BBC

Is this the only non-biased, neutral news organisation on the planet? American news networks just can't compete.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/KMlRNFvX3ew
consumers.ofcom.org.uk/complain/tv-and-radio-complaints/accuracy-or-bias-on-the-bbc/
dailystormer.com/bbc-fires-award-winning-white-male-comedian-for-being-white-and-male/
bbcpanoramasavingsyriaschildren.wordpress.com/
bbc.co.uk/news/uk-21511904
youtu.be/01gFKHNJFHk
bbc.co.uk/programmes/profiles/4Y6tYtnQ7SX13qvkpsMgfKB/presenters
youtube.com/watch?v=CEWiMzC6GNg
honestreporting.com/the-2015-dishonest-reporter-of-the-year-why-the-bbc-won/
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Hahahah fuck off MI6.

Enjoying your personality-driven "anchormen" and celebrity news then? Dumb news for dumb people.

>non-biased, neutral news organisation
i'm not falling for this bait and no one else on this board will.

How did they cover brexit?

Big black cock network? nty

CNN masterrace

>non-biased, neutral news organisation
>BBC

Pick one and only one.

The BBC is an organisation of celebrity paedophiles and celebrity paedophile cover-ups.

Are you the same retarded TA from Cred Forums?

I know you're memeing but dont the BBC actually have to be impartial by law? They can have cripples present the weather and have blacks read the news but they cant actually talk shit like the American news channels.

Just fuck off. Non biased, fuck off. Big Bag of Cock, the fuckers have always been biased to what ever it's trustees tell it.

I wonder who is this shill, shilling for bbc everyday on Cred Forums?

>BBC
>Not biased

whatareyoufuckinggay.jpeg

They wouldn't lie. 30 seconds in. If you want biased news, RT is always constantly trying make Russia seem perfect.

youtu.be/KMlRNFvX3ew

The BBC is a Jewish supremacist organization that attempts to get every bit of pro-open borders brainwashing past OfCom that they can.

The position of Director General of the BBC and of BBC News has always been a constant rotation of jews with anti-white views.

Sorry but Ofcom have no power over the BBC channels. Only the BBC Trust handles complaints. Ofcom will continue to sanction RT for being biased though.

consumers.ofcom.org.uk/complain/tv-and-radio-complaints/accuracy-or-bias-on-the-bbc/

The BBC is not your friend, if you're a white male you can literally go kill yourself.

It's not neutral you retard lol it's center left

Topkek

>Nigger newscaster formerly 99,9% white country
Shameful

Also the BBC litterally fires people for being white.
dailystormer.com/bbc-fires-award-winning-white-male-comedian-for-being-white-and-male/

>BBC
>non-biased

Wew lad. How's that alternate reality you live in?

They are flagrantly leftist and pro-globalism.

>BBC
>non-biased

user...

meh... bbc may be slightly better, but still more nefarious. american overlord is jew. britian overlord is vampire. tomato potato

>BBC is good because RT is bad

I live in the London region and London bbc news is always presented by foreigner.

Occasionally a white face appears on it, so they are representing London population without any bias there.

lol...the London Zoo is so big these days...

London is 60% white according to wikipedia

Anti brexit news had the main spot on their news page almost everyday. While news that was good for people supporting brexit was for the most at the bottom where all the small news items where. The BBC has always had an undertone of bias but it could be argued it was the best of the shitty bunch. These days it's a narrative driven white man hating pile of shit, and the quicker the BBC dies the better.

BBC is pretty far left, the amount of stupid things they post on a daily basis about things like feminism and how women need more jobs in tech, and about how straight white males are basically the problem. The anti-UKIP and anti-Farage rubbish was set at 11 during the GE and during Brexit. They're clearly anti-trump and take every opportunity to slam him while never saying a bad word about shillary. They even did pretty serious editing during the rotherham scandal to edit out the nationality of the perpetrators and replace it with "asian men" and stuff like that. They're just disgusting lefty trolls.

BBC isn't even close to center and all their money comes from the TV licencing racket that exists in the UK.

