Should developers have total free range to create what they want?

This image is retarded. No SJW has ever stopped an artist from creating what they want.
Artists are normally always extremely stubborn and hard-headed about they want to show.
If a dev chose to put some "diversity" quota in their games, it was most likely chosen by them.

Fucking name a moment some piss-ant artist didn't throw a shit fit when they get censored. They go fucking haywire.

>Even on Cred Forums there's groups of neo-conservatives that believe many things should be hidden from an artist's creations.
>should be hidden
there is the tricky bit
there is a group on Cred Forums that doesn't like certain messages - that is 100% fact. But saying that they think these messages shouldn't exist is wrong. They sure as shit don't like when stuff they don't like is put into stuff they do like (transcleric in BG2 EE), but they don't call for it to be banned, save for saying they'll pirate the game instead. Shitposting isn't a ban, it's shitposting.
That's just capitalism though. Nobody is forced to buy something they don't want to buy. If sales suffer, the developers are targeting the wrong audience with the wrong message.

I mean they sorta already do? If you want a game fucking make it. If you are making a game and it's being produced by a company than its the company's game.

>because I said so...
Motherfucker I'm going to go make a baby rape sim just to spite you.

I like all messages.
I just ignore some.
I literally cannot be offended.

Parsee with tits should be on the front page of pixiv.

you've transcended being mad at media
now join the enlightened shitposters and make fun of anything and everything

>>>/neofag/
dead or alive xbv 3
criminal girls, bullet girls and many vita/3ds games
dragon's crown and tekken

>Localization
I repeat, never has it stopped someone from creating what they want because it still exists in some form.

we had that might n9 not a month ago, where the devs had to sexchange a robot to please a sandnigger

So basically it's ok because they're not beat to death while they're drawing it at the very least. Thanks a lot user.

In the end the devs made the decision to do the change.
It's all in their hands.

I want to bury my ochinchin in that meat valley

>No SJW has ever stopped an artist from creating what they want.
>creating
how would you even prove that?

second of all are you saying that because SJWs don't roam in street gangs literally preventing developers from working on what they want, they don't have a negative influence in the video game community?

someone who gets their ass beaten also makes the decision to do the change, so beating the artists to change their mind is still ok.

Post more big tittied elves

Rothbard pls

>elves

Exchange of ideas and views through discussion is positive and good thing.
If you want to lock yourself in your basement, away from outside influences you are free to do so, but don't assume that other people i.e. game developers, want to do so also.

should i interpret this left to right or right to left?

this, moar tiddies

It's not a elf, cocksmokers.

>go take a philosophy class
>All im saying is that some shit is objectively wrong
>objectively wrong

Sounds like someone should take their own advice here.

Do what thou will shall be whole of the law.

Obviously I condemn use of violence in pretty much any context including using it to force other people to do something.
But that's not really relevant here.

Parcy a cute

Yes
That's what I was >implying, you cumguzzler

...

Freud sucks mad cock, both as a psychologist and as a philosopher

Depicting a fictionalized account of something that is unethical isn't unethical itself. Even if it did advocate it, people make their own choices.

>Should developers have total free range to create what they want?
Yes. End of discussion.

>Exchange of ideas and views through discussion is positive and good thing.
there's no inherent positive to this.

furthermore what you call an "exchange" of ideas generally only happens under threat of bad press

Number one. That's terror.

Number two. That's terror.

Harada directly cited social justice bullshit as the reason there won't be a western release of Summer Lesson.

>Yes

No, they are effectively damaging the public by exposing them to bad influence that reinforce negative opinions and prejudice
>people make their own choices.

It's extremely naive of you to think it works like that, just shows how you manchildren are ignorant and shallow

>I have no counter arguments so I will call him a manchild instead!

It's funny to me how smart you think you are.

It must be nice knowing you can absolve yourself of responsibility or guilt because you believe yourself to not be in control of your actions.

This, how can she be envious of other girls if she is so well endowed?

>I can't tell the difference between fiction and reality
>The media I consume actively influences my behaviour
See a psychiatrist.

what's naive and shallow is pretending the social justice pressure doesn't affect developers then turning around and saying games affect people's decision more than direct threats from sjws which range from potential firing to all sorts of attempts at shaming and physically hurting someone

>>>/neofag/

>No SJW has ever stopped...

Well why the fuck japanese games suffer with "localizations" then you fucktard nigger?

it's an impossible standard and a form ove moving the goal posts, this faggot is just baiting. or is actually somehow a deluded neofag who wandered in

I can't be arsed to teach you neckbeards about philosophy, I just advice you to inform yourself on topics before spewing your ignorant opionion

Wow, such oversemplification such debate skills

I'm sorry that basic human psychology is uncomprehensible to you autists

It's not just neocons that want to do this user.
>some shit is objectively wrong
Case in point.

But Harada wanted to create a different version of Summer Lesson for the west.

So your positions are so correct that the public must be shielded from other opinions?

How fragile is your temple of thought?

>I can't be arsed to teach you neckbeards about philosophy
The moment you spouted that there is objective morality it was clear that you have no knowledge of philosophy

You can't possibly be this retarded and conceited at the same time. Please tell me you've been baiting this entire thread.

