So is Dawkins still based?

So is Dawkins still based?

Or is he a blatant sociopath.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/mkuRqZ-SssI
youtube.com/watch?v=PtBy_ppG4hY
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Who pissed on his comfort blanky? Samuel Adams?

Violent crime in the UK is through the roof and spiked in that country since the anti-gun laws of the late 90's.

Who is this faggot so I can add his name to my notebook of traitors that will be tried and hanged when we restore our republic?

There there, I guess we'll just take away the contract between the Government and the People. Then I won't be paying any more taxes. I'll tell you what though, I'll send plenty of ammunition your way if you want to attempt to establish some sort of new, fascist contract like you communists always do.

America doesn't have enough lamp posts to solve their problems.

Dawkins is a professional troll

>checkmate atheists

They'll ignore that. Only 350ish people a year die in America (roughly one in a million) of a rifle. They'll ignore that too.

Anything to virtue signal. Ignore reality. Ignore it as hard as possible. Then call someone a virgin.

White men are obsessed with large phallic objects (rifles, rockets etc) because they lack penis size. They're scared, immature and hostile.

He's a smart guy that is also famous. That does not mean he is correct about everything all the time.

Apparently he is also not above acting like a cunt posting patronizing troll posts online.

Post list pls

Indeed. There's a lot of attention paid lately to the media we all consume and how we have a tendency to cordon ourselves off and only consume the media we agree with and ignore contrary opinions. But that's a symptom of the problem. The real problem is that people are now living their entire lives IN media instead of in the world the way we used to. Dawkins is one of those people. They don't have much interaction and what interaction they do have is only with people who disagree with them.

...

Obviously a blanket is exactly like a gun. Those damn toddlers, going on mass blanketing sprees!

Come and get it bitch

>who agree with them.
Fixed that.

Stop making excuses for retarded niggers who believe that cock size is more important than advancing civilization

ok richard, come and take our guns then

My comfort blanky is a special one, I have a legal right to it because it protects all my other rights. If you try to take it I'll pray for your soul. Oh, wait...

What a retarded statement.
>Not an argument
Either you have the right to defend yourself or you don't. Guns are inanimate objects that help even the odds against aggressors who want to harm you and your property. Any argument against guns is an argument against the right to self-preservation. It's an immoral argument.

>Any argument against guns is an argument against the right to self-preservation. It's an immoral argument.
This. And that right extends to protecting oneself against an tyrannical government. Thus, the 2nd Amendment.

materialists are almost always spergs incapable of sarcasm.

It's almost like the founders knew what the fuck they were talking about. Also, wtf do these smug condescending pricks think is going to round up all these guns from people? They act like we're just joking when we say cold dead hands.

Don't ever let them take yr guns!
But I fear they will ban owning guns and just take em, and you will hand them over, you just will and you know it

Armchair psychobabble.
You are petty and weak-minded and you try to make people dismiss people by pretending it is all about their penis.
No tits please, just GTFO

...

Richard Dawkins is like that gay kid we used to beat the shit out of in PE. He was super clever with the insults and never backed down...but still a bleeding faggot.

Notice how he and Tyson can't speak about the shooting without denigrating religion and believers. The Left is actively trying, and doing a good job, of making school shootings synonymous with the Right, Christians, and the NRA. They are shameless soulless pieces of shit willing to say anything to get their desired outcome.

You don't even need to extend it to the tyrannical government argument. It's self-defense, plain and simple.
Evil people exist, and that cannot be denied by any rational person, and as far as we know, there is no way to eliminate evil people from coming into existence.
Guns exist, and you cannot put that cat back in the bag. They exist, and plans for making them exist. That is just a fact.
Evil people will do evil things, like make and use guns against non-evil people.
Therefore, to protect yourself from evil people, you need to be able to meet their force with equal force.
Full stop. Unless, of course, you don't believe in self-defense. Then, you yourself are an immoral person.

Why do these people always resort to belittling gun owners any time there's a mass shooting?

>mass blanketing sprees near native americans
Your country was born sick and never recovered.

Ask him why he values his own security and places it in priority over those without wealth and fame. Gun grab is class warfare, nothing more.

Someone already made this joke. He literally stole this from a woman's tweet.

Nobody here likes Dawkins. Don't mistake our laughter at the Left eating it's own with actual support for the Fedora God.