Fabrication in BBC Panorama 'Saving Syria’s Children'
bbcpanoramasavingsyriaschildren.wordpress.com/

60% maybe 10+ years ago.

BBC is Zionist swill, you stupid goy.

2011 census

BIG

Something quite remarkable happened in London in the first decade of the new millennium. The number of white British people in the capital fell by 620,000 - equivalent to the entire population of Glasgow moving out.

The consequence, as revealed by the latest census, is that white Brits are now in a minority in London, making up just 45% of its residents.
bbc.co.uk/news/uk-21511904

This was in 2013, 3 years ago so it is probably 40% or less now.

The huge TV's with the sole purpose of looping a moving background makes me think otherwise, tells me they got a big budget and nobody reputable ever gets good budgets.

>BBC
>Non-biased

Who thinks that?

Anyways, all media are biased, to one side or another. Just face it. Stop watching media news and learn to find the truth by yourself.

>implying daddy Putin isn't the high T alpha the world needs
Cyka blyat

>Big-Black-cocks
>news

Ayyyyy lmooaaaaa xDDDDDD

WTF?

The BBC are anti - brexit. They literally run pro hillary ads on all the time.

It's time to privatize the BBC. Their content is a joke most of the time and they discriminate white people under "diversity."

Fuck them. Pedos.

That's white brits, there are more white people in London including irish

>BBC
>Not biased

You just get here mehmet?

yes completely non biased goy

>That's white brits

That is the indigenous population moving away from enrichment.

It's funny cuz you know they are all actually starving to death. XD

The BBC is extremely biased f@m
But they do alter their opinion opinion to co-align with the current establishment's outlook

You say this yet i've seen 10 minute segments on BBC news 24 devoted entirely to what Prince George was wearing the other day.

Why does it matter? She was probably born in this country.

Maybe that person just wasn't good enough? Black people can do just a good a job at news, comedy, presenting like any white person.

youtu.be/01gFKHNJFHk

Loving
Every
Laugh

>non-biased, neutral

Funny guy.

>media that is not completely rigged is better than completely rigged """"media""""
Oh, really? Never would have guessed...

The BBC is biased as fuck, dumbass.

Our government owned media hates white people too.

They just tell them up front "Whites need not apply" so they dont run into this scenario.

...

Older generations actually still respect our royalty. It's a part of a culture. There is a huge global audience interested in the royal family too. Meanwhile ITV is talking about pointless celebrities a lot in their news.

Riz Lateef, Alice Bhandhukravi, Victoria Hollins and Asad Ahmad.
bbc.co.uk/programmes/profiles/4Y6tYtnQ7SX13qvkpsMgfKB/presenters

It matters because we are being removed in our own nations capital city.

Anthony Zurcher is an anti-Trump shill-rat

Bin your TV.

Don't give the paedophiles of the BBC a penny!

Wow, so can I put a sign in front of my business saying "niggers need not apply"

>BBC
>news network that presents the White Helmets as impartial humanitarians
>unbiased

Thanks to professor Stein Bergowitz it's only racist when whites do it

It's the kind of shit that gets white, middle class, bored housewives to shake the bacon between her legs. Other than that, it's fucking cancer.

It's far left

>Black people can do just a good a job at news, comedy, presenting like any white person.
No they can't. Statistically they are worse at everything. On top of that they are ugly to look at.

>Irish
>White

Pick one

>Riz Lateef

Born: London

>Asad Ahmad

Born: London

Invasive species reproduce what's your point? They are not British.

No actually, only white people are allowed to be discriminated against, its technically highly illegal, but you know, CBC being a government organization and all.

ahahahahahahahahahahah

You posted this on Cred Forums a few hours ago.

>non-biased
surely you jest

Look at all these glorious (You)'s my friend!

BBC is the most biased piece of shit ever.You will see once you take the red pill, it all begins to show. They literally play 10 minute propaganda-tier 'short films' during the middle of their national news at 6 pm about refugee children crying because they are struggling to make it to Europe. They in fact constantly show such images, also when covering the migrant crisis you will notice they regularly film ONLY women and children, it's amazing. Then of course the journalist is talking in a very liberal manner, humanizing them and pleading the emotional argument.
Someone once said, "North Korea propaganda got nothing on the West". And it's so fucking true.

