Why does Apple never mention this shit?

macrumors.com/2016/09/19/iphone-7-best-lcd-display-ever-displaymate/

>DisplayMate said the iPhone 7 has "the most color accurate display" that it has ever measured, adding that the smartphone's display is "very likely considerably better than any mobile display, monitor, TV, or UHD TV" that consumers have.

>DisplayMate Technologies has declared iPhone 7 has the "best LCD display" it has ever tested

>iPhone 7 achieved the highest color accuracy, peak brightness, and contrast rating in bright light of any smartphone display, the highest contrast ratio of any IPS LCD display, and the lowest screen reflectance of any smartphone display

>DisplayMate said iPhone 7 has 4.4% screen reflectance, which is a record low among smartphones it has ever tested.

I ask again, is there any logical reason why Apple mentions some of the best things about new devices? That's a big fucking bragging point right there.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=-lmK33hZ-hA
youtube.com/watch?v=cjGsny1h9Oc
displaymate.com/
clarkvision.com/imagedetail/eye-resolution.html
androidauthority.com/amoled-vs-lcd-282084/
theiphonewiki.com/wiki/Main_Page
xda-developers.com/
twitter.com/AnonBabble

bump, I have a few ideas about some long-time Jobs philosophy but I'm not sure its the reason. Want to see what others think, so people can spread it by word of mouth maybe?

Thep probably didn't notice it.

Apple products have had the best displays in the market for a long time now. I think everyone knows that at this point

They don't call attention to the most atrocious and easily disproven of their lies made to attract idiots.

youtube.com/watch?v=-lmK33hZ-hA

MORE LIKE iFAIL

coil whine

Steve Jobs would have mentioned this, Tim Cook only mentions shit fucking normies care about.

I think a normie would care more about a great screen than some new CPU wizardry.

Becuase they know that nobody *really* cares about this, shitty normies can't tell the difference between TN and ips. So they talk about the stupid front facing camera instead.

They like to pretend to care about the cpu to seem intelligent

youtube.com/watch?v=cjGsny1h9Oc

21:27

I'm struggling to find a reason to care.

I'm trying to see this from a wide variety of other people's point of view and I still can't see a reason to care.

Maybe if you were a seasoned marketer you might care? I don't know.

What are marketers doing on... oh wait .

>best display
>1334 x 750
K.

best for an iphone? sure, I bet. better than my galaxy 7? nah, didn't think so.

>displaymate
Kek look at their website
displaymate.com/

>I-I NEED 1080P IN MY PHONE BECAUSE I DUNNO, MOAR PIXELS OR SUM SHIT!!!!!!!!!!

They claim to be the best in the world but dont even have a wikipedia page.

Apple's marketing team targets the retarded base unwashed plebs who don't even know the value of what you just said, the kind of people who put more value in something worn by a famous person rather than raw stats

also

>trusting shit on Macrumors to not be biased

>Implying 1080p is good

If you can see the fucking pixels, then it's not a flagship phone. At the very least it needs to be 1440p.

>1440p
>in a fucking PHONE

the cringe is strong

It's a lot easier to find a refined screen to sell when you're shopping in the 1080p tier and reselling at top dollar.

Try finding a screen that hits these numbers at 1440p. Or wait another year or two and Apple will do it for you and sell it to you at today's price plus a premium.

...

No, not best for an iPhone.

>>DisplayMate said the iPhone 7 has "the most color accurate display" that it has ever measured, adding that the smartphone's display is "very likely considerably better than any mobile display, monitor, TV, or UHD TV" that consumers have.

Can you literally not read? Did you read that on your Samshit? Those pixels aren't helping you read much are they?

>implying Macrumors is the source and tester
>not DisplayMate

Are you brain damaged?

f*ck you applel drone... samsung wins by default because it's super amoled and some f*cking g*y ass ips bullshit. colors are meant to look good, no be """realistic"""

how's your outdoor screen performance?

dunno because I never leave my house anyway so why would it matter. lmao btfo.

And there are still people on Cred Forums saying how the screen is shit for not having MOAR PIXELS XDD.

OLED is better. Now fuck off

the article says best lcd

it's widely know that the best displays are the samsung ones and they don't use lcd

actually lcd is superior

>anything above 720x1280 on a fucking phone

Fuck no.

