The Smithsonian Museum of African-American History and Culture opened last week...

The Smithsonian Museum of African-American History and Culture opened last week. Has anyone from Cred Forums visited yet?

Other urls found in this thread:

change.org/p/united-states-department-of-justice-audit-david-brock-s-media-matters-conglomerate
youtube.com/watch?v=eGgj9S8XO7k
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

sticks and stones?

sign this petition to fuck up david brock and his correct the record goons. you can use a fake name and it only takes 2 minutes

>change.org/p/united-states-department-of-justice-audit-david-brock-s-media-matters-conglomerate

Curtain wall made entirely of stolen bicycles.

Yes there was a thread on it. Pretty boring but it was funny that you could tell they were struggling to find enough black "culture" to fill a whole museum.

Guy had a thread and posted pics from the tour the day it opened.

You have to get tickets, so no. I'm not sure when "all the traffic" will die down and it will be open like all the other museums.

Ugh it looks like shit.

I'm surprised they didn't make it a 350,000 square foot exhibit on peanut butter

>look at the thumbnail
>legit mistake it for a giant mudhut

Of course it looks like the slave ship they came in on

Nothing important desu. Just look at me wordly trash based on how popular the owner was. Real museums have artifacts with no owner that can reflect the entirety of the population that existed at that time.

i hope some one visits it WITH A H-BOMB

NUKE
ALL
NIGGERS

>You have to get tickets, so no.

Screw that then, it's probably full of propaganda like the Newseum.

...

It's full of shit from the past two centuries.

What about all those great ancient civilizations?
>Captcha is houses

Looks like a stack of baskets

Is that to symbolize them carrying baskets on their heads?

I was there during the dedication. I wanted to go see the Washington Memorial but was turned away due to the mall being closed for the dedication which was held the following morning (last sat).

There were a lot of blacks in town for the event and I saw many of them later (mostly at the airport) with t-shirts on from the museum.

As an educated intellectual, (something most of you are not) I am disappointed not that a museum such as this exists (say what you want, assholes) but it's location on the National Mall in what was a green space for centuries and furthermore it's design which while symbolic is an eyesore. At least the Holocaust Museum kept with the similar DC respectable architecture. In 30 years, this building will age very poorly - not to mention it looks like the Sandcrawler from star wars.

While I haven't seen it, I do understand there was a great deal of feuding that went on regarding the collections. For example you won't see anything from the family of MLK cause his kids are all apparently greedy self centered cunts.

(((The Smithsonian)))

Daily reminder that the Smithsonian are the same assholes who suppress evidence of extreme human antiquity.

Carver didn't even invent peanut butter, just popularized it.

HAHAHAHAHAHA

change.org is a political phishiong site. obody anywhere pays any fucking attention to how its "petitions" come out, but the Obama administration uses the site as a way to gather contact info of voters concerned with specific issues for later GOTV, grassroots "organizing" and fundraising efforts.

Using a fake name protects you from that, of course, but it is still a total and complete waste of time -- nobody gives the ass of half a dead rat about the results there.

This -- what is the structure supposed to stand for or resemble? Looks like it is falling in on itself.

It was specifically designed to stick out from DC architecture.
I guess there is something symbolic in forcing the ugly brown nigger museum directly in the middle of all the nice white museums, telling people they have to accept it, and ignoring how it detracts from everything else in the area.

>What about all those great ancient civilizations?

There were no ancient African-American civilizations. You are looking for African civilizations, go over to the Museum of Natural History, across the Mall.

Upsidedown Pyramid

KANGZ CONFIRMED

>suppress evidence of extreme human antiquity.

Assume you are not a YEC guy, so what do you mean?

Here's what I say to that.

The building looks like a Minmatar freighter. How appropriate.

Pre 5000 BC civs. Hell, pre ice age as well, my dude. Humans as we are, have been around for 200,000 years. That's 8000 generations but we are told that we've only been busy for 7000 years. It's just silly. Plus, lots and lots or old, ignored archeological sites that are obviously out of place in the present timeline.

Yea, I live in DC. Since, gf is libcuck, and we were free on the weekend, so we went.

>paid for tickets
>ask the attendant where the exhibit starts
>she points me towards the exit

Is it supposed to look like it's made from mud?

Someone here was there on opening day and posted a bunch of pictures. Didnt' get to save them all though, but this is just one of the displays there

Could it also look like stacked slave ship decks?

>building looks like 3 upside down pyramids stacked into each other

WE

You mean the Emmit Till centre for diversity and enrichment?

Really? That is some lazy fucking art.

