How do we stop Disney's live action monster?

How do we stop Disney's live action monster?

They making sequels to Maleficent and the Jungle Book for crying out loud. I hope they save the Lady and the Tramp remake in 2019 by at least making it CGI. I feel sick.

Other urls found in this thread:

boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=beautyandthebeast2017.htm
youtube.com/watch?v=kpLX_gMwKms
twitter.com/AnonBabble

But you look amazing.

can't stop it. for every one person that realizes it's shit, there's ten screaming women and their daughters that like hearing let it go on the radio and the pretty dresses. disney has so much momentum that not even horrible mistakes in the quality of their products can slow them down.

Why should we care?
I haven't watched any of their live action adaptations and I haven't lost anything because of it.
People choose to subject themselves to these movies, knowing full well what they're going to get.
At this point it's your own fault if you keep watching these films even after deciding they make you unhappy.

>making inferior remakes to movies that were overrated shit to begin with when they were cartoons, but back then they at least had the saving grace of some well made animation
Literally whats the point and why do people see this shit? I hated these movies even as a kid. I will never understand disney fans

You can't modern Disney has no appreciation for art, only profit. They have been slowly fazing out their animation division by cutting budgets and closing studios; It's over, Disney is dead.

>Disney is dead

Bullshit. Animation is doing great thanks to Disney, there would be no animation without Disney, movies like Zootopia are praised by both critics and common audience. One or two live action remakes won't hurt the industry.

>Lady and the Tramp remake in 2019
I thought they were done with Beverly Hills Chihuahua

>They making sequels to Maleficent and the Jungle Book
Why is this a problem?

>One or two live action remakes won't hurt the industry
HURT??

Have you seen the kinda bank this stuff does??

Domestic: $504,014,165 39.9%
+ Foreign: $759,506,961 60.1%
= Worldwide: $1,263,521,126

Production Budget: $160 million

Sauce:
boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=beautyandthebeast2017.htm

...Yeah, pretty much this.

Even back when the man himself was still alive half of Disney's animated projects were flops when they first came out (though admittedly the whole WWII thing was a factor) so before the Renaissance, and even after, Disney had *alot* of media that was live action driving profits.

Animation is expensive and even a *good* movie that's subjectively well made and written and does everything right may not perform well at the box office and that costs millions, Live action is sadly just a safer, cheaper bet that has steadily worked... even if it's crap compared to animation and/or the source material.

I'd fuck that Scarjo.

Maleficent was fucking awful, not that it did awful unfortunately. I enjoyed Jungle Book though.

disney animation has no competition

other studios suck because they either make movies similar to disney's (haha look they are ripping off disney!) or not like disney. (it doesnt look like disney, i dont like it at all).

How horrifying

>scarjo
>anything but a dried up piece of used fruit now

>Bullshit. Animation is doing great thanks to Disney, there would be no animation without Disney
Fuck you shill, all of disneys animation is just princess or musical shit, and because they dont have the balls to make anything grander or break boundries instead, animation in the west has been regarded as only a medium for kids because of walts pathetic need to stiffle the company to only make films for little kids.

>they dont have the balls to make anything grander or break boundries instead

youtube.com/watch?v=kpLX_gMwKms

>sequel to Maleficent
Ugh.
They took one of the most powerful and most feared villains in all of Disney and turned her into a public nuisance and a mild inconvenience. What a shit movie.

They cut that part out, way to further prove my point why disney is the soccor mom of movie companys.

Age is a ducking cruel mistress. Scarlett Johansson used to be so fucking hot.

Thats what happens when you shrink your beautiful breasts because you think the female body is now problematic. How much longer till feminists put their brains in jars and forgo their original bodies to relieve themselves of the “male gaze”?

This. Maleficent was the literal devil. People would shut the fuck up in her presence. She was Mother Nature, she was the dragon of darkness, and green hellfire.
Now she’s... I don’t know, a combination of a neutered Che Guevara and some gay OC from deviantart.

And a few weeks/months afterward, they start feeling inadequate, and start complaining that men are sexist pigs for not finding their new brain jars attractive.