If you ever used your phone for cardboard VR, you'd want higher resolution

Well sure, but I'm not retarded. So again
>anything above 720x1280 on a fucking phone

DisplayMate hasn't done a shootout of the LG G5, it has a better contrast and (in some reviews) over 800nit brightness
DM doesn't actually review a lot of phones.

Since when? Dell used to be the best displays, not counting high end like silicon graphics stuff.

Nice work Apple shill #8493 and #10284! $10 have been credited to each of your iTunes accounts.

If you can see the pixels on your phone, then your phone is shit.

IPS looks like shit compared to OLED, color accuracy be damned. It is known

>implying I'm shilling
Apple's phones are the worst, my point still stands. It's a fucking phone.
>If you can see the pixels on your phone, then your phone is shit.
No, if my phone doesn't work for making calls and texts, then it's shit. If I can see the pixels, it's because I wasn't enough of an autist to get a ridiculously high ppi screen just to wank to the number.

What phone do you have?
If you have a budget phone, I see your point, but seeing pixels on a flagship is embarrassing.

BlackBerry Q10.

>720x720
Genuinely curious, can you see the pixels on that phone? (It does have a smaller screen)

It's got 326ppi, I've never noticed them. Also it's not just about the screen being small, if a phone has a >720x1280 display I will refuse to buy it regardless of screen size.

"On a fucking phone" is not a valid reason not to do anything and 720x1080 as a limit is completely arbitrary. I'm not even trying to be an asshole to you, but you need to develop your ideas better or else you're just contributing to the noise.

LED look better cause of the blacks but they're waaaaay oversaturated and nowhere near a shitty IPS or even a TN for color accuracy.
Everybody in the field knows that.
LEDs are good for smartphone and TVs cause the usual user doesnt need color accuracy and the panel just looks good but they're not aimed to a professional user

>"On a fucking phone" is not a valid reason not to do anything
You can bet your ass it is. Want to know why? Because it's a goddamned phone.
>and 720x1080 as a limit is completely arbitrary
It may be a bit arbitrary but it is the best choice because it's good enough, is HD, and isn't ridiculously high for no fucking reason whatsoever.

I get where you're coming from with small screens, but my phone has a screen length of 5.95 inches.

1280x720 would look like ass on it.
Any particular reason you refuse to buy a high res phone?

>angry
>censoring words
>'super' amoled makes it better

10 year old detected. Not sure if I'm being trolled or not.

>black is done by turning pixel off
>black is done by covering up a light
Besides being retarded, do you go to sleep with the lights on and cover up the lamp with a sheet?

If he's using speech to text, that could explain the censoring. Google does that by default unless you ask it not to.

Yeah
Also enjoy your epic burn in with your meme gay-moleds

See it's not my fault you went full retard and got a giant phone.
>Any particular reason you refuse to buy a high res phone
Because battery life on a phone is ass and the screen is the biggest contributor, I'm not going to get something that has 4x as many pixels to light up and render when there's really no reason for it. I'll get a phone with a QHD display when it can last at least 3 days battery life. Even then probably not because a phone with an HD display would still last even longer, but I'd actually consider QHD at that point.

OLED is shit, fuck that oversaturated garbage.

>OLED is shit

In my opinion anything over 1920x1080 on any sized thing which can be called a phone is overkill. I can see ever so slight jaggies on my iPhone SE's 326 PPI display, it only takes a little more until i literally cannot detect any jaggies. At that point, adding more pixels is fucking retarded, its wasting performance and battery and my eye loses focus before its close enough to try and spot a jaggie. I am not counting VR either, that's another discussion and of course you need as high a density as you can get but VR is a dumb meme.

Anyone with a 1440p or 4K phone display is a retarded drone who literally laps new shit up because of higher numbers.

That does not look like speech to text at all, I think he's just a legitimate Down's babby.

I was just discussing differences in technology and actually if I'd about to buy a screen I'd chose IPS, but make a thread about Samsung vs apple and this is the kind of answers you get.
This board sucks so much, even Cred Forums is better nowadays. Damn consumism and kids talking instead of being beaten.