BBC, over the years generally report on things that matter, they give you reliable and relatively non bias information. You begin to trust the BBC ( i trusted the BBC as a normie). In fact everyone I know apart from a except few think the BBC is absolutely amazing, non bias, A* news source. But then along comes something like Brexit, or the Syrian refugees, or over throwing Assad, or stirring up stuff between Russia. This is where their true intentions come out, give that you watch the BBC for so long you pretty much take anything they say at this point as truth.
If you watched BBC and their coverage of Brexit and the 6 months leading up to it you will see the extreme bias towards remain and the establishment.
I once was driving for 5 hours and was tuned in to BBCR2 the whole time. You will not believe the amount of shit you hear in just those 5 hours. Every 10 mins of so they would cut to headlines as radios do, it went like this;

>Cheaper phone calls within EU
>osborne says emergency austerity if brexit
>osborne says cost 4300 per household
>obama urges UK to remain
>economic experts says UK will lose 10% of it's GDP
>WTO says UK will lose 10% of its GDP
>europe will not trade with us if brexit

This went on for hours, every day for months.

The TRUE non bias network

This desu
They're among the least biased in the world, but still biased. Trump articles are another example. They'll inform on the current event (most of the time), then toss in a bunch of debunked irrelevant shit directly below the first paragraph to bash Trump.

FWIW, I think any organization has the right to be discriminated against. But that only applies to private organization. The BBC gets huge hand outs from the Government.

I think the BBC will be finished in the future though. Netflix is far more popular and people are getting pissed off at their shit content. It's a joke that we need to buy a TV license (that helps fund the BBC) in order to watch Sky Sports.

badly. Dimblebot looked like he wanted to an hero while announcing Brexit's win
youtube.com/watch?v=CEWiMzC6GNg

* I meant any organization has the right to discriminate.

Cant you watch sky sports online?

Lib as fuck
Here in the states, people think it's smart because of the accent.

Aren't the faggots on a Never Trump footing?
Fuck them and their Big Black Cock fetish.

Also you need to remember that the BBC is essentially state propaganda.and only used at during important times. They are

>funded by a 'tax' which everyone with a TV must pay, regardless of whether you use that service
>enforced by the police and court of laws
>BBC is the only 'private' body that can apply for search warrants to enter somebody's home
>should you not pay the fine you can face prison time

BBC and the western media are the BEST SHILLS around, because people believe them, people truly think they are making up their own minds as journalists feed them the narrative.

BBC is shortcut from "Be British Communist" so no.

Most of our papers aren't that bad, even the socialist ones (De Morgen), though agenda-pushing, are nowhere near the level of US papers. De Tijd is pretty much flawless, but their writing style is pretty bland.

I think you still need a Sky Subscription and to get that, you need a TV license. It's a fucking joke.

>Is this the only non-biased, neutral news organisation on the planet?
You're trying too hard, user.

> BBC is the only 'private' body that can apply for search warrants to enter somebody's home

Not quite. Only if they have strong suspicion you are watching live TV. Even then, most search warrants get thrown out.

I once did it to my TV license fraud who came to my house. These cocksuckers have all these legal paperworks. I said no, refused to let him in. He said he would come back with a court order. I laughed at him and told the bald wanker to fuck off. Nothing happened.

The tax issue is kind of weird. Some of our taxes go to it (even if you don't have a TV license).

Still, Germany has a proper tax system to fund their shit.

I have hope that May brings down the BBC.

What the fuck are you on about fellow countryman OP?

The BBC is famously left-wing, even so much so that you are sniffed out by hiring managers if you display a hint of liking anything about right-wing politics.

They beg for more and more of taxpayer money while they produce deliberately nigger-tier TV shows and combat any critique of show quality with RAYCISS and IT HAS TO BE GOOD, THE TAXPAYER WANTS IT

The entirety of the MSM is a dead biased husk, desu

With smartphones and the internet, the alternative media is able to filter the bullshit in the MSM and produce their own unfiltered content.

