Why is a Trump presidency actually a good thing again..?

Why is a Trump presidency actually a good thing again..?

Other urls found in this thread:

bbc.co.uk/news/election-us-2016-37509546
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

because muh feelings.

everybody who looks at the facts know that hillary is more experienced for this position.

people vote trump because of feelings, im worried he might win. democracy does not always favor the best candidate unfortunately. same shit happened in poland, be warned americans.

Because he knows how to run a profitable business and because Hillary is a saudi puppet

>Clinton is losing the election
>Brexit won
>Japan has gone right wing
>Assad is taking Aleppo
>Poland is refusing refugees
>Norbert Hoffer will win in Austria
>Duterte is killing drug cartels
>Based Burton is dropping red pills
>New South Park admits Trump will win no matter what.

When did it all go so right?

What Trump presidency?

Kill yourself lefticuck

Looks like Genesis P-Orridge

kikes dont want it
shills dont want it

>guys we are totally not shills, we're norma posters like you, look at how hillary is good and fit for president, trump is just a xenophobe!
You could at least try

>Doesn't pay people who work for him
>Doesn't pay Federal income tax
>Does illegal business in Cuba

Sure sounds like a great business man! Someone we really want as a commander in Chief of America!

>because muh feelings
I thought that was your game? lib fag.

For some reason I read the first 4 points and I love you a lot but idk why

i feel like you're just, like, a political guy who just like sort of understands everything and is comical about it and stuff

>>Doesn't pay people who work for him
>>Doesn't pay Federal income tax
>>Does illegal business in Cuba
And proof for that is... where?

Kill yourself you leftist cuckold.

...

WHAT IS HAPPENING I JUST CAME ON AND I SEE THIS SHIT WTF

So what?
He knows how to play the system to secure the success of his company and his name.
If anything this makes him even more qualified for the president job.

Als he is a strong man and other Leaders will respect him much more.

Because the globalist end game will be a fucking nightmare in comparison to what a nationalist has to offer.

Quoting Yuri, you liberals are just a bunch of useful idiots to them.

I should just make a copy+paste at this point... anyway:

-Liberal govt. administrations are disastrous, and these are the agencies that have some of the most tangible effects on your daily life
(Obama's HUD required white cities to have a certain percentage of minorities or lose funding, violation of states rights when they his admin. pulled funding if you didn't have tranny bathrooms, DHS that's too scared of being racist/islamophobic, etc etc)
-Isolationist foreign policy, at least relative to Hillary's neo-con hawkish positions (no nuclear war with Russia, focus on ISIS)
-Keep our guns, no more importing third-world problems, no absurd tax rates (though Trump's is a little low for my taste) causing corporations to come home, and so on
-And most importantly, SCOTUS. I would vote for Ivanka if it meant another Scalia

just a few

>He admitted to doing so during the debate
>He admitted to doing so during the debate
>bbc.co.uk/news/election-us-2016-37509546

Last one is still an accusation, of course not proven in court, but this sub still goes on about Clinton about "Benghazi" , despite an 11 hour hearing in conngress, including her favourite CTR shills the GOP ,found her of no wrong doing multiple times, it's safe that to use accusations with evidence as a legitimate attack

>> CTR SHILL THREAD
CTR SHILL THREAD
>> CTR SHILL THREAD
CTR SHILL THREAD

REPLY WITH sage IN OPTIONS, REPORT, MOVE ON

No no no, I'm just trying to understand. Asking a question about your side doesn't mean I'm threatening it, dude.

>Strong Man

The audience literally laughed at him when he said he had good temperament. He gets into twitter wars when attacked, he has such thin skin it's unbelievable

>Other Leaders respect him much more

He's a laughing stock. The UK house fo commons had a debate on whether to ban him from the country, where they sat and insulted him for hours. Our former Prime Minister David Cameron refused to apologise on all comments he made about Trump, after he was chosen as the nominee.

Trump is the ONE fucking candidate that has made it to candidacy despite literally everyone being an obstacle to him, including the Republican Party. All the corrupt government officials and all the biased media in the world couldn't stop him, which is more than anyone can say about Bernie Sanders.

You want another 4-8 years of globalism? You want another 4-8 years of playing World Police? You want more warmongering in the Middle East? You want more economic stagnation? You want more government corruption? Go ahead and vote for Hillary. As the Secretary of State she has contributed to all of these things. Worse than that, she's demonstrated a complete lack of competence outside of lining her own pockets.

Trump lined his pockets doing legitimate business. Trump advocates solidarity. Trump advocates a path away from money-guzzling corruption. Trump advocates turning America's eyes from all the wealth it can take from others to making that wealth here. Trump advocates turning away from Globalism and looking out for ourselves and our own first.

