Is it me or are only degenerates and numales breeding today?

>Styles and fashion are different and I don't like it!

To be fair, that guy doesn't seem like he knows anything about women (treat your wife like your daughter, wtf?), and his wife is fucking nasty so you know he's never achieved anything worthwhile in his life.

I've seen a lot of blue haired, tattoo covered mothers and pudgy yuppie fathers.

Beta Uprising 2: Electric boogaloo!

Another way he is wrong. Men peak a lot later than women, so being 30 and single isn't a huge issue.

The point I was making, Daryush, was that article had a really whiny effeminate tone. It's like reverse numale.

You sure you're not projecting m8?

>hur dur live life as i say so if not you are abnormal

keep labeling yourself your whole life kid, thats what successfull ppl do.

just lisent closely to what you can, and what you cant do just becuase they told you to.

if someone call you faggot and autistic and stupid. maybe you are.

I noticed a lot lately men following their women like pets or children. The woman will be walking along with a powerful stride and the man will be shuffling along in tow.
It's really fucking sad.
I went to a Uhaul recently and the entire outside is adorn with female actresses in doing different moving activities. And I just shook my head in disbelief how society has let women become "the boss" of relationships. Men don't lead anymore nor do many of them want to.

Is this guy just repeating whatever his wife is making him say? Why aren't they talking about the behaviour of western whores?

You're self projecting self projection.

Each post you make it becomes clearer that you're an autistic and probably fat alt-rightist MGTOW non-heterosexual.

...

be non numale get divorce raped

Even if everything was turned around today, it would still take a whole generation to really see the full benefits.

>victorian phone numbers
no surprise here

You are so mad!

>im extremely cynical its a coping mechanism
>lack of self awareness is off the charts

>Is it me or are only degenerates and numales breeding today?

The numale in the OP pic may not have breeded. Without paternity tests on both kids we cannot assume.

Both of his kids could be paternity fraud.

There is no reason to ever commit to a woman without a paternity test. If she is not pregnant you should be focusing on your career and fucking lots of whores.

If a woman you've fucked ever does get pregnant there is still no reason to commit to her UNTIL she has given birth and you have DNA tested the kid to make certain it is yours. If she is offended by a DNA test requirement then leave her. She is trying to commit paternity fraud.

Alpha fucks. Beta bucks. No commitment until paternity test. Never forget.

>mexico in charge of spelling
>mexico in charge of not being jealous and angsty

dude your country sucks lmao it is literally America's toilet.

If you really want to get married one day, I would avoid being overly promiscuous.

>itt
nobody here into saving lives as soldiers?

>If you really want to get married one day

I don't want to get married. No man should.

The state already has guaranteed child support for a woman. That used to be the purpose of marriage. Sex in exchange for child support. There is no reason to get married anymore with child support laws.

Marriage is a huge legal risk for a man with ZERO benefit. The family courts are 100% corrupt. Zero fault divorce laws literally give women incentive to have sex with other men, then falsely accuse the man of physical abuse, and take 70% of his earnings for the rest of his life through alimony. The lawyers, judges, and wife benefit only. If she got pregnant by another man during the marriage, then too bad. The marriage makes YOU the legal father.

Have kids, just don't get married. If she keeps pushing for more after the DNA test then just let her apply for child support. But for fuck sake don't marry her.

Go to reddit's the red pill, or watch Divorce Corp. NO MARRIAGE. EVER.

Or, ya know, you could just slap her a little when she gets out of line. Don't let her use social media either. Make sure she has a good relationship with her father and is a virgin. If you can do those things you should be good.

>or ya know
>ya know
>ya

evermore of a faggot

get out zionist shill

Also, your objection to formal marriage doesn't really address my point.

The purpose of the marriage ceremony is to bring together the families and legitimize it. The social pressure from the family will help keep both parties committed. Serious religious convictions help too.

>reddit

This

Stay mad

You're a faggot for denying the point of that image to begin with, which is that men have it harder than women and people need to STOP denying this. I am tired of people denying it, men objectively have it harder than women.

You're also a faggot for still advocating marriage even though it is absolutely the worst thing a man can do in western society right now.

>Or, ya know, you could just slap her a little when she gets out of line.

She calls cops. You go to jail. Doesn't matter if it's a false accusation.

>Don't let her use social media either.

Who cares if she uses social media? That cannot be controlled without wasting your energy.

If she fucks another dude or starts flirting with another dude because of social media, then again who cares? You let her know you will cut off all social contact forever.

If she still cheats and you have a DNA test proving you had a kid with her then make your support payments but still never talk to her again.

That hurts women more deeply than any slap. Slapping them only gives them leverage to turn the public against you.

>Make sure she has a good relationship with her father and is a virgin.

Agreed. Virgin in this day and age is difficult though.

>Still thinks alpha males lock like jocks from 1980s comedy films
>Calls present day alphas "numales"
Don't leave your basement, senpai

...

The numales arent actually breeding but they are raising the kids I suppose.

ATTENTION
CTR IS SLIDING BLACK BILLY AND KILLARY'S LIBYA TANTRUM HARD AS FUCK
DO NOT REPLY TO SHILL THREADS WITHOUT TYPING sage IN THE EMAIL FIELD
THIS WILL PREVENT YOUR REPLY FROM BUMPING THE SHILL POST

>which is that men have it harder than women and people need to STOP denying this. I am tired of people denying it, men objectively have it harder than women.