The budget user posted is higher than any Disney animated movie not named Tangled

>people would shut the fuck up in her presence
Why did I laugh so hard. Anyway, here's a Maleficent.

>”stop objectifying me you ignorant misogynistic pig”
>”WHY DOESNT ANYONE FIND ME SEXY”
You cant fucking win with these people, its like their brains have no sense of logic or consistency

Either that, or they start demanding men find them attractive because "muh personality."

it wouldnt sell otherwise

Bayformers wouldnt sell to some people if it wasnt filled with ugly lens flares and stupid plots, it doesnt make it an excuse for being badly made shit dumbed down for the lowest common denominator, and it also doesnt mean other people wont pay to see something instead if they changed their stuff to be actually less immature and better written.

One of them has to horribly bomb.

Until then we're powerless.

that'll be the Winnie the pooh movie. no kid today wants to see a Winnie the pooh movie

it was depressing

bayformers at least had fun explosions.

>”not only am i physically unattractive, but i hate all white men and think if you talk back to me or tell me im wrong youre a fucking nazi who needs to be punched and castrated”
>”but im a pacifist and have a great personality”

>thinkins depressing doesnt make for great stories
>”MUMMY LOL AT DA EXPWOSIONS AND OVER DESIGNED ROBOTS THAT LOOK AND ACT NOTHING LIKE THEIR CHARACTERS”
>”WERE DIRCTLY UNDER THE ENEMY SCROTUM”
>”GIMME YOUR FACE”

>LOOK AND ACT NOTHING LIKE THEIR CHARACTERS”

What movies were you watching?

it doesnt. it only makes you feel bad.

Optimus was a violent psychopath and bumblebee is a crude mute. No one acts like they used too, the only good characters that came from these films anyways were frenzy, the agent played by the jesus, and nitro zeus

Wait they are making sequels to the live action remakes?

What would a Maleficent sequel be about?

when's japan d23 expo?

>Optimus was a violent psychopath

Arguably the only one.

>and bumblebee is a crude mute.

Better than the adorable kid appeal character they've been pushing since.

>it doesnt. it only makes you feel bad.
Learn how to feel you fucking pleb

But that was shit.

>Better than the adorable kid appeal character they've been pushing since.
Well, cant agrue with you their...

Jesus Christ, this is like a window into hell.

it was daring!

>thinking star wars will succeed with all these films
>even after everyone hated TLJ and solo is projecting to bomb
>even when you refuse to let toy compnies make toys outve any of the cool designs and insist they only make the same mary sue characters as toys even though no one buys them and its making star wars toys not sell at all
>this level of indignant stubbornness to admit defeat and that your marketing was fucked up
These people would rather go down in the sinking ship then admit they made star wars unmarketable, cant wait till investors kick kathellen kennedy and bob iger out.

iger at least was better than eisner

>Everything except wrinkle in Time is a sequel, Cape film or remake
Is wrinkle in Time any good?

Hes still shit and helped the decay of star wars into its current state. Whats the point of spending 5 billion on a franchise if you tell the fanbase with all the money you wanted to exploit to fuck off?

Oh wait it wouldn't be out yet.
Actually I think I saw the trailer for it. Looked interesting. Some western isaki.

dont worry new indiana jones will make up for it.

I only hope that Solo underperforms. Star Wars needs to be put down at this point.

>pig faced black girl thats super smarter then every one else and has no faults
>disgustingly girly space setting with nothing but rolling plains and ugly flower creatures, and oprah in manson family cultist clothing
>interesting

>Winnie the Pooh kills 2D animation
>Winnie the Pooh kills live action adaptations
He can't keep getting away with it.

No, it needs to be forcefully taken away from disney and given to a company like fox or warner bros that actually knows how to make good movies

>Anyone in Hollywood knowing how to make good blockbusters
Logan was *okay*

too late for that.

why not let the good thing die?

If Disney stops making animated films altogether, then indie/foreign works will finally get their due at the Annies and Oscars.