Fuck Hillary. Fuck the thought of her ever being anywhere near the Presidency or Cabinet ever again. Fuck her lobbyist slush fund that she labels a charity. I hope she has a stroke.

Now they don't respect him because of the election, but once he has the Football and is Commander of the US armed forces they will stop laughing and they will apologize.
And if not, I'm sure NSA and CIA advisers know how to follow orders...

It's not but Hillary is far worse in comparison. This woman has decades of political experience and all of her policies have ended horribly. I don't think people realize she's been doing this for so long and has had literally no positive outcome of anything she's done.

>You want another 4-8 years of globalism? You want another 4-8 years of playing World Police?
Implying you won't get that with either candidate. It's too profitable to stop doing it.

Because it means Hillary wont get the throne.

If the polacks are warning us about Trump he must be Hitler. Watch out.

"Experience" is as valid of an argument as "OMG CURRENT YEAR". Hillary's "experience" is in destroying countries, lying under oath, having people killed, selling out Americans and making shady deals with the tyrants of the world. Seriously, stay out of American politics if you have no idea what's going on. It just makes you look like a retard.

Because even if he is a complete fuck up or a savant, a Trump Presidency will be the most amusing thing to happen in at least 30 years.

>Doesn't pay people for shitty work
>Doesn't want to give his money to the govt.
>Willing to work amicably with foreign countries

>hillary is more experienced

Why is political experience actually a good thing again..?

>Liberal govt. administrations are disastrous

history seems to disagree. under liberal administrations the economy seems to do better.

>Isolationist foreign policy

yes trump already hinted that he wouldn't care if russia ate finland. who cares, its just a deal, a game. surly it won't backfire in the long run. another thing is how inconsistent he is there, since he also will "israels greatest friend".

>Keep our guns

I don't know if you need those semi automatics. other western counries seem to do just fine without guns.

>no more importing third-world problems

that could mean anything.

>no absurd tax rates (though Trump's is a little low for my taste) causing corporations to come home, and so on

hillary is pro small and medium businesses.

>Globalism

Globalism has shown to help the economy and businesses. Trump won't hurt his money no matter what

>World Police

Trump will be literally the opposite, such as failing to say he'll commit to NATO

>Warmongering in the middle east

"I will blow that Iran Ship Sky high" "Take the Oil!" "I will go in boots on the ground and take down ISIS"

>Economic Stagnation

Trump's plan of Trickle Down economics, basically proven to not work, will make Trump's family so much richer, and has been estimated by economists to add $5 trillion to the debt

>Government Corruption

When Donald has said he "may not" accept the outcome of the election should he lose, that's not a figure you want as a peak of "not corruption"

>Legitimate business

He admitted to not paying people, and not paying federal tax, in the debate. And also has done illegal business in Cuba. And uses his Trump foundation, which actually lacks the necessary certification for a charity, to pay off his own debts.

Trump is everything you say you hate.

Is plumbing experience something you look for when hiring a plumber?

supreme Court nominations. that's it.

i was hoping, honestly, that besides conservative judges, he'd be a lame duck with bipartisan opposition.

Trump's a goddamn idiot. all he was good for was blocking a democratic court.

>ID: UR JeW
wew lad

I think he would be a great president because he's a misogynist. I also hate women. I remember when I was 5, I slapped a girl in the face because she wouldn't give my the fucking crayon I wanted. Fuck that bitch. Yea I made her cry but I didn't care.

Will kill the sjw trend. Will prevent Hillary from taking office (she will do to feminism what Obama did to race relations).

...

Sorry, all these raids got me edgy. Where to begin?

I was a HRC supporter until 9 months ago. Started looking on both sides' argument. Found the Clinton investigation pastebins, read about Chaffetz, Gowdy, Combetta.

Why Trump? We are sick of the hand holding, the safe spaces, the multiculturalism. If the media is this legit freaked about Trump (and willing to spin any story to fit false or convenient narratives) that should give you pause to investigate deeper.

Don't let others tell you what to think.

Look deeper-- you know that you're a good person. I support Trump because HRC resonates with me as an ineffective, fake leader owned by NON-AMERICAN interests. Trump might be the same but certainly less and he's not afraid to taunt or fight them.

Them? Positionally, Trump is a nationalist.

HRC is not. I was a democrat, but first I am a patriot.

That's not even getting started on the gerrymandering they are doing with illegal voters. Fuck that shit. That's just the beginning.

In short, for our shills in the audience, you know your time is limited, and that we are both smarter than you and faster. It is impossible to hold us. The harder you try, the more you look desperate and insecure.

For OP, do more research good person.

leave and don't come back.

Thank you for correcting the record!

.002 shekels have been deposited into your account.