Not him, but it is. The only thing going for it is the fantastic true black. It's oversaturated to hell though and the blue diodes burn out over time. It's fuckin crap m8

OLED is nice but a very dumb idea for phones considering that they burn in easily

One thing I was reading about was transflective lcds.
Great stuff really, basically a lcd with a backlight that also reflects sunlight, giving it amazing visibility outdoors.

Someguy took it to the next level on his transflective lcd smartwatch and painted a layer above the backlight in lumescent paint.

The battery life and black levels are enough to make it superior to any form of LCD.

It could be the best LCD in the world but that still doesn't make it AMOLED.

That looks nice, truly, colors from LCD and light visibility from e-ink, if there are no major downsides it could be something new. Imagine in cars or embedded devices, or even ebooks (for muh Chinese cartoons)

even a shitty LED display > "Teh best lcd"

that's why didn't mention it

>>DisplayMate said the iPhone 7 has "the most color accurate display" that it has ever measured, adding that the smartphone's display is "very likely considerably better than any mobile display, monitor, TV, or UHD TV" that consumers have.

>most color accurate DISPLAY ever measured
>of any PHONE, MONITOR, OR TV

Are you fucking blind, can you not read? Can't you read the first line due to your SHAMOLED burn-in covering things?

I like my giant phone, but that is just personal preference.

Also, keep in mind, the bigger the phone, the more space there is to add a larger battery. With my custom battery, my phone goes for ~4 days. While it is true QHD doesn't have much over HD, my computer at home has 4k monitors so I'm just really fond of higher resolutions. Again, personal preference.

>Downs baby

Probably, I have a neighbor with an autistic kid who says bleep out loud instead of cursing.

???
Lcd panels have always slightly more power efficient

It's only when youse memeoled tards use a black theme that lights up 10 pixels in which then you circlejerking over its "efficiency"

Actually power consumption on black themed UIs is not much better than an LCD and on standard light UIs (yes those that Samsung uses) is a lot worse.
LED backlit LCDs are the best for power consumption

OLED has poor outdoor visibility, low brightness, and easily prone to damage and fading out.

It is not the end-all be-all of screen technology. Quantum-Dot screens are offering the best of both with true blacks, good colors, high durability, and strong brightness. However, they won't be available until 2018.

>OLED has poor outdoor visibility
I use my phone with its OLED display all the time in direct sunlight with the brightness as low as possible.

>Quantum
Shit meme

Why tell lies on the internet?
LCDs are usually much brighter than LEDs and that's a fact, and in direct sunlight a good phone is clearly visible at its best, you can't keep it with low brightness.

I'm not. I literally use my OLED display outside all the time. You can not believe it all you want, it doesn't make it any less true. I turned the brightness all the way down when I got this phone over a year ago and haven't changed the setting since.

It might be a shit name, but all the Korean and Japanese panel manufacturers are switching over to it.

Only LG ever got their OLED tech working on the bigger panels, and even then they were never able to fix all the problems associated with it. OLED is the next Plasma.

>for over 1 year I've used a smartphone at the lowest brightness setting

You're either an autist with a battery conservation fetish or someone who's new here and thinks anyone will believe that utter crock of shit.

Your supposed to read informations from your phone with your eyes, not by sticking your dick in the USB port trying to stimulate the com interface

I'm neither. If I needed to see the screen better I'd have turned up the brightness, but I've yet to do so because it's simply unnecessary.

>Your supposed to read informations from your phone with your eyes
That's exactly what I do.

As long as I can see my phone in the sun, I don't give a shit how bright or color accurate my porn will look.

It wasn't funny in the first post, there's no need to carry with this bullshit

I'm not trolling, you fucking mong. I'm telling you about the past year that I've had this phone. I can see the display in the sun. Not that difficult of a concept to grasp.

You don't want to be able to tell what exact hue of Magenta the guy's bell end is? What are you, gay or something?

this is one of the things apple doesnt like to brag about

iphones use to have the best dac and amp of any mobile device, android looked like toys compared to them until htc came along

Sry mr Superman
With all the phones I had, LCD and LED, displays at their minimum are readable but not pleasant to read in a darkroom, not outside lol
And my sight is just perfect. My guess at this point is that you're too stupid to understand what autobrightness is.
So good they decided to remove it lol

I'm pretty sure BB10OS doesn't have autobrightness, or if it does it's disabled by default. I think I'd notice it was on at some point after having the thing for a year because autobrightness normally pisses me the fuck off.

