Where does Trump/Hillary belong on the alignment chart?

Where does Trump/Hillary belong on the alignment chart?

Cred Forums Pass user since August 2016.

Other urls found in this thread:

1d4chan.org/wiki/Alignment#The_iconic_D.26D_alignments_.28and_why_your_party_should_kill_them.29
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

fuck drumpf and fuck white people

trump is chaotic good and hillary is lawful evil

Trump: True Neutral/Lawful Neutral
Clinton: Lawful Evil

Neutral evil, showing a willingness to break personal morality for gain.

well, Mr. Cred Forums pass, I'd say Trump eould be any in the Lawful category (where you put him is up to opinion, I'd say neutral probably)

Hillary is definitely chaotic evil.

>if only trump could be vader

>Cred Forums Pass user since August 2016.

mods, nobody is going to fall for buying your stupid fucking pass

Chaotic good and lawful evil

>John Locke
>Lawful Good

Nerd shit

testing

lol fail

Cred Forums Pass user since October 2016.

/thread

>hillary is lawful evil

is hillary really lawful?

>John Locke, who attacked people who interfered with his plans
>lawfully good
?

True Neutral and Neutral Evil.

Good in D&D is ridiculously self flagellating at times, and Law requires a certain set of standards and ethos.

Hillary: Lawful Neutral
Trump: Chaotic Good

Trump is Chaotic Good
Pence is Lawful Evill
Hillary is Neutral Evil
Kaine is Lawful Neutral

woah how do you get one of those without being a massive faggot?

How's he Chaotic?

How's she Lawful?

That would mean she is going around killing people just for the heck of it. Don't you even know how to DnD newfag

By becoming a massive faggot.

1d4chan.org/wiki/Alignment#The_iconic_D.26D_alignments_.28and_why_your_party_should_kill_them.29

Clinton = Lawful Evil, without a doubt

Trump = Chaotic Neutral or possibly Chaotic Good, hard to say

Chaotic Evil doesn't mean they kill for pleasure, only that they are completely unbeholden by morality or societal norms.

In other words a corrupt Judge who does everything to further personal wealth is CE including silencing those who threaten them in unsporting manners, one who rigidly upholds the law to the maximum to screw over the defendants but will not screw people over who can demonstrate they did nothing wrong is LE.

banner contest

Cred Forums Pass user since August 2016.

My Chaotic Randumb Ranger player has sent that to me in the past.

It works fine for simple morality choices, and if you don't act like a faggot.

Kys nigger
Nigger

See Bending the rules you make to your own gain is an Evil action, not breaking the rules is Lawful. Chaotic is breaking them.

See
>Utterly sociopathic, will murder people for kicks, actively sadistic, and hates everyone else. Always on a feud against society and will piss on a book of law just because he likes it, and fuck you, and fuck your law too, and i'll eat your babies. This alignment has no depth at all. Those are reasons enough to kill them, burn their corpse and mount their head on a pike before he does the same to you, your loved ones, or your children.

Nigger you've linked it to me already, 1d4chan is not the end all or even close to how D&D runs.

It is amusing though.

not changing your archetype based on the battleground and/or opposition.

plebs

Second post best post

Yeah but Lawful evil doesn't mean that you have no personality. You are just describing lawful stupid if anything.

That's not how ones personal morality works Ameri-chan.

LAWFUL EVIL.

She hides behind the law for her personal benefit. Literally the very definition of Lawful Evil.

Lawful?

She's neutral evil. She does horrible things for the highest bidder. Not quite lawful, but not chaotic either. She has no ideology of her own.

I think Trump is probably Trump. He definitely believes in a rule of law, but he's a "strongman" type and if he gets in office there's gonna be a lot of investigations, trials, etc. He's confrontational when he has to be, to win.

do I get a neat badge 2?

Here you go.

I agree that she is lawful evil, but I think it's more because she promotes the law in such a way that it benefits her.

...

I never said anything about ones personality, which if anything would be a result of a persons Charisma and independent of their morality. Just because someone follows the rules of a community/society doesn't make them a drone.

And I gave an example of lawful stupid as it's a good way to define what is the extreme side of the Lawful spectrum. Tact can be used but in the end Lawful characters believe in playing by the rules and in others doing so, LG will try and guide them back to the rules while LE will relish in making rules favoring themselves and punishing those who break them.

Chaotic has no cares for the rules, Chaotic Good seeks to help people who they see as repressed by the rules of society, Chaotic Evil is willing to do anything to further themselves. Either subtly or overtly.

...

>Cred Forums Pass user since October 2016.

