Campaign looks nice

>campaign looks nice
>multiplayer is fun
>soundtrack isn't dubstep
>looks amazing
>sounds amazing

only complain is the DLC we can expect, but other than that, is there any reason not to buy this game?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=iaXE8GcTM9Q
foxnews.com/politics/2016/09/30/fox-news-poll-clinton-ahead-trump-after-debate-fear-motivating-both-sides.html
nytimes.com/2016/10/02/us/politics/donald-trump-taxes.html?_r=0
nationalreview.com/article/431933/donald-trump-foreign-workers-american-workers-arent-good-enough
factcheck.org/2016/02/donald-trump-and-the-iraq-war/
twitter.com/hillaryclinton/status/751581882404384768
twitter.com/hillaryclinton/status/742408690985226241
youtube.com/watch?v=oCTaHdKsxSw
yesimright.com/young-girl-hitchhiked-through-the-middle-east-to-prove-muslims-are-peaceful-what-they-did-next/
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

$50 season pass

>>campaign looks nice

It glorifies the war that destroyed innocence. The race stuff is marketing to distract you from that.

Western civilization ended in 1914.

Why would I want to be reminded?

...

endless niggers, more than there was in the world in 1914. I will never not be mad that some swedish fuck actually thinks that there were african soldiers in the australian army, making up over half of ANZAC forces

shut up shill

Actually it gets pretty fuckin' metal at some points. The melee is brutal and real not "Woosh samurai" Or one bonk to the head, you got people beating eachother to death with their bare hands.

>impressed by cutscenes

what

happened

...Cred Forums........

becasue it's just more of the same

I don't think you know what that word means

No playable women in multiplayer

It ended at WW2 imo.

Because Titanfall 2 comes out a week later

>nigger on the cover
>gritty "realistic" shooter based off history events that can't get any of those events or the people involved in the conflict right.
>it's just a reskin of the same game anyway
Fuck you and your shitty game, shiller.

stop being such a retard, if you cant play games because niggers are in it you spent too much time on Cred Forums or Cred Forums fucking edgy faggot

There's no need to defend it kid, 3/4 of the british soldiers in the beta weren't even european. This isn't the KKK being evil racists by not supporting this product, it's a politically minded company contributing to historical revisionism in order to push an agenda. You don't see people talking about it at your school because they don't want to seem racist.

>Guy complains in chat about too many blacks the entire round
>3-17 on the scoreboard

>Can't play women in multiplayer
>You just don't like it because there are black characters
Is EA really this retarded?

>fuck, the game's actually good
>what to say what to say

dude 3/4 of the soldiers were niggers its unbelieveable how a game that doesnt even try to be historically accurate isn't being historically accurate

>its another "war is horrible" game
>like we wheren't already fed up with that bs
>the only thing that differs from any other shooters ever is the setting
>they gave everybody semi auto and machineguns
>so it plays like any other shooters ever
mkay

Not buying/playing, fuck george soros and fuck white people who pander.

>it's a shill John.

>too many automatic weapons
>no french faction
>too many niggers
>tanks op

I don't want to buy BF1 because I don't like the developers and their decisions.

They try to convey a "War is horrible" message, but instead of showing true horrors of war they just put a few sad quotes here and there and let you just kill hundrends of people with efforless ease. It's like they're saying: "Guys, war is hell but... LOOK HOW AWESOME IT IS BOOOM HEADSHOT YAY BRUTAL TAKEDOWN OMG".

Also, I feel it was kind of a strange decision to not include Russians and French in a game about WW1. Why would you want to cut out the most important countries in this conflict?

And of course, the amount of blacks is through the roof. Maybe it's me being retarded and shit, but when I google "World War 1 photos" I can't see a lot of blacks. As a matter of fact, I can't see them at all. I wish Eastern European (Russia, Czech Republic and Poland) devs would make more games because I'm getting tired of this political agenda in muh videogames.

>>/r/pol/

Play Verdun. It's decent

>tfw normies and plebs think this will be the best fps, and that it will destroy CoD
>mfw the game is actually shit and 'Nam is still the best setting for a shooter

I will not buy this game solely because of the porch monkeys. That's literally the only reason.

This game is fucking lefty pol bullshit. Who cares?

>Tell a story about a unique part of history that isn't told much "The harlem hellfighters"
>Cred Forumsacks go crazy because WOW SJW BLACKS!!

The multiplayer sucks dick the changes to the battlefield formula like no spawning vehicles killed my interest immediately

>80€ game
>100€ more for all the maps removed
>nerfs every 2 months to anything fun and or broken

Why is a regiment that saw a whopping 7 months of a 4 year war being highlighted?

The marketing is portraying them as "elite" when all their notable for is being black, they were no more trained than any other soldier there.

Is more about pandering to low information people of color then it is about telling a unique story. Fuck you dude.

>campaign looks nice
>multiplayer is fun
objectively wrong

>soundtrack isn't dubstep
that doesn't make it automatically good
>looks amazing
yeah thats right
>sounds amazing
this too is right

5/10 b8 made me reply and nearly thought you were serious

I minored in history during my undergraduate. I'm not going near this shit.

One of my thesis papers was on this shit.

no more vehicle stealing from allies, this really sucks my autistic friend.

campaign is pure shit, you can't even play as a german.
standard clichee shooter, enemy is just cannon fodder.

but the multiplayer will be great, i liked the beta so i will buy this game anyway, because fuck the single player.

well lately seems the only thing they do right its sounds
fuck battlefront but the sound on the beta was 11/10

WE

>objectively wrong
Objectively opinion

Who didn't do anything of note in the war. If the swedish cucks are so hell-bent on "muh poc representation," then why not have Indian Sepoy or Nepalese Gurkhas? Or hell, even the French-Algerian soldiers.

But no, let's go with tyrone the thug negro from 'merica.

Harlem hellfighters is literally fucking nothing, It's a cool mention but It doesn't change the fact that they did fucking nothing.

Ever heard about Jack Churchill? Neat stuff but there is no WW2 game where every other fucker runs around with a sword and/or a bow

Objectively a useless argument and point of interest.

>play black ops because expect some hardcore jungle shooting
>the only nam mission is a trench shooter that you quickly leave

The dick was soft.

I'm not buying it because I'm not interested in historical fps games, let alone ones that are historically inaccurate.
looks like every other fps now, but with a ww1 twists and when it releases, it'll be the most popular online fps Normie's will play.

If your people ever have a have a history or culture beyond never inventing the wheel and getting AIDS, we'll see how pissed you get when it gets re-written and shit all over.

Normies will love it.

>imagine this happened 100 years ago.
>imagine being an alien and watching this strange creatures killing each other with strange weapons because of some clay.

That would be really cool but you're right.

WW1 was primarily fought by white Europeans. Fuck, the US didn't even enter the war until it was almost over. Now we have this shit? No, nope nope, naw no.

>tfw best part of Black Ops was playing as Kennedy and Castro back to back fighting off zombies
probably the only reason why I bought the game

WUZ

Best kind of historical inaccuracy.

>it's an EA shills the game episode

US is a major faction in this game, they can't let the US sheeps down and make them realise the US wasn't important in WW1.

you only can play entente, in a WW2 i can understand this but WW1 is very different.
fuck dice, fuck this political agenda shit, and i say this knowing that no one here is as LEFT as i am.
if i watch the trailer i have to puke, the music that tries to make you feel with someone, or even the main menu style and music that makes you feel like you visit an apple store and everyone is clapping, holy shit this is so damn bad.

no doubt they will, they love everything that's just "muh manlyness, muh explosions, muh hardcore experience" and for the "gamur gurls" out there "muh diversity" no doubt people will be playing this until the next big fps release.

The US was important in that they enlisted with British, Canadian and French forces during the war. Most of what the US military itself did was insignificant.

>or even the main menu style and music that makes you feel like you visit an apple store and everyone is clapping
I kekd

yes, i wasn't clear enough.
the US soldiers weren't heroes that changed the war.

>all these mad shrimp dick whitebois

Like pottery.

Rather an above-average dick than a below-average brain, Jerome.

>here comes the fucking oreo.

Read a book dude.

>Cred Forumsazis attacking everything that doesn't fit their opinion again
Like clockwork. When are we getting rid of that shitty part of Cred Forums already?

This and white women are the compensation of african slavery.

stay mad.

When you leave.

Or how about how your forced to play a pilot class when in a plane or that you can't steal enemy vehicles

>LITERALLY the first SP footage they release is Niggers killing germans in a completely fictional setting

jesus i didn't think it would be this bad

now i'm not sure i'm going to buy it at all

And now Cred Forums is shutting down too. Have the jews won?

*smacks lips*
WE WUZ KANGZ
WE WUZ KAISERS
WE WUZ TSARS
WE WUZ VERDUN AND SOMME

DAS RIGHT WE WUZ SHELL SHOCKED AND WW1 WAS THE BLACK MAN'S WAR

DICE SWEDEN - YUSS!

>youtube.com/watch?v=iaXE8GcTM9Q

>videogames have to be realistic

I wish you europeans would take care of those assholes already.

>it's another thinly-veiled Cred Forums thread
Purge soon
You have to go back

>forcing "progressiveness" into everything, even when it's historically inaccurate

>call of battlefield
>ever historically accurate

>supported illegal immigrants himself by giving them jobs to build his failed casinos
L O L
O
L

If the jewish game developers want to shove niggers so much why don't they just made a fantasy world war instead of the actual world war 1?

>when you leave
Exactly, go back to your containment board Cred Forums. Everyone is sick of your bullshit.

Are you kidding? Someone just made a watchdogs 2 thread. This shit is just getting revved up.

>Obvious advertising thread
>78 replies
first board to get deleted has to be Cred Forums

Cred Forums knows that their time is nearly up

I hope that it lasts long enough to see Trump get BTFO

(You)

...

>Game based on world war 2
>Thousands of soldiers died in that war
>Because of muh diversity they are now portrayed as 90% black
Make up your own fucking war if you aren't even going to attempt to be historically accurate. I'm fucking sick of diversity being injected into things when it has no place there. There's nothing wrong with making a game with a black lead. There's everything wrong in pretending the majority of soldiers FROM EVERY SIDE OF WW2 were black

>make a WW1 shooter
>change so much that it should read "a loosely adaption of WW1"

games don't have to be realistic, but forced agendas and 90% fiction for a game that wants to be a WW1 shooter is really poor.

because it wouldn't sell, but otherwise i am with you.

>games have to be historically accurate
I can't wait for the newest game about dying in a shit-filled trench in Verdun

>Fictional World War setting
>No Niggers.
Based Japs.

Forgot image.

>I can't wait for the newest game of call of duty

>make a game about WW1
>can't even get uniforms right
>or include the nations which actually did the most fighting and dying (but you can continue World War 1's adventure by buying Downloadable Content now!)

quality bioware game

Make a african war game.

You rape murder civilians shoot children.

Perfect introduction in to niggezry of affrica.

wtf im with her now

I'd rather have ever other character be black than have character design that terrible.

>0.01 has been deposited into your account

the point is they're trying to shoe horn in 'MUH DIVERSITY' into every fucking game to the point where it's not realistic in the slightest

>injecting political agenda in muh video games
isn't this exactly what you are doing by demanding that it conform to your racial standards?

It's not like Battlefield 1 is a fastidious historical recreation whose otherwise perfect accuracy is compromised to fit black people. It's a game, designed for people to have fun. The diverse racial demographics are to appeal to a broader audience.

>videogames have to be realistic
Only where niggers are involved, right?

>ww2 anime with a small twist
>last 3 minutes turns into mahoshojo yuri shitfest
Never dropped anything so fast

nice strawman.

all games can have niggers, women, gays, jews or whatever, nobody cares, but people have problems with forced agendas because it doesn't fit, it feels wrong, very natural reaction.

And thank the fucking Germans for both wars, and now once again for the European migrant crisis, all because Merkel wants to show the world how progressive she is.

Germany is the worst thing to ever happen to Europe, and the West in general.

>Not "0.01 has been donated to the Hillary Clinton campaign fund in your name"

>if you're not white than you must be black
>white "education"

Pathetic honestly.

It's more about telling a unique story than it is about pandering to low information people of color. See neither of us provided any actual evidence for our vague arguments but now the ball is back in your court

In all seriousness it's cool and there's no real real reason not to have it. Even if you don't think it's cool you have to be a real butthurt benny to actually be triggered by this kind of thing

CTR pays more than the International Trump Defense Force :^)

kek
it's a game based on historical events you fuckwit

I'm just sick of people trying to shove their social justice politics down my throat at every fucking opportunity

>white "people"
>above average dick

kek

Sorry, your people haven't discovered that yet.

Underrated kek

I think it's your arrogance that is triggering, not so much the subject.

>realism

m8 we are talking about a video game where you can teleport to your teammates and where people can survive half a dozen .30 caliber rounds to the chest

Suspens of belive.

History lessons to match up with this shit show.

Only blacks in afrika and the us forces kept them in the back.
No us niggers on the frontlines.

Fuck niggers. Fuck diversety niggers.
They steal bikes and now history.