>720p

It's crap, I've used a 6s before and you notice the pixels immediately. I would honestly prefer my 3 year old xperia z screen because it isn't blurry as fuck. Not just me who thinks that either

clarkvision.com/imagedetail/eye-resolution.html

>I've conducted some blind tests where a viewer had to sort 4 photos (150, 300, 600 and 600 ppi prints). The two 600 ppi were printed at 1200x1200 and 1200x2400 dpi. So far all have gotten the correct order of highest to lowest ppi (includes people up to age 50).

>all have gotten the correct order of highest to lowest ppi (includes people up to age 50)

>people up to age 50

People who say they can't tell the difference are lying

>caring about colors THIS MUCH

no thanks bro, I'm heterosexual.

>colour accurate displays are gay xD

This is shamefully desperate some Android user come and collect this moron from the thread and take him away.

Explain this

well you gotta remember for what type of people these products are aimed for...

Apple displays are good but Samsung's SAMOLED displays are way more pleasing to look at.

No microSD slot end of story.

Because it's still a useless high ppi display that isn't OLED

It's been shown countless times that the most accurate displays are not always the most desired displays.

>Why does Apple never mention this shit?
Because its not true, just a hoax article from a shitty software company to sell their stuff.

because the screen looks the same according to reviewers. Best screens come from Samsung now that there are even setting to adjust the saturation to your liking

They also called the 1+3's display the best they have ever seen... Lol.

wew because OLED BTFOs this

>no micro sd
>no headphone jack
>locked down tighter than fort knox
>shitty app repo
>backdoors everywhere

>desktop monitor 1080p
>smartphone 1444p

Funny thing is that the s7 has better outdoor view than the iPhone 7.

Micro SD is deprecated. Besides, why do you need more than 256 GB? Protip: you can't.
Headphone jack is deprecated as well. Lightning cubstomps a standard 3.5mm jack.
I like a secure phone. Unlike Lagdroid tards that get viruses every other day.
App Store is better than the Play Store.
Nope.

>Besides, why do you need more than 256 GB?
To store 257GB+ data? To save money by buying the base model + micro SD card over buying all that internal storage? Because I fucking want to?
>Headphone jack is deprecated as well.
Oh nevermind, you're just a troll. Sorry I spent any time replying to your post, enjoy your (You)

>DisplayMate

...

How will iToddlers ever recover?

werent OLED supposed to replace ips and be a million times better? i thought some phones already got OLED? are they skipping the phones with OLED from this comparison? or are they just shit in comparison?

/thread

not worth an 800$ upgrade

nevermind

downgrade

I forgot there's no headphone jack for absolutely no reason (other than jewing)

wew lad

>I forgot there's no headphone jack for absolutely no reason
COURAGE
O
U
R
A
G
E

>MKBHD still didn't like it

heh

You don't understand how color gamuts work do you? OP3 does sRGB color correction, like it should be. OLED is superior to LCD in everyway

>You don't understand how color gamuts work do you?

I do. It's still shit m8.

>The different LED energy levels can also shorten the lifespan of the displays.
>The blue pixels in LED displays require the most energy to power, but that also means that they can burn out faster.
>After a long time this can result in a slight tinting over part or all of an AMOLED display.

>androidauthority.com/amoled-vs-lcd-282084/

Enjoy your shit display while it lasts.

>can't afford a new phone every week

Stay in poverty iPoor.

I will, thanks.

>all these mad Androidtard poorfags

>OLED has poor outdoor visibility, low brightness
kek you still living in 2012? Look up the nits on Samsung's latest displays

But you still took the time and effort to reply to this thread

My 2 year old S6 is fine. Guarantee you the display will easily outlive the "non-replaceable" battery. I'd be more worried about your eyes if you're using your phone enough to burn out the OLED's.

Not like it matters when you get a new phone every 1-4 years.

kek

if oled is so great why isnt apple using it in the iphone

OLED FAGS BTFO

lcd is superior technology and apple knows it

That's probably the reason why there are rumors that the next iPhones are gonna have oled displays.
>shit blacks
>good display
pick one. LCD a shit.

