Thanks for whistleblowing

but you've been AIDS ever since.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/QlSAiI3xMh4
imdb.com/title/tt4044364/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assange_v_Swedish_Prosecution_Authority
craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2012/09/why-i-am-convinced-that-anna-ardin-is-a-liar/
youtube.com/watch?v=49vZhQlAEyk,
twitter.com/AnonBabble

You see the fucking autistic as fuck movie they made about him?

Im not OP but no. I don't purchase movies, I torrent everything i watch and so far there isn't a decent torrent of it yet.

Is it any good? I think metacritic gave it an average rating.

Let me just link the trailer it's pretty fucking bad.

youtu.be/QlSAiI3xMh4

I can't believe they made a movie that is even shittier than the worst shit I could come up about snowden being drunk and stoned.

Thank you for correcting the record (tm)

Looks like I'm #shillforhill now

Why are there no competent whistleblowers?

>Assange: Rapist and now a hueg Putin/Erdogan shill, dumps people's SSN's and phone numbers like nobody's business
>Snowden: Putin shill, selling US secrets for protection from China and Russia
>Manning: Probably the least bad from an ethical standpoint but dumped fucking everything they could find and put everyone in danger

>Assange: Rapist

Good goy

If you want to watch an ACTUALLY good film about him check thisout

imdb.com/title/tt4044364/

>Assange: rapist
>Snowden: Putin shill
>Manning (literally a degenerate suicidal tranny): least bad

Jesus fucking christ how can one Cred Forums poster be so fucking stupid?

it's a hillary supporter

It was a good movie.

Snowden is a hero. He stood on his principles and walked away from one of the highest paying jobs in the country.

>assange: rapist

Thank you for correcting the record

Assange has been proven to be a rapist several times. It's not some conspiracy, nor is it very surprising considering what a slimy looking and autistic guy he is.

The fact that you're posting on a tech forum makes me cry. I hope someone tosses you in a burlap sack and beats you with reeds. You're a filthy little ragamuffin who lacks any semblance of taste. You loved Google and own Windows 10. You pre-ordered the iPhone 7. You are the sole reason I write these posts. I hope you're killed by a drunk driver on Halloween.

Rapist how?

imagine being this stupid

He means because popular leftist blog sites like buzzfeed and the (((guardian))) reporting on his rape allegations that it is proven true.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assange_v_Swedish_Prosecution_Authority

Why would he run away if he was innocent?

Literally this entire thing was a psychological operation. Look at how nice and clean everything went, how he turned into a speaker shilling certain opinions, how nobody gave a shit that they were being spied on.

Now people are used to the idea. The late night talk shows made their jokes, Hollywood made a presumably shitty movie which will end up being complete dribble reinforcing the same points that were originally shown in the original Op etc. Now when things ramp up it isn't shocking to people. The 99% of people living in the western world today whom are more or less guided by the invisible hands of mainstream media will probably first try to think of a way to make a joke of the escalation of the violation of their rights for their Twitter friends before they ever think of grabbing a rifle and demanding change.

I am still horrified at how people reacted to this. The way people just bite that easy bait and argue/laugh/"cry" right on cue and at just the right thing every time... there is at least something fishy here even if my theory is completely wrong.

>Sweden
>rape

Did he make eye contact with a woman?

>I am still horrified at how people reacted to this.
Be honest with us, what did you expect?

The woman who accused Assange of rape (anna ardin):

1) continued to sleep with him after the rape
2) had sex with him a few hours after meeting him
3) threw a party for him before he left sweden, after the alleged rape
4) did not accuse him of rape when first going to the police station, only to charge him with manipulating a condom
5) presented an unused condom as evidence of the rape

craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2012/09/why-i-am-convinced-that-anna-ardin-is-a-liar/

If you can't see this for what it is, you are retarded. There's just no way Assange raped this woman.

Well shit m8

Is it just fucking over then?

Then why would he run away?

