>The key word here is closed-source – meaning that the security researchers of the world are not immediately free to audit the viability of the secure algorithms used to encrypt messages on the service.
who do you shill on Cred Forums when reddit is open source?
why do you use non-free websites? do you hate yourself ?
Owen Garcia
I have my own mail server , but agreed .. if you use proprietary mail you should just put a loaded gun next to the side of your head and pull the trigger
John Perry
>Tutanota >trusting Herr Merkel
Camden Stewart
>browsing the internet is the same as storing person info and communications
Bentley Hill
Yes, that's correct. When you browse the internet, you leak a lot of personal information about yourself and companies swipe this up and sell it.
Cameron Morgan
if you use any social media and/or google products it is
Austin Cooper
>germany nope
Colton Reed
No it's not the same , most of the time no one will know Tom subscribes to a midget porn newsletter just from a cookie
Why would you think I attach myself to that botnet , after making a thread about open source encrypted mail
Charles Moore
Tutanota only cooperates with Germany if they get a valid german court order
>Tom subscribes to a midget porn newsletter >The company making the midget porn newsletter sells Toms email, as well as the information that Tom enjoys midget porn, better targeting ads at Tom.
Camden Sanders
>March 21, 2015 please do humanity a favor and die
Gabriel Rogers
well I can see why Germans would not like it, but if you don't live there I don't see how a German court order would be possible
Jayden Jackson
slit your throat imbecile
Ryder Garcia
>all the defensive protonmail users ITT who deep down know the NSA has a backdoor written into their non-free , closed source , proprietary e-mail host
William Diaz
Not a SINGLE person in this thread has shown support for protonmail.
Who are you quoting?
Asher Sanchez
>Muh open source meme
David Garcia
Guess which country isn't on the list?
Also: >The ordinance obliges service providers to have a so-called "interception interface" at disposal for the purpose of surveillance measures ordered by a court. >Here too, the necessary additional equipment and software is at the expense of the provider. >Providers who failed to meet this requirement until 31 May are facing severe fines.