Explain this

the billboard is so it can sell you a product, thus ok, the game you already bought, so censorship

Im interested, which game?

Kids don't play ads.

I just chalk up as women being the illogical creatures they are.

Actually, I really don't care about either side of the argument...on to the next thread!

Fatal Frame 5, Maiden of Black Water. it's on the Wii U. It's shit. Seriously, you can download the demo off the eShop and then pay for the rest but I couldn't even finish the demo because it was just that fucking bad. But see for yourself if you want, if the demo is still there then it's literally free.

fuck you and all your kind, filthy separatist scum.

There's no difference at all. Bikinis are either ok or they're not.

You've got shit taste man, it's literally the only good Wii U game

behind all the sarcasm, this is basically it. no one thinks for one second they can actually take on advertising companies and win

It's okay for advertising because "muh free market"
The Reaganites have their claws in deeper than you think, comrade.

Testing the timer.

anime and manga content is untouched, unbound, untainted by SJW and political agenda.

why did you allow it to happen to video games Cred Forums?

>mfw people dont even give a fuck that games are age restricted anymore
if its 15+ then the content isnt intended for younger audiences
i mean shit ive known kids who play MKX and their mothers dont like videogames because they can show girls in bikinis
its like shit nigga cmon now

that being said they were the last dregs of the technological inept generation
from this point onward families and new parents will actually understand what a videogame is and be able to decide if the true content of the game is inappropriate for their kids
They will probably allow call of duty and battlefield, maybe UFC too.

>Vivid Yellow

She was the best Vivid. Even better than Green.

>Muh moral society user kun

Because (((they))) get money from the left and not the right since it's japanese.

Then why does my copy of Dragon Ball have Bulma's tits covered in bubbles when Yamcha's spying on her?

We are too shy and our hair color is too natural.

go back to 8gag fucking gator

Not to mention that the advertisement on the right was approved for public viewing while the one on the right is specifically for an older audience.
You gotta love the idiots on Cred Forums that would call someone a loser for liking bikinis in videogames when the rest of society enjoys bikinis in all other forms of media.
Are people who rally against bikinis in videogames as something that makes people look immature genuinely mentally retarded? Because to anybody with a functioning brain it seems unreasonable to specifically target videogames with completely different set of standards that fall apart the moment you look at reality.

Nice argument.

Are parents fucking blind? They all seem to understand what R16+ means for a TV show or a movie, and then they buy God of War for little Timmy and are shocked, SHOCKED, that it contains violence and sex. There's literally no reason for this.

One of your examples is a swimsuit company advertising their swimwear.

The other is a costume that was removed because a publisher didn't want fan service to adversely affect their reputation.

It does? The White, Red, and Big Books are all uncensored.

Also, Fatal Frame has possibly the most juvenile use of erotica in a horror game next to RE6.

Semi-serious answer:

That ad is shameless porn, while some video games pretend to be """""art""""" and then immediately juxtapose thinly-veiled fapbait (see MGS5)

Dunno why people get angry about cases in vidya where it's also shameless porn (DoA), but it's why I sometimes have an issue with it.

This is a bit disingenuous, considering plenty of people criticize the sexualization of minors in the media. But apparently anything that people don't complain about on Kotaku or Jezebel doesn't exist, so I guess it's easier to ignore.

This is true. The weird thing is that video games use "think of the children!" argument, which makes no sense. It's not a game aimed at kids, so they shouldn't be part of the equation. It's like saying "You can't have sex scenes in Game of Thrones, think of the kids!" They shouldn't be fucking watching it in the first place.

Meanwhile, the whole kid angle completely fails for advertising. Look at that billboard. Anybody can see it, including kids. On TV you can see bikini ads all the time and it's not like the ads are magically perceivable only to adults.

Also, why is it that having tits in video games automatically makes you a loser virgin weeb? Like, let's use Game of Thrones again. That has way more bare tits than most games that aren't straight up porn. No one gives a shit, no one thinks any less of you. But you have a cute girl in a bikini in a video game and you're a beta cuck no lifer who lives in their parent's basement for playing it.

user there are thousands of art pieces that show or represent naked women, what you're saying doesn't make much sense to me.

>actress is a major slut in movies
>.......
>fictional video game character wears a bikini
>OH MY GOD

That's true. Why does classic art get a free pass for showing genitalia? If I made a giant statue of a naked man with his dick out for all to see, I'd get arrested. If I put up the statue of David, it's fine.

Seriously, is it just a time thing? Like, in 1000 years will furry porn from Deviant Art be shown in prestigious museums as curious exhibits of an age long past?

BUT VIDEO GAMES ARE FOR CHILDREN user!

Tasteful vs not-tasteful nudes. Nudity in "real" art tends to be there to convey some sort of point either in a thematic or in the case of ancient art an anatomical sense and (mostly) isn't just blatant fapbait.

Most of the time nudity in vidya is blatant pandering fapbait and at the very least it shouldn't pretend it's anything else.

So are cartoons, but everyone seems to accept stuff like South Park ain't for little Billy and Suzy.

Prove it.

For all you know, we're just hanging up ancient porn and gushing over how the ancient Greeks were so serious about anatomy or some shit about fertility cults when in reality one guy just makes good porn and another dude made a gangbang drawing.

Is there a reason why everyone thinks games are for kids? Sure it might of started that way, but we've come a long way since then. Plus, every time you think of a gamer you think of someone at least in their teens rather that a small child.

>a long way since then
Not long enough.

A lot of art is just trying to represent beauty, in other words, ancentral fapbait.