>Trump won't hurt his money no matter what
That explains why he ran for President on a politically incorrect platform, cost himself tens of millions of dollars in business deals, and damaged or severed every professional relationship from Manhattan to Hollywood

Because fuck Globalism aka The Death of Western Civilization

Thank you for correcting the record!

.002 shekels have been deposited into your account.

You are not welcome here. Try harder, shill.

she'll still ignore the constitution so no amount of experience does anything for politicians who don't give a shit

The biggest thing is Trump will make all federal regulations 'fair game' so that means you as Joe Blow can actually open a money transfer business or insurance company whereas before you would have needed millions in lobbyist dollars to outbid the existing monopolies.

The second biggest thing is Trump wants to amnesty all the overseas money. Apple actually wants to move a half trillion dollars back into the US but can't because of the existing high taxes so is spending all that money on foreign startups/manufacturing. If Trump's 10% flat tax amnesty goes through then all that cash will come flooding back into the states meaning Apple hires 5000 new employees the next day.

There's thousands of US corps that have offshore money they can't get back. Trump is correct when he expects something like 6 Trillion dollars to come flooding back into the US all at once. Overnight that will easily create a million jobs.

The actual running of the country will basically be done by Pence, Trump just wants to be the money guy in charge of business end of the US dismantling all the bullshit that makes the US poor.

Source now

>Ignore the constitution

Like Trump is? He's saying he'll ennact nation-wide stop and frisk, which has been ruled unconstitutional

Also Australia's conservative government is in for another term.

It was a true story and I really am a sexist.

praise

I know you're a fucking bong but any reasonable person given the choice will pick the guy who wants to restore order to the country over the traitor who wants to rape our right to free expression and private gun ownership.

Glad you corrected the record for us senpai

>Globalism has shown to help the economy and businesses. Trump won't hurt his money no matter what
But he already did by entering politics, you're retarded if you think he already hasn't damaged his properties.

>Trump will be literally the opposite, such as failing to say he'll commit to NATO

Good, other countries have to start pulling their weight and maybe it will curb the increasing devotion of taxes to welfare because they'll have to balance defense too.

>"I will blow that Iran Ship Sky high" "Take the Oil!" "I will go in boots on the ground and take down ISIS"
As opposed to what? Supporting 'moderate' rebels by bombing humanitarian aid convoys with drones and calling them accidents? Deposing people because they don't like US and then leaving vacuum to be filled with the likes of IS? ME has become more radical and islamized only thanks to US constantly fucking with it and the migrant crisis is product of this constant intervention, at least he's planning to finally fucking finish it.

>Trump's plan of Trickle Down economics, basically proven to not work, will make Trump's family so much richer, and has been estimated by economists to add $5 trillion to the debt
Of course it's not gonna work if he only slashes taxes and keeps the expenses as high as they are (medicare and social security are 38% of the federal budget)

>When Donald has said he "may not" accept the outcome of the election should he lose, that's not a figure you want as a peak of "not corruption"
The whole fucking election is a shitshow that sheds light on just how much the MSM and the whole system is in favor of democrats so it can't get much worse.

>He admitted to not paying people, and not paying federal tax, in the debate. And also has done illegal business in Cuba. And uses his Trump foundation, which actually lacks the necessary certification for a charity, to pay off his own debts.
And he has explained it all, you're just spouting what the MSM is without looking into it.

Because everyone is against him

And whoever how right they actually may be the establisment have taken shits on the average joe long enough.

So it's more a big giant fuck you.

>Rape our right to free expression

How the fuck is Clinton against free expression in any way? And hasn't Donald Trump threatened to sue media outlets in the past for attacking him?

>Private Gun ownership

Remember how Obama was supposed to take everyone's guns away? Remember how he didn't? Remember how Donald Trump said, and I quote, "I agree with you, we need to take Guns away from bad people" in the debate?

>Globalism has shown to help the economy and businesses.

You have a look at the US National Debt recently?

>Trump will be literally the opposite, such as failing to say he'll commit to NATO

Good fuck NATO. NATO's not even relevant anymore. Europe can pay for its own goddamn strategic defense.

>I will go in boots on the ground and take down ISIS

Are you quoting this as if what we're doing now isn't worse? You know what with the CIA arming "moderate rebels" who are literally Al Qaeda? With the constant air strikes on Syrian Government forces? If you were expecting to defeat ISIS with a three way proxy war you're an idiot.

>Trump's plan of Trickle Down economics

You know it's funny, I see people talk shit about so-called Trickle Down economics but never any references to what'd be better. Either the Corporations manage the wealth or the Government does. Problem is when the Government controls the wealth it stifles growth unless that Government put policies in place to create a Centrally Planned Economy. You know, that thing Hitler did. So take your pick: Corporatism or Fascism.