To be precise men have it harder when they're young and poor. Men have it much better when they get older and make cash.

A woman's life begins to suck after 30. If she has no looks, is infertile, and has been used up sexually, then her life will REALLY SUCK after 35.

35 is when most men's life become pretty good if they focus on making cash.

...

>writes a holier than thou lecture
>p-please share, as a birthday gift
How do numales even take themselves seriously?

Men who get angry at the image you posted are exactly the type of feminized numales that are the problem. Who cares if the world is harder for men!? We rise to challenges, women cry about them.

Pls be real

>Also, your objection to formal marriage doesn't really address my point.

My objection supersedes your point.

>The purpose of the marriage ceremony is to bring together the families and legitimize it. The social pressure from the family will help keep both parties committed. Serious religious convictions help too.

Irrelevant. Marriage is 100% risk to a man, and ZERO benefit. You can get all the benefits of a wife by hiring a maid and a whore and paying for whatever else you want from a woman.

You get married then you're a dumb fuck. Your boss will enjoy having way more financial leverage over you at work though.

People still think that western society is a patriarchy that oppresses women for many reasons, one being that men are naturally better than women. I noticed that, that there is some type of stigma on men being amazing, on men using our natural talents/abilities to make lives better for ourselves. Ironically enough, feminists are just women who are bitter that not enough men are Chads who can be spread around to all the females in the population. That's why women want Chad to be alpha and dominant and have access to the resources, yet at the same time, they will discourage men from being amazing. They hate beta and omega males, so they don't want us to have happiness or resources. And feminists were always cunts ruled by emotion anyways, so even though their Chad strategy is doomed to fail, they pursue it anyways.

He is actually subtly dropping redpills, but in a way that sjws wont notice. Treat women like children, dont be a beta gamer, procreate....

You must be one of the betas that don't pick up on that.

I'm not denying the negatives outweigh the positives, but there are positives.

The slap is to show her you are in charge. She won't call the police. If you show proper restraint, there will never be a sign.
The point of the slap isn't to hurt them.

Social media is like internet porn for females. It is addictive and encourages vanity. I can't really deny anything else you say here.

I would also suggest making her stay at home to raise the children.

What do you mean by "peak"?

>

You're a faggot. You traditionalists went from "HURR MAN UP" to basically admitting that guys like me are right. Why do you people not understand that men are human too, and that we need incentive and respect to continue on in society? Yes, we need those things. Men endure struggle, but men also expect to be given things in life too. It's human nature, and Cred Forums denies this on a Chinese cartoon board. I am like most men out there - give me something for contributing, or go fuck yourself.

The feminists won because of the "men" that go on places like Cred Forums. Feminists went unopposed doing whatever they want, and still do, while effeminate queers trying to be "alpha males" purposely ignored them and ranted on about their non-existent alphaness while women were ruining everything.

>Cred Forums gets buttflustered whenever they hear that nignogs are outbreeding whites not only in pure blacks but also in mongrels
>Cred Forums gets buttflustered when someone tells them they should get off their basements and start contributing to white supremacy

Holy shit, you guys are just like Cred Forums.

>My objection supersedes your point.
How? If the point is a happy long-term relationship, then your objections to the legal technicalities of marriage are irrelevant.

>Irrelevant
It's still true.

>You get married then you're a dumb fuck.
Trump doesn't seem to think so.

That's all good to know, but once you know this about feminist women then ignore them. Focus on cash. Cut off all other distractions.

To be ignored by a man who makes cash is the what makes most women get very bitter. A woman seeing an older man with cash then dating super hot whores in public hurts them to the core.

Ignore any media that's ad supported too unless it is specifically right wing. Most ad supported media goes left wing eventually because women buy the advertiser's products.

S-shill!

>Treat women like children
Don't treat her as an equal and don't treat her like your daughter. Treat her like your wife/mother of your children.

>go out yesterday
>at least 50% of guys look exactly the same
>undercut, beard, sunglasses, tight shorts
memes have become reality

that wohole just just says 1 thing
we need another fucking WW

>I'm not denying the negatives outweigh the positives, but there are positives.

Any benefit to marriage is completely nullified by the corrupt family courts.

Enforced paternity fraud, 70% alimony against your income at age 55, no fault divorce, cheating is an incentive.

Shut up and stop talking out your ass.

No, feminist women cannot be ignored. I must fight with them at any opportunity I get. Ignoring them just gives them free reign to do whatever they want.

THAT is the biggest problem with men these days. We've become so neutered that everyone tells us to just ignore the degeneracy and "HURR BE A REAL MAN", but that doesn't work. That has gotten us to where we are now, where men are so neutered that we have to roleplay being "alpha males" and women know it's just some pathetic childish game to stroke our egos. Women are slick. They know men are under attack, they know men have it harder than them, but they use it to their advantage and they'll never admit that.

I must argue with the feminists and other degenerates at any opportunity. I don't want to date "super hot whores" either, because those women tend to be the most degenerate these days.

>implying the most important thing in this life is your ego
How about you just shut up and 14/88 you faggot? Risk is inherent in everything.

I disagree with "nullified" because it isn't zero-sum. I'm right.

>The slap is to show her you are in charge. She won't call the police.

Prove she won't call the police.

>If you show proper restraint, there will never be a sign.

Doesn't matter. False accusations are treated by the police as true due to feminist laws.