I fix phones for a living and have seen nearly every brand phone of every kind, and have only very rarely seen screens with burn in. The last one was years ago, which I assume to be an indication of improved LED technology. A store display that sits in demo mode with screen on for 16+ hours a day is not an indicator of real usage.

AYYLMAO
Y
Y
L
M
A
O

Better than Note 7's? Even being just low res "retina"? Even without HDR?
But wait, this says "color accuracy", maybe it excels in this regard but not in others.

Resolution has literally nothing to do with colour accuracy.

How will applelfags ever recover?

>not having a CRT screen on your phone
Why even live?

>tfw SED and FED are dead

>pajeet doesn't know that black isn't a color and only emitted light counts in evaluation of the color accuracy
>pajeet doesn't know how lcd displays work

I know, that's way I'm asking about all the rest.

because apple only uses the cheapest components

>iToddler thinks iShit has any color accuracy
>iToddler thinks black is supposed to be blue

They mainly don't use AMOLED at this point because AMOLED manufacturers simply don't have the capacities at this point.

>pajeet thinks iPhones display black as blue secretly and nobody knows

You don't even know what you're looking at in that image. Stay in your own intellectual lane. In any case,600 Rupees have been depoosited into your Play Store account.

They're nice phones, they really are. I've noticed the difference between the 6S and 7. Still, the OS makes iPhones the computer equivalent of a retarded cripple in a Lamborghini.

>Apple's marketing team targets the retarded base unwashed plebs
Correct.

>Micro SD is deprecated. Besides, why do you need more than 256 GB? Protip: you can't.
MicroSD slots in phones are like USB ports on laptops. Many people use MicroSD cards like flash drives for easy and secure file sharing. It's also nice to be able to just swap cards once they're full instead of wasting 30 minutes transferring shit to your computer. If MicroSD was really depreciated then the latest flagship phones from Samsung, LG, HTC, Blackberry, etc. would not support them. Everything but your precious iShit has MicroSD slots these days.
>Headphone jack is deprecated as well. Lightning cubstomps a standard 3.5mm jack.
Actually, lightning audio is worse than 3.5 mm. The new iPhones didn't become thinner or get bigger batteries either, just a shitty taptic engine. The real reason for removing the headphone jack is to push expensive wireless products. We know you'll buy those too you fucking sheep.
>I like a secure phone. Unlike Lagdroid tards that get viruses every other day.
Many Android phones have much better security than iPhones do. iPhone 7 SecureROM has the same heap vulnerabilities as the 6S does. The A9 and A10 SecureROMs are extremely similar. I've been hard at work for several months now trying to reverse engineer Apples proprietary bus to exploit the SecureROM. I've been fairly successful, to the point that I'm able to bypass certain checks on encrypted image sizes. I still haven't been able to get bootloader unlocks on many different Android phones like the AT&T Note 5. Apple security is shit.
>App Store is better than the Play Store.
They both do the same thing. They both offer the same kinds of apps. Care to give examples?

Not talking about burn-in. Talking about the blue led burning-out causing the rest of the screen to have a color shift.

>Many Android phones have much better security than iPhones do

Troll. Do not feed.

>ignores the rest
Prove me wrong Pajeet.

Post a link to your work.

It's not public. If it was, Apple would patch it you mong. Stop deflecting and prove me wrong.

You made a claim, you prove it is right. Otherwise, you are full of shit.

You probably wouldn't be able to understand what I do anyways. Read up on the malware section of the iPhone wiki. That should be enough. Enjoy not having a file explorer in 2016.

So, you're full of shit. Thought so. Next.

Just weak m8

Work in progress for the iPhone 4s and iPad 2 A5 chips. Enjoy, iNiggers.

Dell isn't an OEM, they don't make the panel.

Nobody cares because none of them will perform as good as an EIZO

They probably didn't even know they bought good diplays,
now Apple employees read on macrumors it has the best display but it's too late, the presentation is already done, so they're posting on Cred Forums about it and saying this: >so people can spread it by word of mouth maybe?
to redeem their pathetic presentation and increase sales

>Work in progress for the iPhone 4s and iPad 2 A5 chips.