It’s the TDS, and this faggot has zero business spouting off on this shit. Brit bongs live in an absolute shitstorm where the cops don’t even carry fucking guns and machetes and vehicles are the weapons of choice.
It’s like Keith Olbermann and his delusions; there’s so much complete horse shit going on right now and they’re so laser focused on stupidity that they can’t see the real problem.

**We’re not giving up our guns. Period.
**Schools will continue to be target practice locations as long as they’re gun free zones. Period.
**Gun grabs and insane gun laws do not work. Just ask Chiraq. Period.
Fucktards that walk about with armed guards don’t get to dictate gun laws. Period.
**Dawkins is not nor has he ever been (((our guy))). Period.

>So is Dawkins still based?
Dawkins was never based. Just because someone hates Muslims, doesn't mean they are based.

>still

This. Notice how all the gun grabbers expect other (mostly white) men, with guns of their own, do the actual grabbing.

So how about it Richard, you want me disarmed, come and disarm me.

Gas all Anglos. They are worse than niggers. Remove this filth now.

Dox his security team and see if he's still so fucking smug about "comfort blankets". The actual term is "security blanket" but this faggot is doing sleight of hand to avoid being asked directly about his own security(which has apparently been in danger a number of times before)

>Why do these people always resort to belittling gun owners any time there's a mass shooting?
It's a coping mechanism to deal with their own fears and anxieties by projecting them onto others because they never learned how to physically defend themselves while growing up.

youtu.be/mkuRqZ-SssI

>White men are obsessed with large phallic objects (rifles, rockets etc) because they lack penis size.

Is that why groids are the main contingent of people in the USA represented in homicide and murder involving firearms?

Britcucks never stop and reflect why they're in the situation they're in.

“In my study of communist societies, I came to the conclusion that the purpose of communist propaganda was not to persuade or convince, not to inform, but to humiliate; and therefore, the less it corresponded to reality the better. When people are forced to remain silent when they are being told the most obvious lies, or even worse when they are forced to repeat the lies themselves, they lose once and for all their sense of probity. To assent to obvious lies is...in some small way to become evil oneself. One's standing to resist anything is thus eroded, and even destroyed. A society of emasculated liars is easy to control. I think if you examine political correctness, it has the same effect and is intended to.”

― Theodore Dalrymple

everyday he grows closer to death and to the nothingness that awaits, so he becomes an evangelical leftist--channeling his last bit of Christian hope into failed social experiments hoping to find some meaning before it's too late.

Fuck off, fool. One materialist, atheistic, anti-culture cunt among us doesn't mean the entire country should face the wrath of your meek and ineffectual indictment. If I tarred every stupid fucking yank with the same brush because of the degeneracy I see coming out of the USA on a daily basis then I'd be for nuking the everloving shitting cunting christ out of your joke country until all that remained was ash but I'm sensible and non-retarded and realise not every American is as dumb as the loudmouths on social media and on your news networks.

As usual, he is just being a shitty person when he has an agenda..

NRA!
NRA!
NRA!

Why are atheists always such edgelords?

>take away your guns

I'd like to see you try, redcoat.

>its a leftist devolves into smug baby talk episode

jesus christ, is there anything less mature than doing some condescending baby talk shit like you're a 12 year old schoolgirl? Some haji should behead this white nigger

If he's a sociopath then he can't be truly smart since he'd lack the self-awareness to recognize his sociopathy. So I'm willing to bet he's just an ignorant golem, unaware of what he shills but feverishly does it

He's an example of celebrity: A person becomes well known for something, be it science, athletics, entertainment or whatever and the person then mistakenly believes his opinion about everything else is relevant.

The biggest problem is that people listen to them.

He's always been a secular leftist piece of shit, yet you're constantly surprised when he says retarded kike shit? Are you slow, OP?

Harvey raped Dawkins

Too bad his blanky fired blanks

When the muzzies start cleansing people he'll wish he had a gun.

>Dawkins
>based
Sorry there, but you seem to have bet on the wrong horseman.

Who is he?

And what team of gun toting specialists is he gonna bring with him to take mine?

Pinko fucks, got nothing

Why does every faggot progressive have to chime in like this? Who do they actually think is going to take away the guns? Is this weak signalling a way for them to feel better about themselves being utterly powerless to do a damn thing?

