What does Cred Forums think of eugenics and euthenasia?
Why shouldn't we limit who can reproduce? Having children should be a privilege if you have good genetics, not a right. Countless people on this planet are living misserable lives because their selfish parents decided to put them in this world without their consent, and they are suffering because of their parents bad genetics.
Also, give me one good reason why we shouldn't euthanize someone who has microcephaly or any other detrimental condition which renders them useless bags of meat?
There should be no eugenics. Those who are more fit to have children will naturally have more of them while the retarded and the incompetent will inevitably fail to raise successful offspring.
Caleb Bennett
No
In the world we live in the retarded and unsuccessful will get welfare
Lincoln Taylor
>In the world we live in the retarded and unsuccessful will get welfare Which is a very good example of eugenics done wrong
Aaron Jackson
Because we don't want petty little dictators running around deciding on who lives and who dies.
Isaac Ramirez
Because then you wouldn't be here making these threads everday
Leo Wilson
Actually more intelligent people have less children and niggers in Africa are making tons of them.
Jaxon Jackson
I agree. Socialists should be castrated.
Luis Hill
Here's my recipe for an Utopia world:
>develop a chemical that causes permanent sterility >put the chemicals in all water supplies of africa and middle east >forced sterilization of illegal migrants, repeat offenders, drug addicts, mentally ill people, retards in general >all pregnant women must do all prenatal tests, if the fetus is diagnosed with a disease abortion is strongly suggested >if parents decide to not abort the diseased fetus, there will never be subsidies or economical benefits of any kind for the baby >never reanimate or put into incubator fetuses born too premature >strong financial support to genetic and eugenic research >make euthanasia legal
Ian Jenkins
Trouble is, who gets to regulate that and how?
>Sorry, goy! It seems you have some subversive ideas. We cannot allow your terrorism to be spread to a new generation!
Liam Morales
Wouldn't happen if eugenics weren't in place. You stop sending aid to Africa, you stop applying eugenics. The nature will take it's course and will quickly reduce the coon population to non-existent numbers.
Christopher Jenkins
Criminal record and not carrying severe genetic or mental deseases seems enough for me to decide.
Eli Thompson
Civilization, for the most part, flourishes only when there is a fertility rate a certain number of times higher than the current female population. You couldn't just limit who would reproduce, you would have to constantly breed the remainder.
Kayden Morales
>enough for me to decide.
Caleb Parker
Yeah, but you still have tons of high IQ people deciding not to have children.
Gabriel Williams
If you menage to stop low IQ from reproducing, that would be not a problem anymore.
Lincoln Jenkins
It's inevitable but not in the totalitarian forced breeding programs everyone seems to imagine. PGD is becoming so cheap that within 30 years there'll so many advantages you can pick and choose for your children, it will be unethical to have reproduction without IVF. First things that will disappear will be mental retardation and physical deformities, then risks for cancer and autoimmune disease, then no more gingers or extremely short people, of course everyone would pick tan or fairer skin especially black parents.
Then you'll have average people, average people are stupid. you will then have people who are motivated by religion or culture, are mormon or muslims and have 100 wives and niggers will still bread. I think there should be some human intervention, but not too much.
Angel Bell
See
Logan Bennett
I fully agree. But I personally feel that the focus of eugenics should be to enhance the human race, rather than eliminate unwanted traits. That would never be accepted, but genetic engineering for a better equipped human being would be a lot easier to advocate for. I mean, there is already evidence stating that certain inheritable diseases are more common in certain groups of people, as well as non-inheritable ones. Some people have better genes to cope with certain illnesses, and that would be a good place to start.
I personally would like to see some people sterilized for the sake of humanity, but that's a hard thing to argue for if you want to be backed by the masses, which unfortunately is what is needed. I am all for eugenics for the sake of creating a better human race, seeing as we have already domesticated ourselves from natural evolution.
Jayden Hughes
House-Mice are one of the smallest species of mammal on the planet and have minuscule brains. However if there is no readily available source of food for them, they will not breed. Even with such tiny brains they know that having children when in all likelihood they'll just starve, isn't a very good idea.