Then why does barely anybody complain about the lack of Russians or French when they were infinitely more important than the Americans? It's always just >m-muh niggers historical inaccuracy REEEEE

Just admit that you're Cred Forumstrash aka the niggers of Cred Forums

>is there any reason not to buy this game?

Not being an absolute fucking retard who thinks this michael bay call of duty version of a world war 1 battlefield game looks fun to play

Hey, I'm not the one uncle toming here.

so where do indians and asians factor in then?

Then ignore me, and stop complaining about the subject

Life is not that difficult when you don't go around looking for things to be offended by

KANGZFIELD confirmed for shittiest bf ever

Sad state of affairs to see people defending an EA game even if it is against pol trolls.

No you just hear what you want.

it's a game based on WW1 history you jackass

no one expects 'realistic' gameplay, what the fuck does that even mean? You play one round, die and never come back?

game actually looks great, its just niggers man...

>niggers
>16 results
>french
>5 results
>russian
>2 results

>forced agendas

The problem is that Cred Forums defines literally anything they don't like as part of a forced agenda

no faggot maybe some people like different things than you do. not everything is an sjw conspiracy

black, trans, gay people etc are the ones being shoe horned into every game because of their perceived 'oppressed' status

If you're looking to a Battlefield game for historical authenticity you have some fucked up priorities

life isn't difficult because you have a metaphorical dildo up your ass. Neutral mc'neutrality, you're worse then the storm front faggots and the sjw shits.

>don't be offended by history revisionist
>just buy the game and don't complain
HI Dice. Thanks for making a shit game.

you have to be living under a rock if you can look at a game like Dragon Age Inquisition and not see the forced political agenda

>shoe horned

This may blow your mind but people different than you exist in the world. Their portrayal in video games and other media, is not shoehorning. It's just a depiction of people that exist

>niggers
>16 results
>french
>5 results
>russian
>2 results

The Cred Forumsfag is immunized against all dangers: one may call him a shitposter, cancer, newfag, cuck, it all runs off him like water off a raincoat. But call him a Cred Forumsfag and you will be astonished at how he recoils, how injured he is, how he suddenly shrinks back: “I’ve been found out.”

Thx for proving my point.

You could focus on no french or vodka niggers but you rather complain about niggers.

BF kangzfield will flop the same way ghost busters did.

Fuck your agendas. No free marketing.

What did she mean by this

Yeah tell me about that time in WW1 that two armies consisting of exactly 32 soldiers each clashed on a 1x1 kilometer square battlefield with regenerating vehicles.

Video games, being *games*, take steps away from reality to be more fun. This is not a new thing.

How?

I didn't say to buy the game numb nuts

I'm not neutral. I'm not triggered by seeing black people in video games and I don't expect Battlefield to be a historically accurate simulator and apparently those are radical positions

video games are going from oversexualising women and being about white people, to being about niggers and giving women equal roles in combat, even though its unrealistic, because the devs are faggot cucks who think you "basement dwellers" need to stop being racist and sexist

now dont get me wrong i never liked games over sexualizing women either because thats not realistic

but now we're getting games that are throwing realism away just to push some political message instead of catering to the people who actually buy the games, and actually in a sense try to cater to people who dont buy a lot of video games

and you defend it

its no conspiracy, its that video game devs and people who buy lots of video games in 2016 are massive fucking cuckold losers who should kill themselves or grow up

>campaign looks nice

How do you know? All we've seen was 12 minutes of WE and Crazy Chicken style gameplay.

He's talking about the fact that everyone says they're mad because the game's historical accuracy is compromised, yet the only thing people seem to actually be complaining about is the inclusion of black people despite there being lots of historically inaccurate things. Meaning it's not really about historical accuracy but just Cred Forums being triggered by black people

it did prove his point

because those things add value to the gameplay, unlike niggers or forcing "equality" in any sense, since niggers and women dont even buy much vidya

What did he mean by this
foxnews.com/politics/2016/09/30/fox-news-poll-clinton-ahead-trump-after-debate-fear-motivating-both-sides.html

why doesnt every soldier just have a gigantic dragon dildo strapped to their face while we're at it, that would definately be progressive and fun

>It's not like Battlefield 1 is a fastidious historical recreation whose otherwise perfect accuracy is compromised to fit black people. It's a game, designed for people to have fun.

Verdun didn't need dumversity.

>I didn't say buy the game numb nuts
Well you may not have said those words, but shaming people who aren't buying it is a good way to try and drum up sales. So how about you stop trying to change opinions by shaming people. You clearly don't want to hear other opinions so therefore your's is flawed to begin with.

What did she mean by this

>nytimes.com/2016/10/02/us/politics/donald-trump-taxes.html?_r=0
What did he mean by this

What did brexit polls mean by this?

kill yourself leftypol, you're not wanted here

No shit, that's why people generally argue. Obviously you have an opposing world view which make you a docile individual. Not everyone is like you, not everyone has the same life experiences. I know this is blowing your mind right now. But some people absolutely diagree with your statement. Hell in some cases they could be the majority. So pull up your panties and learn to participate or 'fuck of'. To throw your skewed rational back in your face.

>Pinochet

Don't forget his magical disappearing acts where he poofed thousands of Chileans out of existence

What did you mean by this?
>Popular vote referendum = electoral college

Titanfall 2 will be dead in a month just like its predecessor

Actually it was the US in both wars that ruined everything. The world would have been better for everyone if Germany won either time

Thoughts?

>lol years ago is the same as today when populism is at fever pitch

What did you mean by that

it's only going to get worse for your kind

commit suicide or move to north korea ASAP

No he didnt you retard

The problem is not the nigger the problem is in what kind of game he is.

Niggers don't belong in a WW1 game.

>bb-b-but muh harlem hellshitters

No one knew who they are (and there's a reason for that, they were literal toilet cleaners, not war heros) before DICE brought them up because they had to search for some black troops because MUH DIVERSITY.

I am talking that there is no histori acuracy at all.

That your know its utter shit game and like shitbusters tve movie try to blame the evile racist for everything.

suspension of disbelief

Learn about it fuck up.


Niggerversety vs historic FACTS!

Video games have literally never been realistic. The entire fucking reason I play video games is to get away from boring reality, a realistic video game would blow ass. There is nothing realistic about a plumber who grows from mushrooms fighting turtles and shit. There is nothing realistic about a soldier who can take more than one bullet and who can respawn when he dies and who can pilot tanks, planes, and attack boats. These things are fine. They're more than fine, they're fun.

It's weird that you perceive anything not built to your specific (and might I add restrictive) standards as an attempt to push a political message. Is it really that inconceivable to you that people would want to play as a black guy, or a gay person, or a woman?

It ended with the napaleon wars.

>populism is at fever pitch
>trump still getting btfo at polls
Populism was at fever pitch 4 years ago too, right?

Reminder that you have to be at least 18 to vote and to post here

my previous post just refuted your post

why are liberals so braindead, Cred Forums?

Colombia had a referendum yesterday, polls always showed YES at around 68%. Turns out NO won in the end.

nationalreview.com/article/431933/donald-trump-foreign-workers-american-workers-arent-good-enough

What did he mean by this?

>Complain about illegal immigrants for not paying taxes
>Support a candidate who's evaded millions of taxes that could have been used to build public infrastructure, improve health care and education

This election is a shitfest, both candidates are awful. who /garyjohnson/ here?

Go away PR guy.

> Is it really that inconceivable to you that people would want to play as a black guy, or a gay person, or a woman?

No thats exactly what i was saying, people who still buy all these kinds of shitty progressive new video games we're seeing are mentally ill cuckolds who should be put out of their misery

>National Review
>Glenn Beck

>illegal immigrants and bad deals with border countries lose $500b a year.
>one rich dude loses money and uses it as a completely legal tax write off
Yeah those are the same.

So you're saying that illegal labor wasn't used in the construction of several of Trump's buildings?

I bet you think he never supported the Iraq War either

>popular vote
>same as electoral college
this guy

He AVOIDED (not evaded, there is a difference in legality there) millions in INCOME taxes.
He is able to do this because of the taxes his businesses paid, and in all likeliness, what he personally paid in capital gains tax.

Trust me. If he wasn't paying any taxes, or he was evading them, the IRS would have thrown him in jail over a decade ago when the auditing started.

I find it hilarious that Trump talks about investing in infrastructure and yet wants to lower taxes. But I'm not American so maybe it all makes sense.

Need a bigger clock soon?

>citing a flawed source
So you're saying you're OK with bad information?

What faggot plays campagin especially in battlefield which never used to have one

He didn't. You can literally go back to his first phone interviews and he says that he's not sure if it's a good idea or not.

>hillary hints at ww3 with russia constantly over nothing

>lol your candidate at first supported a war that ended years ago that my candidate also supported

>Make "WW1" game
>Switch everyone with niggers
>Go on an advertisement campaign about diversity and race war

I really hate this trend.

Hillary was cleared of all wrongdoing by the peopel investigating Benghazi. Does that mean she did nothing wrong?

>fuck America, I gots mine

>he actually thinks anyone will vote for this

clinton has 0 momentum behind her

factcheck.org/2016/02/donald-trump-and-the-iraq-war/
>Stern asked Trump directly if he supported going to war with Iraq, and Trump hesitantly responded, “Yeah, I guess so.”
Doesn't sound like strong opposition to me

>illegal immigrants and bad deals with border countries lose $500b a year.
>I get my news from Infowars and Breitbart

I'm not shaming people who aren't buying it stop putting words in my mouth. If you really are bothered by seeing black people in WW1 game I would guess you'd be better off not buying this game. It would seem arbitrary to me if THAT's what bothered somebody about this game's historical accuracy, but at the end of the day everyone has different standards and it's your money you have a right to decide how to spend it. I'm not going to call you a racist or whatever. In turn please don't say that the developers of this game or the people who buy it are sjws or some nonsense. If I'm shaming anybody it's people who perceive everything inclusive as part of some sinister agenda

Why on earth would I be here if I didn't want to hear other opinions. On this thread I've read a hundred posts and written three.

okay mate

>illegal immigration literally at an all-time low
>military expenditures are over half of our budget
>ITS DEM MEXICANS AND WELFAIR QUEENS DAT AR TEH PROBLEM

>hurr durr I can't refute it so I'm going to inject sources I can try and shame him with.
OK faggot you can't stop posting. No one is buying it.

People are mentally ill cuckolds for liking different things than you?

That's a really asinine position

She didn't do anything illegal, no. She was negligent to an extreme degree, which cost American lives.
I would rather a president that knows the exploits and loopholes of our tax system well enough to take advantage of them, than a president whose negligence will result in the deaths of Americans.

Sure as fuck doesn't sound like strong support. Again though, he had earlier phone calls where he said he was iffy on it, and not even a year later he came out in outright opposition to the war.

that's why Trump is losing in the polls, right?

>all time low

So what you're saying is, we've had this many illegals or more, but they werent a drain on the economy, because they were more white

lmao

>illegal immigration is happening at all
>by most experts there are around 30m illegals currently not paying taxes
>we spend money to keep our country safe
You're not making sense here. Try and keep up.

Battlefield use to pride themselves on at least somewhat being accurate. Even the dice mod that got them hired

Trump didn't do anything illegal, no. He just exploited our tax system to pay nothing to the federal government despite being fantastically wealthy while you and I have to pay our "fair share".

I'd rather have a president who actually has a lick of experience in politics than a literal celebrity businessman

And like it or not that's support for the Iraq War, and it sure as fuck isn't Trump loudly being against it like he's claimed.

>polls matter
see

>LEGALLY didn't pay his taxes
Wow it's fucking nothing

That's why brexit polls were saying it would not pass also right?

He loosely supported it when we were told that Al Queda was in Iraq.
He withdrew that support before we were even in the war.
When we were in the war he stated his opposition to it.
When we were told Al Queda was in Afghanistan he withdrew all support from being in Iraq specifically.

While the war itself was going on, he was never once for it.

WE GOTTA UNSKEW THE POLLS
t.you circa 2012

why did brexit go through despite being 15 points behind in the polls most of the time?

dumb leftist cuck

>LEGALLY did nothing wrong in Benghazi
>LEGALLY did nothing wrong with her private email server
Wow it's fucking nothing

I'm a massive faggot who likes catching aids
t. You now 2016

See I can type a bunch of shit also.

why dont you kill yourself?

Yeah but it was always still decidedly inaccurate, as all video games are

>to pay nothing
IN
INCOME
TAXES
He pays a SHIT LOAD of other taxes you retard. The capital gains he pays in a year probably dwarf every tax you'll pay for the rest of your entire life. He absolutely does pay his fair share, which is why he's able to exploit legal loopholes in the first place.

I would however rather have a president who
1. Hasn't resulted in the death of Americans
2. Hasn't deleted emails to escape trial
3. Didn't VOTE for the war in Iraq
4. Didn't support shitty trade deals like Nafta and TPP (Clinton supported both)
5. Doesn't want to tear up the 2nd amendment of our bill of rights.

