Who was in the wrong here?

Who was in the wrong here?

Kubrick is a hack

kek

director

this but unironically

he attacked her with a white penis, that is rape
if he had attacked her with a black vagina he would have been in the right

His traitorous droogs

set decorator

Your fucking mother

both are degenerates and deserve death

This.

the audience

I liked how in the Mad Magazine parody the giant porcelain dick was replaced by a bust of Dumbo

there are heroes on both sides

>black vagina
I'm a kissless virgin, but even I know all vaginas are pink!

do you think that lady was so horny that she fucks her cats

Going by the art in that house it looks like a good time was had by all.

In the book he rapes her to death. They obviously couldn't do that in the movie so he beats her to death with a giant dong.

>Kubrick being subtle as usual

Neither because they were both degenerates. Just look at the painting behind her, cross worthy

Is the book worth the read?

pyw

The White penis

>source: user's ass
This didn't actually happen.

Yes, it's actually quite fun learning all the slang words.

Stop reading once Alex is recovering in the hospital. That was the original ending, Burgess only added the other shit in later editions because he hated how successful the story had become and felt he had to spoon feed the reader the message that violence is bad. He was a miserable old fuck.

This I really think Kubrick is shit

Only in the inside

You have to be 18 to post on here, kid.

Definitely overrated as a serious film maker but still makes solid movies

ACO really isn't bad though. The worst offenders when it comes to hack trash are The Shining and Full Metal Jacket

is there an archive of old mad magazines somewhere online

Guarantee I've been here longer than you kiddo

THE MODERN AGE

White people

I'm kind of inclined to agree. Besides Eyes Wide Shut and The Shining his movies aren't very memorable.

I had no idea that was the originally intended ending. I hope you post in /lit/.