>implying the American public cares about being cucked by the US government

>implying over 10 people will take their rifles to the streets to demand change

>implying Democracy exists

OK, I read up a bit more on this and have my own doubts. The points about Assange being a Putin-cuck and publishing private individuals SSN's still stand though

I mean, people are using windows 10, even after bitching about the suspicious-as-fuck forced updates. I've come to accept that not many people give enough of a shit to act on internet issues, even if they are annoyed (the two exceptions being SOPA/open internet/etc., and dysfunctional porn censorship).

Additionally, people believe terrorism is a legitimate threat, and that internet surveillance has helped prevent attacks (and it might, sure). In your "land of the free", people are more than happy to forgo privacy for security.

>Is it just fucking over then?
I guess Tor, noscript and encryption are your buddies.

I just get the pleasure of knowing some poor bastard needs to sift through the worst deviant porn the internet has to offer.

this

That fucking movie is an epic cringefest. Holy mother of god it is painful to watch.

If he stayed, he'd be in a Swedish prison, or worse, extradited to an American one, which he understood. The nature of the false accusation has several purposes:

1) Rape needs only a single lying person to work (whereas murder charges would require a dead body)

2) Assange could be sentenced to prison for an arbitrary amount of time, in Sweden, by a secret court, thus taking him out of the game.

3) Assange could have his reputation ruined forever. There is something particularly repulsive about the label "rapist".

You've been had. Assange looks like a faggot, I know he looks like a faggot. I understand the repulsion at his weasel face and pretentious form of speaking. But it's clear to anybody who bothers to pay attention that he is now the US governments No. 1 enemy. Which is why they're sending people to abduct him from the embassy and even back-channeling with Sweden to try and get him. He totally embarrassed the Democratic party and the US government again and again.

>(((buzzfeed)))
Ftfy

why was something needed after citizenfour?

>1) continued to sleep with him after the rape
Somehow makes a rape not a rape? I'm sure that's not the first and won't be the last time that happens, especially when a victim does not know who the rapist is.
>2) had sex with him a few hours after meeting him
OHHHH. I see. You think she deserved to be raped because she's a slut. Perfect sense. Totally see where you are coming from now!
>3) threw a party for him before he left sweden, after the alleged rape
Gotcha. So if my wife drugs me and fucks me with a cactus, yet I don't figure it out and still throw a birthday for her, she didn't fuck me with a cactus?
>4) did not accuse him of rape when first going to the police station, only to charge him with manipulating a condom
Most rape victims do not describe the assault as rape. To be totally honest, it's not their job to do so. What a rape victim thinks or does not think constitutes rape is irrelevant. If there is no consent, it is rape.
>5) presented an unused condom as evidence of the rape
Yeah, fuck choice in the matter! Creepy weasel losers should be able to infect people with STDs and impregnate them whenever they want! No one cares about consent anymore! What are you, an SJW!?

Look, I understand you think Assange is doing a service to people and he deserves to be protected for that, but you are literally being a gross rape apologist right now. That should make you feel ashamed of yourself.

But he was a russien spy?

Sweden has proved that false rape accusations don't even need an accuser. They admitted it.

why are his glasses so fucking crooked

This will do what Citizen Four failed to do; bring the problem to an mainstream audience. It looks stupid, but people might just eat it up, you know?

i've got the same thing. it happens when your one ear is slightly higher than the other

the mainstream audience are all mindless sheep.

He asked permission to leave Sweden and was granted permission. The prosecutors demanded to prosecute him even though the alleged victim withdrew the case against him. They demanded him to return to Sweden for questioning even though it's very easy for them to go to Assange and interview him in the UK.

Let's suppose they are; then what they need is a sheep herder to point them to the right direction. The people who did the movie's intentions might be different, but as long as the goals align..

I don't have much faith, but this movie might make people look at the "nothing to hide" argument differently for a while. I know it's made out to be an action flick than a serious movie/documentary aka Citizenfour, but this movie might just make people question things.

maybe I have too much faith in them

>even though the alleged victim withdrew the case against him

That's not how criminal law works.