>The point of the slap isn't to hurt them.

Ignoring a woman hurts them more than slapping. Slapping just gives them leverage over you. Stop wasting our time with your horrible advice.

>Social media is like internet porn for females. It is addictive and encourages vanity.

Who cares? Waste of energy to control.

>I would also suggest making her stay at home to raise the children.

Only if she home schools, and you have a DNA test proving it's your kid.

It's a waste of energy explaining things over again to you. Answering your questions would only make me go back in circles to points I've already made.

No, you're wasting everyone's energy and time by arguing for the sake of arguing.

Don't listen to me. Go get married. I don't give a fuck about you. When you're on the receiving end of the corrupt family courts let us all know how it went.

If you're talking about false accusations, then what does it matter if you do it or not? Logic bro.

You completely avoid "the point of the slap isn't to hurt them"

So now you refuse to control your woman? All you need to tell her is that you disapprove and why. Easy.

How about you shut the fuck up and realize that you can't tell me what to do as a man? I do what I want, I've forced Cred Forums to accept that many times before. I do what I want based on my own assessment of my life and the situation at hand. Go drink bleach for replying to me like that with the insinuation that I must do what you say. I want to fight you. Fucking degenerate imageboard plebian trash.

I've been married for 11 years and have two kids. Continue to sperg out, please.

and my dad works for nintendo

>No, feminist women cannot be ignored. I must fight with them at any opportunity I get. Ignoring them just gives them free reign to do whatever they want.

Ignore them for the purposes of having sex. Ignore them for the purposes of socializing.

Fight them at work. Fight them in the laws. Fight them where the benefit is measurable.

Business and government are men's natural domains. Do not fight them in the public or social media. Waste of energy. They always win there.

Arguing with feminists is a waste of time. Let other guys know of their danger, then over power the feminists where it really matters. Business and government.

Anti-feminism is right wing. Right wing is conservative. So conserve your energy. Use logic and action. Compete where the benefit is measurable. That is masculine thinking.

Later leaf bro.

>mfw the next generation of kids raised by conservatives rebels and it's the 60s all over again

beta uprising when?

No. I must fight them anywhere I can. Don't worry, I will protect my identity, you can be damn well sure of that.

>men's natural domains
>They always win there

Another huge problem with western men these days. You want to roleplay these "alpha male" stereotypes, yet you fucking literally run away from women and let feminists run around destroying everything and making things more degenerate. Fuck, this is pathetic. Yes, men are neutered these days, but they do nothing to fight back against it.

I really dislike how when this topic comes up on this board, guys will always try to get other guys to opt in and serve women and society under the guise of masculinity. You all think people don't see what you're doin, but this board is full of autistic weirdos, so it's very easy tos ee right through your fucking terrible failed attempts at recruiting people. Guys opt out because they don't feel a reason to opt in, FIX THAT AND THEN GUYS WILL OPT IN MORE YOU STUPID AUTISTIC Cred Forums RETARDS. You Cred Forumsitician faggots refuse to accept this because you are all gay faggots who want to worship women 24/7. Eat my shit fags.

>redditfrog

this thread is over

Here they made a thread about you

oops

>Make no-fault divorce legal
>Keep alimony and child support for no-fault divorce
>Be surprised when only cucks bother with women longterm

The sad part is that traditionally this situation would pose a threat to the ruling class. Luckily for the Jews we have economical entertainment (vidya) and more sexual stimulation than all your ancestors combines (internet pron). It really makes you think.

Get a load of this selfie stick faggot.

>The social pressure from the family will help keep both parties committed
It doesn't anymore, women initiate 70% of divorce. That's where the problem originates.

Men don't really give a fuck about being married, we've handled that for millenia. The recent dealbreaker is women being able to leave us with no repercussions and us owing them money for it.

>I noticed a lot lately men following their women like pets or children. The woman will be walking along with a powerful stride and the man will be shuffling along in tow.
Same. I was watching House Hunters and the husbands were constantly looking at their wives for approval. They would never make decisions, instead they'd ask their wife what she thought then allowed her to make the decision. Every fucking episode I've seen is like that. The wife acts like the man in the relationship and it pisses me off.

It kinda is. I mean if you have kids at 45 50 (and lots of men do). When they are 16. You will almost be 70. Your kids won't listen to you because they can easily overpower you. Then you kids will be no different than any other fatherless brats.

Also only gold diggers go after men over 35 even if your chad or a BBC. Because those same women could date young chad and BBC over you

...and what the fuck was that?

Either you're an amateurish shill that lost it and keeps repeating the same script or an autist that overheated and lost the plot several posts back.

You're repeating the same message over and over but it's plain retarded. If you 'fight them at every turn' you just look like a bully plain and simple. You're punching down at every excuse and looking like a hypersensitive autist who -has- to fight everything for the sake of fighting it. People like you are the ones giving them their case studies and ammunition when it comes to calling for 'hate speech' rules and laws and increased censorship because of 'muh harassment'.

Measured battles like described by the poster a few back are the way forward. Ignore, blank and walk away without taking the bait unless it's a meaningful issue or situation being fought over.

Anyone with a clue about women would notice unless they were a total hermit virgin autist (so you just blew your cover really). Women shit test by making you take the bait, when you don't take it they end up looking like whining attention seekers with no case better than 'pay attention to me' then they look like idiots and make themselves undesirable to their peers. Being ostracised and rejected by peers is what huts women more than anything else.