See >popular vote referendum
>same as the electoral college
I can't wait for your tears next month

if I was an american i would not vote for clinton, she gonna die soon with her health condition

>Normal version on origin €60
>"day one edition" €80
>we wuz kangz edition €130

>sort of want the day one edition because muh 3 day headstart but a physical edition is €40

if you're white and you want to play as a woman or nigger in a setting where women and niggers werent even common or present, yeah you were raised by a single mom who loaded you up on ritalin and fucked a new black guy every weekend or something, that isnt even uncommon, the world is sick, and so are you

>a form of taxes (not all taxes) is equivalent to the death of Americans
Fucking commies.

>he pays some taxes so it's okay that he skimps out on others
>didn't VOTE for the war in Iraq
I'd rather have a president that actually had political power to do so, instead of just supporting it on a radio show
>le 2nd amendment meme
Meanwhile Trump wants to shit all over the 1st amendment

>I don't understand electoral college
You need to go back to school. Oh wait it's Monday so you are probably waiting on the school bus. Don't forget to turn in your homework.

Well, Republican Presidents historically tend to have less significant popular votes due to commiefornia and jew york, so yes, if anything this paints an even worse picture for the libs.

you have no idea what you're talking about

trump is going to win in the biggest landslide in american history

>Muh ebile racist!

Nobady complains about BF 1943, BF2, BF3, BF4 having collord ppl in them.

BF1 is tottaly not shit i swear its the evile racist bla bla bla

Fuck off niggers.

>he pays some taxes
Millions in taxes, yes. He relocates income taxes to other taxes.
>d rather have a president that actually had political power to do so, instead of just supporting it on a radio show
So you'd rather have a president that has constantly fucked up and abused power... than one that hasn't constantly abused power?
Wow Sad!
>Meanwhile Trump wants to shit all over the 1st amendment
Objectively false. See; Trump withdrawing his opinion of reworking libel post gawker hogan case being a massive success.

yeah vote for the guy who wants to sue everyone who hurts his feelings with their speech, that's some respect for our constitution right there kek

face it dude your candidate is a meme. he's a reality tv clown and and a meme business guy reputation ranges from mediocre to sketchy. he puts on a hat and all you idiots go crazy for him, like he gives a shit about you. like he gives a shit about this country.

come on man i know you're smarter than this

Just like Romney right?
>Clinton completely assrapes Trump in the first debate
>scandal after scandal continues to pile up

But he isn't. He's up 5 points in LA TImes daily poll. And he has been for weeks.

As long as I have guns, and lots of them. I do not give a shit.

This!

For da kaiser nyiggaaa

>It glorifies the war that destroyed innocence.
Cry me a river. Why is this war sacred? Do you ever consider how disrespectful all those WWII games were? No, probably not, because you were 8 when they started that fad, and you grew up with them, and it was so cool shooting Nazis in the face, and you never questioned it, and now it's an accepted part of the vidya landscape. But WWI, like omg. You can't even.

kys

>I said it therefore it's true
You are a massive faggot.

No.
>EA & DICE
>Looks boring
>too expensive and DLC galore
>will die when successor is released
>historic revisionism

>CTR this delusional

>0.02 has been deposited into your MAGA account

I think you are sick. You project strawmen fantasies onto everyone you disagree with. You hate the world and everyone in it because you think life is one big game against a political opponent and you think you are losing and the world is out to kill you

Political radicalization has made your mind sick

>yeah vote for the guy who wants to sue everyone who hurts his feelings with their speech, that's some respect for our constitution right there kek
Libel is a thing and has been for a while.
He doesn't want to get rid of free speech though.
Hillary wants to get rid of the 1st, 2nd, and 5th amendments though.

Face it man, your candidate is a domestic terrorist. She has resulted in the death of Americans, and will continue to do so. As a white male she fucking hates you and everything you stand for.

If you care at all about your liberties. If you care at all about the freedoms that the US stands for. If you are a white male, and you vote for Hillary Clinton, you are a cuck. That's all there is to it. I am using the metaphorical definition of the word to its fullest extent, because you are knowingly voting against your interests because MSM has skewed your perception of the character of a candidate, rather than you looking at their policies.

Both of the candidates are generally shit, but Trump's views on trade and immigration are the closest thing to sanity we're going to get between now and the inevitable collapse of the Republic.

>Clinton handily won the first debate

It wasn't much of a victory, it was fairly close; if you were honest, you'd admit that. Stay triggered, libtard.

Trump abuses his power all the time you idiot. Just ask all the contractor's he's ripped off

>everyone who doesn't agree with me is a shill
You have a fucked up world view. Consider suicide.

>>soundtrack isn't dubstep
Nigger have you seen the trailers?

>0.01 has been deposited into your MAGA account

>it's another CTR gets btfo thread

will they commit suicide in november?

You're fucking dumb

>Trump makes good deals that benefit him extremely
>I should not want this for the US because it would be mean to other countries... or something

Oh you mean the contractor who tried to negotiate for more money after doing a bad job? Yeah that was so wrong for Trump to pay him what was agreed upon.

>that picture

Nu-male libtards BTFO. How will they ever recover?

I really don't like niggers and I'm really tired of this new form of blacksploitation. America, especially California, has a disease.

>Fuck, the US didn't even enter the war until it was almost over.
Yeah, likewise, WWII games should always start with the invasion of Poland, not this fucking Omaha beach bullshit

I imagine you're seething in anger right now, unable to come up with counter responses.

>trump makes good deals that benefit him extremely
>this means when he gets into office he'll be working to benefit the people and not himself

does not compute

>if I keep repeating it, it becomes true
Ok nigger, you are just assblasted and it is glorious.

>Trumptard complaining about people calling him a shill
This is so funny I might actually die

Trump won't win. God I want him to, I hate Hillary with a passion and all that follow her.

>haha we called them girly

you win the seat at the head of the 2nd grade cafeteria table

>trying the shill route for the third time
It will work eventually right?

>multiplayer is fun
Casual shit =/= fun
The beta was awful for me, battlefront but with a WW1 skin.

>CTR CTR CTR CTR CTR CTR CTR
>oh no pls don't call me a shill that's mean

Nah, he will win. There's so much dirty on Clinton she simply cannot win. Trump's saving the best for last. A huge pile of shit will come out shortly before the election that will completely kill her chances.

>>LEGALLY did nothing wrong with her private email server
Except she broke several security sanctions and the head of the fucking FBI himself said anyone else in her position would be reprehended for it.
She can't even follow basic fucking protocol for national secrets with her fucking emails. How the fuck do you think she's going to handle everything in office? Not to mention she's perfectly happy lying to the American people
>I'm perfectly healthy, these accusations about my health are ridiculous! I'll even open a jar of pickles to prove it!
>One month later she collapses and it comes out she has phenomena, probably more because that doesn't explain her fucking collapse
This is a woman who thought lying about her health was a good idea, even though there was no fucking reason to lie. She'd totally never lie with real issues though, right?

He's 70 years old and clearly wants to create an opening for his children to get into politics. He has a strong incentive to be remembered as an amazing president.

>if I keep denying I'm a shill people will think I"m not a shill

do they pay you for the posts that help you maintain your cover or only the ones where you're directly shilling?

Gary Johnson is retarded, you're better shooting your pollster than voting for him.

i bet you actually think mexicans and muslims wont kill you on sight to rape the women in your family, the moment they make up the majority

lmao

you are like a little baby

Autism: the post

WE

/,. -‐’⌒ ̄⌒ー-、 \ \
/’:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:|.:.:.:.:.:.:.:\ ヽ: /_/
/.:.:.:.:.:/:.:.:.:,:.:.:|:.:.:ヽ.:.:.:.:.:.’, } /:.:.|
l{:.:.:.:|:.l:.:.:.:/l/’ハ:、.:.:ヽ.:.:.:.:} .{::.:.:.:.:l
ハ:.:.:.|:|:.// ノ ‐ヾ\_|l.:.:.:i }::.:.:.:.:.’,
ヽ:.:.{. ,:=、 ==、 ノ.;./ /::.::.::.:.:.:.’,
ヽゝ 、 ソ!※}::.::.::.::.:.:.
{ `ヽ、ヽフ /イ /‐、_:.:.:.:.:.:.
f^)^)^)^)^)^)^)^)^)^)「-、_,{※} r′ヽ:.:.:.:.
r”⊇、THIS THREAD l|ヽ_/ } t′ ’,:.:.:.
{ ==’、 WILL l|!;r’!※{ t′ ’,:.:.:
ハ„_う CONTINUE l||;;l}. {,コ !:.
_{‘V|l AFTER THESE l||;;;{※.},コ !、
ゞ |l MESSAGES l|.l;;{ },コ }
\„|l DESU~ l| L{.※{,コ /|
|l________l|,rn} },コ\ / 〉

Cred Forums leave.

U

When you girly quasi-males are able to vote, it's worthwhile to point out just how effeminate you are.

Assange has already said that we're getting a massive dump of some kind this month that will be far worse for Hillary than the DNC emails were. Should be fun.

VIDEO GAMES

>Nah, he will win. There's so much dirty on Clinton she simply cannot win
Exactly. If we have ONE fucking unbiased debate where we actually discuss all her fucking scandals there's no way any sane person would vote for her

>if I assume it again and again it becomes fact
This is why libshits don't win anything except for biggest faggot award.

fucking inaccurate piece of shit. they put niggers in ww1 and removed france.
t. /his/

. : : : : : : : : : :`丶、
/ : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : \
. : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : ヽ
. \ | / /: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : ‘.
′: : : :∧: : : : : :|\: :X\: : : : : :’.
/゚3) i: : : : : :.i、ヽ: : : : i ∠-ミハ: :/: : :|
r-’ 今: . „_∨_ イ : : : \ ̄
; Y /  ̄ _厶斗 {―、_
/ ’, r’{ l {::::{ マニニ二ニ7 /::::/ >‐-、
〈 /’、 / ハ {::::{. ∨ / /::::/ / }
\ / ∨ ∨ ‘.{::::{/⌒Y^Y⌒V:::::/ / /{

He wants to lower taxes and lower spending.
I know europoors don't realize you can actually lower spending, but surprise, you don't have to be a socialist shithole!

You sit in a trench for a couple of weeks in real time until your character gets trenchfoot and dies.

He said that ages ago after the DNC leaks and it was nothing.

its time

He meant that he used legal avenues created by Bill Clinton and also utilized by Hillary in the last couple years. Since you're a low IQ low info individual I don't expect you to understand.

The final debate is being moderated by chris wallace. Clinton is fucked.

go back to your safe space

He said October surprise ages ago m8.
It's not nothing. He knows Americans have an incredibly short attention span, which is why he's holding it back to probably just before the third debate so she can't prepare talking points.

Remember when we used to laugh at people like this around here, instead of letting them run the place?

yeah, it's a generic shooter with no new ideas. Just play the previous one it'll be the same fucking thing.

no


>>>/leftypol/

>She has resulted in the death of Americans, and will continue to do so.
She'd have my vote.

Maybe you should let foreigners make the important decisions for you, we're much more qualified.

>Remember when we used to laugh at people like this

You mean never?

Cred Forums has always been ruthless to justice warrior nu-males

I live in a town where latinos are a majority and I've yet to be raped or murdered so there's that. Meanwhile I got mugged by a white methhead on the way to work a few weeks ago.

One day when you grow up you'll learn that a person's is defined by their actions and not the color of their skin. As of right now though you're a shitter and you know it which is why you lean on racial supremacy to justify your own existence in the absence of actual accomplishments

If he cared about his legacy he wouldn't have been a money grubbing asshole his whole life. And running for president is the worst way to get your family into politics. You have to work your way up through the state and congress levels, build connections and political infrastructure. Running for president is a one shot kind of deal, if you win you'll still be hated by half the country after you leave office thanks to the two party system and if you lose you'll be nothing more than a forgotten joke.

Cred Forums was libertarian before it was conservative, so no.

>mfw all these clueless retards who are thinking the devs are pushing political agenda

If you actually knew how the game worked, you'd know that skins are selectable and the only reason why half the british team was black in the beta was because customisation was locked for it. I shouldn't have to explain this shit to you guys, you should have the common sense to already know.

Half of me thinks you all choose to ignore it so you can post epic "WE" meems

You're the anti-social justice warrior nu-males, and every bit as bad.

The internet: srs bsns

You have nothing of substance to say, no arguments to make and no evidence to back them up. You just say that whoever disagrees with you is a girly person.

Your political opinion can safely be discarded

>no rpg's of different kinds
>no helicopters
>no welding
Basically the things that made me enjoy bf4 are lacking; though i do obviously understand why
Gunplay is improved a bit, but not much; and the way the guns feel were always a big negative in bf4 for me

Can't ignore what they never bothered to find out in the first place.

>we're much more qualified
What's your country's GDP?
What is the US's GDP?
What's the power of its military?
What's the strongest military power on the planet?
What is the universal trade currency again?
What is the center of world trade?
What is the world's primary trading language?

I want you to answer these questions real quick for me. Can you do that?

You cuckolds can't even formulate a decent comebacks without babbling like idiots

Back to your safe space please

>he wouldn't have been a money grubbing asshole
That makes no sense
>If he cared about his legacy... he wouldn't have build a legacy
Is what you're saying there.

>you have to work your way up
Since fucking when? Where in the constitution that says only career politicians can be president?

Don't bother user

These dudes started lurking around like 2013 or so. They have literally no idea about this site's culture or history and they don't care.