Have you ever been involved in a domestic violence dispute? After a person is accused of domestic violence, the accuser has no power to "withdraw the case" or "not press charges." The prosecutor picks up the case in criminal law as soon as they are notified of any evidence, and they decide to prosecute or not. The accuser has no power, other than being able to choose not to testify, usually under penalty of contempt.

Only in civil law can an accuser decide to "withdraw a case."

Criminal law does not work like that.

What's the best book documenting Snowden and his findings? I never bothered with the caper beyond acknowledging that muh ebil gummint is spying on us, but I plan on doing a lot of reading and might as well as this to the list.

That maybe how things work in United States of Clapistan but Swedish criminal law doesn't work how you describe it.

>When a crime has been committed the authorities will investigate what has happened, this is known as the preliminary investigation and it will be led by a police officer or prosecutor.[6] The Swedish police and the prosecution service are required to register and prosecute all offences of which they become aware.[7][8][9]

Oh, look! You don't know what you're talking about!

NO U

There are othersl like John Kiriakou, Thomas Drake and Jesselyn Raddack

Looks pretty cringey, but I have to say that JGL does a pretty decent impression of Snowden. Not great, like serious acting great, but pretty good (like something for an SNL sketch).

What is so funny/sick... he basically provided evidence confirming the worst fears of every tinfoil hat wearer from the previous two decades AND TURNS OUT MOST PEOPLE DON'T EVEN GIVE A FUCK WE ARE LIVING IN AN INFORMATION DYSTOPIA. This kid ruined his life for a the appreciation of a few thousand people who know enough to give a shit.

god its pain to read what you write and believe in.
please go back to tumblr you sjw scum!

On the off chance that I'm not being trolled, rape victims absolutely do not act like this woman acted. She acted very suspiciously all the way through in a way that leads me to believe she was not raped at all.

So it's basically Citizenfour for nigger cattle?

Pretty much. Which means some stuff will be some artistic freedoms taken (e.g. things that the NSA won't actually be able to do will happen)

this

it's because you believe the government-controlled media

Blowden says use Signal. Fucktards everywhere run in circles like they've received a divine revelation.

What evidence of the offense do they have if the victim withdraws their testimony?

holy kek, Cage is in this fucking film?

Hiroshimoot is advertising this movie, too. The 404 page links you to youtube.com/watch?v=49vZhQlAEyk, a song from the movie, which video includes footage from it.

Did anybody actually listen to this hipster shit?

Was it actually good?

Give it a listen yourself. It's a bit repetetive, loud, acid-y sounding and it hurts your ears, but the video is kinda neat, since it's matching somewhat.

>everyone who advocates freedom and whistleblowing has a weird last name

>Assange
>Snowden
>Manning
>Stallman

this desu

>snowden
>girlfriend

this

He does have one, though.

Ass ange looks like ass
Snowden the ice cold whistleblower
Manning fucks men
Stallman is autistic guy who stalls progress of software

Snowden IS a traitor?

Yes, but he's cute as hell so I'm willing to forgive him.

god damn Joseph Gordon-Levitt's voice is so fucking god awful i feel like he's trying to make it sound weird jesus christ

He's fucking ugly

It's his mannerisms that make him cute. The glasses and the hair are on the backburner.

Manning and Stallman are somewhat common names.

>Snowden
>Snowed in

It's pretty decent. Could've used a little bit more suspense to actually be good I mean it's the fucking cia and NSA you're dealing with

If anything it made me tape up my web camera on my laptop

>Tfw same thing
Thought it was just me

Hello Mr government man. How's shillary?

Blm cuck

Fuck off you government cuck.

Wow, did the NSA really pay guys to talk shit about a movie?

Are they that insecure?

I'm not seeing it. I saw people expressing legit complaints (judging by the trailer, it looks like they're going with the silly action flick routine; I hope they actually prove me wrong). If you really care Snowden, and you want to watch a movie about him, just watch Citizenfour and the other documentaries released about him instead; they're more or less the real deal.

>Assange: Accused of rape ten years after having sex with a CIA agent, happen to be two weeks after a major leak. Think information should be free.
>Snowden: Only way he found to not be killed was to suck the Russian dick.
>Manning: immature but at least trying to do something