Fuck is this

Shift down one, move Obongo over to CE.

wtf I hate niggers now

To expand on that a Lawful characters greatest fear is becoming a hypocrite, a Chaotic characters is having to obey with punitive measure taken if they don't. Good is selfless while evil is selfish.

>That would mean she is going around killing people just for the heck of it.
Yes.

Stick Obama as CN bordering CE and Clinton NE.

Trudeau TN as anything with 2 or less Intelligence is lumped in there as morality is too complex.

>Soros
>Lawful anything
That man is a harbinger of chaos

He does it to empower his 'New World Order'. I don't understand what NWO he keeps referring to...who is he beholden to? Is there an actual cabal he works for?

Yeah, duh. Vader pushed hard and controlled people in the Empire and caused a lot of power struggles, but he didn't just say "fuck the Empire, I'm going out on my own"

what this guy said:

I don't know how to fill the rest.

So Javert from Les Misérables starts LE but shifts to LN while Jean Valjean is CN but shifts to being CG.

I've given my suggestions.

>who is he beholden to?
Money and his demonic Jew god. It could be argued these things are in fact one and the same

What if the killing people thing turns out to be true of hillary?

Then still NE, CE would be someone willing to break any and all laws in front of others for personal gain. Clinton sits between a willingness to break the rules and adhering to them.

If she consistently tied up lose ends and eliminated all competition she'd be CE.

The difference between NE and CE is between a cheater and a rotten bastard. If you're the best of friends with a cheater you know they'll try not to screw you over too much, a rotten bastard will do it if the reward is right.

There he is. There he goes again. Look, everyone! He posted it once again! Isn't he just the funniest guy around?! Oh my God.

I can almost see your pathetic overweight frame glowing in the dark, lit by your computer screen which is the only source of light in your room, giggling like a like girl as you once again type your little Cred Forums pass thread up and fill in the options command. you don't even fill in the captcha. you're such a disgusting NEET that you actually paid for a Cred Forums pass, you just choose the options command. Oh, and we all know the options command. The "epic" "Cred Forums Pass user since xxxxx 201x". , isn't it? I imagine you little shit laughing so hard as you click it that you drop your Doritos on the floor, but it's ok, your mother will clean it up in the morning. Oh, that's right. Did I fail to mention? You live with your mother. You are a fat fucking fuckup, she's probably so sick of you already. So sick of having to do everything for you all goddamn day, every day, for a grown man who spends all his time on Cred Forums posting about a Cred Forums pass membership. Just imagine this. She had you, and then she thought you were gonna be a scientist or an astronaut or something grand, and then you became a NEET. A pathetic Cred Forums pass NEET. She probably cries herself to sleep everyday thinking about how bad it is and how she wishes she could just disappear. She can't even try to talk with you because all you say is "I NEED TO RENEW MY 2012 PASS" You've become a parody of your own self. And that's all you are. A sad little man laughing in the dark by himself as he prepares to indulge in the same old dance that he's done a million times now. And that's all you'll ever be.

according to who? some chart making redditor?

open your mind lordetard.

:^)

Cred Forums Pass user since August 2016.

Fuck your pic sucks. Are you underaged or something? Why are the socialist retards labeled as good when all they do is redistribute other people's shit?

Trudeau is not lawful at all. He's chaotic as fuck, he's like an even more retarded Obama.
Cruz is a scumbag but he's more Lawful than anything. I'd put him in Lawful Evil or Lawful Neutral.

Trump should be Chaotic Neutral. Hillary is Lawful Evil, she may break the law but she also hides behind the law similar to a mobster.

Obama could arguably be chaotic evil because it's really hard to figure out what he's supposed to be. He's not a liberal, and he flip flops between his loyalty to Israel or Saudi Arabia. None of his actions that he has done this year have made any sense.

Bush Jr. was Neutral Evil. (Putin might also fit here.) He was somewhat chaotic but you could understand his motivations. He was motivated by the petrodollar to enrich his family's coffers and he used Evangelists to spread chaos.

No current president/ political figure could truly be labeled as good although I would probably label Bashar Assad as the closest to a good figure. He actually dindu nuffin wrong at all, the USA just wants to kill him because his country is in the way of Iran who are the real target.

The only other good figure who comes to mind is Deturte, who would be lawful good. A lot of people seem to misunderstand Lawful as being some pansy hippy when really Lawful implies that you follow a strict dogma or code, so you kill with no remorse if the code has been broken.

Chaotic neutral, and neutral evil, respectively.

>hillary
>lawful
nice one