Ah ok. So you were just full of shit about anything that came out later than a 4S. Gotcha.

displays*

My point has been proven that you don't understand what we're talking about. Explain to all of us what a SecureROM is since you know so much.

Butt hurt Lagdroid BTFO like always.
Enjoy your crappy battery life and exploding phones. Lmao

Only with phones which have nav bars.

blacks are still shitty though

B-b-but muh galaxys

>crappy battery
1800 MAH

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Wat? Your point isn't proven you arrogant prick. Again, you only claim to be working on an old 4S. Your code is shit and probably doesn't even work.

>since you know so much.

Also, securerom is nothing more than a glorified bootloader rom. Attacking it gives you entry into the rest of the boot process. I also never claimed "know so much" unlike you. You poser cunt. Fuck off.

Buttangry much?

If the SecureROM is cracked then encryption, firmware signing, and everything else you iFags love to bitch about will be all for nothing.

>Your code is shit and probably doesn't even work.
Oh, such sour grapes.
>you only claim to be working on an old 4S
Scroll up. That picture is proof enough. iPhone hardware is insecure.

>implying I have an Android phone
>implying I have a Note 7
There are thousands of phones out there, user.

Why do Macfags think it's either iPhones and "Android", as if that meant a thing? Do they never get our of their bubble? Are they too into the cult of Apple?

>my battery is huge but iPhone still gets better battery life

This is gold. Why don't you go claim your $100,000 prize from Apple or any other contest wanting exploits, especially in Apple firmware? Oh wait, is that because - YOU. ARE. FULL. OF. SHIT. ??

You haven't proved anything besides a half censored screen of crappy code that does nothing.

Here's your claims again which you are to now prove with evidence:

>Many Android phones have much better security than iPhones do.

Evidence please.

>iPhone 7 SecureROM has the same heap vulnerabilities as the 6S does.

Evidence please.

>The A9 and A10 SecureROMs are extremely similar.

Evidence please.

>I've been fairly successful, to the point that I'm able to bypass certain checks on encrypted image sizes

Evidence please.

I'll wait.

I get almost 10 hours SOT with a 3400 mAh battery. Suck me.

I will hack you off the internet forever m8

Nah I also do it. I have sensivity against light tho. Lower the light, better the eye for me. Also, I hate white / bright themes. Black (and purple or pink but others accepted too) are pretty goddy for me.

...

I don't even use Android, dumbass.

>the smartphone's display is "very likely considerably better than any mobile display, monitor, TV, or UHD TV" that consumers have
Of course, most people get the shittiest screens ever
Can you not read? Most consumers don't get the TOTL Samsucks phone, much less TOTL displays/monitors/UHD TV's
>can't even bother to calibrate his monitor to correct this drift
topcuck, I bet you also believe LCD's don't suffer from drift, don't you?
Also
>using your screens at 50+% LT
Do you enjoy being blinded or do you stare at your phone in sunlight the entire day?
>over 800nit brightness
for what purpose
Thank dumbass consumers that believe brighter/bluer/saturated is better
The same kind of people who believe the color temp on Apple products is right
>OLED is the next Plasma.
Plasma was perfect, the only reason they phased it out was that building them at projector sizes was more expensive than LCD's, and that they couldn't cram 4K in them
>iphones use to have the best dac and amp of any mobile device, android looked like toys compared to them until htc came along
This was because Steve Jobs was an audiophool, he also cared a lot for decent displays, back then the Mac CRT's were among the best made, and the Cinema Display was one of the best LCD's too
But Tim Cuck doesn't care about that, much less Ive

Didn't they mention the display being more color accurate?

Why would I throw away my hobby for money? I'm going to sit on what I have because it will be useful in the future. I also make pretty decent money removing iCloud locks with iBoot exploits (can't create custom firmwares without them). Prove to me that Android has worse security than Android, because your whole argument is that me not giving you what you want means I'm full of shit. Go be an entitled child elsewhere or get a better argument that doesn't depend on me giving you something for nothing. Cry like a bitch.

>Prove to me that Android has worse security than Android, because your whole argument is that me not giving you what you want means I'm full of shit.