Stigma. GoT has real people, video games look cartoony to an extent, I think you've seen all the "why don't you watch real porn" arguments.

Honestly, that shit don't fly man. Imagine if you walked in on someone drawing a naked furry dog man with his red rocket hanging out and he's like "I-I'm just trying to represent beauty!"

>might of
Because most people who play a lot of vidya are retards.

I agree. Bodyshaming should have been banned on all levels.

It's what you get when the public education system (and some private institutions too) decide to start shoving liberal/progressive propaganda down the children's throats 7 hours daily, monday to friday.

>Bodies should have been banned on all levels.
Fixed.

Well maybe thats his idea of beauty.
Do you honestly believe no artist ever hotdogged a statue?
Just thin about that sweet and soft marble ass.

Sure thing friend.

Take a look at the Vitruvian Man, a fairly famous drawing by Leonardo Da Vinci. Sure the man has a fairly prominent dong, but it's clearly not the focus. Da Vinci's trying to accurately model the poses and movement of the human body, and the text that accompanies it is his drabbles on the mathematical proportions of the human body.

Or we can talk about Michaelangelo's Last Judgement, a religious painting involving lots and lots of naked dudes. It itself was controversial in its time for all the nudity, but he justified it because the nudity was to make a specific point that us humans were all naked and exposed in front of the power and omnipotence of Jesus.

Or in other words, you generally didn't see artists painting naked ladies squirming on the ground and then when questioned sputter out "b-but she breathes through her skin!". They depicted nudity for a purpose, either a thematic, anatomical or even a religious purpose. They weren't just blatant fapbait.

Most video games on the other hand? Blatant fapbait.

>Implying I can't masturbate outside to a billboard.
I'll fucking show you.

>marble
>soft

I forget the name, but there is a statue fetish apparently. Countless men (and women) will either masturbate to or bring pleasure to themselves using statues. Plus you have shit like figure hotgluing, so it's fine.

>Using sex appeal to sell cars is okay
>Using sex appeal to sell games is not okay

>Cherry picking
Nigger do you not know how much art was essentially pornography? Or are those works not artistic because 'insert arbitrary reason here'

You can cherry pic 1000s of examples of nudity not equating to sexuality in a work of art and I can pick 1001 of art that does the opposite.

>I can pick 1001 of art that does the opposite.

Ok

Go ahead

It's because the video game industry is a baby compared to film, music, ads, whatever, and it still listens to dumb cunts and gives them a platform.

To be fair, he did say you had to cherry pick 1000 examples first.

well fuck you got me there

gg

Feminists and SJWs aren't into cars.

Thats because when SJWs tried to press auto industry, they throw monkey wrench with tire rims as bonus to those numales and dykes.
People in game industry are too soft or worse filled by sjws.

user that is 2 cases, doesn't really prove all artistic depictions of nudity are tasteful.
Actually it used to be considered tasteless to paint naked bodies if the ones represented weren't mythological beings or the piece had no religious theme. There are cases of people comissioning the painting of naked women for their private collections such as La maja desnuda.
We are humans user, it's only natural.

>Arguing with someone about Fatal Frame V censorship
>"It's not censorship, it's cultural sensitivity!"
>"It would look stupid to explore a haunted house in a bikini!"
>"Why didn't they complain when x happened?"
>She was from the UK

These people go to ridiculous lengths to defend that shit.

>Go ahead

The Dream of the Fisherman's Wife
Literally any and all sculptures of Aphrodite
The Incubus Leaving two Sleeping Women

There that's at least 2 of your examples plus 1. Now please go and extrapolate on how those are somehow not artistic works.

>"It would look stupid to explore a haunted house in a bikini!"
That happens in every single horror movie, just after the token black guy dies.

>it's easier to ignore.
Congratulation, you have found the secret of American media.

The sexualization of advertisement has been a major complaint for decades though?

>Freedom of expression is important!

>DON'T SEXUALIZE ART THAT'S NOT RIGHT YOU FUCKING SEXIST ARTIST PIGS

Both are wrong.

They don't even care about freedom of expression, what they want is protected speech. AKA anything they don't like is "hate speech" or "problematic content" and must be banned.

Just look at the entire PC and safe space culture that's been cultivated in the US and Europe during the last few years.

It's like that almost everywhere
Over in Japan butts, boobs, hips and all sorts of bare nakedness is alright.

But nipples is a step too far apparently, that's just fucking degeneracy. Pic related is the Aphrodite scene from God of War in Japanese.

Whoops, wrong pic.

These things offend your SJW boogeymans just as much, but both are hughmungous, established industries. Gaming is both:

1) Still relatively new
2) Full of leftists who cater to bitching more easily

except neither are, get over yourself

I always had the impression they tolerated nipples and it was penises/vaginas they had a problem with.

Japan is pretty bizarre in regards to what's allowed in their media.

Feminists have been bitching about ads like that for ages but I guess an UNDERAGED LIL SHIT WHO NEEDS TO GET HIS SKULL BASHED IN WITH A FUUUUUUCKIN HAMMER WOULDN'T KNOW THAT RIGHT?!

Officially, either penis, vagina, nipples and as of recent years, detailed cameltoe will get a game rejected by CERO. Not given a Z rating, just outright not rejected. Obviously H games get by it by not being rated anyway but I still find it weird how those games still get mosaics.

>Denise Milani will never have blue eyes

amerifat

Because Japan is aware of the fact that they're fictional characters

Video games are in a really weird place as a medium of entertainment. Especially with the name "Video Games", which follows the idea that "games are for kids". It's developing as there are more different kind of games besides "Click on man to kill" coming out, but they don't necessarily get the same media coverage. As well as the game industry in general not colliding with more "mature" topics very often.