Why do you think feminists get so touchy about any sort of shaming or gaslighting being used on them? Because it works and denies them legitimate victimhood unlike when you fall for their baiting and resort to indiscriminate harassment and/or violence. Shaming and other methods that damage a woman's social standing are the most effective weapons against them when it matters.

But for fucks sake pick your fights properly. Feminists fucking about with vidya or popular culture = don't even fucking think about it unless you want them to give them ammo. Women shilling for refugees or more 'rights' that disadvantage men = unleash the whole fucking arsenal.

These graphs are for women. But monogoy is boring. I cant be with one woman for too long unless i cheat on her. Most men feel the same way which is why porn,hookers strip clubs are in suc high demand

I completely agree about the how dire the situation is. With divorce rates at 50% that is a hell of a gamble to lose everything. I recognize not everyone can get lucky and meet a good girl, but the fact is there is a lot you can do to mitigate the risks. Obviously I'm saying this as a married man who really lucked out so far. It can happen. The spergs ITT get so fucking butthurt about it though. That's fine and even reasonable I suppose. Poor bastards.

But once again, barring your massive sperg out, you can't tell me what to do. Feminists got as powerful as they did because faggot queers ignored them and said "HURR YEAH I'M AN ALPHA MALE YEAH" as women dominated the public sphere and changed everything.

>Why do you think feminists get so touchy about any sort of shaming or gaslighting being used on them?

Yeah, I do that as often as possible, the problem is, not many others want to join in. Yet. But someone must fight them, so I will do it, while you other guys just sit around and let women run everything while you then roleplay about how manly you are when you know you're really not and you're just pretending.

Cred Forums can't tell me what to do as a man, nor can it tell other guys what to do - why can you all not process this through your thick autistic skulls??????

I generally agree. Attack, attack, attack. Fuck PR cucks.

Jesus Christ that image pisses me off so much.

Having a stay at home wife almost ensures you wontbe middle class. Unless you make 100k a year forget about having a home anywhere. Hell i live in Chicago and i cant even find a one bedroom for less than 1000 a month. Even in thr burbs. So yea fuck having a stay at home wife.

I live in rural Tennessee so it's not very hard to do. My children's well-being is worth more than material possessions. I have everything I could use or want.

Lol when the ask for an iPhone,cable a car college tution your going to wish you had a wife that works.

Yes because getting married today requires you to sign a legal contract that renders you submissive to your wife. The only men willing to do this are submissive nu-males and low-IQ traditionalists.

By the time we are all 70, 70 year olds will look like 35 year olds.

>rural TN
Mein neger

>The numale in the OP pic may not have breeded

This. A vast majority of the time it's a lonely beta numale and some trashy whore/SJW who's accidentally had 3 or 4 children by various men.

>muh niggertech
they can buy it themselves
>cable
degenerate
>car
they can buy it themselves
>college
not worth it

None of this is surprising since you live in Shitcongo. Have fun losing your children to public school indoctrination.

I've thought a lot lately about why women suck so much. I think it has a lot to do with women working outside of the home. Not only is it not a satisfying position for them, but there is also not as much time in the day for mothers to pass on traditions and cultural teachings to their children. Sending your children to public school is a bad idea by itself, but when both parents work then they hardly get any attention when they are home. Women are instinctively good teachers to small children, and a lot of people are home schooling so there are lots of co-ops and church programs too.

>I was just outside at the park thirty minutes ago
No

>be born
>brief innocence before cultural propaganda conditioning infects your mind
>forced into work conditioning camp aka school
>by 18 expected to know what form of slavery suits you best
>work
>work
>work
>work
>work
>welp, better have kids
>impregnate some stupid bitch
>have a kid
>get married
>move in together
>work
>work
>work
>force your child into school
>while you keep working
>and working
>and working
>when it's 18, kick it out
>continue to work
>work
>work
>retire
>die

this is the pathetic reality of life in the modern world and in any other system it wouldn't be much better either. SO, why the hell would you perpetuate this miserable process by having kids in the first place? chances are your child will be even more intelligent & sensitive, so if you have the brains - like me - to realize that this is all life is once you put down the hallmark cards and kodak moments, your child will probably suffer twice as much as you have finding yourself alive, averse to dying prematurely by starvation or your own hand, and forced to engage in a meaningless futile survival struggle that is mostly comprised of work, work, work until you die anyway.

Yea ok

People wouldn't need to work so much if they weren't hypnotized by the marketing Jew into spending their whole pay check the day after it comes in. The fact is people can live on much less than they are accustomed to. All you need is your daily bread. You sound cynical as fuck bro.

>chances are your child will be even more intelligent & sensitive

Based on what chances? Life is hell, and it's even more hellish for the few soft souls that inhabit this Earth. But just because you may think you're intelligent, there's still always a chance your kid could turn out to be a dumb degenerate fuckup.

I do agree with the jist of what you're saying, but you go against the very grain of humanity. You basically just described what we've all been doing forever, and it always goes in a circle. Only a few have ever broken the cycle, because only a few can.

>but you go against the very grain of humanity
i knew i was cool
>Only a few have ever broken the cycle, because only a few can.
feels good man

My parents bought me a n64 when i was kid a gameboy as well. Im sorry your parents dont love you.

Cable a is needed otherwise what else are you doing chillin here all day?