Twitter is easy

Try walking into my property, getting past the dogs, and knocking on my door to take my shit

Send him and every gun grabber to die in South Africa. They are nothing more than social disease vectors that will virtue signal the West into ruin.

...

He says he wants Muhammed to throw his kufar ass off a roof. Can't wait to see it on jewtube desu.

Dawkins is 100% committed to the post-human, technologist Brave New World. Haven't you caught on that the materialist-empiricists atheists are amongst the greatest foes of true conservatism and its deference to nature's unmolested order? The policy makers enacting plans of mass population replacement, miscegenation, etc... hold the same worldviews as Dawkins.

An intelligent atheist should always be pro-freedom. Guess it looks like Dawkins isn't intelligent.

...

Is that you John Wayne?

he just rekt every gun nut fuckhead, so yes, he's still based.

really? you consider that "rekt"? lol

You look like a feeble-minded freak the instant you mention penises in an adult conversation.

What a fucking piece of shit. Send him to the middle east, that'll wipe that I'm so superior, smug, condescending attitude off of his face.

That's pretty much what he's always done. He's clever enough to make a career out of pissing people off but some people treat him as somebody who has contributed to the philosophy field in some way, which he has not. Just regurgitating tidbits of 18th-20th century German phil in a way that laymen can understand with bits of humor and sarcasm to keep it entertaining for dumb dumbs.

>contributed to the philosophy field in some way
>regurgitating tidbits of 18th-20th century German phil
Literally what? Dawkins? Aside from being a prominent atheist, he's mainly famous for his work as a popular science writer. After that he's known as a biologist. Are you even thinking of the right guy?

strange that such a scientist could hold anti-darwinist views. He's quick to debunk creation stories and the existence of gods (rightfully so) but it's just such a tonal shift when his opponents bring up Hitler and darwinism in that context.

>anarchist flag
>hating gun ownership
yet another faggot pretending to understand anarchism

Dawkins would say that the point of understanding darwinian evolution is so that humans can understand that nature is brutal and that we ought to separate ourselves from it. He has said it before actually many times. IDK how he can cuck out on so many issues though.

He's always been a condescending asshole.

That's simply all it takes these days to be seen as some mover of thought. Degrasse Tyson and Michio Kaku are other examples.

No, I don't disagree, I'm not a fan (I think his popular science books are quite good for what they are, but I wish he'd shut the fuck up otherwise). I just wasn't sure where you got the idea that he was associated with philosophy in any way, much less continental philosophy.

I wonder if smarty pants can outwit a bullet?

Fuck this asshole is assuming that people will actually give up their guns.

People didn't give up their weed plants when weed was banned they just started growing them illegally. Look at all the people who have dedicated their lives to manufacturing firearms do you think they're just going to stop because the government said so? No they're going to take their business underground just like alcohol Brewers did during prohibition

>a security blanket will protect you during a home invasion, carjacking, or mugging
>a security blanket is an equalizer for women, children, the elderly, weak and disabled
>a security blanket can prevent rape

>Be American
>Eat 6 supersize big macs
>Get shot
>Survive gunshot
>Die anyway of a heart attack because you ate too many burgers

how can you believe in evolution if it's just a theory (a geuss?)

Fortunately Dawkins isn't an American.

It isn’t a theory, it is a hypothesis.

the only people that ever liked dawkins were fedora tippers.
hes a faggot

in ohter words a geuss?

He was never 'based'. He was the original reddit-tier intellectual, and since the 2016 US election, he's turned into a downright fucking kike cumsock.

Why do libshits have to make everything bout sex?

No dummy, rockets, swords and guns are shaped like they are for projectile-acceleration and penetration purposes, which JUST SO HAPPENS to be how cocks were designed, too. Cocks follow the same logic as guns and swords and rockets, not the other way around.

oh look, it's another episode of "retarded foreigner tells americans what's best for them"

I fucking hate brits. fucking fags want us to be as cucked as they are. seriously fuck off

Dawkins took too many athiesm pills ans is now a retarded faggot

You're not doing yourself many favours when you can't even spell 'guess' correctly.

I used to like Dawkins. Now i realize he's a faggot. Now hate him like nigger crap.

Richard Dawkins is a fucking cunt. Anyone who says there would be no war if there was no religion knows nothing of human beings.

He was never based. Atheists are fags.