The newspaper has sports, maybe movies, if there's a book with a lot of media presence they'll do a bit on that. But video-games as a medium don't get the respect that other mediums do, and as such are viewed as "childish" and "not worth an adult's time", but that's changing slowly, especially as "walking simulators", love them or hate them, are showing something "different" that game devs can do to tell a story, that very few other mediums can.

can't agree more

lol no fucker

It's not just about haunted houses and shit though, see

What effect would Pokemon Go have? Even complete normies who don't give a shit about Pokemon or video games know about it because of how much coverage it gets in the media.

Of course not, that'd be crazy. You bring them and then demand everyone conforms to your personal standards and tastes like any reasonable human would.

Because they have been brainwashed to think mosaics are sexier than the real thing (vag or dick).
I shit you not.

what are you talking about

lots of people complain about bikini ads on bus stops, TV, billboards newspapers and more

>Muh video games are still only for children

Normies still actually believe this

why does Japan hate nipples?

Cero going full apeshit.

>But you have a cute girl in a bikini in a video game and you're a beta cuck no lifer who lives in their parent's basement for playing it.
You got it the wrong way around. Beta cuck no lifers who live in their parent's basement are the main ones playing those games, so it's a natural assumption to make. GoT is popular and lots of people watch it, not just a small group of people that can easily be pigeonholed.

It's hard to tell, I'm going to assume that the fallout from Pokemon Go will be more important in the industry itself than in media. Unless other companies take it as a cue to try more experimental and unusual ideas for games, Pokemon Go will just be regarded by conventional media as a phenomenon, a weird thing that happened, as opposed to evidence of videogames being more than just "games".

The other problem is that Pokemon Go is less about being a videogame and more about the exercise, going outside, and socialising aspect. Ideally, I think we need a big hit in the realm of conventional gaming, a new property that appeals to the masses chasing the shadow of Pokemon Go while it's still fresh in people's minds.

Who knows if it'll happen, at this point for every "good" game, there's many that won't do anything to break people's perception of games, combined with the time investment in a lot of games, it's an uphill battle of astonishing proportions. It's probably the one place where the industry SHOULD look to movies for inspiration, I'm not a movie buff, but maybe there's something there to get a guide from. What took movies and television from "mindless entertainment" to "mature passtime"?

Apparently, Japan tried really hard to conform to western sensibilities when it came to censorship to catch up to the rest of the world. Then the western world got over themselves and stopped censoring porn, but Japan never got the memo. Or rather...

Firstly, no member of parliament is going to move for the removal of censorship. They'll be seen as a porn loving pervert, they'd never be elected again.

Secondly, the porn industry employs literally hundreds of people to do the censoring. Ending censorship immediately puts them all out of a job. No one wants to be the guy that put hundreds of people out of a job, they'd never be elected again.

You're absolutely right. Looking at virtually any online newspaper (at least nationally where I'm from), they have sections for music, books, movies and often theater. The fact that video games are missing from this lineup, even though they matter a lot to an increasing number of people is just odd. No wonder the impression of kiddie stuff remains when no media is willing to treat it equally as the rest.

I partly blame old people in charge of the content, but also the video game industry for being content with the current situation. There's few creators that challenge the status quo.

women run this cuck of a country
soon literally
how did america fall so far

any chance it'll change?

Well it's OBVIOUSLY because video games are a cis-gender white-male power trip and objectifying women is bad and stuff

>Secondly, the porn industry employs literally hundreds of people to do the censoring.
They're retarded.
A black square is all you need.

Cero, the Japanese ESRB equivalent, doesn't like bare tiddies or human dismemberment.

see tl;dr: expect it to get worse.

That would end up giving CERO more work.
I'm sure none of them are complaining that they have the ability to just not have to rate something if they don't want to.

>Go to beach
>Everyone is half naked

Censor this please.

>left side has a native head company with abudant access to resources and lawyers who can maneuver and fight ratings
>right side has a foreign head company with less access to resources and lawyers who can maneuver and fight ratings

Alternatively, because FUCKING NINTENDO OF AMERICA

truth. the kardashian sisters were underage for the longest, and yet, their instagram had a massive following of perverts looking to spank it to their revealing photos.

america needs to shut the fuck up and stop trying to dictate what other countries should do.

bikini = appropriate for a beach
bikin = not appropriate for haunted school house

pretty easy to comprehend, no?

>plenty of people criticize the sexualization of minors in the media
Clearly not enough

Speaking of CERO reminds me of this interview with Sakurai

sourcegaming.info/2015/09/18/cero-and-palutenas-censorship/

Everything is a masturbatory aid if you believe in yourself, user.

>Rated M
>Gravure stuff was plot relevant
>Suicides, human sacrifice etc are all fine
Fuck NoA.
>You bought a wii-u for FF5
>Wii-u abandoned already
>#FE censored too
>BS censored even the artbook
>FE If censored
Never again are Nintendo getting my money.

Bikini is appropriate for a gravure idol shoot.

>NoA keeps localising idol games, keeps getting surprised that idols dress up in clothes designed to excite men (and some women)

You ever see a fly ramming their head into a window trying to fly out? And there's another window open in the same room, but the fly is too retarded to figure this out?

>>Gravure stuff was plot relevant
you actually believe that huh

It's their revenge for foreigners calling them nips.