The mc does seem a bit of a Mary Sue but I am still hype
>How dare people try something different with their fantasy worlds asthetics (that costume does look like shit though)

Realistically there is a league of cultists that will watch Star Wars no matter what. Vent Boyega out an airlock and make the Imperials all Japanese guys and you've also got the chinks back.

Because i was entitled to good star wars sequels for years. I dont care how illegal it would be, trump needs to send a force to kill kathleen and all other heads of disney, and spread its IPs to actually competent movie companys. Disney is proof the free market was a mistake.

Let Star Wars die. Kill it if you have to.

You guys are fucking retarded. Women don't get breast reduction because they want to punish men for finding them attractive, they get them for legitimate medical concerns. Holy shit, I grew out of that mentality when I was fourteen.

that'll never happen.

they'll buy another promising animation company.

>How dare people try something different with their fantasy worlds asthetics
No, how dare they make ugly poorly designed shit instead of making something actually cool looking
Even diehards are leaving, anyone stupid enough to still watch themselves be insulted and mocked for three hours deserves to suffer anyways

>Women don't get breast reduction because they want to punish men for finding them attractive
I shit you not ive seen articles of celebrities getting breast reductions to not be “objectified” anymore

I still find it amazing that Abrams wants to pretend that the only people that hated TLJ are afraid of progress. As if it's impossible that a Star Wars fan could find the film bad.

Some of these people put these things in mvoies because they actually believe it, but one thing ive found is that hacks put women or something to pander to social justice warriors in things they know are badly written, just to hide behind the excuse that are critics are misogynists, even though they themselves couldnt give two shits over what ever political movement they pander too. I suspect black april was made to draw away attention from the other bad designs for theTMNT reboot.

And you believe them?

You cant stop it. They get to recycle old shit and exploit nestalgia for cash. It's too cheap to produce and too profitable to fight.

But chinks hate Japs.

Why not just give the tmnt good designs then. I get it for writing but it doesn't hold up for design.

Why would they say that reasoning? Everyone would understand if it was for heslth problems, saying its because of “the damn misogynists” will make them recieve hate

Whoever the fuck you're talking about is a percentage of a percentage. No sane person would spend that kind of money, and undergo a surgery just to avoid being objectified.

The grand majority of women who get reductions do so for medical reasons. Now if you just want another reason on top of your laundry list to hate women go ahead and believe that total lie.

t. weeaboo

Because theyre bad designers and dont want to loose their job, so they think they can use the progressive excuse for their bad designs

He's saying you're a retard that sees a few screencapped fringe blog posts and assumes an entire sex feels the same.
You'd fit right in on Cred Forums, Cred Forums, or Cred Forums. Faggots so desperate to get mad, they'll easily fall for fake shit just to have the pleasure of it.

Youre right that most people do it for health problems, but with a proclaimed feminist like scarlett its easy to see why people would think she reduced them for the other reason, rather then dismissing the possibility entirely like you retard.

Everything disney has made is objectively juvenile shit. They even ruin everything they by to homogenize it to their brand image of mediocre and overrated IPs

t. really butthurt weeaboo

>Starring Scarlet Johansson

Yeah maybe 20 years ago

You can't stop it and you dont understand the thinking of the Normie

Animation has no respect in the west. These live action remakes of silly cartoon movies are them being legitimized for the general audience. It's sad but it's the truth

That's because Winne the shit is no Chaddington

Enjoy your standardized cliched princess shit, disney faggot
I wish i could bitch slap the shit taste outve every normalfag disney fan scum. Theyre why animation gets no respect and shit like sausage party and rick and morty has fans

And you enjoy generic waifubait weeb

At least thats enjoyable rather then putting characters in stuffy outfits and having them only talk about tea and singing, and doing things like banning any merch of leias slave outfit for being “sexist”, showing that they have no respect for the property they spent 5 billion on.

>he hates frilly disney princess outfits
you are the enemy of cuteness.

>you are the enemy of cuteness.
Im not the enemy of cuteness when all your disney princess use the same ugly artstyle