Melee or caster?

>magic missile!

What ABOUT ranger?

both

Don't listen to anti-spellswordfags, they hate fun

Caster who wears enchanted heavy armor and wields a heavy stave that can channel magic that is heavy enough to swat at annoying martials.

But doing max dps is the most fun

I never use casters in any game that lets me not use them.

I choose gun

>longer reach
>can kill "train from child" warrior with one bullet
>can kill mage without noticing me
>lightweight
>reliable
>gentlemen weapon

Melee rogue

yes

melee all day, babe-ayy

Gentlemen and scholars you are. Fighting up close and flinging spelling right in the face of your enemies is the best.

>tfw your DM wouldnt let you play gunslinger in your game of Pathfinder

whats a martial

also any game that lets you wear heavy armor and cast without penalty is casual trash

Always melee, ranged combat can never be as good as melee combat.

Why not both?

Let the faggot elves cast cheesy spells. Real men can handle the wet work.

Melee or non magic ranged

Because being great at one thing is better than being ho-hum in multiple things.

Shut your whore mouth and pick a side.

Melee is best now and always.

In any decently balanced game hybrids will just be mediocre at both things. Hybrid players who whine they should be good at everything are cancer.

just use a magical bow with magnifying spell. It's technically the same as a modern weapon.

Spellsword

you get to take part in melee but you have to put your spells to good use if you want to contribute to the fight

>Tfw casters are bending time and space to his will with a leaf and some dead ants but you just a nigga with a sword.

Never!

>not being so good with your sword you cut through time and space just by swinging it really hard

>T. Skull Knight

Monks are the best obviously.
However, if the world relied on you having magic then the only role to go is Punch Wizard.
I cast fist, the whole fist and nothing but the fist, so help me God.