He's not gunna understand any of that man. he wandered in here durring the summer influx this year. most of these faggots have been so sheltered from opinions opposite theirs and are so self assured that they are in the right at all times and in all action that they have ever taken that they can't take it and duck into their safespaces. he's probably gone already

>Should developers have total free range to create what they want?
Yes. We have a ratings board for a reason.

And localization teams who alter the content should be put on trial for defamation and fined millions of dollars.

Why is it not your job to teach? If you have time to be posting on an anonymous imageboard, you certainly have time to educate your fellow man.

If nazism was wrong, then why did Hitler get democratically elected?

Thanks for making a fool of yourself one more time in an attempt to be amusing, but it's getting stale now

Because trying to make you basement dwelling chronic masturbators into better human beings is just wasted time, as seen by your ignorant and bigoted reactions in this thread

Yes, people should be able to support the type of content they want with their dollar and it shouldn't be regulated by people's religious values. For the US, where people blather on about separation of church and state and shit, they're quite interjoined. And then there's people that you were probably referencing - I.E. feminists and shit. They speak out and change things they don't ever intend to buy because they want to force their worldview on others and make people feel bad for enjoying what they enjoy.

So that hole is designed with only dick insertion in mind, right?

Touhou thread?

...

I believe if you want to make an argument for media to negatively affect society it's not WHAT'S in it but HOW MUCH of it one consumes.

Anyone can create whatever they want, it's the consumer's responsibility to moderate it for themselves. (Except in extreme psychological situations where for whatever reason that person can't regulate themselves)

Dehumanizing your detractors is not a sign of intelligent debate, so you can get off your fucking high horse. And this is all assuming you aren't just shitposting, but I'm giving you the benefit of doubt. Why not offer the same and stop arguing in bad faith?

Yes

Hitler was not elected. The National Socialism party, who selected Hitler as their leader was.

Also, Nazism is not incorrect. The philosophy was immature, but that's to be expected when you base your governance on a failed Austrian painter.

Knowledge only broadens the mind; If you cannot defend your positions against irrational or incomplete platforms, than it is a failure of your ideology or conveyance thereof, not of the other.

Of course

You have done nothing so far apart from state your opinion and attack the character and intellect of those who tried to debate you, instead of providing your reasons and evidence to back them up.

You are a dishonest and inept debater. Now fuck off.

>Also, Nazism is not incorrect

That's the kind of shit I was expecting you to argue

You guys are not worthy of "good faith", just look at this vile shit your friend posted

Wow, looks like someone read the Cred Forums sticky and is now the new Protagoras, dispensing rhetoric lessons left and right

>If nazism was wrong, then why did Hitler get democratically elected?
You're retarded, he lost the election with like 35% of the vote. He was only appointed Chancellor after 2 others before him failed to properly handle the position, and because the President struck a deal with him to become the Vice-Chancellor.

Then after he became Chancellor he basically removed every other party, called on members of his OWN party to vote for a law that made him able to make laws without parliamentary approval and to ignore the constitution.

Also
>different opinions are literally Hitler
sasuga

...

OP's girl Reminds me of Evangelyne

AAA games with high funding should abide by the rules set by whoever funds them, whatever those rules may be

anything else can abide by the artists intent

Genocide is ethically suspect, Wars of Conquest are ethically suspect.

Nationalism is a rationally defensible position. Social Welfare is a rationally defensible position. Cultural homogeneity is a rationally defensible position.

I'll make you an offer. I'll concede if you have a rational argument against National Socialism; Not 'The Third Riech", not "NATZIS!".

Take your best shot at the idea and I'll find you wanting, because you fail to engage because you rely on a superiority complex and character attacks to support your nebulous positions.

How soft is an elf's pubes?

Except the ears and the hair, I don't see much resemblance

>post about censorship
>picture is tits
Every time

>rehashing the same designs from 70s comics and cartoons every game
>m-m-muh artistic vision ! sjws are threatening it !

>creating something original
>fecking ess jay double wheels taking 'way err jerbs should be silenced

every time

free market + don't give obviouslyovertly sexual / violent / hard to understand games to minors + if you have a problem with something morally write a blog post or shitpost on Cred Forums about it.

also moar tits

Sounds reasonable. Unless the person (or persons) gives money to the guy and say "go do whatever, it's your dream project" or funds it himself, then the artist better listen to what they have to say.

My weakness.

It's not an elf.

PARSEE IS NOT AN ELF
still, it's really smooth and silky

I just wanted to talk about boobs, don't you Cred Forumstards have an occulus thread to derail?

what the fuck?

devs should have total free reign to do whatever the fuck they want

it's their creation, they should have it be developed in the way they see fit. if you don't like it you don't have to play it

even if it's the most niche/taboo/controversial thing on the spectrum it's still their right to make the game the way they want to.

Why don't we let the free market decide? Oh, would you look at that, no one want the fecking ess jay double wheels games, they want their weebshit.
>double-digit sales figures
lmao, even vitashit hits triple digits.

Buy me Dead or Alive Xtreme 3 right now.

Tiddy threads on Cred Forums are the only reason I come to this shitheap.

It would be less of a shitheap if you came for video games instead.

Cute bridge princess (Persian)

no one cares about my opinions