Android worse security than android? Assuming you meant Android worse security than iOS, I never made this claim. Your claim is, "Many Android phones have much better security than iPhones do". This is your claim. You get to back that claim up with evidence, it is not for others to disprove, it is for you to prove. Right now.

>Go be an entitled child elsewhere or get a better argument that doesn't depend on me giving you something for nothing

Kinda like what you are doing now? You make a claim like a right poser and now cannot back it up. You're full of shit and are massively in damage control mode because you have been easily caught out. Y'see son, you shouldn't spew shit and not expect to get called out.

Also, still waiting on:

>Many Android phones have much better security than iPhones do.

Evidence please.

>iPhone 7 SecureROM has the same heap vulnerabilities as the 6S does.

Evidence please.

>The A9 and A10 SecureROMs are extremely similar.

Evidence please.

>I've been fairly successful, to the point that I'm able to bypass certain checks on encrypted image sizes

Evidence please.

I'll wait.

no one gives a fuck about accurate colors,accurate just means accurate, not better looking

theiphonewiki.com/wiki/Main_Page
xda-developers.com/
I'm not going to feed the iPajeet anymore curry. Enjoy your dongles and start reading.

Thought so. Full of shit.

Lmao what proof do you want?

>Many Android phones have much better security than iPhones do.

>iPhone 7 SecureROM has the same heap vulnerabilities as the 6S does.

>The A9 and A10 SecureROMs are extremely similar.

>I've been fairly successful, to the point that I'm able to bypass certain checks on encrypted image sizes

That doesn't answer my question.

Stop being dense. Back up your claims with evidence. As long as you can prove your claims, I don't care what the proof looks like. You know you can't because you're full of it.

Just to reiterate:

>Many Android phones have much better security than iPhones do.

Evidence please.

>iPhone 7 SecureROM has the same heap vulnerabilities as the 6S does.

Evidence please.

>The A9 and A10 SecureROMs are extremely similar.

Evidence please.

>I've been fairly successful, to the point that I'm able to bypass certain checks on encrypted image sizes

Evidence please.

Well in that case, you're mostly right. I have no way to prove my claims without giving you working SecureROM exploits. So buy them off me for 100K or fuck off.

>I have no way to prove my claims

Thanks for playing dickhead.

You wanna buy some? I'll let go of my 32-bit SecureROM exploits.

Nice try, my desktop monitor is 4k

>is there any logical reason why Apple mentions some of the best things about new devices?
they know their consumers don't care "if it's good enough" and probably wouldn't understand the significance anyway
android is the domain of the spec war. apple is the domain of "just werkz"

>Thinking anyone will believe this shit in 2016

>just werks
>basic functions need a restart

>lcd
>best anything.

...

Quick, quick! We've got to find [AirPlane|Scratch|Noise]Gate so we can finally show the iPhone 7 as not the obviously best smart phone!

Because display performance is self-evident when you just look at the damn device.

ayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy

>saying the current year makes something more or less relevant
shiggity

>They probably didn't even know they bought good diplays

>Apple hires random people to talk to display suppliers and they just got a good one by chance lol!

Is it possible to be THIS fucking retarded? A company with a market cap of 600 BILLION DOLLARS, just fucking casually assembles phones, runs one of the largest operations on the planet, shifts industries? No sorry, this has got to be fucking bait. There is no way you're over 13 years old, absolutely no way. Get the fuck out you retarded little skidmark.

>Most consumers don't get

Irrelevant you retarded fuck, this is a *company* which does mass testing on EVERYTHING. Nothing to do with what Average Joe buys. Learn English you fucking pajeet.

>I'd rather dick around with smartphone bootloaders than score $100k

Suuure. You gave yourself away right there, moron.

>Irrelevant you retarded fuck, this is a *company* which does mass testing on EVERYTHING. Nothing to do with what Average Joe buys. Learn English you fucking pajeet.
You should learn english redditor, they don't do mass testing on everything, at best they're a small company
Also, it literally says there that it's "very likely" ie. their fucking opinion, not something they can say it's a fact since they don't know what consumers actually have, and they haven't even tested all the current flagships

> mass testing on EVERYTHING

Apple has shown time and time again that they don't bother with that. You are deluded.