>When Donald has said he "may not" accept the outcome of the election should he lose, that's not a figure you want as a peak of "not corruption"

What the fuck does it even mean if you accept the outcome of the election or not? What does not accepting the outcome entail exactly? Saying you would accept it is the very definition of an empty gesture. Are you seriously trying to use a loaded virtue signal as a reason why Trump is corrupt? Are you retarded?

>He admitted to not paying people, and not paying federal tax

I always love how you non-Americans don't understand contractual obligations or tax laws in regard to holding companies and the individuals who own them. It really shows just how ignorant you are.

>And uses his Trump foundation, which actually lacks the necessary certification for a charity, to pay off his own debts.

Donations are tax deductible, dipshit.

>Medicare is 38% of the federal Budget

Of tangent, but how the hell does America spend so bloody much on Healthcare, when it's all privatised?

Canada and the UK have socialised health care systems and spend so much less on it than the US.

the only american administration that could be called liberal and had a sliver of succes would be fdr's, besides that, nothing can compare to reagan. Also on the world stage some prime examples of lefty policies in action would be: greece, venezuela, cambodia, spain and stalinist, maoist and hoqxbaist style guverments in the comintern.

in ethnically white homogenous places in the u.s. the crime rates are just as low or even lower than in western eu contries regardless of the percentage of gun ownership.

Tell me how Krushchec giving Crimea and the Donbass to Ukraine made the votes cast by Russians living there less important than the votes of other ukrainians.

Bush was "experienced".

You're forgetting one thing though, once you lose gun/speech rights you're never going to get them back. So 'restricting' is the same as taking away, except instead of happening all at once it's slowly chipping away.

Yes, because plumbing has a universal end goal; Making Pipes Great Again.
Politics is just powerful people trying to get more powerful no mater who it fucks over. Having more or less experience in fucking people over doesn't really change anything.

No he hasn't.

Clinton constantly pushes the racist card, women card, and all that but continues to buy ads only attacking trump and in almost all cases blatantly lying, she has the media in her pocket and is trying to control the election by lies and propaganda instead of facts.

We do need to take guns away from bad people though... No sane person would disagree with that.

>How the fuck is Clinton against free expression in any way?
I'm sure the champion of the lügenpresse and social justice whose predecessor just handed the Internet over to an unaccountable international body of thugs and dictators will be a great friend to free speech.

>hasn't Donald Trump threatened to sue media outlets in the past for attacking him
Yes, for fucking blatant lies and libel. They take twenty or thirty year old hearsay and present it as fact without even an attempt at investigation or verification. Slander is not protected speech.

>I agree with you, we need to take Guns away from bad people
And how "bad people" meant "on the terror watch list" and how "take Guns away from" was "after their status as a likely terrorist has been confirmed by due process of the law" in line with his agreements and public statements made after consulting the NRA.

a stooge with a robe said it was unconstitutional you twat not the SCOTUS

because its not a hillary clinton presidency

Are you mental? He supported it in the debate, and is proposing it as one of his policies to tackle inner city crime.

"Ads only attacking trump and blatantly lying in all cases"

Her ads attacking him are literally just him talking.

And how is she controlling the election by lies and propaganda?

We don't want someone with "experience", you fucking knuckledragger. Every modern president has been a complete and utter fuckup because they have been indoctrinated by the system beforehand.

There's at least a chance that Trump won't go down that path. Hillary is proudly boasting of ending our freedom if she is elected.

There's no shame in admitting your ideas, Carl.
So, how's your wife's son?

Like all US government spending, it's a way of putting money into private pockets and not actually a healthcare system.

They pay extortionate prices for medicine from big pharma.

>There's at least a chance
There is no chance. If you're not an asshole, you simply don't go into politics.

Because people I dislike think that it's bad.

Have you not actually looked into trump? "Him talking" has been twisted and turned by the media, his comments on women? Mostly taken from his opinion from Rosie O'Donnell years ago, others were twisted into being more vulgar where the women in question have even gone on record saying it never happened that way or was taken as a joke.

I shouldn't even have to explain this shit, it doesn't stop there nearly every point of bad media pointed at trump is half truths, constructed lies, blatant lies, and click bait tier shit.

In the debate they claimed trump was for the Iraq war and even the NEUTRAL mediator pushed it as fact. However despite a single brush off statement of " I don't know I guess" he has been against the war SINCE BEFORE it began and Clinton has chastised him for in her words being for the war. When IN FACT SHE WAS FOR THE WAR!

So why is Trump attacked for this opinion he doesn't have while Clinton isn't for having the opinion before?

Thanks for this info, leaf.

What's the establishment's excuse for not implementing these policies themselves?

DELET THIS