Why its okay for fox to be broken in melee but its not okay for meta knight to be broken in brawl?

Why its okay for fox to be broken in melee but its not okay for meta knight to be broken in brawl?

the reason why melee players hate brawl so much its because fox is bottom tier in brawl?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=E6iYiaDiqIk
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

>Fox
>broken
LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

It's not even close. Meta Knight is fucking stupidly broken compared to the rest of the cast.

Fox has a LOT of counter play and is only better by a small margin than the other top tiers, only by popular top opinions(which is close too).

>1.13 vs 1.000

Fucking kek, do you not know how to read? MK is WAYYY further ahead of the rest of the cast.

Plus that list is from 2015.

>Smashfags have not yet reached 20XX levels of competitive play

Fox is only best because he's a little faster/stronger than average, metaknight is just has retarded priority and is frustrating to play against making him a magnet for 12 year olds

>1 stock sample size
you win this time, user

This is why.

Who would win, Smash Pikachu, Melee Fox, Brawl Meta Knight or Sm4sh Mario? >implying Mario isn't top 1 in the current patch

Imagine Jigglypuff in Melee, but with guaranteed kills off the top.

Meta Knight wins by a landslide.

can we include pre patch diddy with the hoo hah

thx doctur

smash 4 mario shouldn't even be a part of this discussion

It honestly depends on how much hitstun there is. If all the characters have the same amount of hitstun, AND they keep all their mechanics, fox wins.
If the hitstun varies depending on which game they're from, metaknight wins because it's impossible to actually get followups on him.

Thanks doc

And finally, if the hitstun is dependent on the character who hits you (AKA pikachu hits melee fox for 64 hitstun, metaknight hits pika for Brawl amounts) then Pika wins by a landslide.

Fox has more potential than any character but it's hard to realize that potential, not easy.

People don't like Brawl because the mechanics are slow, have some RNG, and it's extremely boring to watch due the game rewarding defensive play way too often. Use your brain when considering why people dislike a game stupid retard.

...

And he has way more counters. And the rest of the cast also has tons of potential unlike in Brawl.
And Fox is prone to SDs, fuckups in general. And he's combo fodder.

There's simply no comparison. Fox is simply amazing. Meta Knight is fucking stupid.

Here's the thing though, at theoretic "20XX" levels of play Marth is the best character in the game.

Gracias, doctor.

Thanks doc

Brawl has tripping, Metaknight doesn't even need to walk so at competitive level, Metaknight doesn't suffer from tripping.

Fox has options but doesn't have this kind of advantages.

For the sake of discussion, let's just say that any attack keeps the hitstun of its game, so Melee Fox hitting 64 Pikachu leaves Pikachu in melee hitstun.

Also to up the bullshit a little let's replace Mario with pre-patch Sheik.

Characters keep their own ledge mechanics for edgeguards, meaning if if Melee Fox grabs the ledge while Sheik tries to recover, it will work as an edge-hog and Sm4sh's ledge trump won't apply, but if Sheik tries the same it will work as a Sm4sh ledge trump.

Each character keeps its own shield and airdodge mechanics as well as movement tech and others (including tripping and magnet hands)

Defend this.

Skill.

Defend THIS

youtube.com/watch?v=E6iYiaDiqIk