SSD problematic under Linux?

Why are there so many 1-star ratings for SSDs that the owner ran under Linux?

Are those reviews fake or are there really some SSDs that tend shit the bed early under Linux?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swappiness
wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Solid_State_Drives
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Linux users in general aren't smart enough to write proper drivers for things like TRIM, and choose instead to demean the drive manufacturers

Trim support is actually built into kernel so there is no need for any drivers. Not that Cred Forumsedditor like you would know that.

The Linux kernel has aggressive memory management settings that completely rape SSDs.

This.

I have a samsung SSD I bought 3 years ago in my laptop running ubuntu/linux mint. Never had issues.

Huh, I've been running Linux on a tiny SSD for awhile now and I've noticed no issues

Holy fuck... Tell me this is a meme, please!

>The Linux kernel has aggressive memory management settings

wat.

wasn't this windows with its swapping shenanigans?

I don't know OP, my first SSD has clocked 20k hours and still has 0 reallocations

Linux users are accustomed to a higher standard of quality.

This can happen if you use a swap partition. Linux is pretty aggressive with unloading stuff from RAM into swap.

I've an 850 EVO that I primarily run Windon't 10 on.

I'll be fine, right? Or are there issues/bugs/problems with Samshit SSDs and Linux? Planning on giving Manjaro a partition my SSD for a dual boot install

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swappiness
Windows creates a swap file on the fly if needed (slower)

because on windows they tell you that it's not recommended to have any other Windows necessary stuff on SSD like boot and what not.

My point is with a modern system you don't need a swap partition.

who puts a swap file on their SSD

Any custom settings for SSD usage or standard Linux installation?

people who also defrag their SSDs

You can use a swap file as well on linux.
It's only needed for suspend to disk on modern*.
The old rule of thumb was as much swap as ram, but I've also read that now 4G should be enough for that even if you have more ram than that.

yeah. I would consider not even having /var or /tmp on an ssd, if you had another option.

SSDs in general are shit tier, trust me. It's hard to find a good and reliable SSD as of now

There's an article about this on the install gentoo wiki.

I've been running with no swap for years now and haven't noticed any issues. With the amount of RAM available in a modern system, swap isn't really required anymore.

I have an ssd and i've been runing arch without any kind of problem.

This claims are false, please at least read a bit before spreading FUD, i don't get in what way you're benefited by trying to deter people from using linux.
wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Solid_State_Drives

THIS

This. Linux users are much more likely to stress their SSD than windows users.

Standard installation

I don't have /tmp on SSD though, but mostly for speed
I can't really vouch for that but I do believe that SSDs evolved past "don't write anything on it or it'll die in a year!!11" FUD