All the old anons are gone.

>Doesn't remember Ron Paul 2008 or 2012
>"dude Cred Forums was totally liberal guys really"
My god you fucking idiots.

>babbling like idiots
I was imitating the babbling of an idiot so I suppose that's right.

I don't suppose you're old enough to have ever seen that final phrase before, though.

>Remember when we used to laugh at people like this around here, instead of letting them run the place?
Literally never happened. I have no idea why faggots like you come here and try to insist that Cred Forums was a perfect paradise of people who were never mean or insensitive and we should go back to that when it never was that

No-one cared about the DNC leaks when it showed the dems and Hillary to be massively corrupt and in the pocket of rich corporations.

Because Hillary herself didn't use charged language.
Liberals don't think with logic, they think with fee fees. If the leak has something that hurts their fee fees, it will have a big impact.

All those things are exactly why we shouldn't let Americans run the place. It's dangerous.

>What is the world's primary trading language?
English, btw.

>It's another "Let's pretend Cred Forums used to be super liberal in a shitty attempt to get people to become liberal" episode
This is even more pathetic than the time I saw a beggar in a key thread claiming that oldfags would literally buy anyone on Cred Forums a game if they asked for it because he was so desperate for a game

>2008
Fucking newfag.

Even then it was nowhere close to... all this.

>All of those things where America is the best at is why... we should let people who aren't as good as America run it

Fucking lol

>English
Because of the US.

Why do americans always ruin everything?

Why did I even expect people to talk about game mechanics on Cred Forums?

The first BF1 thread with an OP that isn't about niggers and the thread is still:
>WE
>Presidential debate

The sooner Japanesemoot deletes this board the better

>t. overweight, middle-aged eurocuck

Tell me more about how young I am or how progressive 4channels used to be rofl

>I live in a town where latinos are a majority and I've yet to be raped or murdered so there's that.

I was exaggerating on the mexicans, they're a bit different, but seriously, it isnt safe for white people to go to mexico for a reason, and you're fucking delusional if you think they cant make the US shitty like mexico

>One day when you grow up you'll learn that a person's is defined by their actions and not the color of their skin.

One day you'll grow up and realize no one gives a fuck about hurting someones feelings by being prejudiced against specific groups to keep themselves safe, when they can clearly see they commit vastly disproportionate amounts of violent crime

You speak like some dumb fucking child who doesnt understand anything about the human mind or logic

Animals would not survive if they could not stereotype other animals by behavior, its literally one of the most basic kinds of logic, you'd have to be too fucking stupid to be able to walk to not know how to be racist, its not going away you fucking dumbass kid

If I can't destroy shitters in a little bird then whats the point of Battlefield?

You wouldn't let a drunk idiot without a driver's licence make the decision of who gets to drive the new Ferrari.

>Because of the US.
Because of the Commonwealth.

>they put niggers in ww1
why are you surprised that nations that had contact with africa for thousands of years have black people in them and were willing to send them to die in the most brutal war to date

You must have selected cuck-vision. This forum was especially dominated by young, racist white males back then.

You actually have no clue

Because in 2004 Cred Forums didn't give a shit about politics of any kind. The first big election on Cred Forums that got people worked up was 08.

And yes, people always casually said shit like nigger, faggot, jew, kike, cunt etc. There was never a period in Cred Forums's history where people didn't casually say shit like that.
Cred Forums was always first and foremost about liberties and freedom, as it was a bastion of free speech. For its early period it was libertarian, since both conservatives and liberals were pushing against it on each side. But recently, the push from liberals has been so massive against free speech, that it has shifted Cred Forums into conservative territory.

>you will never be an assravaged white boy completely triggered by a video game

Yeah, okay, you keep posting screencaps from other sites of posts made within the last year, that'll prove something about the Cred Forums of ten years ago, I guess.

>making up over half
race is set by class. if you dont want black people on your team dont play as black people, you dumbass yankee white boy

If he cared about his legacy he would have been building it his whole life is what I'm saying. You can't just be a c grade celebrity known for one predatory real estate profiteering, chintzy brand deals, and being that guy who gleefully fires people on TV then turn 70, put on a hat with a slogan and expect to be remembered as a public servant.

You can't really expect a guy like that to put on a hat and become your hero. a guy who has never shown regard for anyone but himself, a guy who uses his power to extort and scam people, a guy who has never run for office or engaged in philanthropy or been involved in public works of any kind.

You really have to be smarter that this user. He doesn't give a shit about you. He's not fit to be president.

The same loophole used by:

>Clinton
>New York Times
>Mark Cuban

Shit nigga

No, I wouldn't let someone without a license drive a ferrari, that's why only legal citizens can be president.
But I would prefer to let the person who has flown planes their entire life, and driven in car simulators with huge success drive the ferrari, than the person who has crashed about 20 cars in their driving experience.

go to bed, darkie

You really think a website that used to have a loli board gave a shit about being PC? Cred Forums has been infamous for being "right wing" for a long, long time.

They where young and white but they weren't racist

people said nigger all the time but it was just to be edgy. we said a lot of edgy stuff

Cred Forums shat on most politics and ideologies, including actual racism

>you will never be a smelly shitskin animal

>If he cared about his legacy he would have been building it his whole life
He has. He turned a million dollars into 4 billion, at least.
>Then turn 70, put on a hat with a slogan and expect to be remembered as a public servant.
He started being political and engaging with politics during the Clinton administration.

>You can't really expect a guy like that to put on a hat and become your hero. a guy who has never shown regard for anyone but himself
He employs tens of thousands of people.

>a guy who uses his power to extort and scam people
A guy who makes the best deals for himself and follows through with the deals.

>a guy who has never run for office or engaged in philanthropy or been involved in public works of any kind.
A guy who has not murdered Americans with his negligence, a man who has not voted for awful wars

>You really have to be smarter that this user. He doesn't give a shit about you. He's not fit to be president.
You think he doesn't give a shit about me?
Meanwhile Hillary Clinton tells me I should FEEL SORRY for being a white male. That I should give up my right to bear arms. That I should give more in taxes via forced charity. That I should let my economy go to shambles. That I should let unrestricted access to my country open up to the migrant crisis.

No. I give a shit about this country, and Donald Trump is what the country needs right now.

i was here shilling for obama in 08 and i was calling him a nigger traitor two years later

>including racism
Oh, yea sure, that explains all those fat lipped nigger eating watermelon images that were created, because we all totally hated racism.

Same desu. Voted for Obama, then fucking hated him and became libertarian.

>This forum was especially dominated by young, racist white males back then.
What, because they were edgy and said nigger a whole bunch?

And these days we have actual white supremacists going around the place desperately trying to convince people that their views don't necessarily make them racist. How far we've come.

>Because in 2004 Cred Forums didn't give a shit about politics of any kind.
And yet Bush and Fox News and right-wingers in general and especially thin-skinned Neo-Nazi lulcows ripe for the milking were the sources of endless mockery, whereas liberal policies, if they came up at all, seemed to be generally accepted as common sense. It was a period in time where young, internet-savvy male corresponded heavily to leftist sympathies. Sure, you could call people fags, but well, there wasn't really any reason to ban them from getting married. What are you, a Christfag? And God forbid someone actually said "the world is sick" because of single mothers and ADHD diagnoses. What are you, my fucking grandma?

>Left-wing = PC

I see now. Cred Forums is a mental illness.

>whereas liberal policies, if they came up at all, seemed to be generally accepted as common sense
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
We made fun of commies all the fucking time you retard.

Fucking liberals with their revisionist history.

absolutely triggered. literally tumblr tier

This thread has so far lasted 3 hours with over 300 replies meanwhile the mods delete tinnitus threads, get your fucking act together

There should be no laws arround marriage at all, thats what we should have done instead of legalize gay marraige, dissolve all marriage laws, to fix all these dumb stuck up feminist women, but instead we just created another outlet for men who dont want to be exploited by women or marriage, by normalizing faggotry

You'd have to be living under a rock for the last decade at least to think otherwise.

>can't say anything bad about things blacks do
>can't say anything bad about Islam or Muslims
>must be pro-tranny and pro-gay at all times... or else

By the way this aligns hilariously with the alarmists that are actually running about this place now complaining that gay marriage is a slippery slope to paedophilia and that the LIBERALS are enabling them. They would've had a fucking stroke coming here in those days.

>woman who has a track record of shameless corruption and ineptitude, measurably the worst Secretary of State we've ever had, who voted for the most asinine war in history and endangered American lives due to her absolute negligence
>people will actually vote for her because CNN tells them Trump is le mean racist man

>said nigger a whole bunch

Don't even pretend that wouldn't label someone a racist for saying nigger today, even under the veil of "edgyness"

Just because you think you weren't being racist for saying it - deep down you know you were/are

i went to a school that was 99% african americans

trust me

it smelled like a zoo

>whereas liberal policies, if they came up at all, seemed to be generally accepted as common sense
Liberal policies are a fucking joke you ridiculous piece of shit. The UN recently said that the US owes black people reparations for years of "Racial Terrorism". Those are the kind of liberal fucking policies that are ridiculed as the pathetic ideals they are

It isn't safe to go to Mexico because Mexico as a country is broken and corrupt. It's broken because drug cartels run everything from the top down because they have unlimited money. No civil government can function because it can't compete with the all powerful cartel.

It's not because Mexicans are violent people or whatever. Just a simple political reality. A political reality, I might add, that is facilitated by a certain neighboring country's simultaneous prohibition of drugs and its appetite for them that it gives the cartels billions and billions of dollars to satiate. Now whether or not Mexico's resulting problems are that country's responsibility per se is it's own political and philosophical can of worms, but i'm just telling you the reality.

At the end of the day no one cares what you are afraid of user. People aren't going to stop existing because you don't like them, and people aren't going to dislike the people you don't like because you don't like them.

You have the mind of child incapable of sound logic. It's like if when you were a kid you were smacked by someone wearing a green shirt and now you rail against evil green shirts. Complete inability to grasp cause and effect

>Trump populist alt-right politics = Ron Paul LIbertarianism

holy shit go back to watching Fox News and stay there

>liberal policies, if they came up at all, seemed to be generally accepted as common sense

Seriously, how dense can you be? Everyone consistently shat on leftists and Obongo.

It doesn't take a genius to realize how utterly autistc liberal policies are

If you can't drive the trains, you don't buy it
Luckily, I'm pretty sure you'll get to do some hot Kirov on Kirov action

facts hurt dont they?

But what he said was true.

Fucking niggers

Reparations for slavery is not a liberal policy. Our black president was against reparations. You're stupid as fuck. kys

Oh yeah, sure, it's Schrödinger's fucking racism. All those 13-year-olds saying nigger back then were totally racist and if I weren't I don't belong, but now you can say nigger all day long and it doesn't make you racist and if I think otherwise I don't belong. It's just edginess or completely sincere depending on whatever you need it to be, but either way, I'm wrong about it and a stupid newfag, innit.

But in the real world we can clearly see that what started as juvenile edginess that would've been mocked if it ever crossed the line into sincere stormfaggotry has now mutated into the actual political beliefs of a bunch of stunted manchildren who took it all way too seriously.

That's the thing really. We never took anything seriously.

It's push back.
We were libertarian for years, especially boards like /k/ for obvious reasons, until the left started trying to censor everyone and make people feel bad for being white. The push back shifted people more conservative.

> measurably the worst Secretary of State we've ever had

Maybe in your fantasy, delusional world. Holy shit you guys are pathetic.

35 days 16 hours and 30 seconds until the mass Cred Forums suicide. i cannot fucking wait

>man who has a track record of shameless corporate corruption and exploitation, supported the most asinine war in history and got away with not paying millions in taxes while claiming to be a champion of the middle-class
>people will actually vote for him because Fox News tells them Hillary is le evil feminism lady

Typical cucked numale beta nonargument lol
>it's ok for the president to be shamelessly corrupt and bought off by big donors, as long as they don't say mean things!
Literally child mentality.

Where is proof?

Your logic is a bit off there.

And now Cred Forums tries to censor everyone who has a remotely leftist opinion

What are you even talking about? Are you literally mentally retarded?

Yes it is.And if you want to drag Obongo into thing lets go right ahead
>Trayvon Martin case is under way, literally all fucking evidence points to Trayvon being a fucking thug who beat the shit out of someone for following him (not a crime)
>Obama steps forward and says "If I had a son he'd look like Trayvon"
>Contributes nothing to the conversation other than WE THE SAME COLOR YO and race baits the entire thing
Liberals are always fucking laughable. Name one policy that isn't a joke

Military spending is 4% of the budget numbnuts.

She was pressured into fucking resigning she was so bad.

>Reparations for slavery is not a liberal policy

Literally every BLM activist and nu-male on twitter is demanding reparations

Obama will change his mind too when he realizes the idea has gotten traction

so this is /v ?
why do ameritards need to discuss retard trump and snake clinton here ?

lol what does that have anything to do with slavery reparations? It's actually crazy how batshit insane and stupid you guys are. Please go back to your containment board.

>S-shut it down!

>Benghazi was a lie created by the right-wing media!
>all those American soldiers died because Trump said a mean thing!