Don't tell an artist what is and isn't appropriate for their art faggot

>Sex is used to sell
>Cars
>Clothes
>Food
>Movies
>Music
>Men's magazines
>Women's magazines
>Fashion
>Alcohol
>Etc
But use it to sell or even be present in games?
>Losers, neckbeard virgins, misogynerds!
LMAO! The only reason this is accepted is because the industry is full of spineless, white knight betas who can't even conceive of saying no to a woman, that actually believe videogames are uniquely bad when it comes to these things, despite all available evidence.

Bikinis are always appropriate.

it's all very simple. looking at women wearing bikinis is acceptable because those women put it on to get attention, and by looking at them you're giving it to them. on the other hand looking at bikinis in video games is taking attention away from them. it's also considered ok to show celebrities' asses on the cover of redbook right next to the candy bars at the grocery store check out, but men's magazines with girls on the cover are wrapped in plastic to protect children from seeing them. this seems hypocritical until you realize that women have an "do what I say and not what I do" mentality.

Especially with camel toes

this reminds me of the guy that said wearing a bikini to the store is somehow taboo.

adult magazine = for adults
kids game = for kids

>""""""""""aid""""""""""

What did he mean by this?

I would not say it's taboo, but it would be weird/inappropriate.

except the adult magazines are displayed next to candy and coloring books for kids, right at eye level for a 6 year old.

not on a coast city

It's an unlockable outfit after you beat the game isn't it? Why not go silly?
Or do we have to apply realism and what is appropriate to unlockable extra content lest it cut from the game?

>coloring books for kids
user...

If SJWs could manage, they'd take them out of ads too.

I live in a coastal city and not once have I ever seen someone grocery shop in a bikini.

>Mom had shittons of magazines just like this
>See news channels decrying "sexy" shit while simultaneously advertising it
>see "sexy" commercials constantly, even on cartoon network because lol demographics
>saw shitty "adult" movies with titties in them all the time because of adults
>went to shitty stores filled with lingerie, bra's and underwear because, mom.
>go to pools and see actual girls in bikini's don't give a fuck.

Pretty sure kids see this shit all the time, they live in a world with adults after all.

I never really gave a shit because I just wanted to watch cartoons and play video games.

you don't go out enough. i've seen plenty of people at walmart in a bikini, down here in galveston.

this

>walmart
there's the fucking problem. literal human trash store.

That reminds me. Once I was shopping with my dad and little brother. Little bro puts a box of condoms on the conveyor belt. Dad and I were like "Woah what the fuck" and asked him what he was doing.

He thought it was gum.

Condoms were sold by the checkout counter, alongside candy and nuts and shit. It even had pictures of sexy ladies on it and he still thought it was gum.

Video games are a smaller target, advertising is too big for the New Age Soccer Moms, SJWs.

But the games on the right are rated T for teen, not little kids an adult would have to buy it for child to even have access to the content, if the parent so wished.
But the ones on the left are much more sexual and are open for all to browse.
It's an obvious contradiction and double standard of how people the two mediums, so stop trying to come up with a logical reason where there is none.

>It even had pictures of sexy ladies on it and he still thought it was gum.

Well obviously he thought it was sexy gum.

subway, starbucks, heb, sunglass hut, 7/11, the mall, etc.

it's not uncommon at all to see people out in swimwear. when I was younger, I would go shirtless inside of many stores along the seawall.

if we're talking about utah, or kansas, then I could understand why it might be weird to see someone out in a bikini.

not sure what your implying with this. adult coloring books are now a thing, if that's your meaning.

also, the magazines are next to the candy display, which everyone that's ever worked a grocery store knows, was designed that way to attract kid's attention.

underrated post

>I live in a coastal city and not once have I ever seen someone grocery shop in a bikini.

Bullshit. I don't believe a single thing you say. I go to the stores near the beach in new york and there's always someone in a bikini there during summertime.

If by underrated you mean edgy as fuck.

the video game industry is worth a fuckton of money these days tho

maybe, but they're not wrong, well except for the stuff about OP deserving to have their skull bashed in

I'm pretty sure the Islamic Kingdom of Britain banned bikinis in ads.

Thats probably an adult colouring book, it was a fad a while back.

They gave us shitty Nintendo outfits in return.
Luckily the game was shit, so no need for bitterness.

And women who sunbathe topless.
The media churns out shit and then acts mystified as to why those things are more common, I despise the media.
>We wont release the id of the shooting suspect, we wont give them attention that shooters crave- - Sheriff
>It's believed the shooter was ******* *huge image* - media
>Why are there so many shootings? It's clearly guns, and us giving them so much coverage has nothing to do with it.

In Londonistan. They used the bodyshaming excuse.

Everybody involved takes a bit of the blame, the masses for assuming a medium in it's infancy should instantly be at the same level as mediums that have had years to develop their way into society.

Old media hounds for stagnating their content, and pandering exclusively to the audience they already have (old people who don't want "them childish vidya-gaems" getting in the way of their "serious" news).

The industry, which as it becomes more profit driven, is less likely to take risks, and is content with the current state of thing, as well as idealising "cinema" and other mediums, to the point of using it as a selling point ("No really, it's a good game, we got a hollywood writer to help make it").

The consumers, for lots of little reasons, that pile up. There's lots of infighting among communities, with the current "SJW" thing everything is either "pro" or "against", very little just exists because it was the creator's idea. Also we tend to thrive on controversy, when a dev or trailer makes a stuff up, the community goes up in arms about it (even if it's only for like a week or something). Dishonesty in video-game media is weirdly permitted compared to others as well, weirdly enough due to the whole "entitled gamer" thing. A lot of gamers (mostly on PC), know about computers, and mods, and games in general. So where another medium might go "oh, that wasn't as good as I thought it would be", we sometimes go "Umm... you showed us a trailer, why was that shit a blatant lie? I can see the fucking code, why did you lock the framerate/resolution/quality?" (with varying levels of reasonability, sometimes we're on the money, other times there's a reason for it and it turns into just whinging and whining... but the games are sold for $60, so we're justified right?).