Expand on your argument and offer some physical evidence. While I don't doubt it could be possible, you don't really have any evidence backing up your claims.

A well regarded archaeologist could make his career off a find that implied advance civilizations before the rise of Egypt/Mesopotamia/Indus valley/Yellow river civilizations. To say they're suppressing it is dumb as hell. It serves no purpose.

Jesus I thought you guys were kidding, this is beyond meme-tier.

Wish I saved the rest because they're all that fucking bad. I mean that seriously, they're really fucking bad

I thought native americans were really black.
Are you telling me that afrocentric historical revisionists lied?

How appropriate that it looks like a shit colored prison.

THIS guy I like...

youtube.com/watch?v=eGgj9S8XO7k

On Cultural Appropriation, he talks sense. Imagine that.

No, but I've heard about it almost every single fucking day for the past month in the news

Liberals seem more and more anxious about race lately w/ blacks behaving like obvious subhumans at recent protests

Gotcha, thanks. I wondered if you were into the "humans and dinosaurs frolicking together" stuff, but thought it was happening 100 million years ago instead of 4,000.

So far, the evidence I''ve seen for that is extremely weak, and plausible motives for suppressing The Truth seem lacking, but it is an intriguing possibility.

>pressure cooker with holes in it

>ask the attendant where the exhibit starts
>she points me towards the exit

That may be the single most profound moment I have ever heard of, no matter what the museum.

Or the a of somebody looking to be fired on Day One.

Or something that never happened.

But I hope it was the first one.

10/10

That would actually demonstrate how there is no pressure at all. See:

what kind of pokemon do they have there?

Oh wow, I wonder if they'll get enough complaints to change it.

The black kind

haha that's awesome

Hmm really made me think

"Lazy fucking art" is pretty much synonymous with "art" now. Which is sad.

Also, if you have to have a sign to explain what your art says, it means you don't trust the art to speak for itself, which means you know you created bad art.

...

Can't tell if serious. That was just a DC nigger joke.

What a hideous looking building

Not picking our own cotton was one of the worst decisions in the history of mankind.

Are all the exhibits niggers locked up in prison cells and you can throw peanuts at them?

>a bunch of crap nignogs once owned
DA SMIT'SONYAN MOOSEUM OF NIGGA HSITORY AND CULTURAL AWARENESS MUSIC AND RECREATION THANATOLAGARIUM

That building is very black

Nah, I'm not a Young Earther. That shit is next-level idiocy.
Here is merely SOME evidence (though DEFINITELY not ALL of the evidence) suggesting not only a human presence on Earth BILLIONS of years ago, but also suggesting complex human civilisations on Earth BILLIONS of years ago:

* A human skull fragment from Hungary dated between 250,000 and 450,000 years ago
* A human footprint with accompanying paleoliths (stones deliberately chipped into a recognisable tool type), bone tools, hearths and shelters, discovered in France and dated 300,000 to 400,000 years
* Paleoliths in Spain, a partial human skeleton and paleoliths in France; two English skeletons, one with associated paleoliths, ALL at least 300,000 years old
* Skull fragments and paleoliths in Kenya and advanced paleoliths, of modern human manufacture, in the Olduvai Gorge in Tanzania, dated between 400,000 and 700,000 years
* Neoliths (the most advanced stone tools and utensils) in China of a type that indicate full human capacity, dated to 600,000 years
* Hearths, charcoal, human femurs and broken animal bones, all denoting modern humanity, in Java, dated to 830,000 years
* An anatomically modern human skull discovered in Argentina and dated between 1 million and 1.5 million years years (eoliths -chipped pebbles, thought to be the earliest known tools- at Monte Hermoso, also in Argentina, are believed to be between 1 and 2.5 million years old).
* A human tooth from Java yielding a date between 1 and 1.9 million years years
* Incised bones, dated between 1.2 and 2.5 million years, have been found in Italy
* Discoveries of paleoliths, cut and charred bones at Xihoudu in China and eoliths from Diring Yurlakh in Siberia dated to 1.8 million years
* Eoliths in India, paleoliths in England, Belgium, Italy and Argentina, flint blades in Italy, hearths in Argentina, a carved shell, pierced teeth and even two human jaws all bearing a minimum date of 2 million years (end of part 1)