Car sure they can buy it themselves like i had too. But my parents did co sign and put a down payment which is 2000 dollars. Plus they pay for insurance. Gas you want that all on you back?

College very worth it. Otherwise i would still be in reatil. Idk about where you live but around here with some kind of degree you wont even be allowed to be a manger at McDonald's.

Public schools are not bad it just depends on the town and the drive of he child. Even the BBC kids that went to my highschool turned out to be successful.

So yea any kid can succeed regardless of school it's really up to them.

>n64 when I was a kid
I got a Nintendo when I was six

>cable
wifi tethering on my phone

>car
hard work is one of the best things for a kid, also learning not to expect more than they can afford...

>college
I used a GI bill, I would recommend technical/trade school or programming

>public schools
I'm not even going to dignify this with a response

Your bizarre argument that men were too busy trying to play 'neomasculine' alpha male tropes not only fails to even match the timeline of the rise of feminism, but isn't even accurate. If anything they're the ones picking stupid autistic fights over little things like 'muh evbil feminists are ruining my vidya' while running away from the real fights.

Feminists got powerful in the first place because they used methods that were subversive, revolutionary and without precedent, not because people just ran away and refused to fight them. It's basic shock of the new stuff; they used social blitzkrieg tactics on an opponent with no idea what was going on. It was always going to be an easy win for them against mainstream establishment conservatives when you could hijack their traditional values to feel obliged to protect women and sense altruism to manipulate them. Likewise use 'current year' style arguments against them to make them feel like they're outdated or on the wrong side of history when they have no examples to argue back with.

Thing is now the feminists methods have become stale and predictable. Increasingly we're figuring them out and learning how to fight back against them and win.

But the first way to fuck things up is to pick every and any fight we can with them because when we do that, we not only make ourselves look bad, we overuse effective means against them and give them time to figure us out. We want to keep things fresh and difficult to defend until the most important battles are won like pushing back the most anti-male regulations and ending women as the main winning tool of those shilling for anti-white and pro-migration polices.

As above, as tempting as it is to fight them at any excuse, pick your fights carefully. It's not about PR, it's about avoiding giving them time and experience against you to develop a way of fighting back before they key arguments.

Are you certain you lucked out?

reddit.com/r/adultery
doccool.com/cheated-on-husband-for-better-genes/

Women are superior at lying than men. They convince themselves emotionally of their lies so they're more convincing. This technique comes to them by natural feminine instinct.

No marriage. DNA test your kids. Period.

How is he a cuck? Are those not his kids?

Statistics show that the liberal viral meme propagates itself only by poaching conservatives' kids.

>Your bizarre argument that men were too busy trying to play 'neomasculine' alpha male tropes not only fails to even match the timeline of the rise of feminism, but isn't even accurate

It's not inaccurate just because you disagree with it. Do you even see the responses in this very thread. They can all be summed up with "HURR YEAH JUST BE A REAL MAN AND BE MASCULINE WHILE WOMEN DO WHATEVER THEY WANT. YEAH".

Little bro, I don't have to listen to you. Just accept it. You and others here are trying to get me to stop fighting feminism and misandry while you admit it's a problem at the same time. You just want to roleplay being a tough alpha male while anyone with a brain knows you are all effeminate fags pretending, trying to make up for something you clearly don't have.

I will fight anyone I want to. Sure, you can go ahead and roleplay all you want to make up for how western society mistreats you as a man. You all already do that anyways. Meanwhile, I'll be actually opposing feminism and female degeneracy, since SOCIAL BACKLASH is the only thing they understand anyways. I have had some people side with me so far. Not many, but I always knew it was going to be an uphill battle anyways.

Reply again so I can laughingly brush aside whatever spergy rant you come up with next.

>The slap is to show her you are in charge. She won't call the police.
Dis gonna be good.

Livestream you slapping your wife/gf and we'll see the results.

Certain? No. I've lived with a woman for 12 years, so I know her disposition. Women's ability to lie is an evolutionary counter to men's superior physicality. The only reason I wouldn't DNA test my kids is fear, straight up.

>reddit
Jesus... no

You'll learn the hard way you're wasting your energy by fighting feminists by arguing in public. The best way to defeat feminists is through action.

Make money. Create laws that favor you. Abolish laws that do not favor you. Business and government.

Just like sports these are all competitive closed systems that have measurable results. Arguing with a feminist in public will never put money or power in your pocket. Arguing with a feminist in public will never change the law. Making cash and lobbying a congressman with money will change the law.

You'll laugh your ass off once you get good at business and see how easy it is to fuck a woman over in business. Men can fuck women over in business just harshly as women can fuck men over in romance.

Trust me, kid. You'll never go wrong making cash. Conserve your energy. Focus your words on making money.

I recommend learning from men who came before you, but you can always learn the hard way.

>The only reason I wouldn't DNA test my kids is fear, straight up.

Raising a child that's not your own because a woman wanted your money, but preferred the cum of a taller and more muscular man than you should make you even more afraid.

DNA test your kids.

Peak attractiveness. If you look up any list by Cosmopolitan or whatever about the current sexiest men alive you'll almost never see a guy younger than 30. Men age like wine.

Never leave evidence

youtube.com/watch?v=oo0d1zTAFKA

I actually think being a man is great. It seems like having to take what I want has made me more confident, I can do anything because it's me, and because I've done it before.
Trying to pick up girls used to get my heart beating because getting publicly rejected was embarrassing. But now it's like I've done it so many times there's nothing they can say that I haven't heard before.