Not to mention the price point, and different payment models of games. Frankly, it's a hard thing to get involved in if you don't start out as a kid or treating it as a kid would "just for fun".

I believe the word you want is sultanate, as in, Sultanate of Britain. Just a suggestion.

Caliphate.

It also seems that there is no chance of this situation changing in upcoming years with EU becoming a shitskin central and US having both presdential candidates saying that games are evil.

My problem is that I live in New Zealand, which is next to Australia. Australia is SUPER weird about sexuality. Not just in games, but it does affect games. Fucking Australia keeps cockblocking the entire Oceanic region, those underarm bowling bludgers.

>And women who sunbathe topless.
I didn't even know that was a thing until movies and TV told me it was.

The caliph is like a muslm pope while a sultan is the equivalent to a king.

I blame the English. If they could've just listened to the French and unclenched their arseholes a little bit, the whole English-speaking world would've been better off for it.

Western civilization was a mistake, genocide when?

>Adult versus minor
>Billboard ad versus rape connotations

Why do you guys try so hard to bait those (you)s?

In most of europe people dont give a shit about nudity at all.
Being amerifat must suck.

Made me kek.

>not liking rape

What manga is she from?

Point is, the interactivity. In vidya you can do whatever you want to female avatar. Real life ? Not so much unless she want sex. Bikini is not actually problem here, just a fucking excuse for media or what fuck ever sjw is

>mobile games

What's the downside to showing kids tits anyway?

Ads are masturbatory aids
why do you think theres magazines in some peoples toilets
sure some people might read them for something to do whilst taking a shit
but plenty dont

but i guess now everyone has a smart phone so you can waste time with that and also get your rocks off too.

If I were a woman I'd walk around in public scantily. I know how important it is to preteens that they get to see half a boob. That half a boob can be their fap fuel for a full 6 months.

What's wrong with some games being fap tools? Isn't that kink shaming? Thats just as bigoted as homophobia if some anons want to fap to 3d girls that's no one else's business

Huh. I never thought about it. Like, as a kid you've probably seen your dad's dick or your mom's tits anyway right? Personally I assume part of it is due to "WHAT IF KIDS TRY SEX AND GET PREGNANT", which could be prevented with proper sex ed. Which leads to my second assumption that no one wants to teach sex ed because it's embarrassing as fuck, so they just pretend kids aren't into sex at all or go for a blanket ban on it.

Probably something along the lines that it'll objectify women.

I know there are some femanon hambeasts here on Cred Forums. It's the (second?) most popular board on Cred Forums, and bitches love things that are popular.

So it's time to fess up. Do you personally feel like your womanhood is at risk when you see fictional women with attractive features? Do you feel envy or anger? Or nothing?

If you show boys boobs they might actually become heterosexual, which cannot be allowed to pass.

i like to play as the hot chicks, same as any escapist stuff i'd imagine

I wouldn't go scantily dressed, but I would go with sexy panties or even pantyless and "accidentally" give panty shots.

Has Viz ever released a completely uncensored set of DB yet or is it still all over the place in which volumes are censored and which aren't?

The only women here are women (male)

Both should be prohibited.

I don't but I know some who do, I bought my friend Skullgirls and his sister wouldn't let him play it if she was around, she's extremely insecure just generally too. I don't give a hoot but I'm well aware I'm ugly so I'm not really bothered by it.

You always see thiccfags around, you'd think hambeasts would be more popular. At least on Cred Forums or something. Besides, it's like that one joke right?

>How is a fat woman like a scooter?
>They're fun to ride but you wouldn't want to be seen doing it

Occidental society it's retarded and hypocrite

>they might actually become heterosexual
what a frightening thought

There isn't any.
But people, especially Americans it seems, don't like kids knowing about anything related to sex. They see nudity and think "sex", even if nudity doesn't have to have anything to do with sex.

I think I need a soma. Reading that really triggered me.

Wait, what's wrong with the ME3/trans porn actor thing? They modeled the character after someone who looked sexy, and it worked. Sure (s)he is trans, but it doesn't change the fact they look sexy and the character looks sexy.

You mean american society.

In the rest of the western world, we don't make a big deal of boobies. Being topless is natural at the beach. In fact, you can see them on TV even during "regular" hours while in the US you are ok with showing a car chase live but make a big deal of a breast.

Hell, even your cinema make you look like the worst lover ever : in almost every fucking hollywood movie the girl keep her bra while making love. It just makes no fucking sense.

When I was like 14 I was sitting in class minding my own business when the THICC girl in front of me did what pic related shows to talk with the girl in front of her. She wasn't wearing panties and I got to see a legit puffy pantyhose cameltoe.
That was a good day.

Did that make you a thiccfag from then on?

Maybe. I just now remembered that event.

It's a self-fulfilling prophesy.
>Hide the boobs! The kids can't handle it!
So showing off your boobs becomes a big thing, since it's rare to see them. People react when they see a boob.
>See? They're really interested and offended and shocked every time they see a boob! We were right!

>considering plenty of people criticize the sexualization of minors in the media
lol this hasn't happened since the early 80's.
Get any Teen tv show and it's about a supposedly 12-13 year old kids wearing make up that must have their first love experience

its obvious that certain groups are interested in supplanting gamings original culture with their own...

isn´t kylie jenner and co still 16? Didn´t she have an Puma ad where is halfnaked? Why is no one complaining about that?