(start of part 2) Curiously enough, several of the very earliest artifact discoveries display a truly extraordinary level of sophistication. In Idaho, for example, a 2-million-year-old clay figurine was unearthed in 1912. But even this discovery does not mark an outer limit. Bones, vertebrae and even complete skeletons have been found in Italy, Argentina and Kenya. Their minimum datings range from 3 million to 4 million years. A human skull, a partial human skeleton and a collection of neoliths discovered in California have been dated in excess of 5 million years. A human skeleton discovered at Midi in France, paleoliths found in Portugal, Burma and Argentina, a carved bone and flint flakes from Turkey all have a minimum age of 5 million years.
How far back can human history be pushed with discoveries like these? The answer seems to be a great deal further than orthodox science currently allows. As if the foregoing discoveries were not enough, we need to take account of:
* Paleoliths from France dated between 7 and 9 million years
* An eolith from India with a minimum dating of 9 million years
* Incised bones from France, Argentina and Kenya no less than 12 million years old
* More paleolith discoveries from France, dated at least 20 million years ago
* Neoliths from California in excess of 23 million years
* Three different kinds of paleoliths from Belgium with a minimum dating of 26 million years
* An anatomically modern human skeleton, neoliths and carved stones found at the Table Mountain, California and dated at least 33 million years ago
But even 33 million years is not the upper limit. A human skeleton found in Switzerland is estimated to be between 38 and 45 million years old. France has yielded up eoliths, paleoliths, cut wood and a chalk ball, the minimum ages of which range from 45 to 50 million years.
There's still more.

(start of part 3) In 1960, H. L. Armstrong announced in Nature magazine the discovery of fossil human footprints near the Paluxy River, in Texas. Dinosaur footprints were found in the same strata. In 1983, the Moscow News reported the discovery of a fossilised human footprint next to the fossil footprint of a three-toed dinosaur in the Turkamen Republic. Dinosaurs have been extinct for approximately 65 million years.
In 1983, Professor W. G. Burroughs of Kentucky reported the discovery of three pairs of fossil tracks dated to 300 million years ago. They showed left and right footprints. Each print had five toes and a distinct arch. The toes were spread apart like those of a human used to walking barefoot. The foot curved back like a human foot to what appeared to be a human heel. There was a pair of prints in the series that showed a left and right foot. The distance between them is just what you'd expect in modern human footprints.
In December 1862, The Geologist carried news of a human skeleton found 27.5 m (90 ft) below the surface in a coal seam in Illinois. The seam was dated between 286 and 320 million years. It's true that a few eoliths, skull fragments and fossil footprints, however old, provide no real backing for the idea of advanced prehistoric human civilisations.
But some other discoveries do.
In 1968, an American fossil collector named William J. Meister found a fossilised human shoe print near Antelope Spring, Utah. There were trilobite fossils in the same stone, which means it was at least 245 million years old. Close examination showed that the sole of this shoe differed little, if at all, from those of shoes manufactured today.
In 1897, a carved stone showing multiple faces of an old man was found at a depth of 40 m (130 ft) in a coal mine in Iowa. The coal there was of similar age.

>Has anyone from Cred Forums visited yet?
why would any from /pol visit it?
get the fuck out of here nigger lover you have to go back

(start of part 4) A piece of coal yielded up an encased iron cup in 1912. Frank J. Kenwood, who made the discovery, was so intrigued he traced the origin of the coal and discovered it came from the Wilburton Mine in Oklahoma. The coal there is about 312 million years old.
In 1844, Scottish physicist Sir David Brewster reported the discovery of a metal nail embedded in a sandstone block from a quarry in the north of England. The head was completely encased, ruling out the possibility that it had been driven in at some recent date. The block from which it came is approximately 360 million years old.
On 22 June 1844, The Times reported that a length of gold thread had been found by workmen embedded in stone close to the River Tweed. This stone too was around 360 million years old.
Astonishing though these dates may appear to anyone familiar with the orthodox theory of human origins, they pale in comparison with the dates of two further discoveries.
According to Scientific American, dated 5 June 1852, blasting activities at Meeting House Hill, in Dorchester, Massachusetts, unearthed a metallic, bell-shaped vessel extensively decorated with silver inlays of flowers and vines. The workmanship was described as 'exquisite'. The vessel was blown out of a bed of Roxbury conglomerate dated somewhat earlier than 600 million years.
In 1993, Michael A. Cremo and Richard L. Thompson reported the discovery 'over the past several decades' of hundreds of metallic spheres in a pyrophyllite mine in South Africa. The spheres are grooved and give the appearance of having been manufactured. If so, the strata in which they were found suggest they were manufactured 2.8 BILLION years ago.

(start of part 5) What are we to make of these perplexing discoveries? They cannot simply be dismissed. If even ONE of these discoveries is TRUE (and I believe that MANY if not ALL of these discoveries are TRUE), then it changes EVERYTHING that modern mainstream anthropologists THOUGHT they knew about the human species. (end)