>And now Cred Forums tries to censor everyone who has a remotely leftist opinion
Wrong. Calling someone a faggot for their opinion isn't censoring them.
Trying to have them fucking fired from their jobs for having an opinion is censoring them
Go to Cred Forums right now. You can have all the leftist opinions you want. That doesn't mean they will agree with you like the hugbox you desperately want. You won't be banned or censored though

Not at all.
Cred Forums shits on them, yes, they call them idiots and tell them why they're wrong.
But they're still allowed to post. They aren't banned for posting. Cred Forums doesn't want them banned from posting.

That's the difference. It's still an open discussion, you'll just be told why you're wrong.

>Fox News
>Anything other than controlled opposition

Nice meme

yeah facts really hurt you
poor baby

And that makes her the worst ever? I bet your dumbass can't even name 3 other secretary of states without looking it up. Jesus, do everyone a favor and kys or at the very least never have children.

>Can't name one policy that isn't a joke
You brought up Obama. I brought up that he's a racebaiting joke

>we're not censoring you, we''re just filling your threads with Cred Forumsshit until you stop posting
>we're not taking away your videogames, we're just yelling and screaming until you stop playing

>She wasn't the worst!
>So you can't say she was bad!
Literally changes nothing.

Well, "trying" is a big word, because it's not like they have the means. Well, not on Cred Forums anyway. I guess all the people who have fallen victim to harassment campaigns and death threats for having liberal opinions might have a thing or two to say about being silenced.

But on Cred Forums it's more like "impotently wishing they could" than "trying".

>Obama will change his mind too when he realizes the idea has gotten traction

Oh he will? You can predict the future now? Holy shit you're stupid af. Keep making things up and living in your delusional fantasy world detached from reality and facts.

Oy vey

>lol you guys are so stupid because of X reasons that I'm not listing, I'll act superior while I ad hominem with no real substance to my argument lol upboat me! XD

I honestly hope that Clinton becomes President and does everything she promises which will ruin the USA forever.

I hope they turn you into a 1984 brazil nightmare by the end of the 2020s

Nigga how would I not be able to name Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, and James Maddison. Are you fucked in the head?

Money is not a legacy

Hanging around politicians is not engaging in politics.

A guy that makes the best deals for himself is a good CEO. A bad politican. A politicans entire job is to benefit other people, you know his constituents. And it's not entirely accurate even to say he follows through with his deals considering all the stories about people being straight up ripped off by him

If you're talking about the inflated email scandal there's no evidence that anything his opponent has done resulted in anyone's death jesus christ. This whole thing such an obvious political smear campaign. Dozens of politicans are known to have done as she's done. I'm not saying it's totally okay but it's blown retardedly out of proportion, especially in comparison to Trumps three decades of scandals and shitty scams which seem to go unmentioned.

When the fuck has Hillary Clinton told you you should be sorry for being a white male? Or that you should give up your right to bear arms? Or anything that you have said? You have constructed a strawman

I don't think you care about this country at all. You are willing to turn over the keys to a scamster with a cool hat because he tells you you are a patriot if you are with him. He makes you feel good inside. You don't care about this country's future, about the hard work of forming rational legislature and analyzing policy and participating in in depth public discourse and making political compromises. You have no idea how politics works, why it exists, or even what it really is. You just your god emperor to win because he makes you feel good inside so he must be the good guy

Changes nothing in your mind because you're a pathetic, delusional cuck. Delusions are by definition unmalleable even in the face of direct evidence to the contrary. Go back to your containment board.

If the actually had the means to get some leftist fired, they would.

You clearly don't know what censorship is. In fact you seem to be calling for Cred Forums to be censored because you don't like what they have to say

>This mad

>said no one ever

BecUse they didnt.

Niggers did not figth on the west front they did not figth on the east front.

Niggers are a insult the allies did not want to throw at there worst enemy.

...

Look up the definition of censorship.

>all these cucked liberal betamales only have "go back to your containment board" and no further argument at all

Since when have you here? 2011?

Faggot I've been lurking since 05 and he's right. Pretty fucking rich of you to accuse him of historical revisionism

Go ahead and explain, please.

>Hillary wasn't that bad her leaking state secrets due to incompetence wasn't that big of a deal
>I mean what about [unsubstantiated rumors] and [lies and half truths]

>It's like if when you were a kid you were smacked by someone wearing a green shirt and now you rail against evil green shirts. Complete inability to grasp cause and effect


If people with green shirts were going around being violent, you'd have every fucking right not to like people in green shirts

Brown people commit vastly disproportionate amounts of crime and have low IQ. This is undisputable, this is fact. You cannot deny this. You can blame it on "whitey " all you want, I wont assert any differently here, but reasonable people will treat them with prejudice, because it is in their own interests, because the general person sees that they are behaving badly much more than whiter people.

It is completely fucking rational to recolonize that people associated with certain groups might have certain behaviors, and to stereotype people

You are a fucking delusional white kid who would get murdered and robbed the first week he'd live in the ghetto

You clearly don't know the definition of critique. Spamming CTR CTR NIGGERS SHILL OY VEY OBONGO isn't "telling someone why they're wrong"

I wasn't aware there was a class "nigger" in BF.

Do you even know the first thing about this "scandal"?

Yes, people died, the issue was, could Hillary have prevented it? And after numerous investigations led by people who were desperate to get some dirt on her, it turns out, no, she couldn't have. And the ignorant opinions of right-wing buffoons who think she totally could've phoned up the general and scrambled some jets or whatever she was supposed to have done don't matter.

American are raised to be cucks and dont have to deal with real problems/uncomfortable facts until they are in their mid 20s

This is why they are losing on all ends

They actually have. You know what for? Committing crimes. Cred Forums has actually gotten people arrested for committing crimes while spreading their leftist bullshit. They don't however see someone with a leftist opinion and try to get them fired purely because they disagree with them.
I know one woman who got fired was a staff member at Mizzou who was demanding that the media not be allowed in the "safe space". That violated the students rights to film in a public place and she had other students force the guy filming away.

>Cred Forums shits on them, yes, they call them idiots and tell them why they're wrong.
It's because they're numale cucks, right?

>Cred Forums doesn't want them banned from posting.
Is that why they keep telling them to leave?

>m-muh gubment will always tell da troof!

It's not like mainstream politics consistently panders to average people and tells them what they want to hear..no..no..no

They never actually do. This was a major part of the reason I stopped being part of the "liberal" side, I saw far too many arguments where they had nothing but personal attacks and feels => reals rhetoric.

>WHAT DOES IT MATTER AT THIS POINT!?
Go to bed Hillary.

Please i am around since the 90.

Your not even fucking trying ege lord.

>LOOK AT THESE CHARTS

>Trying to have them fucking fired from their jobs for having an opinion is censoring them

nope.avi

It's not censorship either, so I have no idea why you're claiming it is

>recolonize
*recognize

It's the same as saying that since Nazism is a right-wing phenomenon, all right-wingers are Nazis.

And that's ignoring the fact that the right wing has its own form of political correctness. Especially in these parts.

already had mine pre-ordered for a while senpai

on ps4

Right wingers are nowhere near as PC today as the left. How many right wing safe spaces are their in college campuses?

It can only be unlocked by acting like a nigger in a match, after you find 3 hidden buckets of fried chicken across the map

It literally is.
>I DON'T LIKE THIS PERSONS OPINION, I'M GOING TO TRY TO HAVE THEM FIRED OVER IT
That's literally sending a message to everyone that if you don't fall in line they will try to fucking fire you.
Or have you forgotten the game dev who made a joke with his friend about big dongles and the woman sitting in front of him took his picture and had him fired?

VIDEO GAMES

>Money is not a legacy
His corporate empire is.
Trump is a household name, and it was long before this run for president too.

>Hanging around politicians is not engaging in politics.
Making significant donations and hosting political parties is.

>A guy that makes the best deals for himself is a good CEO. A bad politican.
Not at all. You want to make the best deals for your company much like you want to make the best deal for your country.

>If you're talking about the inflated email scandal there's no evidence that anything his opponent has done resulted in anyone's death jesus christ.
Her negligence absolutely resulted in the death of Americans in Benghazi

>When the fuck has Hillary Clinton told you you should be sorry for being a white male? twitter.com/hillaryclinton/status/751581882404384768

>Or that you should give up your right to bear arms?
twitter.com/hillaryclinton/status/742408690985226241

>I don't think you care about this country at all.
I care about the liberties this country stands for, absolutely
>You are willing to turn over the keys to a scamster with a cool hat because he tells you you are a patriot if you are with him
I'm willing to vote in a man that has been a massively successful businessman so he can put those skills to work on their economy and protect my personal liberties

Meanwhile, you want to vote in a woman who will take away your liberties, let in illegal immigrants in mass, let in migrants in mass, give illegals easy access to citizenship, put us boots on the ground in Syria, and create the worst trade deals this country has ever seen.

Fucking white people and their facts right?

>THE NUMBERS ARE RACIST

Yes.jpg

Cred Forums- VIDEO GAMES

Since 2007.
Cred Forums has been libertarian the whole fucking time.
We always hated commies and neo cons alike

what does the average Cred Forums poster look like?

>Switch tactics!

College campuses tend to be more left-wing, and it's been that way for decades. You want right-wing safe spaces, go to r/thedonald.

HA

VIDEO

G A M E S
A
M
E
S

Are you high? That's just the highest level of censorship before imprisoning and execution. T

>telling someone to leave is forcing them to do so
That's not censorship.

>It's another leftist can't handle other opinions so he dumps porn to try to get the thread deleted episode
This happens every fucking time kek

>r/thedonald
>right-wing safe space

you just went full retard

I never hated commies. Maybe you did. But we didn't talk about it.

But sure as hell mocked Republicans all the time.

Pages 4-5 had too much VIDEO GAMES

Does r/thedonald ban people for having liberal opinions?

Reeeeeeeeeee a difrent opinion get out reeeeee

Kys

>That's not censorship.
No, it's showing their impotence in enacting the censorship they obviously want.

...

>Is that why they keep telling them to leave?
Getting told to leave isn't being censored. No one is forcing you to leave. They just don't agree or like your opinions, which they have the fucking right to do.
It's fucking hilarious that you can't understand this

>I never hated commies
Because you don't have the slightest grasp on economics, possibly.

Nobody on the right wants safe spaces though. We can't laugh at idiots in a safe space. Like you, if I was in a safe space I couldn't call you a retard for thinking I or anyone else besides pussy ass liberals consider safe spaces to be anything besides a declaration of the inability to comprehend opinions.

No one is to blame for crimes but the people committing them. If you can't get behind this simple principle then you don't belong in this country.

If you would look upon your fellow citizens with prejudice because of their color of their skin or whatever bullshit reason you don't deserve to call yourself an American. The spirit of this country is self determination. You can have success if you work for it, you will fail if you do not. You are defined not by your ancestors, or your peers, but by your own will.

"they" this, "we" that. All I ever hear from racists and racist apologists. How about you act like an adult and treat people like individuals. How about you act like an individual and take responsibility for your own words and actions.

>Hillary supporters stick their head in the sand about her massive breach of national security that warranted a federal investigation and nearly indictment
>"it's ok because all politicians are corrupt"
Holy shit the left wants to destroy this country. But hey, at least your black neighbor and gay friend will love you for voting blue huh?

>minimum requirements
>Processor (Intel): Core i5 6600K.

What's your issue precisely? Should I have said "alt-right" because mainstream right-wing positions aren't welcome either?

>Went from IT'S CENSORSHIP to
>THEY'D CENSOR ME IF THEY COULD
Top fucking kek. Need a hand shifting the goal posts?

Telling someone to leave is banter you retard.

>soundtrack isn't dubstep
it's 2016 m8 i don't think that shit's been in vogue in years

>Not at all. You want to make the best deals for your company much like you want to make the best deal for your country.
Countries aren't for-profit businesses, family.

>Her negligence absolutely resulted in the death of Americans in Benghazi
How so?

>I care about the liberties this country stands for, absolutely
Except for niggers and trannies, right?

>I'm willing to vote in a man that has been a massively successful businessman so he can put those skills to work on their economy and protect my personal liberties
Personal liberties? Trump literally said he wanted to censor the internet. youtube.com/watch?v=oCTaHdKsxSw

...

>But sure as hell mocked Republicans all the time.

Classic limp-wristed edge lord

Yes

You'll love it

>Nobody on the right wants safe spaces though.
So they keep saying, before retreating back into their own safe spaces.

Just because you don't use the word that doesn't mean you're not a massive hypocrite.

how about you stupid niggers stop committing crimes?

Precisely
Which is why gun control is fucking retarded. Glad we agree.

...

>Yes
Really? Do you have any proof?

So is calling video games sexist and yet that's somehow censorship

>Countries aren't for-profit businesses, family.

LOL

The multiplayer was snipers only, the recoil on the other guns were abysmal.

Seeing Lawrence in SP would be good though

...

Yes, classic. That's what we were talking about. Classic Cred Forums. What a bunch of limp-wristed edgelords we all were. How different from these armchair brownshirts of today.

That's nice in theory but in practice you can't treat a country of 320 million people like individuals. Eventually you have to look at the group.