There hasn't been any discussion in my country about videogames since age ratings were established after Manhunt.
None. Slap an 18 rating on it and you can sell it. Problem solved.

Let's hope SJW-ism doesn't catch on here.

This. I was in Barcelona a few months back and I saw naked bodies everywhere.

Which isn't always a good thing (60 year old penises bah).

None.
Pokemon Go could've been the biggest game of the century, but nooo Niantic had to give it to 10 DESIGNATED H1Bs.

>10 designated H1Bs

What does this even mean? I do feel like Go is under utilized. It should have more interactivity with other players I think, like being able to trade Pokemon or a friends list so you can see what your friends are up to and what pokemon they have. Trading is a big one. If you live in a landlocked state like Utah, you probably aren't going to find enough water to get water pokemon from.

It's a bad meme for shitty programmers from India.
Pokemon Go is not much more than Ingress with a Pokemon skin.

Huh. Now that I think about it, there's absolutely none. I mean, kids engage in nipple-sucking at the earliest parts of their life, and bathe with their parents regularly. Then at some point it's not okay for them to see breasts, and then after they reach adulthood they're shunned for seeing breasts.

Holy crap Americans are fucked up in the head.

I recall reading something. There was this tribe of people somewhere that had no contact with the outside world for ages. So they had some unique values. One of them was that the women were topless, just like the men. One day, an explorer asked about this. The woman he asked didn't understand, the explorer had to explain that the west sees boobs as taboo first in order for the woman to understand why not wearing a shirt was such a big deal for him.

The woman just laughed and said something like "Boobs are just for babies. Why are you so worried about baby things?"

Well that's africans they're arse people typically.

To answer why all of this censorship anti-fun shit is happening is very simple. Allowing us evil privileged people even a modicum of ability to escape quietly into any form of media just isn't on the cards. Whoever is pushing it all wants us to experience every miserable second until we wind up either utterly demoralised or going utterly insane.

I think it was like the Amazon or Papa New Guinea or something.

>Then at some point it's not okay for them to see breasts,
Have you never really thought about why this is?

It's because of bras. They inherently exist to improve the female appearance. Seeing a naked titty is like seeing a woman without makeup on, they're exposed for the liars they are. That's where the taboo comes from.

Funny thing about bras. Apparently if you don't wear them then breasts will sag due to the weight as you'd expect. But... if you wear them TOO much then you don't develop the muscles required to support the weight of your own breasts so they sag anyway. So it's really important to not wear a bra for a while during puberty, when your breasts start to develop. Apparently the best thing to do is to only wear a bra sometimes, like wear one when you go out but take them off when you come home.

Of course, the best thing to do is just be a member of the DFC master race and never have to worry about sagging tits in the first place.

the answer is: real women making money is good
telling a real woman what she can't do with her body is against their mentality, but telling men and women who design a fictional woman what they can't and can do is okay
a real woman can tatoo cum slut on her forehead that they would see it as empowering

That is false.

It's literally the best PZ game.

Get a clue

>2013

Umm... no it isn't. Anime has been turning leftist for a while now. You've got anime like Kabanari of the Iron Fortress where Bibi was right, but still got his ass kicked by moralfags. You've got Gate which is pro Japan which I'm fine with but is pretty political.

Not to mention a lot of these edgy mangas are blantantly communist and libtard such as Maou no Hajitial. Despite the edgyness it's very libtard such as the MC hating men, looking very feminine, his hatred of masculinity, his hate of capitalism since he hates taraffis.

So yea, anime isn't safe from sjw and libtard propaganda.

Yeah, but I don't give a fuck about any of the shit.
They still have fucking cute girls.

this

>Bibi was right
What? He was a genocidal maniac with daddy issues and a boner for corpses.

Holy shit people like you should off themselves because you will never make any actual progress happen towards your political views. Instead you join an echo chamber like Cred Forums and become more and more insufferably autistic to the point where you can't have a coherent conversation because everything you say is behind 7 slippery slope logical fallacies and the other person doesn't care about politics.

This.

>If I spout buzzwords it will mean something

Try staying in your Cred Forums quarantine board, you mentally stunted moron.

Americans are ultra cucked

Cred Forums Pass user since November 2013.

In japan its only allowed when children are exposed

>Cred Forums Pass user since November 2013.

Because soccer moms think bikinis in vidya not for kids "are pandering towards kids unlike those ads that are directly aimed at a reasonable adult like [me]". Also hypocrites.

>People freak out if girls are in bikinis in video games
No one actually does this you fucking retard.

Cred Forums Pass user since October 2016.

>2016
>not having a Cred Forums gold account

Cred Forums Pass user since August 2016.

based goldenbros

Cred Forums Pass user since November 2013.

>took German classes in high school
>teacher was smoking hot, and she liked to wear short skirts and stockings
>she also liked to sit on her desk, legs crossed
>would sometimes rearrange her legs, giving those of us sitting at the right desk a an amazing view

I didn't actually learn any German in that class.

TEst you faggots

>Allowing us evil privileged people even a modicum of ability to escape

We are privileged as men when it comes to sexual escapism.

Think about all the porn and fanservice you've been given for free in your life. Women didn't have that privilege in their life.

>no pass

Girls on billboards are not underage. Kill yourself you fucking pedo.

>seeing an adult wearing a bikini
vs
>seeing an underage wearing a bikini

Whelp

think JAV, not doujins/H-manga

Womyn are free to make all the porn and fan service they want too, they just don't because they have different sexual needs, you know sexual dimorphism

16 is legal in 90% of the world

>make

But that's the difference. Men are given fanservice for free to the point of having it too much. You haven't worked for it.

