...
Should Moba (a.k.a Competitive clicking) be considered games?
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
topix.com
twitter.com
Yes, just shit ones.
then pachinko is a video game also?
youtube.com
> tfw you will never have that many dragon dildos
>bernie and not trump
>weed and not vape
>implying pc degenerates don't buy weed rolls from Camacho Hernandez
>/k/ stuff
>PC mustard shits
/k/ is a console only board
what do kittens have to do with pcfat race?
pretty much this
/k/ is essentially arma, RO2, and Project Reality general
Cred Forums is defending Gone Homo's right to be called a video game in another thread, so sure, these shitty fuckin things can be video games too why not.
I'll give you Arma and add STALKER
The rest are not featured on /k/ at all
That's the point
Gone Homo and Undertale are already considered masterpieces by steam users and pc gamers in general.
The point is that they have at least some kind of gameplay - not just autistic clicking.
I'm wondering if Cred Forums will defend pachinko and mobas as real games.
>Gone Homo
>some kind of gameplay
well there is more than clicking
I don't consider gameplay but you could argue it has at least some kind of walking and moves that could be represented as gameplay
> ITT people who suck at video games
Cats are just like PC gamers
>shy
>aggressive
>lazy
>fat
>doesn't take commands
and get angry even when you do what they want
to be honest some already defend that JRPGs and visual novels are games. from that to pachinko and mobas is a thin line
Gameplay needs choices and a failure state.
Stanley Parable makes the cutoff of 'game'
Most JRPGs are gameplay focused despite the texting
The last JRPG I played was radiata stories on PS2 and I know there were story driven only JRPGs back then but most were gameplay focused
>Waking up and first thing in the morning I hear is the sound of rapid mouse clicks from roommate in the other room
>Click click click click!
No thank you.