Then on the other hand you have people who only ever get advances, who have their entire self worth based on what other people think of them. It's no small wonder that women have crippling insecurities and break down at the smallest hurdle.

We are living in a matriarch that's why

Anti-natalism is the true red pill.

>You and others here are trying to get me to stop fighting feminism and misandry while you admit it's a problem at the same time.

No, we're trying to get you to fight feminism where it matters.

Feminism is nothing more than macro level nagging. It has SOME impact. But taking physical action towards logical self-interest will have WAY more of an impact in your own life.

Once you have cash then you can change the law.

Men's rights activists are about as effective at changing the law as women who think that wearing a "power suit" to work will get them that promotion at work. In both scenarios those idiots would be better playing to their natural strengths.

If the MRA wants to change the law so fucking bad he can stop arguing with feminists on tumblr or twitter, and lobby a congressman by donating to his campaign. Likewise, if the woman wants the promotion so bad she can spread her legs for the boss and fuck his brains out like any intelligent woman would.

It's that simple.

>I popped out a couple shithead brats
>my opinion is worth more than yours

That isnt how it works, that's not how any of this works.

Laws in the US are such that her testimony alone will get you arrested. It won't necessarily result in a conviction, but a false claim will absolutely result in your arrest. Cops are mandated by domestic violence laws to arrest and ask questions later. Your employers will see the arrest even without a conviction. That's all that matters.

You won't be able to prevent a woman from talking. You're an inexperienced fool if you think you can.

But again, western society favors women and disfavors men. Your snide arrogance is just more Cred Forums hubris. I can do whatever I want, nothing you guys can do about it.

>Make money. Create laws that favor you. Abolish laws that do not favor you. Business and government.

I have advocated this, I was flooded with responses of "HURR JUST BE A REAL MAN. MEN DON'T DO THAT STUFF. YEAH. JUST MAN UP. YEAH. YOU'RE A MAN JUST MAN UP".

On and on, over the course of 2 years. The common sentiment here is that men shouldn't change laws to favor us, even though we should. I was constantly told that changing laws is something "mra neckbeards" do, and that I should just flex my muscles and "be a real man" while women have an advantage over me and other men. I can't live with myself if I ever have sons and they are victims of a degenerate western society that sees them as trash while women are seen as better than them in every way. I must change things. For my potential sons, and for all other men too.

You may be right.
Now we have to blend in. Adopt the numale fashion. Find a woman to breed with. Then, spend 18 years forcing your kids to see the reality of the world without your woman knowing what you're doing.

That's what I'm saying. There's going to be a beta uprising. We must harvest their energies.

>If the MRA wants to change the law so fucking bad he can stop arguing with feminists on tumblr or twitter, and lobby a congressman by donating to his campaign. Likewise, if the woman wants the promotion so bad she can spread her legs for the boss and fuck his brains out like any intelligent woman would.

They do try that, but there is a massive stigma against MRAs that just won't go away. Western society is hard on men and easy on women, it's that simple. And yeah, a lot of the reasons that MRAs are unsuccessful is because of men like on Cred Forums who base their masculinity off of being roleplaying wannabe "alpha male" retards, but that was already obvious to begin with.

Once again, I've been married for 11 years.

You act like women don't like being overpowered. Tell me again how experienced you are.

Yes, because they're the responses of people arguing this on the internet rather than doing anything serious that fit that. I was on about the very real battle that allowed them to get to the opposition they occupy now in the first place in our academia, cultural and creative establishments and media.

You're not fighting shit though, you're just going full keyboard warrior and giving feminists page after page of screen prints to argue why we need all these new 'hate speech' rules to deal with all these 'horrible evil misogynistic internet trolls'. By picking every fight possible with them on the internet you're making yourself the strawman so they don't even have to imagine one up.

What have you actually done to actually stop the encroachment of further feminism and resist misandry in a meaningful way?

I couldn't give a fuck about living up to some meme 'alpha male' image or trying to be 'manly'. I give a fuck about de-railing them when they try and fuck my country up supporting open doors migration and support toxic and destructive leftist causes just to look social acceptable. The more times you play the angry ranting man role irl the less credibility you have when you later try and subvert their own message and make them feel like they're the guilty ones for supporting a socially unpopular or destructive cause.

It's one fight at a time, not all of them spammed out in some epic sperg out.

When we can slowly win the biggest immediate battles we can move onto more important and systematic ones. For example pushing for artificial wombs and other solutions to permanently destroy the value of women in human society to prevent this current era ever being repeated again where they can wield so much influence over politics because of their biological role as the gatekeepers to reproduction. First we turn them against the leftists and minorities, then we take their rights.

youtube.com/watch?v=xsYi9aWM8Q4

>You're not fighting shit though, you're just going full keyboard warrior and giving feminists page after page of screen prints to argue why we need all these new 'hate speech' rules to deal with all these 'horrible evil misogynistic internet trolls'.

I don't care. Someone needs to oppose them in a brutal way, so I do it. Nobody in this thread is going to change my mind. In fact, I'm going to go insult some feminists right now. Be back soon.