What do you mean given? What is an example

To be fair SJWs also bitch about muh objectification of women in giant ads, it's just that marketing companies simple doesn't give a fuck because they know that sells. In the other hand non-japanese/slav vidya companies are filled with beta orbiter faggots who can't stand for what they like and want.

There is no explanation other than vidya is a relatively new medium and therefore weak. The morally broken are always on the hunt for weak preys.

The public bikini woman CHOOSES to show her bikini. The private artificial one is PROGRAMMED to show you her bikini, thus not a choice and highly "immoral"

Any fanservice that doesn't have anything to do with game's plot or sexy ads that don't have anything to do with the product.

Porn is +18 everywhere though. And naked things.

sjws are all conspiring to take over the game industry fresh out of their useless gender studies college education because otherwise they would have to work at mcdonalds

Games are art and artists are free to make whatever they want, and those ads were likely made by men because they know it sells so men weren't given anything, they made it.

What if they were designed by a grill like Bayo was?

And who are you to decide that men have "too much" fan service? Do you want womyn to wear mudslime beekeeper suits?

I'm sure it would get down to "male oppression" shit

Women dont need the porn and fanservie. They get the real stuff much easier.

Because Video Games are low art and have the smallest lifespan, they're the easiest target for fir change.

They aren't free to do anything they want. Artist that did things for women would get fired.

Modern men are desensitized to porn.

You could get real stuff too, but you don't because games give it for free. That's privilege.

Fir change is the worst change desu

>Women dont need the porn and fanservie
What are
>twilight, 50 shades of grey, magic mike etc.
>bodice rippers
>otome games

There's shitloads of female-oriented fanservice around and it's incredibly disingenuous to claim otherwise.

Because videogames are generally seen as entertainment for under 18 people.

This thread is dildos

Womyn are capable of making art/videgames too if they want to make something for womyn they can

>Modern men are desensitized to porn

You're making a generalization there, where are the proofs?

Source

Because regardless of the age ratings, most of these games are aimed at selling to kids and teenagers. The age rating makes it more enticing, and I honestly hope these games are being made easier because they are trying to make sure kids can play in addition to any ol adult dumbass. But they may be (rightfully) cynical enough to think that some people are at a child's level when designing some of these games.

They don't get fanservice forced into normal media like men.

IMO whether it's created by a man or a woman shouldn't matter. While women would naturally have a more informed perspective on writing/designing female characters, bringing up the fact that a woman created it is not only a piss-weak argument, it unintentionally invokes a double-standard where works are judged differently based on the gender of its creator.

ITT: neckbeards who will never have sex are angry, because they need to masturbate during vidya

I dunno, there are pretty huge amounts of shirtless muscledudes in hollywood. Or is it male powefantasy-pabdering at that point?

>"""""""""""normal media"""""""""""

>I ask you all not to upload what I said here on the net
>not only was it uploaded, it was also translated to english
Why did you betray him, anons?

>236 pages
This better be good.

pass dat sauce bruh

50 years ago men got satisfaction for weeks from woman showing her boobs, but modern men need at least 2 dicks inside the woman and probably the woman having a dick too to gain any satisfaction at all.

meant to

Don't assume the trash coming here are the modern men

America is the most retarded country on the planet. It's a literal nation of hypocrites.

Takes trash to know trash evidently.

That's retarded

Tell what's supposed to be wrong about those words.

That only effects some people though, it's the effect of the internet and easy access to porn it was inevitable.

Trying to police male sexuality isn't going to achieve much, just ask the religious right, the horse shoe theory is real.

"Normal media" doesn't fucking mean anything, especially when billion dollar hollywood movies are apparently not "normal media".

iqdb gave me nothing. pass a panda link, friendo

>That only effects some people though
The same people who can't stop crying when their anime tits are covered?

It's still a privilege that women don't have.

Women don't have internet access?

Sure, whatever you say officer.

*Weeeoooo weeeoooo weeeooo*

No they don't, and they're not capable of making their own art/porn/videogames either, men have the privilege of being uniquely capable of doing all those things

top fukin kek

This was meant for this
>

Hambeasts aren't real thick

>You always see thiccfags around, you'd think hambeasts would be more popular.
I wouldn't be surprised if it's hambeasts who are pushing that joke.

>People freak out if girls are in bikinis in video games
How many people actually freak out about it though? Seems like only a vocal minority care.

It's real unfortunate that the minority gets attention from the creators.
a.pomf.cat/rrsbkw.webm

>pretending you've ever worked for your porn

What do you mean work for porn?, If you mean paying for it then yes I have paid for it.

because everyone low-key thinks 16yr olds are hot

I think they mean,"have you created porn", since the post they're replying to implies men can do that.

It's sarcasm, user.

No I haven't, but this isn't about me it's about men vs womyn in general I guess

I know, I'm just clarifying what I think they meant.

I really want a game that takes place in this type of dystopia

>Public
>Private
In private you can masturbate.

UGH, is it too much to ask for the video game industry to stop pandering to sexist males?

corporation only follow ecoshit, vegan, LGBT, SJW and pro woman shit because it give them money

There is no real support from companies and governments, they only do it to win the popularity contest and money.

When those movements are not profitable anymore, they are gonna ditch them and follow the next fad.

Poe's law at full force here. Up until the last panel I thought this was going to be a satire about social justice.

mericans like to think they are pure respected people, but his country is home from most perversion you could imagine.

