What's the best Rockstar open world game?

He is correct actually

RDR>GTA5>SA>Bully>VC>3

Best atmosphere: Vice City
Best physics/shooting: RDR
Best open world features: San Andreas
Best technology: GTAV
Best driving: GTAIV
Best story: None of them, the Housers are garbage at writing stories.

THIS too bad it'll never be on pc.

RDR > Bully > GTA IV > GTA:SA > Vice city > GTA V > GTA III

Did anyone play this ?

>GTA IV ">" anything

Are you one of those hipsters that think GTA IV is better than GTA V?

RDR>GTAIV> VC >SA >V>III

But you've never been to school.

I beg your pardon?

If you weren't a casual with adhd you'd probably love it too.

RDR

RDR > Bully > Manhunt (not open world) > the rest

>III because you can't beat a classic

I dont think III deserves only nostalgia points.

It's one of the better designed GTA's that gave you the most gameplay per square meter. A really nice, tight experience.

>
>I really hate GTA V. It's so bland.
It's bland and somewhat soulless, but it objectively had everything we could've wanted from a new gta game, which alone puts it above 3 at the very least.

>RDR felt dead to me.
Not sure what you mean. It's a western game, it's not supposed to feel crowded and full of life. I personally felt like it was the best Rockstar has ever made.

>Bully because I can bully and take my rage out from school.
Compared to rockstars other titles, it wasn't nearly that good.

>IV because of Niko.
Just for the character? Vanilla gta was depressing and bland game play wise, but it had soul unlike gta 5. BoGT on the other hand was amazing.

>III because you can't beat a classic
Yeah you can, and R* has. 3 was good, but people view it with nostalgia goggles to the point where it's ridiculous.

GTA IV was easily the worst GTA in the series, back when it came out, everyone thought it was a glorified tech demo. All it had was "muh physics and itsy bitsy details that applease my auitsm", Nothing was good about it, awful story, shit MC, boring driving. If you think this was better than GTA V, consider suicide.

RDR>Vice City=BoGT>SA>IV>Bully>III>TLaD

IV > V in some ways, worse in others. Thus the >

>be shit at driving in IV
>n-no! I-its the games fault! I'm really g-good at M-mario Kart!

>le latest addition is le worst meme

I love how Cred Forums hates hipsters yet you cunts also hate literally anything new.

I didn't enjoy it as much as Cred Forums would've liked. GTA Online is a scam to make more money (also have no friends), and there's nothing to do after a 100% completion.

That wasn't even a defensive arguement, it's just assuming I was bad at the game.

>GTA Online is a scam to make more money
True

>There's nothing to do after a 100% completion
Basically the same as all the other GTA games in that respect

>its another GTA IV stealth thread

when will u faggots fuck off

Grab, red dead

disgusting

If you don't like IV driving then you definitely are bad at the game, you think IV driving is too difficult because you'd rather have the game drive for you.

Just because you are slow at driving doesn't mean the game is slow. You're just shit. Learn to play.

GTAV driving made the whole game really fucking boring.

what are some mods?

Best opinion

IV had the best story though

I honestly, unironically loved GTA IV, and while GTA V has a great map and amazing graphics, the in-game interaction with said features are really lacking, and I keep trying to not go back to GTA IV whenever I'm playing it.

Nico was a great MC and the story gave me some feels.

The Police was great although they had too much health.

Vice City. Most of their games suck.

GTA III

I'm a sucker for RDR but it's hard to beat GTAV.