Like I said before, I should mention how sad it is that Cred Forums now concedes that things SHOULD favor men, whereas before, you all sperged out 24/7, insisting that men just "man up" and accept a shitty life where women are treated better than them and that we should just accept that. I see I defeated Cred Forums on that front too. Yes, we need to change the laws, we need to change the social culture, everything, to favor men. I accept your concession and I acknowledge this board's defeat on this topic.

Like almost all other human traits, political belief is highly heritable. Children being rebellious is normal, but rebellion doesn't stick. They eventually mostly turn into their parents.

genes>>>experience.

>That will only happen in an angry beta uprising.

Sounds like something to look forward to, but will it ever come to pass in our sick society?

Not our fault you neckbeards cant get laid, let alone attract a fertile wife

Why is Conservatism 0%? I'm even further to the right than my cuckservative parents. You'd think there'd be at least one respondent here.

>But again, western society favors women and disfavors men.

Not in business it doesn't. Not in sports it doesn't. Not in government it doesn't. You're massively inexperienced if you think otherwise.

The only exception in government that does not favor men are the corrupt family courts and the domestic abuse laws. Those laws need to be changed.

>The common sentiment here is that men shouldn't change laws to favor us, even though we should.

That was a common sentiment? I call bullshit.

>I was constantly told that changing laws is something "mra neckbeards" do

Uh okay. A businessman lobbying a congressman to change the law is about as far away from an "mra neckbeard" as you can get.

You're way too emotional, and arguing just to argue. Reminder: You're in Cred Forums to talk about politics. Money and politics go hand in hand. You want to control politics then make money.

Jesus fuck get some common sense.

Here is how this works:

>Society: "Men, you are all woman abusing pedophile rapists, have nothing of value to add to society, are completely obsolete, and are the source of all the world's problems. Your presence is not desired, and your input in society is not permitted. Fuck off."

>Men actually fuck off.

>Society: "Why have all of the men fucked off?!"

Seriously, the social attitudes against men, their masculinity, and gender roles are fucking poisonous right now. It is destroying any incentive for men to involve themselves in society at all.

Check this mindfuck out:

>Engendering gender harmony

>Thursday, September 29 2016

>dukechronicle.com/article/2016/09/engendering-gender-harmony

>Yesterday, the Duke Men’s Project held its first meeting. The project, led by a goal of “creat[ing] a space of brotherhood fellowship dedicated to interrogating male privilege and patriarchy,” is both admirable and necessary.

>One of the central goals of the Duke Men’s Project is to explore and tackle certain “toxic” parts of masculinity.

>Toxic masculinity is what encourages men to suffer in silence from depression, internalize stress instead of releasing it and develop unhealthy sexual attitudes that can manifest in abuse and assault.

>The Men’s Project is novel because it provides males a space (a safe space even) in which they can discuss their own gender.

And the icing on the fucking cake? Check this fucking line out:

>It is not a reeducation camp being administered by an oppressed group in the service of the feminization of American society, but rather a space by men and for men.

If you seriously need a disclaimer to assure people that you are not running a "reeducation camp," then you are probably running a fucking reeducation camp.

This hysterical feminist bullshit is destroying men, masculinity, fatherhood, boys education, and society in general. Who wants to contribute to such a society or its future?

underrated af

>They do try that, but there is a massive stigma against MRAs that just won't go away.

Then stop being a fucking MRA! Make some cash and lobby a congressman.

>Western society is hard on men and easy on women, it's that simple.

In the PUBLIC. Not in the PRIVATE DOMAIN where real competition occurs.

See? We're doing it right now. We're in a system of competition as you read this. The system is called Cred Forums. We are debating. The winner of the debate convinces the other readers how best to go about their life. Profit.

To the readers: I recommend entering into a system called business. The winner of business gets to decide how best to control their life. Profit. If they win enough at business they can even change the law! Maybe even become president. It's really fantastic stuff.

>And yeah, a lot of the reasons that MRAs are unsuccessful is because of men like on Cred Forums who base their masculinity off of being roleplaying wannabe "alpha male" retards, but that was already obvious to begin with.

Getting rich is as alpha as it gets. Look through my posts in this thread. It all has the same base idea. Make money. Make money. Make money.

MAKE FUCKING MONEY.

>Once again, I've been married for 11 years.

Then you are a fool.

To the younger readers please do not be this guy.

>numales
>breeding

top kek, numales live in a state of permanent adolescence, scraping by as a barista in san francisco with barely a pot to piss in, thinking that some day their """art""" career will take off.

Then they'll have kids who'll go even further left then their parents

Everything is a cycle that keeps getting wider and bigger and more extreme

Humans are a parasite

Well you should care because it's counterproductive. You're being like the Dylann Roof of anti-feminism, spraying indiscriminately anyone who looks remotely like the 'enemy' regardless of their actual value or whether they even deserve to be targeted in the first place. Any potential allies that could be used against feminists get immediately alienated by that sort of approach.

That's also how you validate the complaints of the emerging matriarchy and give value to their cries for protection and for white knights to support them and introduce even misandrist regulations.

You defeat it by carefully picking fights without alienating potential useful idiots so that you can turn enough women against it to form a critical mass that can defeat it and restore you to a position of power. Then you stab them in the back and destroy both their rights and both social and biological role in society so that they can never claim a domination position over you ever again.

You don't get to play divide and conquer then get a Trojan horse into the heart of the new aspiring matriarchy when you sperg out and make yourself undesirable at the first excuse for a fight.

Its, not a survey, its a report on the strength of the effect of heritability.