And in fact, our inability to look at the group without being called racist is why things have gotten so bad. Black America is broken and nobody is trying to fix it. Pointing out its broken gets you called racist and you just get ignored or at best chastised about how you shouldn't generalize a group with facts.

>Countries aren't for-profit businesses, family.
u wot
Economies absolutely are. That's why the goal is to export more than you import to grow the economy. It results in better quality of life for people in the country.

>How so?
Because people had been asking her for more increased security in the region for a great deal of time

>Except for niggers and trannies, right?
I believe in their right to be degenerate as long as I'm given the right to make fun of them or point out crime statistics of them.

>Personal liberties? Trump literally said he wanted to censor the internet
Re-evaluated his position on internet terrorism into simply one of having stronger cyber security.

.....Dracula penis?

...

No, calling video games sexist is not censorship, just stupidity.
However, wanting what you believe to be 'sexist' portrayals of women in games to be censored or removed from games, which is what many liberals advocate for, is in fact censorship.

...

Well, I'm not a hypocrite? I don't like safe spaces. Echo chambers bore me, I love debate both reasonable and calling people like you dumb retards for assuming just because you can't handle different opinions I can't either.
You dumb retard.

>However, wanting what you believe to be 'sexist' portrayals of women in games to be censored or removed from games, which is what many liberals advocate for, is in fact censorship.
No it's not. Censoring things is censorship. Anything short of that isn't.

Otherwise Cred Forums is censoring me too.

>casual fps #284 with darkies

yeah no.

>How so?
>Discuss wethever or not it was a youtube video that caused the attack. While American soldiers are fighting for their lives
>Ignore every request for increased security
>Delete/Ignore all emails corresponding to the exchange.
>To this day claim that it was a youtube video that caused the attack.

You're not being very clear on what IS censorship.

Cred Forums doesn't want your opinions to be banned by mods.

>fuck battlefront
>the beta
>didn't even play the whole game
>complain

I know Cred Forums is filled with faggots, but whoa

And liberals don't want your games to be censored by the government.

>Me being called mean things on Cred Forums is the same thing as liberals forcing game devs to change their games or have them removed from stores
You're a retard. No one on Cred Forums has ever censored you.
Meanwhile we had Hatred removed from Steam until the uproar it caused got Gaben to put it back on. And we had GTA 5 removed from several huge store chains in australia. AND have had every game that shows sexy women get shit scores over it, and DOA no longer being localized because of that

They want it censored by developers.

So that'd be like Cred Forums asking me to censor myself. Which they do.

I've been posting since 2006 and browsing since 04.

Literally every thread was completely full of racism and misogyny, just like today.

Just because you grew up to be an overweight and economically illiterate nu-male, doesn't mean we (or you) were any less racist - no matter how much you want to blame it on "Le edge xD"

>If you would look upon your fellow citizens with prejudice because of their color of their skin or whatever bullshit reason you don't deserve to call yourself an American.

>You are defined not by your peers

Yes you absolutely are you entitled sheltered white boi. To ask people to ignore their own instincts and put themselves in harms way because you dont want to be "judged" for something you're associated with is entitled and pathetic.

Its your groups responsibility to fix your behavior if you dont want to be judged for it

My little sister deserves to hate you smelly worthless shitskins, and she does, and im so fucking glad, i didnt even try, they just started shipping them into her school so now they do nothing but whoop and holler and disrupt class and made her become racist apparently, LMAO

>Meanwhile we had Hatred removed from Steam until the uproar it caused got Gaben to put it back on.
So not censored?

>And we had GTA 5 removed from several huge store chains in australia.
But was the game censored, though? I guess not, because if it had been, it could've been sold in those stores. Fortunately there are plenty of other places to get GTAV.

>AND have had every game that shows sexy women get shit scores over it, and DOA no longer being localized because of that
Well that's just banter, man.

Do explain.

No they don't. They just call you a dumb faggot.

Why are her horns censored?

>He ignores the actual censorship here to respond to an easier post
Top fucking kek.
And no. Cred Forums telling you to go away is not the same as EVERY mainstream review site shitting all over a game in reviews for having sexily dressed women.
It's literally saying "Remove this from your game/future games or we'll keep giving you shit scores, which hurts your sales

I guess some of us grew up while some became even more stunted.

I find it hilarious that women that try to be special snowflakes with dyed hair and unique piercings, and thick glasses all just look the same in a sort of rainbow blur, whereas women that don't look far more unique.

It's exactly the fucking same. If you don't like hearing the opinion that your game is sexist garbage, don't make sexist garbage. You can't demand people to change their opinion for the sake of your sales. That's closer to actual censorship than anything you're talking about.

It's clear that you don't know what censorship is and you're just using it as a cudgel to bash people of the wrong political persuasion. Liberal opinions are censorship. Right-wing censorship is banter.

Only voting rigth will safe us.

The faggots mentall ill gender fa tasts all get purged.
Its worth it. Left tards pushed to much to hard.

Its time for blood.

Because I want to be a white guy like 95 percent of video games

>Countries aren't for-profit business
Fucking delusional. Economies are businesses and should be run like one. Sometimes you have to fuck over some people. You think America hasn't fucked anyone economically, for their own benefit? Delusion.

>how so?
She refused to approve ramping up security in an area that obviously needed it, even when pressured to do so. Americans died.

>except niggers and trannies
Everyone is equal. If they have the right to live how they want, crazy right-wingers have the right to mock them. Free speech censorship is fascism.

If any pol tels you to an hero subhuman.

>So not censored
Except it completely was censored until someone saw that it's fucking ridiculous and put it back up. You're literally saying WELL IT GOT BACK UP SO IT DOESN'T COUNT

And the game was literally banned from several stores, that's a means of physical censorship. Yes the game could be got somewhere else, but the fact that the store refused to carry it because it hurt feminist feelings is censorship purely because it potentially cost the developers a shit ton of sales

>That's just banter man
No, giving games horrible scores which HEAVILY hurts sales with people who check reviews is not banter. DOA is literally not localizing because they will lose money over it. They know fans who would buy the game will just import it, and this way they don't lose a shit ton of sales over a shitty score by a gaymen journalists

>no one is to blame for crimes but the people committing them
So you're against gun control? Y'know, since you can't ban all guns because of the actions of a few outliers, right?

>is there any reason not to buy this game?
It's EA, along with everything it implies

>Having a conventional/mainstream and intellectually-void, center-left opinion
>grown up

i shiggy diggy

>If you don't like hearing the opinion that your game is sexist garbage,
>hearing the opinion
>opinion
kys famalam.

You can't take a joke yet claim other people are immature. Mhm.

>It's exactly the fucking same
No, it's not. And you're a retard if you believe that. Let me break it down for you.

>You post your opinion on Cred Forums
>They call you retarded
VS
>Dev makes a game with sexy women in it
>Review sites which are meant to be UNBIASED shit all over the game heavily hurting sales
>Dev doesn't sell nearly as many copies as they could have if the game was reviewed fairly

You're a fucking moron if you think they are the same

Not only did I not say her email scandal is okay, i specifically said I wasn't saying that

How stupid are you to try to put an opinion in my mouth after I've already rejected it

Being a household name is not an indicator of greatness. Kim Kardashian is a household name.

Giving money to politicans is setting a really low bar for "egnaging in politics". Politics is hard, complex work. You wouldn't hire a driver who didn't have an extensive driving record. And you certainly wouldn't hire someone without an extensive driving record for the hardest and important driving job in the world. Yet you essentially want to make Trump the head driver of America's formula 1 team because he hung around some drivers and maybe bought a few cars.

You want a politician who will make the best deals for the country, not for himself. Trump has never really done anything for anyone that is not himself.

There is no evidence that Hillary Clinton's decisions directly led to the death of Americans in Benghazi. Embassies in crumbling middle eastern countries are dangerous by nature. Do you know how many embassy attacks and deaths there were in this administration compared to the previous one? Hint: It's not more. The security measures in place were standard. Whether or not they were adequate is a valid discussion of policy, not the Secretary's personal decisionmaking.

Simply being asked to listen is not the same thing as being shamed for existing. Your strawmen are very strong.

The restriction of certain kinds of weapons is not the same as giving up your right to bear arms. Next you are going to tell me that your right to bear arms is being infringed because you can't own a thermonuclear device even though it's technically "arms". No part of the constitution extends into infinity, even though there's the first amendment you can't shout fire in a crowded theater and even though there's the second amendment you can't own any and every weapon ever.

>it's another mods ignore blatant trump thread episode

>Except it completely was censored until someone saw that it's fucking ridiculous and put it back up. You're literally saying WELL IT GOT BACK UP SO IT DOESN'T COUNT
Well if "we totally would if we could" counts then again Cred Forums is censorship central.

>And the game was literally banned from several stores, that's a means of physical censorship. Yes the game could be got somewhere else, but the fact that the store refused to carry it because it hurt feminist feelings is censorship purely because it potentially cost the developers a shit ton of sales

I guess the fact that the grocery store around the corner doesn't carry GTAV is also censorship then.

>No, giving games horrible scores which HEAVILY hurts sales with people who check reviews is not banter.
Well, it's not censorship at any rate. It's literally, LITERALLY the opposite of censorship. It's people expressing their opinions.

>There is no evidence that Hillary Clinton's decisions directly led to the death of Americans in Benghazi.

yeah it was just a youtube video right, but muslims arent radicals and we need to import reckless amounts of them

you dumb sick traitors need to be lined up and shot

>having an edgy, intellectually void alt-right opinion
>grown up

>That quote
Conveniently ignoring how many repubs are fundamentalist christians who think demons live in the people they don't like.

>M-muh sales

You act like this has any fucking relevance to the argument. Oh no, think of the poor devs! Won't you soften your harsh OPINION for their sake? That's an appeal to pity and not proof of censorship.

back to your safe space tumblrina

>Well, it's not censorship at any rate. It's literally, LITERALLY the opposite of censorship. It's people expressing their opinions.
Impressive mental gymnastics you got there.

just too bad for the historical inaccuracy

>Impressive mental gymnastics you got there.
The fucking brass on this feller

Last I check this was the videogames board, not r/thedonald

Nice strawman, leftie. He's talking about policy

C'mon, you can think of something better than that

>Well if "we totally would if we could" counts then again Cred Forums is censorship central.
No, it's not the fucking same at all because the censorship DID happen. You being called a faggot is not the same as a game being removed from Steam. Yes the game got put back up, but the fact that it was removed in the first place was censorship

>I guess the fact that the grocery store around the corner doesn't carry GTAV is also censorship then.
No, the fact that the stores such as Target carried other video games but refused to carry GTA is censorship. Nice try shifting the goalpost there though

>Well, it's not censorship at any rate. It's literally, LITERALLY the opposite of censorship. It's people expressing their opinions.
Except as a reviewer it's not your fucking job to insert politics and personal beliefs into the review of a product. A journalist is meant to give an unbiased review. Not intentionally try to hurt sales because they were offended

Reminder that Trump would sell you out to our greatest ally for a dollar

>People aren't mooslims and mooslims aren't people. Lucille! Grab meh a beer!

my god this is unbelievable

i never liked women being oversexualized in video games because it wasnt realistic, but now, you absolutely massive cucks will go to the ends of the earth to defend women being inserted every where in combat roles for equality because thats just so progressive and you're so tolerant and liberal and not sexist right!, you're not one of those creeps who wanted women being sexualized in vidya right, you stand for equality!

you people are seriously fucking sick and need to be put down

Review sites are supposed to be unbiased, but of course beta SJW cuck "journalists" have to shoehorn their unwanted liberal hogwash into every review.
>le diversity meem
>le strong female role meem
Aren't developers supposed to make games aimed at their target audience? Instead they have to pander to liberals so their game doesn't get shit on.

>The restriction of certain kinds of weapons is not the same as giving up your right to bear arms.
Yes it is
>Next you are going to tell me that your right to bear arms is being infringed because you can't own a thermonuclear device even though it's technically "arms"
I'm not able to aim and direct the force on a single individual, so there's a big difference. You ARE allowed to own things up to 35mm in the US because generally up to that point the shrapnel is a non issue.

> No part of the constitution extends into infinity, even though there's the first amendment you can't shout fire in a crowded theater
Shouting fire in a crowded theater is a command, not an expressed opinion. It is also a private establishment. Free speech is about expressing opinions, not commands.

>though there's the second amendment you can't own any and every weapon ever.
You can own whatever a military soldier can carry, excluding explosives due to their lack of precision.
That's very intentional.
You cannot own automatic weapons without a class 3 license though, which is fucking retarded and I hate that it'll never be reversed (and the knowledge of it never being reversed is why I'm ESPECIALLY against gun control)

Trump has the least jewish support of all the candidates, his "ties" are practically all just lip service "oh my daughter married a jew we love them very much remember muh six trillion"

kek

You're a fucking retard. No ones asking you to soften their harsh opinion. We're telling you to fucking review the goddamn game based on it's merit and gameplay. Knocking the game down several fucking points because it has a scantily clad woman is censorship.
It's hurting sales to try to convince devs to remove the sexy women in the next installment.

i grew up hating rednecks but they less delusional than you insufferably sheltered white kids

...

