Explain this to me right wingers

...

>You say you want to ban Muslims from the country every time they commit a terrorist attack
Wrong. I want ALL Muslims gassed.

>yet you say banning guns will accomplish nothing after mass shootings.
Drugs are banned but that has not stopped people finding and using them.

>What gives? Can’t you see the obvious contradiction in those two things?
You can make claims but that does not mean they are true.

Keep in mind that you anti-gun activist help gun sales. Thanks.

One is people with an ideology of aggression
The other is a tool with no will of it's own that canl be used by aggressive people

>yet you say banning guns will accomplish nothing after mass shootings
Because there is no empirical evidence showing that banning guns will have any impact on mass shootings. Gun ownership and mass shootings are not correlated. That means that even as gun ownership goes down, mass shootings do not go down. If you want mass shootings to stop you need to get to the root of the cause because even if in your magical utopia little Timmy the mass murderer couldn't just make a zip gun to shoot people with, he would just make napalm or an IED instead.

I want to ban all immigration, not just Muslims.

What about Australia then?

That's an apples to oranges comparison.

"Why do you want to ban nitroglycerin, it's the people who cause the explosions."

We have more guns than they have people. We probably have more guns than we have people. Even the most authoritarian government in history would struggle to make a dent in our civilian gun supply.

Australia has a ton of guns. In fact, Australia has 24.1 guns per every 100 people. Gun control didn't solve their problems, apparently they just don't have as many people that want to murder strangers en-masse.

Undermensch post

“Guns don’t kill people, people kill people”

As a Leaf Liberal cuck, I’d say It’s a stupid and illogical right wing argument, perfect for a stupid and illogical OP. youre embarassing yourself.

>Be a liberal
>See people in liberal cities blown apart and mowed down by trucks of peace
>Work overtime to assure public mudslimes are peaceful and that terrorist acts have nothing to do with their medieval sandnigger faith that cannot be amended by it's own doctrine.
>See niggers shooting each other (these cities have tight af gun laws) and pimping out run-away girls (girls you claim to care about) on the streets.
>Blame cops.
>See miserable pill-popper shoot up school
>"The gun, and only the gun, is the cause of this. We need the same gun laws we have in big liberal cities.

Can’t you see the obvious contradiction in those two things?

It literally doesn't matter how many guns we have because the two things are not correlated. The US has a problem where some people want to murder hundreds of people. That is the problem that needs to be addressed because banning guns doesn't fix it.

>be american
>get shot
>"better give guns to teachers so schools will become safe again"

Lol, look at the right wingers make opposite arguments that can’t both be true yet they both present them as if I’m the dumb one. Lmfao.

Your question is so retarded it's not even worthy of a response. Try a new shill tactic. Nice softcore porn image tho

>You say you want to ban Muslims from the country
except they dont

Also explain how the majority of terrorist attacks are not done by muslims, yet banning all muslims increases safety. Why not ban all rednecks?

How about you go with the one that has actual data behind it? There are zero instances of gun control resulting in a reduction of mass shootings in the US.

>The US has a problem where some people want to murder hundreds of people.
>problem
Mongrels killing each other is no problem in my books.

So Trump didn’t call for a Muslim Ban? And people on here don’t want white heteroChristian ethnoStates? Lmfao, nice try huckster.

>You say you want to ban Muslims from the country every time they commit a terrorist attack, yet you say banning guns will accomplish nothing after mass shootings.
>What gives? Can’t you see the obvious contradiction in those two things?
It's simple.

Non-Whites don't belong in White countries.
Firearms belong in White countries.

What contradiction?

Wow. It's as though we believe that people do things.
Muh almonds

All school shooters are democrats.
I'd rather ban democrats.

>Non-Whites don't belong in White countries.
shouldn't have imported so many Africans then

Because guns are inanimate objects that do nothing of their own volition and require a human operator.

People choosing to commit crimes and making the series of conscious decisions and actions necessary to carry out those crimes are the issue.

One bans the inanimate object. The other bans the people.

Which one makes more sense.
>Hurr the object cuz dat uddah wan is raycis

No, he didn't. He called for a ban from certain countries. When the ban was in effect Christians were blocked as well.

New Zealand confirmed for non-country

Muslims are not an inanimate object written in the constitution.

I'll just leave this here

>be German
>sister is dating a Sunni much to Shia families shame.
>no guns means can’t shoot sis
>no worries I will just strangle her
>family honour restored

>So Trump didn’t call for a Muslim Ban?
No. Trump banned travel from six specific countries: Iraq, Syria, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen. It had nothing to do with whether you were Muslim or not, and considering that even though those countries are a majority Muslim they still are a small fraction of the total population of Muslims in the world you'd have to be insane to think it was a Muslim ban.