>drugs
>child prostitution
>violence
>torture
>alcohol
>discrimination

I've seen people actually act this way, at one point someone was surprised that a non-white person had an accent, this was somehow racist, it was not a forced accent either it's just how they talked. "wow, just casual racism everywhere in these old movies"

>that art style
Why is this a thing?

>child prostitution
what

I thought this would be a fatal frame thread

...

Spookiest Twilight Zone episode ever.

youtube.com/watch?v=2vjPBrBU-TM
>america

So are floor tiles. Your point?

Jesus fucking Christ.
Do they realize that it's a character saying these things? Not a real person? What if the character is sexist and homophobic?
WHY CAN'T THEY REALIZE THIS SIMPLE SHIT?!
AHHHH

do you know what else is gross?
this artstyle

Literally pedophilia.

...

>A single movie contains all this sexism, racism, homophobia, and transphobia
What the fuck is she watching?
Seriously though, if anything, it's done on purpose. It's part of the movie, whether it be the personality of one character, or something else. Why the fuck can't SJWs realize this shit?
Also, the generalization of the 90's sucking makes me angrier than anything else in this comic. You can't base a generalization of an entire fucking decade off of one movie that triggers you.

>Tv shows kill children all the time now

>I can't kill kids in video games

Someone said it was Ace Ventura a while ago.

>mosaics are sexier

They are.

slantmagazine.com/house/article/sinful-cinema-ace-ventura-pet-detective-the-most-offensive-and-homophobic-football-movie-ever-made

But video games are for children user. Yes, all of them, without exception.

Look at this brainwashed jap fucking shit.

>that comments section

>Firstly, no member of parliament is going to move for the removal of censorship. They'll be seen as a porn loving pervert, they'd never be elected again.
Sometimes I wonder if that would actually be the case. I guess it depends on how many perverts have influence over there, you'd have to imagine there's lots that just don't talk about it, there wouldn't be an adult film industry there at all if there wasn't.

>Sure it might of started that way
Not even. Even during their early years there were games about killing and destroying things.
I think older people believe video games are for kids because there's the word "games" and only children like to entertain themselves instead of thinking about the Real World™.

They show you a pussy so you see a single pussy.
They show me mosaic pussy and I see ten pussies.

youtu.be/YBvM2YBFrgo?t=29s

Can we just get rid of ads already? When's the last time you've seen an honest ad? For video game players that video of Ubisoft downgrades comes to mind but the same thought is applicable everywhere else.

let's be honest everyone with half a brain is using adbock and a good hosts file already

>Is there a reason why everyone thinks games are for kids?
I see this with almost any pastime or leisure activity. People have some notion that adults should not have fun because it's childish or something, it's completely absurd too given that "adult" leisure activities are no different. Kids play video games but they also watch movies & television, read books, listen to music, practice arts, play sports, etc. but none of those are considered "childish" except video games. You often see people saying things like "grow up" or "manchild" as if you need to stop liking what you like in order to be an adult, which is pretty ironic since it's childish to taunt others like that.
>you like soccer? you're a stinkyhead

I have no idea why people associate games as a child activity nor do I understand why fun things are deemed bad either. Maybe it's some kind of pent up jealousy or just plain lack of understanding.

>Sure it might of started that way
The first video games were made by old engineers who enjoyed and played them with their colleagues after work using all that rad equipment, that tradition stayed for a while, especially in Unix circles.

I thought it was just a tilefucker reference

Decency laws employed during the occupation of Japan from the end of WW2 until now.
Even though America itself has moved away from that decades ago, the Japs still stick with it.

Who animated this!? Is there more?

because the main demographic of video games are children

While it is possible to view body from an entirely artistic point, there were plenty of depictions of sex throughout history, although most found were in sketch form, and most nudes don't look that much different from what you could see in Playboy.

>he's never jacked it to jcpenny's lingerie catalogues

look at gigantic faget heere

One is real and the other is escapism

Nope.

These are the same people who can't separate fiction and reality.
Of course, they can't separate characters from authors.

Maybe since one is for children and other not?

It's NOT okay when Japan does it.

If Japan wanted to be respected then they shouldn't have bombed Pearl Harbor

>Trying to purge the pacific of burgers
I respect them a lot for that.

That would require logic and an actual argument.
But instead those same people decide to deflect criticism and claim that anyone that plays videogames can't discern from reality.
It's kinda funny.

Ace Ventura was awesome
>that 5 min scene where Ace burns all his clothes, brush his tongue and cries himself in a shower after finding out he kissed a tranny
Kek

>west: photo realism devoid of any personality and originality

>east: creative stylization committed to reach new frontiers by abandoning the shackles of realism

That's nothing compared to Assigned Bane.

I liked it but I think that When nature Calls was better

Because those ad models look literally like mannequins, not sexy at all.

in islam the head of the church is also the head of the state.

>Of course, the best thing to do is just be a member of the DFC master race and never have to worry about sagging tits in the first place.
/thread

we have to hear Christians and the left bitch about it for 20 years after.

less about that and more about the media reaction.

The thing that annoys me the most, is the way she grabs the controller.

>I never went to the beach in my life, the post

>naked things
Underage nudity is allowed in art as long as it's portrayed in a non-obscene manner. At least outside of the fascist puritan Anglosphere.

>transphobic
Is the character supposed to be a woman or a man pretending to be a woman? I'm assuming the latter because of the way they look.

>At least outside of the fascist puritan Anglosphere.
The funny thing is that they also allowed non-obscene underage nudity up until very recently. There are several album covers from less than a half century ago that have naked underage girls on them.

Because if you told the owner of the billboard to remove it he'd rightly tell you to fuck off, but games are a new industry and the pansies fold really often.