>Yes the game got put back up, but the fact that it was removed in the first place was censorship
The game wasn't even released yet. It's potential censorship.

Actually it's not even that because Steam is a private platform like Target and has the ability to decide for itself what it does or does not want to carry. This is hardly the only game that has been "censored" from Steam, you know.

>No, the fact that the stores such as Target carried other video games but refused to carry GTA is censorship.
Nah, though.

>Except as a reviewer it's not your fucking job to insert politics and personal beliefs into the review of a product.
That's just like, your opinion, man. You're free to follow other reviewers if you disagree with these.

>Not intentionally try to hurt sales because they were offended
They're not going to mitigate their honest opinion for the sake of giving your garbage game MORE sales you twat.

Maybe we should do away with reviews entirely because in your world they should all just be 10/10 anyway.

This
>My face when I suddenly started to respect rednecks far more than most modern liberals, because they at least love this country and their fellow American citizens
It was a really mind shattering moment for me.

>Muslims are a tolerant and peaceful people!
> Me? No, I'd never live in a Muslim area.

Where are you even getting all this shit now, it has no resemblance to anything even remotely relevant to the conversation any more.

Maybe you need to take a break from Cred Forums, you're starting to see ghosts under your bed.

Ah, yes, YOU don't want it, so therefore no one wants it. You're not the target audience, so NO ONE is the target audience.

kys

>that's like your opinion meme
No, it's not. Game reviews are supposed to be unbiased. You review a game based on its merits as a video game, not on your arbitrary political beliefs that at least half of your readers don't agree with.
>knocking off points for some SJW reason that many of your players don't agree with
>this score is now aggregated into the game's overall score and lowers it, potentially hurting sales
It's unprofessional and that's an objective fact. There is no argument to be had here.

>Knocking the game down several fucking points because it has a scantily clad woman is censorship.
My God, you've actually boiled your argument down to the tiniest kernel of retardation. You are not qualified to argue what is or isn't censorship. I can hardly believe my eyes. This has to be bait. To see it stated to plainly, without any attempt to even hide the complete utter lack of logic, this is like the unicorn of bad arguments on Cred Forums.

>strawman
post discarded instantly lol

>Wow guys DRUMPF (pffthahahah I'm so funny guys lol) is such a racist, he hates people that aren't white
>If he wins I'm moving to Canada, Switzerland, or Norway. You know, places fucking full of white people.
Fuckin liberals man.

Yeah, gun control is dumb

If you were expecting a gotcha moment because you thought I was some kind of liberal strawman I'm sorry to disappoint you lol

>black america is broken
yeah. Black people know this more than anyone

>no one is trying to fix it
I spent a minute trying to figure out an expression to convey my incredulity at this false statement but i decided to just say you're very wrong. There are literally tens of thousands of grassroots programs by and for black communities to tackle the internal cultural and socioeconomic problems they face.

I'll agree that racial dialogue is also broken and there are lot of things that will get you called a racist that shouldn't. I'll also say that there some things that will get you called a racist that should get you called a racist, and one of them is when a white person frames every single issue blacks face as an internal cultural problem, something that I unfortunately see a lot of and will help neither to solve black america's problems nor to improve inter race dialogue

Churches are considered institutions. That's why I brought it up.

And to all the idiots claiming the right doesn't support censorship, I'd like to remind you of all the video games and movies that wing of politics has tried to stamp out for not having "conservative" or Christian values. The Da Vinci Code. Grand Theft Auto. Anything with someone gay in it. Hell, I remember a call to boycott Colgate toothpaste because the company was hiring openly gay workers.

Both ends of the spectrum are responsible for the exact same shit. Now take this trash back to Cred Forums.

>The game wasn't even released yet. It's potential censorship.
It was going to be censored until people called it out for the bullshit censorship it was and Gaben had it put back up. And the game had literally no reason to not be on steam. Almost every fucking AAA game is a mass murder simulation. The thing that was so "offensive" about hatred is that he had no motive for killing beyond that he wanted to

>Nah though
Nice to see you have no rebuttal. Yes, refusing to carry GTA but selling other shooters like COD is fucking censorship.

>That's just like, your opinion, man
No, it's fucking not. You are meant to be unbiased. It's literally in the fucking job description. Reviewers are meant to give unbiased reviews.
>You're free to follow other reviewers
Except this doesn't stop all the mainstream reviewers DRASTICALLY hurting sales by giving shitty reviews over the game showing some cleavage

>They're not going to mitigate their honest opinion for the sake of giving your garbage game MORE sales you twat.
Again, the job is to review the fucking game. Review the GAMEPLAY, GRAPHICS, STORY, AND MUSIC. There's absolutely nothing wrong with giving a game a shitty review, IF THE GAME IS IN FACT SHITTY.
Knocking off several points because they have a girl in a bikini with huge tits is censorship. They aren't reviewing the game, they are injecting personal beliefs where they do not belong.

>holy shit you're so stupid like I can't even, holy fuck how can someone be so stupid like omg holy shit lol literally laughing at how stupid you are, no one can be this retarded like wow lol
Typical liberal Redditor ad hominem with no substance. Tossed out.

>Game reviews are supposed to be unbiased.
This is literally false. Games reviewers are paid to give an opinion. You review the game on its merits as a complete product, not on the arbitrary demands of manchildren who want you to ignore half the contents, because those just aren't relevant to video games (unless those contents happen to be the WRONG politics, then it's worth making ten threads an hour about).

i was just thinking of the video game industry as a whole over the years, how its evolved, and how you nerds have gone from buying politically incorrect autistic garbage to politically correct cuck garbage

This whole medium literally went from regularly oversexualizing and "objectifying" women to pretending women are just as physically capable as men in like less than 5 years, now you have games where women are in melee combat everywhere just as proficient as the men in those games, and you rarely even see cleavage anymore (not that i ever liked that) and you fucking losers still defend it

The whole industry needs to die, but "gamers" are a bunch of pathetic cuck retards who throw their money at anything apparently

>I have no rebuttal so I'll just keep calling your argument stupid
It is censorship. Giving a game shit reviews so it will sell poorly because you were offended is a form of censorship. The reviewer cannot stop the game from existing, so instead they try to hurt the sales and the amount of people who will play it

>This is literally false. Games reviewers are paid to give an opinion
An opinion on the gameplay. Not your shitty political beliefs that you inject into the game

>review its merits as a complete product
I agree. That doesn't include arbitrary political opinions. "This game doesn't have enough diversity" isn't a legitimate complaint about a game, any more than "this game doesn't let me kill niggers" is a legitimate complaint. Politics have no place within video game reviews unless the game is explicitly political and the developers intended it to be such.

>IF THE GAME IS IN FACT SHITTY.
According to your arbitrary standards and not theirs, right?

Okay, one last time. Stores have the right to decide for themselves what they want to carry. That is not censorship. Reviewers are paid to give an opinion, even opinions you don't like, even opinions regarding things you want them to ignore. That is not censorship. Contributing to a negative consensus about something is also not censorship. Nothing you mentioned is censorship and they are, in fact, exercises of freedom in the Western world. Not only are these things allowed, you should be thankful that they are.

>one of the most brutal wars which UStatians entered late
>feature a small group of niggers that did nothing but be black
>France is DLC

WE
WUZ
KAANGZZZ

You lads have no idea how happy I am to see that retarded censorship hungry faggots like the one in this thread are the minority here.

There's a bunch of grassroots movements but none of them are going anywhere. And it's only blacks trying these movements. White people cannot head them or even participate in this current atmosphere. At best you get those fringe individuals working to make a predominantly black community better, and if we get a million of those we might get somewhere. But I ain't holdin my breath.

If we want to fix black America we have to address black America. And black America and half of white Anerica refuses to allow it to be addressed.
At this rate one of two things is gonna happen, black America collapses and who knows what happens next, or this whole thing gets a lot worse real quick.

>The whole industry needs to die

I mean not really, i guess i just thought too much of vidya consumers, it makes sense now that i think of it, the same kids pathetic enough to buy vidya for sex appeal are now growing up with nothing better to do than throw their money away on cuck propaganda vidya

The best part is he had no say in being born with Trump as his last name. How the fuck did he have any power over something his ancestor did before he was even born?

Your argument is essentially "muh feels". muh scary feels to be exact

By the time your an adult you should have figured how to treat strangers with respect without having to trust them.

There's no logic in being prejudiced one way or the other. If you would treat a person with more suspicion because of the color of their skin then you are an asshole. If you would treat a person with less suspicion because of the color of their skin you are a fool, and putting yourself in a vulnerable position.

>these basement dwellers genuinely believe Trump will ever win
Gonna love every laugh on election day
How many of you are going to kill yourselves when Hillary becomes your president?

t. europe

>Giving a game shit reviews so it will sell poorly because you were offended is a form of censorship.
They give games bad reviews because they are bad, in one way or another. Of course, it's all opinions, so you're free to disagree, and buy the game regardless. Fortunately for you these reviews usually go into quite a bit of detail regarding the reasoning behind the verdict. You could read that, you know, and decide for yourself.

But in no fucking reality is this anywhere close to censorship, get it through your fucking skull. Not even if you're going to attribute malice to reviewers, which is a blatant assumption on your part.

>An opinion on the gameplay.
And opinion on the game. The whole product.

Here's a fun little exercise. Since opinions about anything but the gameplay don't matter at all, I guess we should ban any discussion of the race or gender or sexuality of video game characters from Cred Forums, since they're blatantly off-topic. Agree?

They come over from reddit or tumblr or neofag or who knows where else and think they can survive outside their safe spaces. It's very interesting that liberal ideologies flourish only in places where all other beliefs can easily be censored, but in places where very little is not permitted, they are much fewer in number.

Trump is trending very well in swing states, and much like brexit, there's a HUGE percent of the population that is afraid to admit support for Trump due to being seen as sexist / racist for it.
He'll win. After Brexit, the fact that the polls are even as close as they are is just evidence he'll win.

I don't believe he'll win but I'll never support Hillary. I don't support social justice, I don't support BLM, I don't support the globalist agenda, so why would I support a candidate like Shillary?

>KEK KEK KEK KEK
>CTR CTR CTR CTR
>SHILL SHILL SHILL SHILL
You alt-right kiddies are even worse

>According to your arbitrary standards and not theirs, right?
My standards are reviewing the game based on gameplay, story, graphics, music, and voice acting if the game has it.
These are not arbitrary standards, these are the only thing you should be reviewing the game on.

Giving the game a shitty score because you're a faggot cuck who gets triggered seeing a big titty woman is in fact censorship. You are no longer reviewing the game based on it's own merit, you are reviewing it on your own political beliefs.

Let me paint you a picture here.
>A muslim person makes a line of blenders
>Now this is a pretty good blender, and I'm reviewing it for my review site, my opinion will greatly affect how many blenders are sold
>The blender is good, deserves a good fair review on how it performs
>Instead I rate the blender 5/10 because the man is muslim and I don't like that
That is censorship, as is giving games shitty scores over political beliefs.

I treat people with suspicion or the lack thereof based on how they dress. Dress like a gangster and I'm not gonna turn my back to you, red yellow black or white. Frankly I mostly see blacks dressing like gangsters. White people around here either wear boots and a 10 gallon hat or a plaid shirt and fake glasses.

It's interesting that right-wing beliefs only thrive in places where people are forced to put up with obnoxious shitheads trying to dominate every coversation

what did brexit mean by thT

Keep telling yourself that. 90% of Trump's campaign is just memes. People think it's funny to support him.
It'll be like UKIP in the UK - gain a lot of traction but fall short in the end.

The whole black thing is to draw attention from the shit game they are trying to get away with releasing, screencap this if you want

>everyone in my shitty flyover farm is voting for Trump how can he possibly lose?

How do people get this naive? The world is a shitty place and cultures are not equal, get over it.
yesimright.com/young-girl-hitchhiked-through-the-middle-east-to-prove-muslims-are-peaceful-what-they-did-next/

>They give games bad reviews because they are bad, in one way or another
Except when a game is good but they give it a shitty score because
>IT HAD A WOMAN WITH BIG TITS IN A SLUTTY OUTFIT AND THAT HURT MY FEELINGS
That's completely unfair and you know it

>can't have strong arguments
>can't form statements
>lol ur just meanies
You are so full of shit.

>My standards are reviewing the game based on gameplay, story, graphics, music, and voice acting if the game has it.
>These are not arbitrary standards, these are the only thing you should be reviewing the game on.
You don't even realise that you are giving an OPINION here on what is relevant to a video game and what isn't. Yes, these are arbitrary standards. You decide that these things matter and other things don't. Well, they matter to you. You can just ignore the parts of a review pertaining to other areas of a game.

>Giving the game a shitty score because you're a faggot cuck who gets triggered seeing a big titty woman is in fact censorship.
Please keep going, I can't get enough of seeing this idiocy stated so plainly. It's so utterly absurd it's like I entered some bizarre alternate reality where logic doesn't work.

90% of Trump's campaign is policy.
Liberals just focus on the memes.

>It'll be like UKIP in the UK
Where the sole purpose of the party was to get Brexit happen and they did?
I agree.

I live in libtart filled Minnesota actually.
Never met a high energy Hillary supporter in my life, and I live in fucking MPLS.