Make sense to eradicate people prone to commit crimes (mudslimes, niggers, mentally ill, leftards - but I repeat myself) rather than inanimate objects with no will of their own.

Lol. Did typing that give you a hard-on?

>shouldn't have imported so many Africans then
That was the Jews and the imports were never intended to be citizens.

There is no contradiction. You can make a gun out of a pipe. You cant make a muslim. In other words. Violence will always happen. Muslims can be prevented.

If only we could prevent niggers and beaners too. Then there would be almost no violence.

Guns and humans aren't the same thing. Is that too complex to understand?

Can you easily contraband muslims?
Can you buy dozens of muslims in the black market after a ban(mass deportations)?

Because maybe it's not about the guns themselves, but the people who use it?

Do you really think banning guns will prevent a shitskin from bringing a knife, a hatchet, a hand-made explosive, an illegal gun, or acid that he can throw in your face?

Just look at all the acid attacks in the UK and think for a minute, if a shitskin had a gun, he would probably do less long-term damage than he would throwing sulfuric acid in a person's face.

HURR DURR JEWS

so no actual arguments, got it

>HURR DURR JEWS
Yes, the Jews were largely responsible for the slave trade.

>so no actual arguments, got it
I also explained how the slaves were never intended to be citizens when they were here.

>You say you want to ban Muslims from the country every time they commit a terrorist attack, yet you say banning guns will accomplish nothing after mass shootings.
>Ideology of violence and rape
vs
>A tool for killing

It's sad you are unable to see those two posts don't contradict each other at all.

Also, the USA does in fact have more guns than people.

>We should ban guns from people that are mentally unstable and have predilections of violence towards others.
>We should allow people who espouse an ideology which explicitly states their end goal is the subjugation of all other people’s at the point of the sword to wander freely in our country

Really fires the frontal lobe

Australia has a functioning mental health system for people who are isolated and potentially violent, giving those souls recourse other than 'go out in a blaze of terror and glory.'

Banning guns won't do a god damn thing to address the sick individuals who want to commit mass murder.

I'll make it a little easier to understand. If you have a tool, such as a nail for creating a house and putting two pieces of wood together, a normal person would use it as a tool.

An ideology and nigger mentality will take that nail, apply it to a club and try to rape and attack another tribe or group of people.

The nail is always useful to people who are smart enough to use it where applicable. If you give that same tool to someone of low IQ and is taught by their religion that they're supposed to kill the infidel, then don't you think that the person is more responsible?

Be German
Mother raped to death by Paki horde
Thank them for bravely surviving the warzone they brewed up in their own country
Get beheaded anyways
Government claims you and mother were the aggressors

I know right, the right winger position looks even more messed up.

Islam is an ideology, there is zero way you could ever stop someone within the country from theoretically converting to Islam. However, with guns, you could theoretically track all of them that move in and out and those already here, although practically speaking you can’t do that. The right wingers are so disconnected from reality it’s a wonder they’re able to accomplish basic tasks.

It was mostly English traders using slaves as an easy commodity to supplement the spices and linens that they made real money off of.

The colonies didn't even have that large of a demand for slaves, we just had tons of them dumped off here and decided to make do.

Then in typically sleazy British fashion, Parliament outlawed slavery without telling anyone, and then tried to blame the entire debacle on colonists.

>However, with guns, you could theoretically track all of them that move in and out and those already here
Not without a secure border you can't. Democrats have fought tooth and nail to ensure that anyone can bring in or take out anything from the country without having to go through a checkpoint. That includes people, weapons, and drugs. Good job.

>One an object that has been used to defend the innocent countless times.
>The other is a Extremist political ideology masquerading as a religion, that call for the extermination or enslavement of anyone who doesn't conform

>Are apparently the same thing!

>Claims disconnection from reality in his opponent
>Is completely disconnected from the reality of gun manufacturing

Any asshole with a rudimentary CNC machine and access to the internet can crank out AR-15 parts all day long, for very little material investment.

If you honestly think you can track how many rifles are out there on any given day, then you are truly delusional.

Explain this to me left wingers, you say only 0.01% of muslims are terrorists, yet you wnat to ban 100% of guns.

stop blaming a religion on a groups crimes
blame the terrorists
you sound stupid when you blame an entire people

...

guns don't kill people, niggers and muzzies kill people!
check/mate SAGE