tha man so we should ban it!!!!

gay

Then I misjudged you. That's my mistake. You only disagreed with one aspect and I had myself fooled thinking you were against it all.

I personally have a problem with the graph too. I feel it's possible to be egalitarian without sliding down that slippery slope, just as you probably feel. However, that's personal - it doesn't mean the rest of society won't slide down into shit without us. That's what I'm afraid of. After our society presses for more gay rights, after they've already gotten equality, there WILL be a group of pedophiles pressing for their rights.

>If there's so much in-fighting among BLM and Feminists, why do they still ultimately support each other and join forces to hate CIS white men? Especially when CIS white men are split among their support with BLM and Feminism?
Enemy of my enemy is my friend, I suppose. Intersectionality isn't really that effective, except when its united through hatred, because a a lot of these movements are already built from resentment, and they always find reasons to resent and hate each other as well.

>It's evident that CIS white men aren't the problem here, so why are they still the major target, and not the system itself?
Universities are essentially state-run. Cognitive dissonance is instilled into the population, whether its on the left or the right, in order to stop them from thinking rationally which is the only way to maximize freedom and reduce state power. Left-right is is largely a false dichotomy to hide the real axis of up-down. Notice how libertarians are demonized equally to leftists here? Its because nu/pol/ is more interested in brainwashing, not redpilling.

>inb4 because the system is run by cis white men
It largely is, and Jews, because they're the most intelligent, and it takes a ton of energy and intelligence to run the system. Leftism isn't entirely nefarious, they just don't know what they're aiming at, on purpose.
>More and more women and minorities are being chosen over men because of BLM and Feminism.
Yes but they're largely used as stooges, like Loretta Lynch and BLM, not as the real actors. The right wishes it was as successful at controlling minorities as the left.

> no one believes that.
That's very believable.

Thats alright, its hard to determine peoples beliefs and values anonymously, where its the same as new people every thread.

Pedophiles are already pressing for their rights, Cred Forums has a large contingent. I don't personally see it as a bad thing as most people do, but that's a whole other argument.

>9 adopted boys

Men are perverts. They should NEVER be allowed to adopt boys.

I didn't know Ryan Reynolds was gay! He's aged a bit, too.

...

It's not wrong, though.
It doesn't matter if you support egalitarianism, but not feminism. Feminism, anti-racism, and gay rights, stemmed from that, and from that will stem beastiality rights, anti-white sentiments, etc.
>muh slippery slope
No. It has already happened in Canada, and anti-white sentiments are all over the western world.
The point is, by smoking the egalitarian cigar, you got stage I lung cancer. You liked smoking, but not the cancer. Too bad, this is what smoking leads to. By not choosing to quit smoking, you let the tumor grow, and spread.

There is no middle ground. You can't have cancer on Mondays, and Tuesdays, and a cancer free weekend.

There is no compromise. You can't tell the cancer where it should draw the line, and what organs it can't attack.

You either quit smoking, and try damn all to cure your cancer, or you let it kill you.

..At last I truly see