Obligatory
youtube.com/watch?v=PtBy_ppG4hY

>thinking dawkins was based

kys faggot

ill always like Dawkins for his evolution stuff. I dont really care that he's been embarassing himself in politics for decades

He needs a helicopter ride.

he's an overinflated bag of fart

>be brit
I'm so sorry

Based as fuck. Top tier bantz.

apparently Dawkins thinks the Jewish oligarchy that rules America is benevolent and will definitely never turn into a communist dictatorship that wipes out tens of millions of people

he believes that their plan to demographically replace us is the "kinder, gentler" solution that they have adopted, and he knows that short of an armed insurrection the jews will succeed

that is why it is pointless to keep guns around, because Americans are too pussy to revolt these days so long as they have their xbox, porn, and doritos

Sanity from the Southern Cross.

>still
Atheists are insane.

This

Believing in a god is delusional.

>admits radical Islam is conquering the West
>still wants Westerners disarmed
Pretty sure that this guy has been replaced by a clone or something.

Dawkins is backpedaling on his own words. In the 80's he wrote about how all the different races were clearly different sub-species of humans. Now he has drank the leftist Kool-Aid and is saying there is no difference between races.

>Boomer whinging about wars and firearms.

I'm sick of these pieces of shit. When we win, I hope their pension plans are stripped from them and their property prices plummet.

Its all they fucking care about.

That's right you should be sorry for fucking up western civilisation you dumb fucks.

He was never based. He doesn't even understand the split between analytic and continental philosophy and yet because he's a biologist he feels qualified to talk about philosophical issues far outside of his narrow field of expertise.

Dawkins is an intellectual coward who is afraid of the kike

But thanks for the meme, you old faggot

Durrr hurrrr uhhhhh like why are you banning drugs when it's the PEOPLE who do them. I keep saying this the DRUGS aren't the problem

t. internet philosopher talking about stuff outside of his expertise (literally any intellectual subject matter)

>HURRR MUH DIK
>BIG DICKS BUILD CIVILIZATIONS.

KYS Nigger.

We'll return bullets to his dome.

He's an idiot for attacking christianity - he identified serious problems, but ignored the benefits of religion in the first place. In his effort to secularize people and make them aware of the danger of dogma he only helped turn swathes of the population into hedonistic and immoral savages. I honestly can't understand how he doesn't see it. I had my time disliking religion in general thanks to people like dawkins, but having now witnessed what befalls society without a good moral fiber that religion gives us, I can definitively say I'd prefer a religious population to an irreligious one.

The only good thing about him is that he's consistent with his beliefs and shits on judaism and islam as much as he does christianity, which of course earns him the ire of the liberals, since islam is their darling religion that can do no wrong even though they don't believe in it.

Look out guys he's gettin his comfort blanky out!!

He's a ethologist primarily, so philosophy is something he is familiar with.

it is a theory
you were thinking in hypothesis

doesnt matter if your bullshit book says otherwise

in the last century we have seen the divergent evolution of at least one bird species

nevermind all those experiments that pretty much prove it for non retard people

It's a demonstrable fact.

>Either you have the right to defend yourself or you don't. Guns are inanimate objects that help even the odds against aggressors who want to harm you and your property. Any argument against guns is an argument against the right to self-preservation. It's an immoral argument.
You would have to prove that whatever gun is a "reasonable" amount of force. I can't for example own a small tactical nuke for self-preservation against a potential government threat. I believe that guns are reasonable myself, but that's what you also need to show to seal your argument. I would argue that any form of self defense that when used properly is effective and has an extremely low possibility of harm to anything unintended is reasonable, which guns fall into.

kek this is actually a good meme. Dawkins might be on to something.

checked, but image also making the argument to bring all those things back.

Fuck yeah, dodgeball.

Gun grabbers are such pathetic wimps. Soyboys. Who do they think is going to take the guns? Them? LOL. Make me laugh. The are just delusional. Thinking they can get Democrat COngressmen to pass a law that will make 300 million guns just disappear is magical thinking.

He's an absolute pseud that persuaded only edgy teens and redditors. When was he ever based?

Guns, gun laws, gun ownership and gun owners are all evolving!
Is it convergent, neuvergent, divergent, or cyclovergent?

He's always been a sociopathic piece of shit.

Tell me how that works out for you in 40 years when the Muslims take over

>small penis alert