Basically, before age 20 (e.g. while still living at home) the degree to which you embrace conservative ideals will be determined by the people raising you, whoever they are, but after age 20 the influence of genetics rockets up to accounting for ~60% of the varience and the impact of how you were raised plunges to "no measurable impact"

was meant for

10 years our so left. don't care. If I'm really lucky 20-30 years. don't care. you guys deal with it. *cool shades*

>For example pushing for artificial wombs and other solutions to permanently destroy the value of women in human society to prevent this current era ever being repeated again

I recommend just separating women into two categories. Paid whores and nurturers.

Never have sex with a woman who is a nurturer. Go into any relationship with a nurturing woman knowing you'll never have sex with her even if she is pretty. Treat a woman who is a nurturer like she's your mother. She is a safe to love, and it is safe to receive love from her. If she has sex with a guy it won't hurt you in the slightest since your relationship with that woman is 100% not romantic or sexual. It's motherly.

Then use the money from your career to fuck paid whores like the guys in porn do. When she fucks another guy who cares? She's a whore. There's a ton of whores in every variety these days. Look at porn for proof. You don't love a whore. You replace a whore. The only woman you love is the woman who is a nurturer in your life, and if that woman nurturing woman fades away, then it's still no big deal. There are plenty of women who enjoy being nurturing towards a man so long as it doesn't involve sex.

Separate love from sex. Separate the powers of women just like men have separated the powers of government so no single entity gains to much control over you.

You need to shut up dude. Read more. Get some real world experience. Fucking christ.

>i judge people's political ideology based on their fashion

You think a non-bisexual right-winger is going to sport a man bun?

>permanent adolescence

Withdrawal from sources of endless negativity and ridicule is not "permanent adolescence." Although such a thing can exist in lazy fucks who just want to sit around all day, it absolutely cannot account for what is occurring to men in the West.

Seriously, here are just a few examples of the poisonous atmosphere driving men off.....

>EMBATTLED Human Rights Commissioner Gillian Triggs will allow the Australian Bureau of Statistics to discriminate against hiring men partly because they are more likely to commit domestic violence.

>couriermail.com.au/news/queensland/australian-bureau-of-statistics-to-discriminate-against-hiring-men/news-story/77143fa1b5fa1967a29a86a83b9fb742

>Men won't volunteer to help the Scouts for one depressing reason: they'll be labelled paedophiles

>telegraph.co.uk/men/thinking-man/men-wont-volunteer-to-help-the-scouts-for-one-depressing-reason/

>May urged to SACK Andrea Leadsom just a day after putting her in the Cabinet as it emerges she claimed it was 'sensible' not to have a male nanny in case he's a paedophile

>dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3691619/Andrea-Leadsom-claims-cautious-sensible-not-appoint-men-nannies-case-turn-paedophiles.html#ixzz4M3evEn00

>youtube.com/watch?v=HeVKCj9_-Xc

Who the fuck wants to go anywhere or do anything in a society that constantly places you under unmerited suspicion and constantly treats you as if you are a security risk just because of how you were born? Of COURSE that is going to drive men off and into the only places where they can get a LITTLE positive affirmation. Even if that affirmation is found in fantasy worlds and video games, that is where they are going to seek it.

You cannot expect men to BE men in a society that demands they NOT be men, because the very thing you are demanding from them is the very thing they are told needs to be "deconstructed" because such masculinity is "toxic."

M8 that separation you speak of was literally how it was for most of human history. Most women didn't whore around. Whores were paid to fuck strangers. Men married virgins (or at least tried to).

The current paradigm is unusual compared to historical practices (Europe and Near East).

...

> Men married virgins (or at least tried to).

Keep in mind, that marrying a woman would still go against my advice of not having sex with a woman who is a nurturer.

Every guy should find one pleasant demeanor woman in his life to be a nurturer to him, and go into it knowing from the start he NEVER wants to seek sex from that woman.

Now if you find one pleasant woman who is nurturing, and you decide to have kids with her, then great. BUT DO NOT EXPECT her to KEEP BEING NURTURING to you after having sex with her! A woman you're fucking WILL DESPISE a man who has sex with her and then wants to be cuddled and held like she is his mother.

Once you have sex with a woman the whole dynamic changes. A woman you fuck will expect you to provide for her. There is no such thing as free sex for a man. Free money maybe when he gets older, but not free sex.

Hence why I say separate paid whores from nurturers. Maybe add a third category: the virgin who gives birth to and raises your kids. That woman will always be liability though. She is raising your children after all.

>The current paradigm is unusual compared to historical practices (Europe and Near East).

There have been times in the past where prostitution and promiscuity were extremely high. It happens during recessions. Many men were worried their wife was secretly a prostitute during the Victorian era for instance.

Alpha fucks and beta bucks always becomes more obvious during these recessions. This time the prostitutes are filming themselves in high definition porn so it cannot be hidden. That is the only unusual thing. Typically women would take their prostitute past to the grave.

High definition porn does not allow that. Then again porn does not account for all the women doing sugar dating and college babe escorting.

Wrong thread.

are you implying there isn't a strong correlation there?

That scouts thing is really depressing because it's also very true. There are so many jokes based on the idea that camp counselors touched kids because it's happened before, that if you somehow aren't one of those people, you're some kind of anomaly. I try not to have anything to do with kids outside of my niece and nephew purely because I know otherwise I'm automatically a pedophile.