...

>BBC
>Not biased

Jesus you are joking.

I've seen the inside of the BBC over a period of 3 years, it is totally biased and frankly many of the senior people there are literally in cloud cuckoo land.

Luckily the license fee will be one within a decade and hopefully the BBC can die.

>hiring chris evans was a good idea

Imblying non bi assed media can profit

...

Nu-Top Gear is the most desperate thing I have ever watched from the BBC

Chris Evans is a unfunny rodent
Joey Tribbiani because ?american?
and the rest are woman and niggers

it's funny. they keep pushing muh diversity in tv and it keeps backfiring yet shit like deadpool and clarkson's new show will be ridiculously successful despite being politically incorrect white guys

u won't catch anything with this obvious shit bait

cept maybe sage

this is the worst bait thread I have ever seen

>BBC unbiased
What a joke

honestreporting.com/the-2015-dishonest-reporter-of-the-year-why-the-bbc-won/

i used to watch it but at some point i relised how biased is it.

in this case a plestinian stabed two israelis and the bbc did its max to make it seem otherwise.

sorry, for me it lost rhe moral high ground

I don't really like Israel but fuck palestine.

>Is this the only non-biased, neutral news organisation on the planet?


HE THINKS THE BBC IS UN-BIAS!

WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU ON ?

>doesn't think all Palestinians are dogs.

Must be biased.

>city of london propaganda machine
>unbiased

Really makes you think

BBC is one of the worst for it amongst other ones the UK get on mainstream television. It's very leftist and pro globalism. I personally watch/read Al-Jazeera and RT for news. I take it like with most news sources with a pinch of salt but it's nice to see a story that's not all about how we need to suck Germany's dick and how our jez is overcoming all odds to become the successful leader of new communis..I mean labour...

>deadpool

Youre falling for another jewish trick, hes bisexual.

>deadpool is the epitome of inclusive

Reddit please.

Sorry.

Pansexual.

I guess that means he fucks dogs too or something.

NPR Masterrace. My day cannot begin without Morning Edition on the way to work, and cannot end without All Things Considered and Market Place on the way home.

Seriously. Best journalism in the country. Their talk shows and radio's documentaries are good too, but are biased to the left in most respects.

Your having a fucking laugh

Cool story bro

you should stop now OP.
just - stop mate

Its only neutral about british news. Horribly left wing for international news.

Not replying to anyone in particular here, but I think it needs to be asked to many ITT if you know that

Non-biased =/= agrees with Cred Forums

This board is incredibly biased toward the right, so any news outlet which is truly unbiased would be further left than Cred Forums on most issues (not saying the BBC is, making a general comment on the criteria people seem to be applying)

No non bias means non bias, not agreeing with pol. Looking at both sides of the story without having a an internal agenda which 95%of all media have.

>I know you're memeing but dont the BBC actually have to be impartial by law?

Yes, their charter is supposed to oblige them to remain politically neutral. In practice however, you've more chance of flying.

>that picture

Fucking excellent b8 OP

It's "non-biased" in that they don't have as obvious a bias as say the gaurdian does.
But the placement of articles on their website is so fucking obvious. Before the EU referendum pro-remain events were always top page news whilst leave ones were down below.

I usually do a rule of three. I hear about something on a news site or here. I will start at one end of the spectrum like Mother Jones or VICE. Read about the same story on BBC and then see if someone like Drudge or infowars got a hold of it as well. If all 3 report, I can often filter and form an 'informed' opinion. If one or more outlet is missing the story, it makes me suspect.

BBC has failed to report on several things recently that could potentially be firecrackers if they divulged, say, the race/origin of a perpetrator or they completely fail to bring up a scandal that they may have been involved in. Ah well. Still more balanced than anything you can get in the States.

What would BIG BLACK COCK have to do with news?

Someone say BBC?

rt.com

...

i luv u rusia

There's no such thing as a non-biased neutral news source. Which is why you are dumb for getting all your news from one place.

The Guardian actually considers the BBC heavily right wing believe it or not