Brexit happened, buckaroo. It was exactly the same shit. "Lol Brexit supporters are just outlying racists and Islamophobes it'll never happen don't worry xD"

>Here's a fun little exercise. Since opinions about anything but the gameplay don't matter at all, I guess we should ban any discussion of the race or gender or sexuality of video game characters from Cred Forums, since they're blatantly off-topic. Agree?
No I don't agree. Because discussion here DOESN'T HURT SALES YOU FUCKING FAGGOT
If you're in a position that your review will make or break a games sales you give that game a fair fucking review. You don't drop several points because you get offended over sexy women in it

>let's take a picture of Trump's rally while he's talking
>and then let's compare it to Hillary's while they're setting up the stage
>yeah this sounds like a good argument, those Hillary shills won't know what hit them!

Never met a Trump supporter that wasn't a pepe-spamming meme teen

You do realise that that is 1. religious discrimination and 2. judging the blender on factors entirely independent of the blender?

You're not actually going to argue now that a game's story or presentation or graphics are not part of the game?

Because Trump is fucking stupid compared to Hillary. She's scum, but he spews conspiracy theory bullshit with no basis in fact. The "birther" belief he had for the longest damn time is good enough evidence of that, and he wants to put a denier of climate change in charge of the Enviromental Protection Agency.

Would you let a murderer take the wheel of a bus going 60mph, or a chimp?

>we can fit 30,000 people (trump average rally attendance) into a tiny gym hall

why are liberals so low IQ? is it the soy based diets?

>while they're setting up the stage
m8
Those are the full attendance pics.

It may be unfair in your eyes, it's obviously completely fair in theirs, and either way, not censorship in the eyes of anyone who knows what the word means.

Are you done babbling? The image was talking about economic p o l i c y.

I couldn't care less about conservative christian values

I'm proud of my frog posting habits knowing it triggers you.

>gameplay, story, music and graphics are arbitrary when it comes to a video game
Fucking kek. Get the fuck off this board. You don't know anything about gaming.
>wow you're so stupid like wow holy shit I can't believe how stupid you are it's amazing lol no one can be so retarded lol like I can't even?!?!?
More typical liberal Redditor ad hom trash with no substance or rebuttal, discredited.

>Hey Jim we got this new game for you to review, it looks pretty good, play though it and give us the review
>"Does it have sexily dressed women?"
>Uh yeah, but that's not what you're paid to review and write abou-
>"6 OUT OF 10, MISOGYNISTIC GAME"
>Don't you think that's completely unfair to the people who made the game and the readers who are tricked into thinking the game is bad because the ONE person reviewing it got offended?
>"NO AND FAGGOTS ONLINE WILL DEFEND ME SO WHO CARES"
There's literally no arguing with retards like you. A reviewer is meant to be unbiased. There's literally no arguing against this

>I'm not going to respond to any point you said, I'm just going to attack you personally
Yup, pretty much the whole reason I stopped being a liberal.

>being proud of a literal reddit meme
I bet you're a proud member of Anonymous too right?

I wasn't speaking specifically to you.

>Because discussion here DOESN'T HURT SALES YOU FUCKING FAGGOT
No? There are people who buy games based on Cred Forums's recommendation. Anyway, what we were talking about is what is relevant to the discussion of video games. And clearly it is final destination, no politics, gameplay only.

The nebulous criterion of "hurting sales" for the wrong reason is still not censorship btw

>w-well he didn't know about them
bullshit, and you know it

If "he's definitely going to lose", why the fuck do you care who I support? Hillary is guaranteed the win, right? So why does it matter? You seem angry about my choice of political candidate. Pretty childish desu. Or maybe you're actually worried?

2012 election happened too

Pepe is home grown Cred Forums meme goodness, and we took him back.

A chimp because the murder wants to kill me, also chimps r kewl

I'm arguing that a character design is a very minimal part of the game, which does not justify several points being taken away if the reviewer doesn't like it.
And taking away points over sexy women in a game is sexual discrimination. Stop slut shaming shitlord

Of course you did, reddit.

Just like rage comics, right?

Obama's poll numbers were far wider, and people weren't shamed about supporting Romney.

You are literally so mad over people having opinions you disagree with that you want to classify it as censorship of the opinions you agree with, and you see no irony in this.

You can go on and on about misleading the people with their 7.5 instead 8/10 if people don't bother to actually read the review and that it's only wrong because it's done for the wrong reasons and how only the things you care about should matter but it's all such a crock of shit.

I'm not the other guy, and you're looking for a motive that isn't there. Just posting my viewpoint.

The goalposts

THE GOALPOSTS

I hate nu-males as much as anyone on Cred Forums, but this user is right

kekcucks needs to go

I get the feeling if these movements were full of white people then you would say something like "blacks aren't even interest in fixing their own communities, all the community programs are full of white people it's all a feel good white liberal sham". But that's beside the point, because often these programs do have white people! Community programs tend include members of the community of all races, or members from outside the community who have time and skills to graciously offer.

You're operating off a media strawman picture of reality. Every day in cities around the country people of all races talk to each other and participate in their communities and do the gritty, unglamorous, and often boring work of making things better. But of course that doesn't make the headlines. The media wants to divide people because the more divided we are the more afraid we are of each other and the more they think we'll tune in to watch the nightly news. I better watch CNN the race war is going to break out any minute and I need to know when it happens.

You can't fix black America user. Only black people can do that. But you can help race relations. You don't have to volunteer for whatever cause or vote for whatever candidate or do anything other than respect people. Don't denigrate the people trying to fix things or say they don't exist

>I'm going to intentionally hurt this games sales
>The game was actually pretty good, the only real thing that bothered me was sexy dressed women in it
>This is somehow not financial censorship and me sending a message that I will continue to hurt the sales of every game with sexy women in it
Fucking. Retard.

Remember, when you've lost the argument, call someone reddit.
If you're too new to remember feels good man pepe, you're new as fuck.

What the hell do you suppose was then

ten years on Cred Forums is probably the biggest reason I'm so liberal

>respond to me by criticising me for things i didnt and never say despite shitposting on Cred Forums full time while probably getting paid more than you

lmao

If you paid attention in political threads you'd be libertarian by now.
Liberal policies and economics don't work.
Socialism is a failed idea.
Communism is criminal.

>it's ok when liberals do it!
So if a guy reviewed a game and took off 2 points because the protagonist was black and he doesn't like black people, that's ok to you? After all, it's just his opinion right?

I can't wait for this.

>I'm arguing that a character design is a very minimal part of the game
So, part of the game.

>which does not justify several points being taken away if the reviewer doesn't like it.
Anything justifies points being taken away if the reviewer does not like it, that's basically the only reason for taking points away, and how many is always up to the reviewer's discretion.

>And taking away points over sexy women in a game is sexual discrimination.
No, stop making shit up.

horrible things like that have happened in every country, certainly in America

anecdotes are not of much use because you can use them to support literally any position. I can make the argument that white people are psychopaths then cite the Aurora theater shooting

No one here is paid to have an unbiased opinion, meanwhile reviewers are. Nice try though idiot.
It's financial censorship. They are intentionally hurting reviews to get the games to sell less because they are offended by sexily dressed women.
Taking away sales from a game because you got offended is clearly censorship. Censorship comes in many forms
>T-they can give shitty reviews and every reader just had to second guess the reviewer and it's okay
They are paid to be unbiased. Giving a game shit scores over a political belief is incredible biased

Just because a meme starts on Cred Forums doesn't mean it stays there

kekcucks are fucking embarrassing, might as well buy a guy fawkes mask while you're at it

I think some gamergate offshoots already do things like this for "SJW games", if any of them are still around after two years. They're free to do so and we're free to recognise them for the petty manchildren they are.

You guys should take the politic stuff else where atleast stsy on track and talk about niggers

And conservatism and denial go hand in hand.

Moderation is key.

The whole point was that the naive attitude of trust strangers is completely retarded. Though on a side note, not every culture treats women equally, and Turks have a bit of a reputation there too.

It didn't stay here.
But we took it back by making it a 'hate symbol'

>I'm going to intentionally hurt this games sales
You're the only person who thinks like this. Reviewers actually think "I'm reviewing this game, I dislike this aspect, so I'm going to lower the score, which is my job".
>This is somehow not financial censorship
No, it's isn't. There's no such thing.

Stop committing financial censorship of EA by not buying ten copies of Dragon Age Inquisition right now you hypocrite.

Just like Anonymous and Gamergate, right?

If the reviewer doesn't like the character design, they can take ONE point away maximum, because it's such a small part of the game. Yet they mark games down by 2-4 fucking points over it.

And yes, it is. What's the difference between Slut Walk, a movement to empower women showing off their bodies by telling men they can't say how they are dressed, and reviewers demanding women be covered up in games?
It's literally slut shaming sexual discrimination user. Are you a shitlord?

Conservatism is acceptance of facts, such as gun control not working.

>If you paid attention in political threads you'd be libertarian by now.
Ah yes, the old Cred Forums fallacy. If you come here long enough, you will come to think exactly like me!

>they're petty manchildren lol xD
>but it's perfectly fine and understandable for a reviewer to take off points for a woman being dressed too risqué
Funny how you had to throw in that little ad hominem jab. I thought people were free to their opinions?

So if you think a racist reviewer is a petty manchild, I have every right to think an SJW reviewer is a beta numale cuckold.

If these groups were run by white people I'd think them ineffectual since the primary pull must come from the black community itself.
But they also cannot do it alone, it must be Americans coming together of all races, but that's simply not happening on a wide scale, and we're seeing an outright reversal of that now.
Racial tensions are so damn high right now.

>Literally IT'S OKAY WHEN WE DO IT
Yes there is a thing as financial censorship. A reviewer is paid to give an UNBIASED review of a game. Please tell me how giving it a shitty review over sexily dressed women is unbiased.
I'll wait

>If the reviewer doesn't like the character design, they can take ONE point away maximum
This is an arbitrary distinction you're making.

>Yet they mark games down by 2-4 fucking points over it.
How do you even determine that? Do they give the "original" unadjusted pre-sexism score alongside it?

Fuck you're dumb.

>What's the difference between Slut Walk, a movement to empower women showing off their bodies by telling men they can't say how they are dressed, and reviewers demanding women be covered up in games?
Agency.

The current state of the democratic party the only thing holding it together is blind millenials and denial, conservatism has never really been connected to denial, except on maybe the faaaar right

15% of the population is niggers, and they're responsible for over half the murders committed in our country every year now

when it comes to shooting sprees, black kids are for once, not over represented, but for once, make up an amount proportional to their percentage of the population

but this gives niggers an excuse to treat white kids like they're all school shooters

you people are sickening

If by "taking it back" you mean "pissed on it so no one else wanted it", then you're right Fido.

And liberalism is pretending to care about issues that don't affect you so you can virtue signal on social media and feel good about yourself for being a "caring" slacktivist.

>No one here is paid to have an unbiased opinion, meanwhile reviewers are.
Doesn't matter. It's about relevance to video games.

If politics are a topic for discussion on Cred Forums then they are a relevant criterion for reviews.

>le virtue signal maymay

>I thought people were free to their opinions?
Oh, is my banter censoring you? I guess the argument has come full circle. Go back to your safe space faggot.

Yeah, because climate denial, religious fundamentalism, and secret muslim/jew conspiracies are based in fact.

It's very true though. Like how feminism wails about rape culture but suddenly gets apologetic over the mass molestation by migrants.

Just like the trickle-down meme right?

Please tell me how you telling people not to buy games or not buying games yourself is not financial censorship.

If the answer is reach then that just means your censorship is smaller in scope but that doesn't make it better morally.

Who are you replying to? I'm not the censor guy. I'm calling you out for being a biased faggot.
>it's totally ok for reviewers to deduct points because they don't like scantily clad women
>but a reviewer who doesn't like a black protag is a petty manchild
Pure liberal hypocrisy.

>Moderation is key.

A LITERAL SELF ADMITTED MIDDLEGROUND FALLACY KEK

holy fuck you need to fucking kill yourself pronto

>This is an arbitrary distinction you're making.
No, this is called being rational. If the main characters jacket is blue and I fucking hate the color blue, taking away 3 points from the score is completely unfair.

And games like dragons crown got reviews as low as 6.5 with the reasoning being "misogynistic designs"

Tell me how giving bad scores over your own political beliefs in unbiased. Go on

You're a fucking retard. No one is paid to be unbiased on this site, so no one has any reason to trust Cred Forums for accurate game reviews. Anyone can post here. Meanwhile reviewers are meant to be trusted to give honest fair, and unbiased reviews

You two are the only guys in this thread, ive been watching you post and post and the poster count doesnt move, for fucks sake, waste eachothers time someplace else, you really think youre going to change anyones opinion?

You mean the meme started by the left to try and ridicule the fact that only rich people can create thousands of jobs?

Nice meme arrow nonargument you fucking betamale.

Of course I have my opinion on these things, but I think both of them are entitled to their opinions too, and most importantly, that none of them are censoring anyone by giving their opinions because that's fucking retarded.

Oh I just called someone's opinion retarded, I'm sorry, didn't mean to censor anyone.